View Full Version : Shoplifting Incident Prompts Scare At Roosevelt Field Mall
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/12/24/roosevelt-field-mall-evacuated/
ugh.... sheeple....
//Facepalm//
NY needs a common-sense law requiring shopping racks to be bolted down so shoplifters cannot knock them over, thus causing unnecessary panic among holiday shoppers. This tragic incident is not the fault of the shoplifter, nor the fault of the vendor, but clearly and quite obviously the fault of the unsecured rack. While some legislators may prefer to ban shopping racks outright, I submit that the march toward complete eradication of such racks must be gradual: first there needs to be legislation introduced that requires all vendors to register their racks and then securely bolt down all shopping racks (severe penalty for failing to adhere). Second, any vendor found not to be in compliance with new rack registration/bolting-to-floor legislation will lose their privilege to have racks and only allowed to sell from cardboard boxes affixed to the floor by eco-friendly duct-tape in colors that do not inflame local gang tensions or elevate/denigrate any race (no white/black/yellow/red/blue tape please).
I cannot understand how a mall, in NEW YORK of all places, thought they could flaunt simple anti-panic measures that are so common-sense and reasonable.
It's truly enough to keep me from visiting such a dangerous state.
Bailey Guns
12-26-2013, 16:43
^^ Racks should be limited to holding only 7 items of clothing.
Bailey Guns
12-26-2013, 16:46
So now can we assume that gunfire sounds like a clothing rack falling over since some people said the falling rack sounded like gunfire?
StagLefty
12-26-2013, 16:51
So now can we assume that gunfire sounds like a clothing rack falling over since some people said the falling rack sounded like gunfire?
it's worse-racks held 30 capacity clothes hangers. [ROFL3]
^^ Racks should be limited to holding only 7 items of clothing.
Absolutely NOT! Y'all in flyover country just seem to think that any number is fine! Good gawd, if firearms can only legally hold five, four should be enough for a panic-inciting clothing rack.
Nobody needs more than four on a rack!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/hatidua/96247B21-4A7F-4C12-9011-1CCF4043E470_zps9d167f8e.jpg
Bailey Guns
12-26-2013, 17:01
I stand corrected with photographic proof. That would be more than enough shirts for me.
Bailey Guns
12-26-2013, 17:06
"Three shall be the number thou shall count, and the number of the count shall be three."
Great-Kazoo
12-26-2013, 17:36
RF was a shit hole ,35 years ago. . Going out on a limb here, to say perhaps that upstanding citizen, may , or may not be related to these fine citizens.
http://news.yahoo.com/600-people-involved-movie-theater-brawl-5-arrested-182829797--abc-news-topstories.html
Plus! all these evil black attachments make it an assault rack.
38491
"Three shall be the number thou shall count, and the number of the count shall be three."
"Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out."
"Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out."
YOU SILLY SODS! You got me all worked up!
okay I know it is totally derailing this thread, but it needs killing... so:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XcxKIJTb3Hg
"Running for their lives?" Seriously?
Sad, pathetic sheeple. Crying? Hugging?
Wonder what would happen if something really bad happened to them...like their credit cards getting cancelled or getting a real life?
Can only hope/pray those motherless fucks stay on their coast and away from Colorado. Liberals.
I hope so, but I fear that this is the way our society is headed. Over-dramatic lemmings who are "in their own worlds", and react like cattle or animals to something happening to the environment. Sad, this is why I avoid public places as much as i can, and when I have to go I am always looking for ways to quickly get out of the way of a sheeple stampede. I don't even necessarily have to exit. If it really is an active shooter I have ways of protecting myself at all times.
I'm surprised "Military-style" assault swords are still allowed in the UK. Why would the average citizen want or need--for that matter--aweapon capble of mass destruction such as that?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.