Raising Boys That Aren’t Metrosexual Pussies

[HoneyBadger]

This guy just started an ongoing column about raising your son(s) to be real men. So far I like it and I thought some of you might also like it:


Parent, if you have a young son and you want him to grow up to be a man, then you need to keep him away from pop culture, public school and a lot of Nancy Boy churches. If metrosexual pop culture, feminized public schools and the effeminate branches of evanjellycalism lay their sissy hands on him, you can kiss his masculinity good-bye because they will morph him into a dandy.
Yeah, mom and dad, if – if – you dare to raise your boy as a classic boy in this castrated epoch, then you’ve got a task that’s more difficult than getting a drunk Rosie O’Donnell to hit the urinal at Chili’s.
Get it right mom and dad, you are rowing against the flotsam and jetsam of Sally River. I hope you have a sturdy ideological paddle and some serious forearms, because our crap culture is determined to keep your boy and his testosterone at bay. Yes, they will attempt at every turn to either drill it or drug it out of him.

Part 1: http://clashdaily.com/2014/01/raising-boys-arent-metrosexual-pussies-1-get-butt-outdoors/
Part 2: http://clashdaily.com/2014/01/raising-boys-arent-metrosexual-pussies-2-train-boy-leader/
More parts to come

[blacklabel]

Awesome, thanks for the links.

[sniper7]

But, don't you want your son to like Justin bieber and want to dress fashionably while doing icky work like chores that are for mere peasants?


i can't stand the kids that are showing these signs at such an early age. But yet I have to remind my wife I don't want him watching her shows with the metros and homos and getting some sort of idea that men act like that. But...like everything else the media will jam it down your throat to make you think that is reality when the truth is a very small percentage of boys act like that, at least around here.

[Sharpienads]

Good read. I like the title of his book.

[HoneyBadger]

Good read. I like the title of his book.
Which one?

http://clashdaily.com/books/

[Holger Danske]

My oldest boy is turning 14 this year and he asked me to guess what he wanted as a present. Me: iPod? Boy: No, throwing knives and a pistol. Me: a .22? Boy: A .357 like yours. Ive never been so proud.

[Zundfolge]

I find it ironic that Doug Giles has two drop dead hot daughters that are both better men than most of us here (one of them was the chick that posed as a prostitute with James O'Keefe and brought down ACORN).

[SouthPaw]

Well I went out to a few bars this weekend and can tell you a lot of parents failed at this. There were guys wearing tighter jeans and smaller shirts than half the girls in there. It's funny to see people my age in there and then the younger guys in tight green pants that are only a few years younger.

[Sharpienads]

Which one?

http://clashdaily.com/books/

Raising Boys Feminist Will Hate

[nathan0259]

I am proud to say my 2 year old son has many toy guns that he loves to play with! Its hard getting my wife on board with bringing him up as a boy, he's our only one and she likes to coddle him. I think one big thing that I see a lot of parents fail on is making there children finish things that are hard. If my son gets hurt I check him out to make sure he isnt broken or bleeding to bad and make him finish what he was doing. He burnt his hand on the stove this morning after burn cream and a bandaid he finished "helping" make breakfast.

Its a good read. Might have to pick up his books. Adam Carola had a similar book out a few years ago. I just can't remember the name of it.

[rockhound]

my kid and i will be getting greasy in the garage today, good day

[blacklabel]

Adam Carola had a similar book out a few years ago. I just can't remember the name of it.

In 50 Years We'll All Be Chicks.

I still need to get a copy and read it.

[TheGrey]

Yeah. Women are clearly to blame for society's downfall.

[TheGrey]

I believe I understand where the author is coming from, but vilifying women as the reason boys aren’t the way they were when he was growing up doesn’t earn him my empathy.

Every generation looks back with nostalgia, and looks at the present generation with contempt. It’s a given. I certainly do. If I had my druthers, I’d take my useless nieces and nephews and shove them into the nearest military boarding school that I could find. When I was their age, I’d already been working for a year and living on my own.

In my opinion, the qualifier the author is seeking is the difference between progressives and feminism. It’s not the same thing. Feminism is usually tarred with one big brush rather than understanding that feminazis don’t represent the entire gender. Sure, the media loves to put a spotlight on the radical women; it sells copy. Feminism is defined as “the advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social and economical equality to men.” Do you understand what that means? That means being able to have a bank account and make your own financial transactions without having to have a joint account with a man, or have his permission to withdraw more than $30. It means having the same pay rate when you’re doing the same job. It means being able to hire movers to pack out your stuff when you PCS, and NOT have to plant a kiss on all of them because they have suggested that if you don’t, it may not all make it to your destination. Does this make sense? It’s damn hard to be a manly-man in this society, but it’s equally hard to be a female that has struggled to gain equal footing. So when I read articles written by a man that is subtly blaming the “pussification” of America on “feminists,” I have to wonder if he honestly knows what he’s saying. Using dirty names designed to denigrate women doesn’t make me feel warm and fuzzy toward him or his site where he tries to “humorously” highlight the difference between men and women.

It seems to me that he’s pointing the blame at an easy target, when an even easier target is more available: progressives. Progressivism/socialist philosophy touts “equality” but does not provide a solid road map as to how to get there. Family values are eschewed as “old-fashioned”; instant gratification is held more important than the satisfaction that comes from hard work. The biggest casualty of today’s youth is the concept of responsibility.
I read a truly excellent article written by the mother of a teenager that helped to explain a problem that could develop into a major problem as they grew up: their inability to get and keep a job. There are several issues that bring this problem to bar: high unemployment, illegal immigrants taking the jobs that used to be the purview of teens, and minimum wage restrictions. These three events combine to limit teenager’s abilities to learn the foundations of a good work ethic. I’m paraphrasing, and if anybody wants to see the article in its whole, PM me and I’ll send it to you.
Concern that today’s sons are all turning out to be Justin Biebers is legitimate- but don’t point the finger at women. We’re liable to bite it off and explain your mistake later. Point it instead at decaying values brought on by progressivism. We women are just as concerned about it as you guys are.

[jason303]

i can't stand the kids that are showing these signs at such an early age. But yet I have to remind my wife I don't want him watching her shows with the metros and homos and getting some sort of idea that men act like that. But...like everything else the media will jam it down your throat to make you think that is reality when the truth is a very small percentage of boys act like that, at least around here.

I have to turn off modern family when my kids are in the room. Sniper7's right on with this post. The homo agenda pushers want you think every thrd house on the block has two daddys. I get that it exists, but I don't want it forced into
my awareness like they do.


My oldest boy is turning 14 this year and he asked me to guess what he wanted as a present. Me: iPod? Boy: No, throwing knives and a pistol. Me: a .22? Boy: A .357 like yours. Ive never been so proud.

Nice.



my kid and i will be getting greasy in the garage today, good day

right on.]

[jason303]

I believe I understand where the author is coming from, but vilifying women as the reason boys aren’t the way they were when he was growing up doesn’t earn him my empathy.

Every generation looks back with nostalgia, and looks at the present generation with contempt. It’s a given. I certainly do. If I had my druthers, I’d take my useless nieces and nephews and shove them into the nearest military boarding school that I could find. When I was their age, I’d already been working for a year and living on my own.

In my opinion, the qualifier the author is seeking is the difference between progressives and feminism. It’s not the same thing. Feminism is usually tarred with one big brush rather than understanding that feminazis don’t represent the entire gender. Sure, the media loves to put a spotlight on the radical women; it sells copy. Feminism is defined as “the advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social and economical equality to men.” Do you understand what that means? That means being able to have a bank account and make your own financial transactions without having to have a joint account with a man, or have his permission to withdraw more than $30. It means having the same pay rate when you’re doing the same job. It means being able to hire movers to pack out your stuff when you PCS, and NOT have to plant a kiss on all of them because they have suggested that if you don’t, it may not all make it to your destination. Does this make sense? It’s damn hard to be a manly-man in this society, but it’s equally hard to be a female that has struggled to gain equal footing. So when I read articles written by a man that is subtly blaming the “pussification” of America on “feminists,” I have to wonder if he honestly knows what he’s saying. Using dirty names designed to denigrate women doesn’t make me feel warm and fuzzy toward him or his site where he tries to “humorously” highlight the difference between men and women.

It seems to me that he’s pointing the blame at an easy target, when an even easier target is more available: progressives. Progressivism/socialist philosophy touts “equality” but does not provide a solid road map as to how to get there. Family values are eschewed as “old-fashioned”; instant gratification is held more important than the satisfaction that comes from hard work. The biggest casualty of today’s youth is the concept of responsibility.
I read a truly excellent article written by the mother of a teenager that helped to explain a problem that could develop into a major problem as they grew up: their inability to get and keep a job. There are several issues that bring this problem to bar: high unemployment, illegal immigrants taking the jobs that used to be the purview of teens, and minimum wage restrictions. These three events combine to limit teenager’s abilities to learn the foundations of a good work ethic. I’m paraphrasing, and if anybody wants to see the article in its whole, PM me and I’ll send it to you.
Concern that today’s sons are all turning out to be Justin Biebers is legitimate- but don’t point the finger at ...



I think you`re right, but this is as far as I got before my beautiful wife called me and my boys to breakfast. Or brunch as the fags would call it.

[sniper7]

Excellent points TheGrey.

you can't blame women for wanting equality, if you want to point a finger, point it at those who gave it to them. Same goes with all the social programs, you can't blame the users, you can blame the people who created the programs and let the loopholes in that allows it to be abused.

Find you a good woman that agrees with your ideas on how to raise children. Sure, you won't come to an agreement on everything, but my wife and I are pretty close when it comes to how we want our son to be raised, and give him opportunities at every sport we can, access to real world hands on stuff instead of watching it on tv or reading about it in a classroom.

every group out there has an agenda for children. The NRA gets them into shooting and hunting programs, PETA wants them to love all animals, not eat them and hate all people who harm animals or eat them, others want to make kids okay with gays and be open to express themselves and suppress all those who oppose them. The list goes on, it just depends on what programs and groups the kids are exposed to. That is where parenting comes in and you don't allow your kid to attend the presentation or the day of school when such things are taking place, don't like it: there is private school and home schooling.

[HoneyBadger]

Yeah. Women are clearly to blame for society's downfall.
I don't think this is the point of his writings.. He is saying that we need to raise our sons to be powerful leaders and men capable of leading and caring for a family.

[HoneyBadger]

.
Concern that today’s sons are all turning out to be Justin Biebers is legitimate- but don’t point the finger at women. We’re liable to bite it off and explain your mistake later. Point it instead at decaying values brought on by progressivism. We women are just as concerned about it as you guys are.


lol agreed.

[Aloha_Shooter]

I believe I understand where the author is coming from, but vilifying women as the reason boys aren’t the way they were when he was growing up doesn’t earn him my empathy.

Personally, I like strong women like those portrayed by Robert Heinlein or Anne McCaffrey. I just don't like androphobic Amazons who blame men for all their past ills or metrosexual Europhiles who want men to be like Serge in Beverly Hills Cop.

[TheGrey]

Personally, I like strong women like those portrayed by Robert Heinlein or Anne McCaffrey. I just don't like androphobic Amazons who blame men for all their past ills or metrosexual Europhiles who want men to be like Serge in Beverly Hills Cop.

Personally, I despise the stereotypical man-haters- the "womyn" that use "Women's studies" as a major at Berkley. That just perpetuates the feminist-as-a-man-hater. They've total missed the point. Men are wonderful. I let the a$$holes identify themselves and then I deal with them on an individual merit. It's like today's culture s so lazy that they take the stereotypes and put them in the role of prototype.

No, it's interesting that you bring up Europhiles. I tend to classify the Europhiles into the "not a danger" category, I don't tend to mind them as much, although they don' fit my mental mold of "real man" by a longshot.

...although there was a vey sniffy, judgmental French soldier that I yanked out of "not a threat" and threw into the "totally dominate NOW" category.

[Ridge]

I find it ironic that Doug Giles has two drop dead hot daughters that are both better men than most of us here (one of them was the chick that posed as a prostitute with James O'Keefe and brought down ACORN).

Are you really saying that your proud of that man because his daughter posed as a prostitute to entrap someone and then destroy him with lies?

[TheGrey]

I don't think this is the point of his writings.. He is saying that we need to raise our sons to be powerful leaders and men capable of leading and caring for a family.

I know that is his inevitable intention, but there's a good deal of thinly-veiled misogyny on his site. It's not overt, but it is pervasive.
Much of what he says resonate with me, too. But then he pisses in the Wheaties and wrecks it.

[HoneyBadger]

I know that is his inevitable intention, but there's a good deal of thinly-veiled misogyny on his site. It's not overt, but it is pervasive.
Much of what he says resonate with me, too. But then he pisses in the Wheaties and wrecks it.
Understood. It's a shame, because he says so many good things.

[TheGrey]

Understood. It's a shame, because he says so many good things.

He does. We need strong-willed, independent people in our next generation.

[HoneyBadger]

He does. We need strong-willed, independent people with good values and strong principles in our next generation.

Fixed it for you.

[TheGrey]

Yes! Thank you. :)

[Sharpienads]

Are you really saying that your proud of that man because his daughter posed as a prostitute to entrap someone and then destroy him with lies?

I would be proud if that were my daughter.

[HoneyBadger]

Are you really saying that your proud of that man because his daughter posed as a prostitute to entrap someone and then destroy him with lies?
Destroy him with lies??? What the actual fuck are you talking about? Douchebag was living a lie and he got caught.

I would be proud if that were my daughter.
[Awesom]

[Aloha_Shooter]

Are you really saying that your proud of that man because his daughter posed as a prostitute to entrap someone and then destroy him with lies?

I'm proud of his daughter for exposing the lies at ACORN and other illicit agencies of the Left. If you think O'Keefe's exposes were lies then you have already drank the Kool-Aid and lost any judgment or common sense you ever had.

[Bailey Guns]

I'm proud of his daughter for exposing the lies at ACORN and other illicit agencies of the Left. If you think O'Keefe's exposes were lies then you have already drank the Kool-Aid and lost any judgment or common sense you ever had.

OD'd on the KA.

[sniper7]

I'm proud of his daughter for exposing the lies at ACORN and other illicit agencies of the Left. If you think O'Keefe's exposes were lies then you have already drank the Kool-Aid and lost any judgment or common sense you ever had.

He has no control over what they put in the pony trough

[Ah Pook]

Yeah. Women are clearly to blame for society's downfall.
Damn straight. [LOL]

Seems to be a lot of blame going on. Your kid. Your responsibility. Too bad some won't accept that responsibility.

[electronman1729]

Even though im pretty young and have a long way ago before i have kids i will keep this article saved. Dont want my son to be a total pussy.

[Irving]

I'm not really worried that I won't be able to out parent a 30 minute sitcom.

[Sharpienads]

I'm not really worried that I won't be able to out parent a 30 minute sitcom.

The first stage is denial. They already got to you.

[MED]

So much of this depends on the parents, and especially the father. The child is impressionable through elementary school and the core set of values are pretty well set by eight and you reinforce them through middle school. If the father is active in these years teaching the child how to work and be self sufficient through example, then the child will pick up on that. Boys need to be outdoors (camping, hunting, etc., a core component of how we are wired as men) and they need to develop a work ethic when they are young. When I give my son a task, he has seen me do the same thing with him throughout his life so he knows that I never ask anything of him that I don't do myself. Most importantly, he knows I will listen to him and I care about him; what he thinks and feels. Being masculine doesn't mean he is void of feeling; he needs to be empathetic as I am with him. We have fun and he is of strong character and I am proud of him. If the father is absent, an idiot, or an urban pussy, then who knows what the child will become; outside influences will certainly shape him. I had this conversation several times with my x about her son. She was raising the boy to be a wuss and his father was a destructive idiot. So, fathers...it starts with you; what you are willing to sacrifice when raising your child, because it takes time, effort, and example to be successful.