View Full Version : National Geographic anti gun story
battle_sight_zero
07-18-2013, 06:36
Even the National Geographic has to get involved now attacking private sales and making armlist sound like a Lord of War Movie. http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=19680493
How a Armslist trade goes down in the mind of a liberal. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=urs62KS4ZQM&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Durs62KS4ZQM
Homer should have used Armslist http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xIpLd0WQKCY&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DxIpLd0WQKCY
This is my shocked face. :Cool:
Goodburbon
07-18-2013, 07:24
Even the National Geographic has to get involved now attacking private sales and making armlist sound like a Lord of War Movie. http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=19680493
How a Armslist trade goes down in the mind of a liberal. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=urs62KS4ZQM&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Durs62KS4ZQM
Homer should have used Armslist http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xIpLd0WQKCY&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DxIpLd0WQKCY
Your YouTube links aren't working.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
buffalobo
07-18-2013, 07:36
Your YouTube links aren't working.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Worked ok for me.
Sent from my VS840 4G using Tapatalk 4 Beta
BPTactical
07-18-2013, 07:47
Between NatGeo and MSNC they are the official anti gun channels on the boob tube.
lpgasman
07-18-2013, 07:49
"Definitely not a lot of people have these weapons," Torrez said. "It's a war gun. All you need is a finger to pull the trigger."
Oh shit! Now they're gonna ban fingers.
"Definitely not a lot of people have these weapons," Torrez said. "It's a war gun. All you need is a finger to pull the trigger."
Oh shit! Now they're gonna ban fingers.
Hopefully not the middle one, I need that to tell them exactly how I feel.
Sent from my Otterbox Defended Tactical iPhone using High Capacity "Clips".
brokenscout
07-18-2013, 08:02
"It's really scary waiting for someone to pull up who you know has an AK-47," van Zeller said.
kawiracer14
07-18-2013, 08:21
"This is a typical Russian round," Torrez said, holding a large clip.
"This could literally penetrate steel," Mike told van Zeller, as he handled the sniper rifle. "In Iraq, they told the snipers, don't waste one round on one person, even if he is standing behind a brick wall. Usually they'll have two, three guys lined up, then they shoot because it would go through the brick wall and all three of them."
Bailey Guns
07-18-2013, 08:43
Torrez sounds more like a dumbass than an "expert".
Wow, quite sad how ignorant they are.
robertcolorado2009
07-18-2013, 09:34
They are of the notion that every gun sold is going to be used for killing people immediately. That's the idea they want every libtard to believe. Every gun is for wanton murder. That each and every one of them is bought/sold just for the need top kill a human. Notice how they never mention law abiding citizens buying and using them for the usual plinking, target shooting, warmint shooting, competition uses and the list goes on of legal and lawful reasons to own such weapons. One sided reporting at it's finest!
Rooskibar03
07-18-2013, 09:43
I actually watched this last night and while you could sense a small undertone of an agenda I will commend the reporter for being honest. The story was told from a fact finding point of view. Only a few times did her bias come across.
They failed to mention many states do not allow private sales at a gun show like AZ does. She spent time with shooters and made an attempt to understand the culture, but at the same time did a lot of fear mongering with some of her statements.
The guy she buys the.50 from make a joking comment, "you could start you own war with this" and of course she got her panties in a bunch, but she did go onto shoot it herself.
They are getting better at hiding the agenda.
Goodburbon
07-18-2013, 11:03
I actually watched this last night and while you could sense a small undertone of an agenda I will commend the reporter for being honest. The story was told from a fact finding point of view. Only a few times did her bias come across.
They failed to mention many states do not allow private sales at a gun show like AZ does. She spent time with shooters and made an attempt to understand the culture, but at the same time did a lot of fear mongering with some of her statements.
The guy she buys the.50 from make a joking comment, "you could start you own war with this" and of course she got her panties in a bunch, but she did go onto shoot it herself.
They are getting better at hiding the agenda.
Hiding their agenda?
Not quite. When I see a monthly exposé on the dark underworld of private car sales, the treacherous realm of private audio component sales, and the topsy turvy dominion of private home sales, THEN their anti gun agenda might be hidden in a flood of anti capitalist investigations. Until then, it's the same story it was last month on NBC, the month before that on 60 minutes, etc.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
The anti-gun rhetoric is in vogue and National Geographic (as most any other publication) is more interested in selling their magazine than sharing the facts if responsible gun-ownership.
I actually watched this last night and while you could sense a small undertone of an agenda I will commend the reporter for being honest. The story was told from a fact finding point of view. Only a few times did her bias come across.
They failed to mention many states do not allow private sales at a gun show like AZ does. She spent time with shooters and made an attempt to understand the culture, but at the same time did a lot of fear mongering with some of her statements.
The guy she buys the.50 from make a joking comment, "you could start you own war with this" and of course she got her panties in a bunch, but she did go onto shoot it herself.
They are getting better at hiding the agenda.
You made it farther than me. They were trying so hard to bait the gun stores in the first 5 minutes I had to tell my wife to turn it. And the whole dramatic music score as they cut to commercial. Unbelievable.
Aloha_Shooter
07-19-2013, 10:54
Unfortunately, Nat Geo, like Scientific American, has been taken over by agenda-driven liberal media wonks. Both publications are alot flashier and certainly more profitable but they both have also lost a great deal of their former objectivity.
flan7211
07-19-2013, 11:04
Just plain assie. I really hate these people.
battle_sight_zero
07-19-2013, 11:51
Just plain assie. I really hate these people.
Thats why I posted this garbage. I dispise these type of people with all of my heart. I have no sympathy or care for them when terrible things happen to them.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.