View Full Version : Newtown Demolition Crews sign NDAs
ThunderSquirrel
10-15-2013, 12:36
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/10/15/contractors-forbidden-to-publicly-discuss-newtown-school-demolition/?intcmp=latestnews
NEWTOWN, Conn. – Contractors demolishing Sandy Hook Elementary School are being required to sign confidentiality agreements forbidding public discussion of the site, photographs or disclosure of any information about the building where 26 people were fatally shot last December.
[tinhat]
SuperiorDG
10-15-2013, 12:40
Sounds normal to me. Can you imagine some assclown trying to make a buck off the murder of those kids?
BushMasterBoy
10-15-2013, 12:48
Or garnering votes...
Or passing more gun laws...
Dont see why they are needed.
Is there a criminal case still pending?
Does this affect national security?
If both answers are no, what are the trying to hide?
Was this done for the wtc clean up?
Dont see why they are needed.
Is there a criminal case still pending?
Because it was a sham to further GC agenda. Review the video of the event that you can find, listen to the "news" reports related to it, and draw your own conclusions.
:eek: :tinfoil:
Sent via my Mobile Work Avoidance Device
BPTactical
10-15-2013, 19:03
Because it was a sham to further GC agenda. Review the video of the event that you can find, listen to the "news" reports related to it, and draw your own conclusions.:eek: :tinfoil:Sent via my Mobile Work Avoidance Device
Winner, winner chicken dinner.
I would be willing to bet no such NDA was required for Columbine, Lubys, Virginia Tech etc.
The ONLY reason one would require a NDA is if they have something to hide.
The stench worsens.
The entire SH story is looser than a .25 cent whorehouse door in Cancun during spring break.
Dirty, rotten bastards.
Colorado_Outback
10-15-2013, 19:11
Winner, winner chicken dinner.I would be willing to bet no such NDA was required for Columbine, Lubys, Virginia Tech etc.The ONLY reason one would require a NDA is if they have something to hide.The stench worsens.The entire SH story is looser than a .25 cent whorehouse door in Cancun during spring break.Dirty, rotten bastards.
7/10
Not bad.. Dirty, rotten bastards sealed it.
BushMasterBoy
10-15-2013, 19:20
It is obvious now, that Obama leads the charge to remove the second amendment from the Constitution. The real question is who is Obama really working for?
BPTactical
10-15-2013, 19:24
7/10
Not bad.. Dirty, rotten bastards sealed it.
Not even an attempt at a rant.
If I were to say what I really felt regarding this.............hang on, someones at the door.....
BPTactical
10-15-2013, 19:26
It is obvious now, that Obama leads the charge to remove the Constitution. The real question is who is Obama really working for?
There, all fixxxeded up now
Columbine, Aurora Theater, Luby's and VT were not razed. Why Sandy Hook?
BushMasterBoy
10-15-2013, 19:39
Connecticut has the highest income per capita of any state, maybe they can afford it?
Sounds normal to me. Can you imagine some assclown trying to make a buck off the murder of those kids?
Hmmmmmm
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-ClpfNopg7nE/Ul4HmjBGvDI/AAAAAAAAFJo/gj2Dww0oFKM/w1066-h576-no/Morgan.jpg
Columbine, Aurora Theater, Luby's and VT were not razed. Why Sandy Hook?
I don't think that's the issue.
The issue is why do construction workers need to sign NDAs? Columbine's rebuilding was very public, and that was a good thing. If you're going to force taxpayers to pay to rebuild, you should show them what they are getting and why.
I have to say, this turd just keeps on stinking.
Could be something a lot deeper they are trying to hide. Or they want to get rid of the building and the memory of it all together. May or may not be a good thing
If I was a parent who lost a child there, I'm not sure I'd want the incident brought up again via some member of a demolition crew talking about bullet holes in walls and blood stains on floors. This is an instance in which I think the families of the victims might benefit from some silence on the topic in order to facilitate healing.
sellersm
10-16-2013, 08:58
Or the public & parents need to know about the lack of bullet holes & blood...
I think the question of "why" is more than reasonable here, and it only adds to the level of distrust that already exists about the whole "incident".
Sent from my fat fingers using Tapatalk
kidicarus13
10-16-2013, 11:00
That's right, 20 elememtary school kids (plus others) were shot dead in a school only because the US Govt could advance its position on gun control. Just like 2977 people were killed on 9-11 by the US Govt. Uh huh [Sarcasm2]
Other than national security and ongoing litigation, there is never a reason for government secrecy.
How can you trust a government that hides anything? No conspiracy theories on what happened. They need to give a reasonable answer as to why the ndas. Prevdnting emotion distress is not a valid reason.
HoneyBadger
10-16-2013, 14:48
Other than national security and ongoing litigation, there is never a reason for government secrecy.
How can you trust a government that hides anything? No conspiracy theories on what happened. They need to give a reasonable answer as to why the ndas. Prevdnting emotion distress is not a valid reason.
Absolutes are difficult to apply, but in this case, I generally agree. There is no legitimate reason to hide or cover up anything here. ...Unless they are trying to hide or cover up something.
This whole thing stinks to high hell. [pileoshit]
blacklabel
10-16-2013, 15:42
If I was a parent who lost a child there, I'm not sure I'd want the incident brought up again via some member of a demolition crew talking about bullet holes in walls and blood stains on floors. This is an instance in which I think the families of the victims might benefit from some silence on the topic in order to facilitate healing.
If I remember right they didn't even get to see their children's bodies. I'd sure as hell want to see that.
If I remember right they didn't even get to see their children's bodies. I'd sure as hell want to see that.
How is that even possible?
Lex_Luthor
10-16-2013, 16:03
I'm upgrading my hat to tin-foil underwear!
But seriously, I'd be the loudest sombitch on the planet if I could not properly bury my baby.
blacklabel
10-16-2013, 16:20
I'm upgrading my hat to tin-foil underwear!
But seriously, I'd be the loudest sombitch on the planet if I could not properly bury my baby.
All that I could go back and find was that facial pictures were provided to the parents before the bodies were provided to the funeral homes. Not as tin-foily as I had originally read.
BPTactical
10-16-2013, 16:48
All that I could go back and find was that facial pictures were provided to the parents before the bodies were provided to the funeral homes. Not as tin-foily as I had originally read.
Well now, aint that nice of the Gubberment?
They go and provide such a thoughtful and benevolent service to save the parents from grief.
Absolute, pure 100% bullshit, in spades.
How come the relatives of Aurora, DC, Virginia Tech and Columbine did not receive such tender, loving and sensitive care?
Bullshit and it makes the "WeirdShitOMeter" peg even more on this "Incident".
No explicable reason whatsoever to deny a parent the right to see their child who has been killed, no matter how gruesome it may be.
That is the parents right and choice and no others to make.
Add the fact that the records pertaining to this were sealed by the state of Connecticut almost instantly and shortly thereafter Connecticut lawmakers passed legislation ensuring they would remain sealed.
The narrative does not fit at all.
sellersm
10-16-2013, 16:52
The narrative for truth does not fit at all.
FIFY. The narrative for a cover up of some kind fits quite well...
jhood001
10-16-2013, 17:07
No explicable reason whatsoever to deny a parent the right to see their child who has been killed, no matter how gruesome it may be.
No reason whatsoever, but let's set the reason aside for a minute. WHAT RIGHT OR LEGAL PRECEDENT exists that allows the state to deny a parent access to their dead child?
That is the parents right and choice and no others to make.
Yep.
stevelkinevil
10-16-2013, 17:17
This thing stunk as a FF op from the get go and only gets worse. Ever seen the uncut vid of the supposed father of a slain 6 year old laughing it up, smiling then getting sad and working up crocodile tears once its time to broadcast?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcNCurZDjr0
<MADDOG>
10-16-2013, 17:30
Guys, I am not debating the "cover up" of the shooting. But just as a counter argument, it is fully within the right of the owner (in this case the school district, and in turn the town) to require NDA's of its contractors. Would you as a parent want someone making a buck off the murder of your child?
<MADDOG>
10-16-2013, 17:47
who's making a buck?
If any pictures or video make it to any media, its making a buck.
BPTactical
10-16-2013, 17:48
Would you as a parent want someone making a buck off the murder of your child?
How is that any different from elected officials pushing a political agenda using the murder of a child?
<MADDOG>
10-16-2013, 18:23
How is that any different from elected officials pushing a political agenda using the murder of a child?
No dispute there; it's not.
IMO, it goes back to the old adage "control what you can control". Why would the school district WANT the conditions of that school released?
sellersm
10-16-2013, 18:45
IMO, it goes back to the old adage "control what you can control". Why would the school district WANT the conditions of that school released?
Because that was a model, brand new school built as the model of a modern, Agenda 21 influenced school. It was to be the prototype for all new schools going forward... Oh wait, you said why would they WANT it released? Never mind...
Because that was a model, brand new school built as the model of a modern, Agenda 21 influenced school. It was to be the prototype for all new schools going forward... Oh wait, you said why would they WANT it released? Never mind...
Sandy Hook was actually a pretty old school. It was remodeled shortly before the shooting. That doesn't make it new.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.