PDA

View Full Version : 72 types of Americans that are considered to be extremist and potential terrorist in US DOCS



battle_sight_zero
08-28-2013, 20:43
Saw this posted on a couple sites: Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)? If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents. At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam (http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/21/obama-administration-pulls-references-to-islam-from-terror-training-materials-official-says/) from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens. And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay. So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke. The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them. And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.
Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.

To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link. As you can see, this list covers most of the country…

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=32)

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=32)

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=32)

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=32)

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=36)

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=36)

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=36)

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=36)

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/162321199/2161-docs#page=36)

10. “Anti-Gay” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

11. “Anti-Immigrant” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

12. “Anti-Muslim” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

13. “The Patriot Movement” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

15. Members of the Family Research Council (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

16. Members of the American Family Association (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

21. Members of the Christian Action Network (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21 (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

27. The militia movement (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

28. The sovereign citizen movement (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes” (http://joemiller.us/2013/04/101st-battalion-commanders-outrageous-e-mail-to-subordinates-characterizing-traditionalists-as-haters/)

30. Anyone that “complains about bias” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology” (http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/10/Radicalization-FINAL090911.pdf)

40. “Militia or unorganized militia” (http://info.publicintelligence.net/SLATT-TerrorismTraining/terrorismindicators.pdf)

41. “General right-wing extremist” (http://info.publicintelligence.net/SLATT-TerrorismTraining/terrorismindicators.pdf)

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N. (http://info.publicintelligence.net/SLATT-TerrorismTraining/terrorismindicators.pdf)

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God” (http://info.publicintelligence.net/SLATT-TerrorismTraining/terrorismindicators.pdf)

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

45. Those that are “anti-global” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear” (http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf)

58. “Rightwing extremists” (http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf)

59. “Returning veterans” (http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf)

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration” (http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf)

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms” (http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf)

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling” (http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf)

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes” (http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf)

64. “Anti-abortion activists” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-)

65. Those that are against illegal immigration (http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-)

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner (http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-)

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations (http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-)

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-)

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr (http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-)

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”) (http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MIAC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies (http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf)

72. Evangelical Christians (http://www.adfmedia.org/files/ExtremismPresentation.pdf)

The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with. In some of the documents referenced above, members of the military are specifically warned not to have anything to do with such groups.

We are moving into a very dangerous time in American history. You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs. Free speech is becoming a thing of the past, and we are rapidly becoming an Orwellian society that is the exact opposite of what our founding fathers intended.

Please pray for the United States of America. We definitely need it.

http://thetruthwins.com/archives/72-...ment-documents (http://thetruthwins.com/archives/72-types-of-americans-that-are-considered-potential-terrorists-in-official-government-documents)

Bailey Guns
08-28-2013, 20:45
I stopped counting after I reached 20 categories that fit me...

battle_sight_zero
08-28-2013, 20:48
I stopped counting after I reached 20 categories that fit me... = We still like you. Either way some VERY INTERESTING LINKS when you click on the descriptions.

Great-Kazoo
08-28-2013, 20:50
You're 3-4 years behind the times. Shit's been going on since O's 2nd year in office.
http://www.ar-15.co/threads/14141-Congrats-all-everyone-here-just-got-promoted-to-TERRORIST?highlight=domestic+terrorist

battle_sight_zero
08-28-2013, 20:56
You're 3-4 years behind the times. Shit's been going on since O's 2nd year in office.
http://www.ar-15.co/threads/14141-Congrats-all-everyone-here-just-got-promoted-to-TERRORIST?highlight=domestic+terrorist

Not really behind the times. Many of the documents in the links are very recent.

Squeeze
08-28-2013, 21:40
Yeah, I'm certain we are all on a "list" of some sort. And this is for the .gov = [fyou]

buffalobo
08-28-2013, 22:06
Sounds like profiling to me.

That's racist. :what:

Sent from my electronic ball and chain.

sniper7
08-28-2013, 22:21
Fuck that list. Just because I was driving down that particular sidewalk.....that's profilin!

TFOGGER
08-28-2013, 22:23
29/72...YES!

Tinelement
08-28-2013, 22:24
I read 1. then quit.

ZERO THEORY
08-28-2013, 22:56
I'm angry. I'm scared. I'm confused. I'm nervous. I'm curious.


What a fun time to live in America. And by fun, I mean terribly depressing and unnerving.

<MADDOG>
08-28-2013, 23:34
I wish I were eloquent enough in in my written word to convey the written similarities I see between 1861, 1914, and now; but I cannot.

lpgasman
08-29-2013, 07:42
But now the Obama administration isremoving all references to Islam from terror training materials,

And then they are re-inserted on 51-52-53.

roberth
08-29-2013, 08:30
The first document uses the Southern Poverty Law Center as a reference, next to pResident obama SPLC is the biggest bunch of racist, ignorant, imbeciles on the planet.

Aloha_Shooter
08-29-2013, 09:32
Hmm ... I must be doing something wrong, I only score about 25 ...

PugnacAutMortem
08-29-2013, 10:17
#59...returning veterans are extremists?

I thought military personnel were supposed to steer clear of anyone on this list...how do you steer clear of the military IN the military?

Steps
08-29-2013, 11:02
72 examples showing our Government is against our Constitution, and they are trying to take over our Nation.

III%!

merl
08-29-2013, 11:10
I think the Govt has taken over the nation. Pretty much defines Govt :)

Mtn.man
08-29-2013, 11:56
I am Ninja. they are not even aware of me.

Mtn.man
08-29-2013, 11:57
Just sent this to my friend, Jeff Foxworthy,,, You Might be a terrorist,,,,,,,

TEAMRICO
08-29-2013, 20:04
Someone call me?

Shit, looks like my Resume!!!

Great-Kazoo
08-29-2013, 20:20
72 examples showing our Government is against our Constitution, and they are trying to take over our Nation.

III%!

You must be new. This administration has shit canned the Constitution, won over 50% of the country, and did it with the assistance of the MSM. We have an information system that spread more MIS-Information than Tokyo Rose, William Joyce, Axis Sally and Baghdad BOB, combined.

OBAMA CELL PHONES. Where did winning the masses originate?? Here's one place.

Substitute cell Phone and INTERNET for Radio, it make sit an even more interesting read.

Goebbels approved a scheme whereby millions of cheap radio sets (the Volksempfänger (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volksempf%C3%A4nger)) were subsidised by the government. Goebbels claimed the radio was the "eighth great power",[92] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_propaganda#cite_note-92) and he, along with the Nazi party, recognized the power of the radio in the propaganda machine of Nazi Germany. In that "Radio as the Eighth Great Power" speech, Goebbels proclaimed: It would not have been possible for us to take power or to use it in the ways we have without the radio....It is no exaggeration to say that the German revolution, at least in the form it took, would have been impossible without the airplane and the radio. ...[Radio] reached the entire nation, regardless of class, standing, or religion. That was primarily the result of the tight centralization, the strong reporting, and the up-to-date nature of the German radio....Above all it is necessary to clearly centralize all radio activities, to place spiritual tasks ahead of technical ones,...to provide a clear worldview, By the start of the Second World War (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II) over 70% of German households had one of these radios.

mountainjenny
08-29-2013, 20:30
29 of those fit me or loosely fit me. That's is the number without reading the articles attached and not counting the ones that said " general right wing extremist" and "right wing extremist". I don't consider myself an "extremist", but I'm sure I fit that definition for many on the left politically.

rockhound
08-30-2013, 04:33
At least i know my govt hasnt forgotten about me

splogan
08-30-2013, 20:34
I always thought it was interesting those of who fought are a threat. That and anyone proud to be american. Sad state of affairs

BPTactical
08-30-2013, 20:57
Curious how this "list" will play into background checks eh?

Gman
08-30-2013, 22:02
Just because I was driving down that particular sidewalk.....that's profilin!
I had the right to remain silent... but I didn't have the ability.