PDA

View Full Version : Connecticut to Confiscate



UrbanWolf
02-22-2014, 15:18
http://www.grandviewoutdoors.com/articles/3661-connecticut-set-for-possible-gun-confiscation#sthash.X9iFuYO0.9NGGDhMS.dpbs

Legislators in Connecticut ain't happy with all the gun owners who didn't register their semi-auto guns, prompting some groups to push for confiscation on as many as 100,000 residents.

So is the the real thing or an attempt to scare an additional group of sheeps to comply?

sroz
02-22-2014, 15:40
Funny how they want to grant amnesty to 11+ million who intentionally broke our laws, yet will not consider it for 100,000 they legislated into a criminal status. They are right on the ocean. Why is it so difficult to believe boating accidents are a real problem over there?

bobbyfairbanks
02-22-2014, 15:42
political suicide if they do

Bailey Guns
02-22-2014, 15:45
political suicide if they do

Might be a lot more than that...

sroz
02-22-2014, 15:46
Wonder how many of those guns are buried in the north woods of Maine? Woods are so think, they wouldn't know where to start looking.

Hound
02-22-2014, 15:47
But..but.. They said this could never happen!!!!

[Sarcasm2]

mcjhr
02-22-2014, 16:00
This is gonna get interesting!

"legislatures are concerned", they damn well should be!

streetglideok
02-22-2014, 16:03
Worth paying attention to this for the same reason everyone watched the recall elections we organized. If they resort to confiscations and no one stops them, guess what could spread to other liberal states like the 7 year itch?

blacklabel
02-22-2014, 16:05
Could be a definitive moment or moments not too far in our future.

BPTactical
02-22-2014, 16:09
Curious how many of the LEO's are chomping at the bit.........

UrbanWolf
02-22-2014, 16:14
They might use dirty tactics, jail and confiscate one at a time when someone got pulled over and busted for owning one without registering.


http://www.gunandgame.com/forums/attachments/powder-keg/57118d1357951409-molon-labe-pictures-molon-labe-vik-battaile-politics-1356294265.jpg

bobbyfairbanks
02-22-2014, 16:14
I read an estimate that the high number of people not registering is 350-500 thousand. that would increase there current prison population by 500%. It is not possible. It would literally mean suicide.

SamuraiCO
02-22-2014, 16:16
Funny how that is always the next step and the same legislators said it would never come to this they just want sensible gun laws.

Geology Rocks
02-22-2014, 16:19
Curious how many of the LEO's are chomping at the bit.........

every single one that I know of has already said they will never follow those orders and will turn in their badge instead.

ben4372
02-22-2014, 18:01
every single one that I know of has already said they will never follow those orders and will turn in their badge instead.Most of them are lying to you.

streetglideok
02-22-2014, 18:01
I bet a lot of those cops will follow orders, as it will be put to them that these people are felons, and they shouldn't have guns. Some may hope for some gun play. Go look at the Connecticut hometown section on ar15, and look at how some are just rolling over. Reminds me of kalifornia.

blacklabel
02-22-2014, 18:06
every single one that I know of has already said they will never follow those orders and will turn in their badge instead.

Ask them how they're planning on supporting their families when this happens. I'm not here to bash cops but the thought that they'll just walk away from their means to support their families is hard to believe.

roberth
02-22-2014, 18:07
I bet a lot of those cops will follow orders, as it will be put to them that these people are felons, and they shouldn't have guns. Some may hope for some gun play. Go look at the Connecticut hometown section on ar15, and look at how some are just rolling over. Reminds me of kalifornia.

They most certainly will, when it comes to their paycheck or your rights what do you think the trump card is.

streetglideok
02-22-2014, 18:15
A sign of where their morals are. I've walked from shops that operated shady. If they aren't on the winning side, history, and the public will not be kind to them or their families.

BPTactical
02-22-2014, 18:19
Read up on Micheal Lawlor, he is pretty much the architect of CT's plan.

<MADDOG>
02-22-2014, 18:20
Might be a lot more than that...

My thoughts exactly.

And how do they know who has these "assault weapons"? Did this state have a firearm registry?

Gun advocates are worried that as many as 100,000 otherwise law-abiding Connecticut residents are now felons and are exercising a kind of civil disobedience by refusing to register their previously legal rifles and magazines. The state's top advisor to the governor on gun laws has said that his office might track down unregistered owners by comparing lists of people who purchased so-called "assault rifles" in the past with the names of people who registered their rifles by the Jan. 1 deadline

UrbanWolf
02-22-2014, 18:26
Might be a lot more than that...

Current state of Kiev come to mind...

hatidua
02-22-2014, 18:28
every single one that I know of has already said they will never follow those orders and will turn in their badge instead.

...and I can leap tall buildings in a single bound.

DSB OUTDOORS
02-22-2014, 18:31
http://youtu.be/WTdO-w3xnpw

Irving
02-22-2014, 18:49
Most of them are lying to you.

And to themselves.

streetglideok
02-22-2014, 19:19
Just look at the FCC and their lil plan to stick their noses into television news rooms. Didn't hear one FCC agent throwing in the towel. It'll be the same with the guns.

trlcavscout
02-22-2014, 19:58
Hopefully they dig in and stand their ground.

clublights
02-22-2014, 20:20
My thoughts exactly.

And how do they know who has these "assault weapons"? Did this state have a firearm registry?

Gun advocates are worried that as many as 100,000 otherwise law-abiding Connecticut residents are now felons and are exercising a kind of civil disobedience by refusing to register their previously legal rifles and magazines. The state's top advisor to the governor on gun laws has said that his office might track down unregistered owners by comparing lists of people who purchased so-called "assault rifles" in the past with the names of people who registered their rifles by the Jan. 1 deadline

If they already have a list...... why do folks need to register?

clublights
02-22-2014, 20:21
Just look at the FCC and their lil plan to stick their noses into television news rooms. Didn't hear one FCC agent throwing in the towel. It'll be the same with the guns.

No one would be likely to shoot an FCC agent in the newsroom .....

Also it was just a proposal not inaction yet.

streetglideok
02-22-2014, 20:49
The FCC nearly did it, if it wasn't for public outcry. I can bet you money the agents would have no issue following orders, even if it stepped on the bill of rights.

KS63
02-22-2014, 20:59
I'd like to see the politicians who support this go door to door confiscating the guns. That shit will change real quick.

HoneyBadger
02-22-2014, 21:14
I'd like to see the politicians who support this go door to door confiscating the guns. That shit will change real quick.
Of course that would never happen. These are not honest people we are dealing with here.

merl
02-22-2014, 21:57
They might use dirty tactics, jail and confiscate one at a time when someone got pulled over and busted for owning one without registering.


This
A well publicized test case, ideally with someone who cannot possess for some other reason, would ensure the other unregistered ones never see daylight.

Gcompact30
02-22-2014, 22:13
MOVE OUT OF TOWN QUICK!!!!!!

sniper7
02-22-2014, 22:35
Very interested to see what happens here. Hoping somebody takes a stand....

clublights
02-22-2014, 22:58
Very interested to see what happens here. Hoping somebody takes a stand....


hopefully a lot of somebody's

1 is a easy to hide " criminal"
100 is a crazy cult that had it coming
1000 is hard to ignore
10000 has a fighting chance to win.
100000 wins the battle.

stevelkinevil
02-23-2014, 01:32
I can tell you this. Of course many in LE will comply, many will comply begrudgingly. Many still will not. One emboldens the other. It is a personal matter, and every man will make his choice, and as more make the choice they know is right more will join. The snowball becomes the avalanche.

HoneyBadger
02-23-2014, 08:48
hopefully a lot of somebody's

1 is a easy to hide " criminal"
100 is a crazy cult that had it coming
1000 is hard to ignore
10000 has a fighting chance to win.
100000 wins the battle.
I would think that 10,000 would be enough to win is one. How many cops in CT are willing to die to follow an order that they have moral qualms about? (Of course I hope it never comes to that.... we would basically drop to 3rd world country status overnight.)

the real issue is that if there ARE 100,000, they need to know that they are not alone and that they have 99,999 others behind them.

worst case scenario: I think if the IRS or DHS or some other illegitimate government organization picked just a few to make examples of, a lot of good people would roll over because it is not worth the risk to have that happen to them, especially their family.

streetglideok
02-23-2014, 09:25
They'll operate with the idea, divide and conquer. One at a time, sporadically to get the rest to roll over on their rights. Re-examine Ruby Ridge and Mt Carmel in Waco and what unfolded there. The feds ran a good smear campaign against Koresh. With Weaver, I don't think they were able to pull that off at the time of the stand off. IIRC, wasn't there a growing local presence where they were staging during the standoff, making the feds growingly uncomfortable? Both cases, the feds ultimate goal was to just kill them all off to cover up any mishandling IMO. One could speculate that the locals may have pushed the feds to negotiate and resolve the matter peacefully. Either way, it was a federal agent, a cop, that had no issue with killing an unarmed mother holding a baby, and his partner said he would have done the same.

<MADDOG>
02-23-2014, 10:30
I think some of your conclusions are pretty bold there street...

Back on point, I researched my own question: CT does have it's own "database" via the "Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection". However in my brief search, I did not find how long the state had been collecting data ( I seen 1993 mentioned somewhere).

Which leads me to another question: how much data does the CBI collect?

streetglideok
02-23-2014, 10:52
May be bold, but if it makes you dig deeper into the matter, so be it. Do some reading on those two events, and you'll see the lessons learned from their early attempts.

Jeffrey Lebowski
02-23-2014, 11:58
every single one that I know of has already said they will never follow those orders and will turn in their badge instead.


Most of them are lying to you.


I can tell you this. Of course many in LE will comply, many will comply begrudgingly. Many still will not. One emboldens the other. It is a personal matter, and every man will make his choice, and as more make the choice they know is right more will join. The snowball becomes the avalanche.

I'd expect most half-heartedly comply. If told to go door to door, how many are going to have the stomach to search when the owner says "I have nothing"?
There will be some who enthusiastically bust folks, and some who look the other way. I'd think almost all would rather do real policing, though.

UrbanWolf
02-23-2014, 11:59
I'd expect most half-heartedly comply. If told to go door to door, how many are going to have the stomach to search when the owner says "I have nothing"?
There will be some who enthusiastically bust folks, and some who look the other way. I'd think almost all would rather do real policing, though.

What if they were been threatened to lost their job?

BPTactical
02-23-2014, 12:02
What if they were been threatened to lost their job?

Some people have principals and integrity, some don't.

wctriumph
02-23-2014, 12:03
What if they were been threatened to lost their job?

You are either a cop (or soldier, etc.) or one of the little people. One is armed to the teeth with huge resources and the other is on his own. Move along, nothing to see here.


TEA

III

TFOGGER
02-23-2014, 12:16
I'm wondering how this will affect CT's compliance with federal Safe Transport laws. Will it be like NJ, where you risk your freedom even if you follow all the federal laws that are supposed to guarantee safe passage?

flogger
02-23-2014, 12:19
I think some of your conclusions are pretty bold there street...

Back on point, I researched my own question: CT does have it's own "database" via the "Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection". However in my brief search, I did not find how long the state had been collecting data ( I seen 1993 mentioned somewhere).

Which leads me to another question: how much data does the CBI collect?

Remember, those background checks are destroyed after approval or denial, right?

Irving
02-23-2014, 12:40
I'd expect most half-heartedly comply. If told to go door to door, how many are going to have the stomach to search when the owner says "I have nothing"?
There will be some who enthusiastically bust folks, and some who look the other way. I'd think almost all would rather do real policing, though.

Police hear "I've got nothing," and "It wasn't me," and "That's not mine," all day, every day so it isn't likely to make a difference.

Ah Pook
02-23-2014, 14:54
Let the legislators be on the front line to kick in doors and see if their tune changes.

Ranger353
02-23-2014, 17:02
So, the real question is after all this great discussion: What are are you going to do between now and November here in Colorado? Anyone of those people that voted in favor of those laws last year needs to be ousted from office, and you know who I am talking about too. Those pro-gun candidates need support, manpower, and money.

ChunkyMonkey
02-23-2014, 17:04
Few people have principle and integrity, most don't.

Fixed! [Coffee]

ChunkyMonkey
02-23-2014, 17:07
So, the real question is after all this great discussion: What are are you going to do between now and November here in Colorado? Anyone of those people that voted in favor of those laws last year needs to be ousted from office, and you know who I am talking about too. Those pro-gun candidates need support, manpower, and money.

Also for those who cannot contribute money or time, the least one can do is to convince one more voter to see your side and switch side. Isn't that how one double its number?

Jeffrey Lebowski
02-23-2014, 17:44
What if they were been threatened to lost their job?

"Hey, I looked. Found nothing. What do you want from me?"


Police hear "I've got nothing," and "It wasn't me," and "That's not mine," all day, every day so it isn't likely to make a difference.

But that's after they've already found something.

flogger
02-23-2014, 19:47
Why do they keep poking at the bear? That never ends well.

If this gets serious and people resist, someones gonna get hurt. A group of 100,000 felons are nothing to mess with, and thats just one State?

This is the stuff movies are made of.

hatidua
02-23-2014, 20:32
Why do they keep poking at the bear? That never ends well.

There's no pushback, and there won't be. Look at CA/IL/MA/NY gun laws (and increasingly CO laws), politicians pass whatever laws they want and the masses go along. There's a heap of "I won't comply" posts on gun forums across the country, but when push comes to shove, how many are going trade their comfy suburban existence for prison with nightly backdoor love sessions with 300# hairy cellmates?

Anyone that does resist will be labeled a domestic terrorist, shot (err, I mean, "the tear gas somehow ignited..."), and then we'll get back to Keeping up with the Kardashians or some other reality TV blather. The "LEO's won't enforce such laws" posts are truly laughable: which one of them is going to ditch their career/pension just to save some random citizen's gun collection? -ain't gonna happen.

If CO passed laws banning every single gun (all of them, not just AR's), and the powers that be came door to door to collect them, how many are going to (suicidally) resist a group like this:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/hatidua/REptQy2_zps8d675eeb.jpg

ben4372
02-23-2014, 20:45
Why is the DB in the Hummer drawing down on the guy with the camera? His momma should give him a talking to.

HoneyBadger
02-23-2014, 20:47
There's no pushback, and there won't be. Look at CA/IL/MA/NY gun laws (and increasingly CO laws), politicians pass whatever laws they want and the masses go along. There's a heap of "I won't comply" posts on gun forums across the country, but when push comes to shove, how many are going trade their comfy suburban existence for prison with nightly backdoor love sessions with 300# hairy cellmates?

Anyone that does resist will be labeled a domestic terrorist, shot (err, I mean, "the tear gas somehow ignited..."), and then we'll get back to Keeping up with the Kardashians or some other reality TV blather. The "LEO's won't enforce such laws" posts are truly laughable: which one of them is going to ditch their career/pension just to save some random citizen's gun collection? -ain't gonna happen.

If CO passed laws banning every single gun (all of them, not just AR's), and the powers that be came door to door to collect them, how many are going to (suicidally) resist a group like this:


So then what's the plan? Throw buckets of rainbows and unicorns at them until they go away?

bobbyfairbanks
02-23-2014, 20:51
That looks like heavy militarization of the police not a good thing. We have all as Americans have a duty to resist a tyrannical government. Law enforcement drawing down a citizen that is recording them is in my opinion tyrannical. This should never be allowed. I don't care what reasoning you try to give me. Those police disgust me.

kidicarus13
02-23-2014, 20:53
There's no pushback, and there won't be. Look at CA/IL/MA/NY gun laws (and increasingly CO laws), politicians pass whatever laws they want and the masses go along. There's a heap of "I won't comply" posts on gun forums across the country, but when push comes to shove, how many are going trade their comfy suburban existence for prison with nightly backdoor love sessions with 300# hairy cellmates?

Anyone that does resist will be labeled a domestic terrorist, shot (err, I mean, "the tear gas somehow ignited..."), and then we'll get back to Keeping up with the Kardashians or some other reality TV blather. The "LEO's won't enforce such laws" posts are truly laughable: which one of them is going to ditch their career/pension just to save some random citizen's gun collection? -ain't gonna happen.

If CO passed laws banning every single gun (all of them, not just AR's), and the powers that be came door to door to collect them, how many are going to (suicidally) resist a group like this:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/hatidua/REptQy2_zps8d675eeb.jpg

Agree...agree...agree...and agree.

flogger
02-23-2014, 21:02
Agree...agree...agree...and agree.

We could have mini war zones in our cities too and get on TV like the rest of the world!

People are fed up and when push comes to shove, well, that is civil unrest. Its happening all over!

How many of you reading this would end up a felon if it happened here? Would you comply and 'register'? I'm not sure I would.

bobbyfairbanks
02-23-2014, 21:07
Well I am not sure you would be a felon if a state passes a law that is violation of the us constitution.

merl
02-23-2014, 21:10
Why is the DB in the Hummer drawing down on the guy with the camera? His momma should give him a talking to.

Because publicity is bad. They would much rather that picture not exist. (what is it actually of BTW)
I can see why that guy got turret duty though, looks like a slow mover.

merl
02-23-2014, 21:13
Well I am not sure you would be a felon if a state passes a law that is violation of the us constitution.

hahahaha. You'll be a felon unless the SC actually hears the case and rules in the favor of the constitution. Meanwhile you get to mount your defense from jail with all your assets confiscated.

hatidua
02-23-2014, 21:23
Because publicity is bad. They would much rather that picture not exist. (what is it actually of BTW)

Boston, post-marathon.

streetglideok
02-23-2014, 22:54
There's no pushback, and there won't be. Look at CA/IL/MA/NY gun laws (and increasingly CO laws), politicians pass whatever laws they want and the masses go along. There's a heap of "I won't comply" posts on gun forums across the country, but when push comes to shove, how many are going trade their comfy suburban existence for prison with nightly backdoor love sessions with 300# hairy cellmates?

Anyone that does resist will be labeled a domestic terrorist, shot (err, I mean, "the tear gas somehow ignited..."), and then we'll get back to Keeping up with the Kardashians or some other reality TV blather. The "LEO's won't enforce such laws" posts are truly laughable: which one of them is going to ditch their career/pension just to save some random citizen's gun collection? -ain't gonna happen.

If CO passed laws banning every single gun (all of them, not just AR's), and the powers that be came door to door to collect them, how many are going to (suicidally) resist a group like this:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/hatidua/REptQy2_zps8d675eeb.jpg

You get the twinkie. The folks in the other states will just roll over and register. Keeping your job, and living in suburbia is more important than doing the right thing.

BPTactical
02-23-2014, 23:15
You get the twinkie. The folks in the other states will just roll over and register. Keeping your job, and living in suburbia is more important than doing the right thing.

Better to die on one's feet than live on your knees.

streetglideok
02-24-2014, 06:59
We all check out at some time. Only difference is how. On your feet, or on your knees... begging.

wctriumph
02-24-2014, 10:59
Well, how about setting up a phone tree if registration becomes law and we don't register. When one member is being harassed a call goes out, those that are true show up to defend their brother patriot and the war starts there. My family is with me, I'm in for the duration.

If push come to shove then I am willing to put it on the line for my beliefs when it becomes the last resort to stay free. Like Bert says, better to die standing up than live on my knees. I'm old and my knees don't bend so well.

Edit: Before we get there, we should all be doing our best to elect representatives that will honor their oaths of office so it does not come to that here.

TEA

III

TFOGGER
02-24-2014, 11:21
I may be mistaken, but a lot of us on here are old enough that we really don't fear the consequences of resisting tyranny. We would all prefer that it never come to that point, but if it does, I feel that we have a higher than average probability of taking action than the general public. This may or may not be a good thing for us.


I'm over 50 now (well over) and the Armed Forces say I'm too old to track down terrorists. You can't be older than 35 to join the military.They've got the whole thing backwards. Instead of sending 18-year-olds off to fight, they ought to take us old guys. You shouldn't be able to join until you're at least 35.
For starters:
Researchers say 18-year- olds think about sex every 10 seconds. Old guys only think about sex a couple of times a day, leaving us more than 28,000 additional seconds per day to concentrate on the enemy.
Young guys haven't lived long enough to be cranky, and a cranky soldier is a dangerous soldier. If we can't kill the enemy we'll complain them into submission.
"My back hurts!" "I'm hungry!"
"Where's the remote control?"
An 18-year-old hasn't had a legal beer yet and you shouldn't go to war until you're at least old enough to legally drink. An average old guy, on the other hand, has consumed 126,000 gallons of beer by the time he's 35 and a jaunt through the desert heat with a backpack and M-60 would do wonders for the old beer belly. An 18-year-old doesn't like to get up before 10 a.m.. Old guys get up early every morning to pee.
If old guys are captured we couldn't spill the beans because we'd probably forget where we put them. In fact, name, rank, and serial number would be a real brainteaser.
Boot camp would actually be easier for old guys. We're used to getting screamed and yelled at and we actually like soft food. We've also developed a deep appreciation for guns and rifles. We like them almost better than naps.
They could lighten up on the obstacle course however.. I've been in combat and I didn't see a single 20-foot wall with rope hanging over the side, nor did I ever do any pushups after completing basic training. I can hear the Drill Sergeant now, "Get down and give me...er...one."
And the running part is kind of a waste of energy. I've never seen anyone outrun a bullet.
An 18-year-old has the whole world ahead of him. He's still learning to shave, to actually carry on a conversation, and to wear pants without the top of his butt crack showing and his boxer shorts sticking out. He's still hasn't figured out that a pierced tongue catches food particles, and that a 400-watt speaker in the back seat of a Honda Accord can rupture an eardrum. All great reasons to keep our sons at home to learn a little more about life before sending them off to possible death..
Let us old guys track down those dirty rotten cowards who attacked our hearts on September 11. The last thing the enemy would want to see right now is a couple of million old goats with attitudes.

UrbanWolf
02-24-2014, 11:39
This is my CA/IL/MA/NY because the way they are. When it comes down to it, almost no one will resist, let it be LE, military, civilians.


There's no pushback, and there won't be. Look at CA/IL/MA/NY gun laws (and increasingly CO laws), politicians pass whatever laws they want and the masses go along. There's a heap of "I won't comply" posts on gun forums across the country, but when push comes to shove, how many are going trade their comfy suburban existence for prison with nightly backdoor love sessions with 300# hairy cellmates?

Anyone that does resist will be labeled a domestic terrorist, shot (err, I mean, "the tear gas somehow ignited..."), and then we'll get back to Keeping up with the Kardashians or some other reality TV blather. The "LEO's won't enforce such laws" posts are truly laughable: which one of them is going to ditch their career/pension just to save some random citizen's gun collection? -ain't gonna happen.

If CO passed laws banning every single gun (all of them, not just AR's), and the powers that be came door to door to collect them, how many are going to (suicidally) resist a group like this:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v355/hatidua/REptQy2_zps8d675eeb.jpg

ChuckNorris
02-24-2014, 13:05
We could have mini war zones in our cities too and get on TV like the rest of the world!

People are fed up and when push comes to shove, well, that is civil unrest. Its happening all over!

How many of you reading this would end up a felon if it happened here? Would you comply and 'register'? I'm not sure I would.


Oh I would comply - you betcha!
I predict a lot of boating accidents in Chatfield.
You'll be able to go fishing for Ruger Bluegill, S&W Trout!
That's what will happen to my stash!

ChunkyMonkey
02-24-2014, 13:27
Oh I would comply - you betcha!
I predict a lot of boating accidents in Chatfield.
You'll be able to go fishing for Ruger Bluegill, S&W Trout!
That's what will happen to my stash!

Too easy.. mine were all lost in the great colorado flood of 2013. They are probably out there under few feet of silt and mud.

HoneyBadger
02-24-2014, 13:46
Well, how about setting up a phone tree if registration becomes law and we don't register. When one member is being harassed a call goes out, those that are true show up to defend their brother patriot and the war starts there. My family is with me, I'm in for the duration.

If push come to shove then I am willing to put it on the line for my beliefs when it becomes the last resort to stay free. Like Bert says, better to die standing up than live on my knees. I'm old and my knees don't bend so well.
Edit: Before we get there, we should all be doing our best to elect representatives that will honor their oaths of office so it does not come to that here.


+100000




I may be mistaken, but a lot of us on here are old enough that we really don't fear the consequences of resisting tyranny. We would all prefer that it never come to that point, but if it does, I feel that we have a higher than average probability of taking action than the general public. This may or may not be a good thing for us.

That quote actually makes a lot of sense. I'm also going to blatently steal that.

Zundfolge
02-24-2014, 16:48
Based on the comments I've read on several news sites and blogs (calling for the outright murder of the judge and doctors in the case), I think the Justina Pelletier case is more likely to cause a violent response from the people of Connecticut than the gun registration/confiscation fiasco.

Alpha2
02-24-2014, 19:55
"Based on the comments I've read on several news sites and blogs (calling for the outright murder of the judge and doctors in the case), I think the Justina Pelletier case is more likely to cause a violent response from the people of Connecticut than the gun registration/confiscation fiasco."

As well it should. That is a travesty of the first order.

BTW, when your background check goes in to the CBI, they get "long gun, handgun, or basically other", Full auto, semi-auto, revolver, pistol, not in the report. They only get more info if there is a criminal investigation, or the FFL goes out of business, and all the bound books go to the BATFE. The firearm serial number is on the 4473, but it doesn't go to the CBI, or BATFE until the aforementioned situation.

Mtn.man
02-24-2014, 20:10
What is this gun registration you speak of?

Irving
02-24-2014, 21:00
Based on the comments I've read on several news sites and blogs (calling for the outright murder of the judge and doctors in the case), I think the Justina Pelletier case is more likely to cause a violent response from the people of Connecticut than the gun registration/confiscation fiasco.

I had to look this up. I wish I hadn't.

HoneyBadger
02-24-2014, 21:03
I had to look this up. I wish I hadn't.
...resisting the urge to look it up...

[shithitsfan]

Irving
02-24-2014, 21:07
...resisting the urge to look it up...

[shithitsfan]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11/20/its-kidnapping-hospital-takes-custody-of-teen-because-her-parents-were-too-active-in-pursuing-her-care/

ChunkyMonkey
02-24-2014, 21:08
...resisting the urge to look it up...

[shithitsfan]

You should since you have a child.

HoneyBadger
02-24-2014, 21:12
Oh wow. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I don't want to live on this planet any more...

streetglideok
02-24-2014, 21:30
Well, how about setting up a phone tree if registration becomes law and we don't register. When one member is being harassed a call goes out, those that are true show up to defend their brother patriot and the war starts there. My family is with me, I'm in for the duration.

If push come to shove then I am willing to put it on the line for my beliefs when it becomes the last resort to stay free. Like Bert says, better to die standing up than live on my knees. I'm old and my knees don't bend so well.

Edit: Before we get there, we should all be doing our best to elect representatives that will honor their oaths of office so it does not come to that here.

TEA

III
Few listen to me or at least pay attention to what I say, but I've hinted at something similar last year. If they shut off your phones, if you have radio, you can still get the word out. They can bully one person, but a large group of people show up, the law will be put into an uncomfortable position.

flogger
02-24-2014, 22:00
Few listen to me or at least pay attention to what I say, but I've hinted at something similar last year. If they shut off your phones, if you have radio, you can still get the word out. They can bully one person, but a large group of people show up, the law will be put into an uncomfortable position.

Yes, that's what will happen. Do not cower, do not give up.

kidicarus13
02-24-2014, 22:23
Oh I would comply - you betcha!
I predict a lot of boating accidents in Chatfield.
That's what will happen to my stash!

And then what? Get incarcerated for being in possession of a firearm after laws get put into place to ban them because you didn't take a stand when it counted?!

I get tired of everyone talking about boating accidents and then out of the other side of their mouth... MOLON LABE. Please.

<MADDOG>
02-24-2014, 22:45
BTW, when your background check goes in to the CBI, they get "long gun, handgun, or basically other", Full auto, semi-auto, revolver, pistol, not in the report. They only get more info if there is a criminal investigation, or the FFL goes out of business, and all the bound books go to the BATFE. The firearm serial number is on the 4473, but it doesn't go to the CBI, or BATFE until the aforementioned situation.

Thank you Alpha. Based on what you stated, there is indeed a database.


If push come to shove then I am willing to put it on the line for my beliefs when it becomes the last resort to stay free. Like Bert says, better to die standing up than live on my knees. I'm old and my knees don't bend so well.
Edit: Before we get there, we should all be doing our best to elect representatives that will honor their oaths of office so it does not come to that here.

&


I may be mistaken, but a lot of us on here are old enough that we really don't fear the consequences of resisting tyranny. We would all prefer that it never come to that point, but if it does, I feel that we have a higher than average probability of taking action than the general public. This may or may not be a good thing for us.

+1.

I am not that old yet (my knees are 50% [LOL]), but IF it came down to it, I see BP's, WC's an TF's quotes being very applicable.

We'll see if CT goes door to door; and what happens if they do.


I get tired of everyone talking about boating accidents and then out of the other side of their mouth... MOLON LABE. Please.

I think in a broad sense, you are right Kid. But again, we'll see what happens in CT...

stevelkinevil
02-24-2014, 22:45
And then what? Get incarcerated for being in possession of a firearm after laws get put into place to ban them because you didn't take a stand when it counted?!

I get tired of everyone talking about boating accidents and then out of the other side of their mouth... MOLON LABE. Please.

AMEN, if at that point you have a "boating accident" for what reason are you "saving" said arms?

Clint45
02-25-2014, 00:38
AMEN, if at that point you have a "boating accident" for what reason are you "saving" said arms?

The problem with alleged "boating accidents" is that in some states it is a crime not to immediately report the loss/disposal of a registered firearm. If anyone comes around asking to inspect your collection and you cannot account for a registered firearm that's automatic jail time.

Great-Kazoo
02-25-2014, 08:24
The problem with alleged "boating accidents" is that in some states it is a crime not to immediately report the loss/disposal of a registered firearm. If anyone comes around asking to inspect your collection and you cannot account for a registered firearm that's automatic jail time.

WE DO NOT HAVE REGISTRATION IN CO. GET WITH IT! That is a dead horse that's been beaten more times than NYNCO.

FWIW: IF you think people in states where there is gun registration, have all their guns registered, think again.

merl
02-25-2014, 08:56
WE DO NOT HAVE REGISTRATION IN CO. GET WITH IT! That is a dead horse that's been beaten more times than NYNCO.

FWIW: IF you think people in states where there is gun registration, have all their guns registered, think again.

Breathe :)
We might have if Morse's "responsibility" bill had passed and the thread title does mention CT.

But you are correct, CO does not currently have registration requirement. Since we just lost FTF transfers even the 4473 "registry" is of marginal use here, quicker and more reliable to ask any of a dozen marketing companies if a person owns guns.

Great-Kazoo
02-25-2014, 09:06
Few listen to me or at least pay attention to what I say, but I've hinted at something similar last year. If they shut off your phones, if you have radio, you can still get the word out. They can bully one person, but a large group of people show up, the law will be put into an uncomfortable position.

We have a network in this area. There's a few gun owners on the block, neighborhood etc. IF, saying IF something like that were to happen here, it' be all over the NoCo area and possibly the state very fast.
One more reason to own a hand held or mobile /ham radio. Even a CB radio is heads above cell phones, in emergency situations.
For more info visit this forum.
https://www.ar-15.co/forums/144-Survival-amp-Preparedness

flogger
02-25-2014, 09:07
Even if 'They' know what firearms you have purchased, there are still quite a few grey guns out there.

Sharpienads
02-25-2014, 09:29
Even if 'They' know what firearms you have purchased, there are still quite a few grey guns out there.

You mean ghost guns? With 30 caliber clip magazines? Scary thought....

Mtn.man
02-25-2014, 09:42
https://scontent-b-sjc.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/p320x320/1797513_10152311495925432_1603461930_n.jpg

Zundfolge
02-25-2014, 10:01
Oh wow. I don't want to live on this planet any more...

I still want to live on this planet, but there's a LOT of people I'd like to remove from it first.

streetglideok
02-25-2014, 13:29
We have a network in this area. There's a few gun owners on the block, neighborhood etc. IF, saying IF something like that were to happen here, it' be all over the NoCo area and possibly the state very fast.
One more reason to own a hand held or mobile /ham radio. Even a CB radio is heads above cell phones, in emergency situations.
For more info visit this forum.
https://www.ar-15.co/forums/144-Survival-amp-Preparedness

I've had m license since 2011 actually. as well as my wife. I need to add an HF rig to my list however.

Oh btw, off topic, but I have a pic of an ice sculpture of your avatar

HoneyBadger
02-26-2014, 08:16
http://americanlibertyriders.ning.com/m/discussion?id=3899508%3ATopic%3A551747
Connecticut sends out the first confiscation letters

Whistler
02-26-2014, 10:18
Wow that is a scary looking... female?

BPTactical
02-26-2014, 10:22
Wow that is a scary looking... female?

Facsimile of....

What gets me about the article is how do they know who has "large capacity magazines"? Did you have to provide ID for a magazine purchase?

Zundfolge
02-26-2014, 10:27
What gets me about the article is how do they know who has "large capacity magazines"? Did you have to provide ID for a magazine purchase?

The new law requires registration of full capacity magazines, the people that are getting letters are the ones who's registrations came in after the deadline.

merl
02-26-2014, 10:38
The new law requires registration of full capacity magazines, the people that are getting letters are the ones who's registrations came in after the deadline.

Yep, take that as a second warning. If you are going to comply with a registration requirement make sure you comply with it exactly.

Zundfolge
02-26-2014, 10:39
Yep, take that as a second warning. If you are going to comply with a registration requirement make sure you comply with it exactly.

And don't believe any offer of "amnesty" or "grace period".

merl
02-26-2014, 10:40
And don't believe any offer of "amnesty" or "grace period".
Unless written in law. that is the first warning I was thinking of.

Zundfolge
02-26-2014, 10:48
Unless written in law. that is the first warning I was thinking of.

Even then, once you're in a registry you're in a registry and its only a matter of time before the powers that be change their mind about what you're allowed to own and then you get a letter.

Mtn.man
02-26-2014, 10:55
Better get ready.

https://scontent-a-sea.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1/p75x225/1904174_241426506039305_228583317_n.jpg

merl
02-26-2014, 11:03
Even then, once you're in a registry you're in a registry and its only a matter of time before the powers that be change their mind about what you're allowed to own and then you get a letter.

That is why I said If you comply, whole other can of worms there. Worst case is choosing to comply and doing it incorrectly effectively notifying the state of your non-compliance.

crays
02-26-2014, 11:18
Wow that is a scary looking... female?
Wait...What's she doing in Connecticut? Didn't she used to be Bob Newhart's receptionist in Minnesota?[facepalm]

HoneyBadger
02-26-2014, 12:14
Wow that is a scary looking... female?

That is EXACTLY what I said to Mrs HoneyBadger when I showed her the picture.


What gets me about the article is how do they know who has "large capacity magazines"? Did you have to provide ID for a magazine purchase?
In CT, you do have to show ID to buy ammo, and possibly magazines. I have a friend there I can confirm this with. He is moving to Colorado next week to GTFO of CT.

Zundfolge
02-26-2014, 12:19
I have a friend there I can confirm this with. He is moving to Colorado next week to GTFO of CT.
Does he know what the situation is here? :p

HoneyBadger
02-26-2014, 12:23
Does he know what the situation is here? :p

lol Yes. He was job hunting and in his career field there were oppourtunities here, Oregon, California, and Nebraska. He picked Colorado. He is well aware of our situation, but he is fully ready to vote for constitutional principles as soon as he has an address here and can register to vote.

Irving
02-26-2014, 13:51
Really hard to take that article seriously.

roberth
02-26-2014, 18:34
Better get ready.

https://scontent-a-sea.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/t1/p75x225/1904174_241426506039305_228583317_n.jpg

It should say

For when shit hits the can.

lowbeyond
02-26-2014, 22:55
Curious how many of the LEO's are chomping at the bit.........

no not really.

I have been assured that they would never ever ever do that. LEO are strong supporter of the 2nd A. They would quit. If you dont believe that.. well looks like you are a cop hater

HoneyBadger
02-26-2014, 22:58
They would quit. If you dont believe that.. well looks like you are a cop hater
LOL


[facepalm]

lowbeyond
02-26-2014, 23:02
So then what's the plan? Throw buckets of rainbows and unicorns at them until they go away?

Your cop hater sarcasm is getting tiresome

Here is what you do. If a cop comes to confiscate your guns. Well its pretty clear there is a LAW that allows them to do so. So you MUST just hand them over, else you are a criminal and NOT a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN.

If you refuse well you are a douche and just giving the rest of us law abiding citizens a bad name you god damn fukking CRIMINAL.

You see they, the cops have no choice. Law is the Law.

So hand them over. That is the LAW. Then of course you should totally send as many sternly worded letters as you hvae stamps for. Petion the courts. If they ignore you - keep wrinting letters. Keep filing suits.

If you find yourself in the proverbial boxcar, well law is the law, you - obviously belong there as you would not be there if you did not break the law you damn criminal.

So keep writing those letters, after all just trough that door is a hot meal and a shower. And never ever ever question the cops that would confiscate guns. They are just like you and me trying to put food on the table - plus they keep the rest of us safe from your law breaking criminal ways.

Gezzus this site has turned into an anti-LEO site full of cop haters

Hope you all never need one.

hghclsswhitetrsh
02-26-2014, 23:07
An unconstitutional law is not actually a law is it? Am I a cop hater now?

Colorado_Outback
02-26-2014, 23:12
The man said the law is the LAW!

Move along now.

bobbyfairbanks
02-26-2014, 23:37
An unconstitutional law is not actually a law is it? Am I a cop hater now?

You totally must be. The constitution be dammed, cops will and can do anything and it is ok as long as it is a law.

WETWRKS
02-26-2014, 23:50
Your cop hater sarcasm is getting tiresome

Here is what you do. If a cop comes to confiscate your guns. Well its pretty clear there is a LAW that allows them to do so. So you MUST just hand them over, else you are a criminal and NOT a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN.

If you refuse well you are a douche and just giving the rest of us law abiding citizens a bad name you god damn fukking CRIMINAL.

You see they, the cops have no choice. Law is the Law.

So hand them over. That is the LAW. Then of course you should totally send as many sternly worded letters as you hvae stamps for. Petion the courts. If they ignore you - keep wrinting letters. Keep filing suits.

If you find yourself in the proverbial boxcar, well law is the law, you - obviously belong there as you would not be there if you did not break the law you damn criminal.

So keep writing those letters, after all just trough that door is a hot meal and a shower. And never ever ever question the cops that would confiscate guns. They are just like you and me trying to put food on the table - plus they keep the rest of us safe from your law breaking criminal ways.

Gezzus this site has turned into an anti-LEO site full of cop haters

Hope you all never need one.

Just because something is law doesn't make it right nor does it make right the individuals who enforce that law. If you asked the british monarchy all our founding fathers were criminals for resisting the law and remember that the nazi party was all just following the laws and the orders of their superiors. It still doesn't make it right and people must resist these laws that go against the constitution. The constitution is there to restrict laws that would give the government too much power over the lives of the citizens.

Irving
02-26-2014, 23:56
How long does lowbeyond have to be a member here before you guys realize he is messing with you in every thread like this?

<MADDOG>
02-27-2014, 00:09
Lowbeyond, to echo what those before me have stated; (and in case you haven't noticed) some of the members here believe some/most LE will have no qualms enforcing bad (ie: unconstitutional) laws. And I don't believe your statement helped any [LOL].

Does that make that LE's will hold the meaning of "uphold the Constitution of the US" true? Hell, I dunno. Factually; nothing has been stated to the contrary (to my knowledge), with the exception of certain lawsuits by Sheriffs and public forums. But, nothing has proven otherwise either...

My opinion only. I, and many others, are waiting to see what happens in CT.

EDIT: I don't believe Low is f'n with peoples' emotions on this one...(sorry Irv)

Irving
02-27-2014, 00:27
Come to your own conclusions I suppose. https://www.ar-15.co/search.php?searchid=1887765

My personal favorite was when he pointed out that if police can't get the permission of a judge to search your stuff, they can just ask a dog.

<MADDOG>
02-27-2014, 00:32
Bad link Irv [Beer]

davsel
02-27-2014, 00:33
^^ Link no work

Whistler
02-27-2014, 00:44
Agree with Irving, he's gaming, doesn't smell right.

Irving
02-27-2014, 00:46
Hmm, works for me. Just a link to his recent posts. One of which, this month, is when he gets called out by another as being a cop hater and Maddog gets in the middle (briefly). :p

I was trying to prevent this thread from getting derailed, and just ended up derailing it further. [facepalm] [gohome]

GilpinGuy
02-27-2014, 00:49
Link no good for me either. Weird.

vBulletin Message Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms.

<MADDOG>
02-27-2014, 00:56
One of which, this month, is when he gets called out by another as being a cop hater and Maddog gets in the middle (briefly). :p

If that's the case; my sarcasm meter is broken, and my due apologies!

However, the context of my message, in regards to LE enforcement, in #120 still stands...

Irving
02-27-2014, 00:58
Of course your context still stands. Here is the other thread I mentioned by the way.

https://www.ar-15.co/threads/125469-Oversight-board-faults-LAPD-s-Dorner-deployment

<MADDOG>
02-27-2014, 01:15
Thank you Irving! That link worked, and now I see...

wctriumph
02-27-2014, 02:08
Your cop hater sarcasm is getting tiresome

Here is what you do. If a cop comes to confiscate your guns. Well its pretty clear there is a LAW that allows them to do so. So you MUST just hand them over, else you are a criminal and NOT a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN.

If you refuse well you are a douche and just giving the rest of us law abiding citizens a bad name you god damn fukking CRIMINAL.

You see they, the cops have no choice. Law is the Law.

So hand them over. That is the LAW. Then of course you should totally send as many sternly worded letters as you hvae stamps for. Petion the courts. If they ignore you - keep wrinting letters. Keep filing suits.

If you find yourself in the proverbial boxcar, well law is the law, you - obviously belong there as you would not be there if you did not break the law you damn criminal.

So keep writing those letters, after all just trough that door is a hot meal and a shower. And never ever ever question the cops that would confiscate guns. They are just like you and me trying to put food on the table - plus they keep the rest of us safe from your law breaking criminal ways.

Gezzus this site has turned into an anti-LEO site full of cop haters

Hope you all never need one.

I guess we know who the gov' agent is among us is.
[Coffee]

TEA

III

tawm
02-27-2014, 07:53
41433

ahem.

So much for the "Constitution State".

hatidua
02-27-2014, 08:13
41433

ahem.

So much for the "Constitution State".

I highly suspect that CT officials were absolutely thrilled with those that got their paperwork in a day or two late. Those that were late with their paperwork facilitate the stated goal of "having less of these weapons in circulation".

For those that registered magazines, does the state dremel-tool a serial number on each one?

bobbyfairbanks
02-27-2014, 08:16
How does anyone think it is ok for the government to seize any kind of legally purchased property. That is theft plain and simple.

HoneyBadger
02-27-2014, 09:13
Your cop hater sarcasm is getting tiresome

Here is what you do. If a cop comes to confiscate your guns. Well its pretty clear there is a LAW that allows them to do so. So you MUST just hand them over, else you are a criminal and NOT a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN.

If you refuse well you are a douche and just giving the rest of us law abiding citizens a bad name you god damn fukking CRIMINAL.

You see they, the cops have no choice. Law is the Law.

So hand them over. That is the LAW. Then of course you should totally send as many sternly worded letters as you hvae stamps for. Petion the courts. If they ignore you - keep wrinting letters. Keep filing suits.

If you find yourself in the proverbial boxcar, well law is the law, you - obviously belong there as you would not be there if you did not break the law you damn criminal.

So keep writing those letters, after all just trough that door is a hot meal and a shower. And never ever ever question the cops that would confiscate guns. They are just like you and me trying to put food on the table - plus they keep the rest of us safe from your law breaking criminal ways.

Gezzus this site has turned into an anti-LEO site full of cop haters

Hope you all never need one.

Wait... now you're calling ME a cop hater? [LOL] [LOL] [LOL] [LOL]\

Attention everyone:
If you stand up to defend the Constitution of The United States of America, YOU HATE COPS!

JMBD2112
02-27-2014, 09:20
in before the lock

HoneyBadger
02-27-2014, 09:43
in before the lock

just bend over and let it happen. [sheepshagger]

brokenscout
02-27-2014, 10:01
That's one thing I thought about
How does anyone think it is ok for the government to seize any kind of legally purchased property. That is theft plain and simple.

brokenscout
02-27-2014, 10:04
Hope this is a joke, Our founding fathers were criminals/terrorist's according to this
Your cop hater sarcasm is getting tiresome

Here is what you do. If a cop comes to confiscate your guns. Well its pretty clear there is a LAW that allows them to do so. So you MUST just hand them over, else you are a criminal and NOT a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN.

If you refuse well you are a douche and just giving the rest of us law abiding citizens a bad name you god damn fukking CRIMINAL.

You see they, the cops have no choice. Law is the Law.

So hand them over. That is the LAW. Then of course you should totally send as many sternly worded letters as you hvae stamps for. Petion the courts. If they ignore you - keep wrinting letters. Keep filing suits.

If you find yourself in the proverbial boxcar, well law is the law, you - obviously belong there as you would not be there if you did not break the law you damn criminal.

So keep writing those letters, after all just trough that door is a hot meal and a shower. And never ever ever question the cops that would confiscate guns. They are just like you and me trying to put food on the table - plus they keep the rest of us safe from your law breaking criminal ways.

Gezzus this site has turned into an anti-LEO site full of cop haters

Hope you all never need one.

ANADRILL
02-27-2014, 10:41
Is Lowbeyond the new NYNCO?

Teufelhund
02-27-2014, 10:57
Irving's got it. Every time there is a cop-related incident thread here, there is one particular member who jumps Lowbeyond's shit, sometimes before he even posts, about being a cop hater. Lowbeyond's post above was sarcasm.

Now, back to the topic before this one gets locked for something stupid.

Whistler
02-27-2014, 11:12
Now, back to the topic before this one gets locked for something stupid.

Awww, I made this shiny new tinfoil hat for nothing... party pooper.

RblDiver
02-27-2014, 11:44
How does anyone think it is ok for the government to seize any kind of legally purchased property. That is theft plain and simple.

Perhaps eminent domain? They'll claim it's a public good that they can use the guns to build a throne for Teh Wun, Game of Thrones style?

streetglideok
02-27-2014, 12:08
I wouldn't call anyone a cop hater because they are against cops that violate the constitution. Those kind are no longer cops, but are traitors, and enemies of the people.

wctriumph
02-27-2014, 12:16
I wouldn't call anyone a cop hater because they are against cops that violate the constitution. Those kind are no longer cops, but are traitors, and enemies of the people.

Here, here I say.


TEA

III

Redcon1
02-27-2014, 12:27
here is a link to the bill http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/act/pa/2013PA-00220-R00SB-01094-PA.htm i read it and there is a lot of weird stuff in there.

Robb
02-27-2014, 12:57
I have to applaud you for reading the whole damn thing.

HoneyBadger
02-27-2014, 14:03
I wouldn't call anyone a cop hater because they are against cops that violate the constitution. Those kind are no longer cops, but are traitors, and enemies of the people.

DING DING DING! WINNER!!!!!
[Bow]

KAPA
02-27-2014, 16:01
So when will they be coming after these felons? I hope if it happens someone slaps on some Go Pro cameras. Will be interesting to see if they send the lady in the photo holding up that AR and the old man in the background.

merl
02-27-2014, 16:07
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-ed-gun-registration-20140214,0,4908372.story


Guns defined in state law as assault weapons can no longer be bought or sold in Connecticut. Such guns already held can be legally possessed if registered. But owning an unregistered assault weapon is a Class D felony. Felonies cannot go unenforced.
<snip>
But the bottom line is that the state must try to enforce the law. Authorities should use the background check database as a way to find assault weapon purchasers who might not have registered those guns in compliance with the new law.

Squeeze
02-27-2014, 18:03
If you truly believe LE won't follow orders to confiscate and use any force they deem necessary to do so...

http://gunssavelives.net/blog/you-have-to-hear-what-this-connecticut-police-lieutenant-told-a-caller-about-gun-confiscation/#

blacklabel
02-27-2014, 18:32
If you truly believe LE won't follow orders to confiscate and use any force they deem necessary to do so...

http://gunssavelives.net/blog/you-have-to-hear-what-this-connecticut-police-lieutenant-told-a-caller-about-gun-confiscation/#

I'd love to see that authenticated.

Squeeze
02-27-2014, 18:50
I'd love to see that authenticated.

Me too. If this is the case, Connecticut could have a bloodbath on their hands in the future.

streetglideok
02-27-2014, 20:04
I can't say it enough. If they go and confiscate guns and the gun owners merely role over and let them have them, this will not go well for us. It will set a precedent for things to come here. If the patriots stand their ground, and it becomes a real scene, this will become politically volatile. It'll either go one extreme, or the other. All would depend on who screams the loudest, the "its for the children!" crowd, or the "Give me Liberty or give me death!" crowd.

Irving
02-27-2014, 20:37
I think that the officer that took the call handled the call pretty well until he called her unAmerican. I thought she was stupid. I've taken calls like that before, where people go on amazing high level rants based on a piece of incorrect low level information. I don't know what she expected by calling a guy at a desk and trying to have that conversation. I don't put a lot of weight (almost zero) on anything he said actually. Anyone who has taken a phone call like that before, where it is clear you are speaking with a retard, it doesn't even matter what you say to them. He could have told her everything she wanted to hear and she would have called him a liar.

nathan0259
02-27-2014, 22:21
She called him up looking for a fight. She has every right to be pissed off but there is no need to be the antagonist. If they come to your house handle it how you see fit.

bryjcom
02-28-2014, 00:10
That women sounds like a guy trying to sound like a woman.

GunsRBadMMMMKay
02-28-2014, 02:21
If they can use the background check system to look for those who haven't "registered", then in fact there is already a registry............since the "background check" system recorded who bought what kind of what and when they bought it. This is just another gun grab, as we've already seen play out.....say in Kommiefornia. And I don't even own a tinfoil hat (yet).

(I'm guilty of skipping a few pages and just browsing the latest replies....I realize others have already pointed this out - LOL)

GilpinGuy
02-28-2014, 04:30
While I certainly do not want it to happen, I do wonder what the backlash would be if (when?) someone gets shot during a confiscation - be it the LEO or the gun owner who gets shot. It'll be interesting to see how people react. Reminds me of "Enemies, Foreign and Domestic".

HoneyBadger
02-28-2014, 08:45
41459

Robb
02-28-2014, 08:54
I wouldn't call anyone a cop hater because they are against cops that violate the constitution. Those kind are no longer cops, but are traitors, and enemies of the people.

and along those lines here's an article I ran across this morning, nothing new but it may ad clarity to those who just can't see it yet:

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/vigilantes-with-a-badge-the-war-against-the-american-people_022014

HoneyBadger
02-28-2014, 09:25
and along those lines here's an article I ran across this morning, nothing new but it may ad clarity to those who just can't see it yet:

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/vigilantes-with-a-badge-the-war-against-the-american-people_022014
Some really sweet comments there:

We must take [LEOs] out while they are off duty

cops think their super citizens above the law... TIME TO GIVE THEM A BEAT DOWN!!!!

They all live somewhere. Their cars and homes all burn and their bodies react the same way to high powered rounds.




Just.... wow. I'm really glad that our forum is better than that.

Whistler
02-28-2014, 09:37
Just goes to show many folks have a propensity toward violence, uniformed or not but yeah most of those comments (ravings) lack any semblance to rational thought. What the hell is wrong with people advocating targeting children and burning houses? Crazy, sick and twisted!

HoneyBadger
02-28-2014, 09:40
Just goes to show many folks have a propensity toward violence, uniformed or not but yeah most of those comments (ravings) lack any semblance to rational thought. What the hell is wrong with people advocating targeting children and burning houses? Crazy, sick and twisted!
Absolutely sick and twisted. Some people are out looking for a fight. Maybe the internet just brings that out in people? [Dunno]

Either way, if that time ever comes, I don't think internet threats will be an effective way of communicating our position.

RblDiver
02-28-2014, 12:44
Either way, if that time ever comes, I don't think internet threats will be an effective way of communicating our position.

You kidding? When that time comes, I shall pull out such snark that they will have no option BUT to bow to my superior wit! WIT I SAY!

BPTactical
02-28-2014, 13:14
While the comments are a bit out there and should remain unspoken, I feel a whole lot of citizens feel the same sentiment.
What do you think the LEO'S reading them think? If it is not "oh shit" or "maybe we need to rethink this" then they aren't getting it.

As far as HB's comment on sick and twisted people remember, the elected officials actions and statements have brought forth this reaction from their constituents.

UrbanWolf
02-28-2014, 13:47
Your cop hater sarcasm is getting tiresome

Here is what you do. If a cop comes to confiscate your guns. Well its pretty clear there is a LAW that allows them to do so. So you MUST just hand them over, else you are a criminal and NOT a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN.

If you refuse well you are a douche and just giving the rest of us law abiding citizens a bad name you god damn fukking CRIMINAL.

You see they, the cops have no choice. Law is the Law.

So hand them over. That is the LAW. Then of course you should totally send as many sternly worded letters as you hvae stamps for. Petion the courts. If they ignore you - keep wrinting letters. Keep filing suits.

If you find yourself in the proverbial boxcar, well law is the law, you - obviously belong there as you would not be there if you did not break the law you damn criminal.

So keep writing those letters, after all just trough that door is a hot meal and a shower. And never ever ever question the cops that would confiscate guns. They are just like you and me trying to put food on the table - plus they keep the rest of us safe from your law breaking criminal ways.

Gezzus this site has turned into an anti-LEO site full of cop haters

Hope you all never need one.

http://gameswalls.com/wallpapers/c/command-and-conquer-red-alert-2/hammer-and-sickle-1.jpg

UrbanWolf
02-28-2014, 13:53
Is Lowbeyond the new NYNCO?

More like that Drumer guy.

Kraven251
02-28-2014, 14:50
This will get fugly, really damned fast.

DavieD55
02-28-2014, 18:22
While the comments are a bit out there and should remain unspoken, I feel a whole lot of citizens feel the same sentiment.
What do you think the LEO'S reading them think? If it is not "oh shit" or "maybe we need to rethink this" then they aren't getting it.

As far as HB's comment on sick and twisted people remember, the elected officials actions and statements have brought forth this reaction from their constituents.

Which is the exact reaction the morses and bloombergs of the world are counting on to use as fuel to further clamp down on their oposition. Either way they have an agenda to push and they will keep pushing people regardless, that is how progressive commies operate.

10mm-man
02-28-2014, 20:00
While the comments are a bit out there and should remain unspoken, I feel a whole lot of citizens feel the same sentiment.
What do you think the LEO'S reading them think? If it is not "oh shit" or "maybe we need to rethink this" then they aren't getting it.

As far as HB's comment on sick and twisted people remember, the elected officials actions and statements have brought forth this reaction from their constituents.


I would have to agree! Wait until they start going door to door; then you'll see some sick, and twisted stuff..........

Squeeze
02-28-2014, 20:06
lowbeyond...lot's of fail there.

Meanwhile...

http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i445/TangoDownPro/EatingPopcorn_zpsa7b00364.gif (http://s1094.photobucket.com/user/TangoDownPro/media/EatingPopcorn_zpsa7b00364.gif.html)

68Charger
02-28-2014, 20:35
I was just thinking on this subject... I hope common sense prevails on both sides.

Just food for thought, the population of CT is 3.7M as of 2013. (currently in decline, I wonder why)
3% of 3.7M is 111,000 people, not a huge difference from the 100,000 the CT authorities are throwing around.

Which I thought was significant, since 3% (or III%) of the population was all that actively took up arms against the British during the revolution.

I'm beginning to think that they're one "unifying event" away from martial law...

Limited GM
02-28-2014, 21:18
^^^ it's my understanding that election s aren't held during times of martial law. Right?

streetglideok
02-28-2014, 21:39
^^^ it's my understanding that election s aren't held during times of martial law. Right?

Among other things. King Obama needs a plan for 2016.

HoneyBadger
02-28-2014, 22:28
"Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal" -Martin Luther King Jr.

streetglideok
02-28-2014, 23:05
"Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal" -Martin Luther King Jr.

Amen to that. Mark Twain one wrote, history doesn't always repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme a lot.(something like that)

UrbanWolf
02-28-2014, 23:07
Amen to that. Mark Twain one wrote, history doesn't always repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme a lot.(something like that)

“History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme.”

mikedubs
03-01-2014, 09:35
http://gameswalls.com/wallpapers/c/command-and-conquer-red-alert-2/hammer-and-sickle-1.jpg

...Conscript reporting...

How very fitting that this pic was posted...thx UrbanWolf

UrbanWolf
03-01-2014, 15:21
...Conscript reporting...

How very fitting that this pic was posted...thx UrbanWolf

"We will bury them!!!"

Ronin13
03-01-2014, 16:07
UPDATE: A spokesperson with the Special Licensing and Firearms Unit of the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection told TheBlaze that a letter has been drafted to send to gun owners who are found to be in possession of unregistered semi-automatic rifles deemed illegal by the state’s new gun control law. However, “not a one” letter has been sent out so far.The spokesperson, who didn’t want to identify herself, refused to comment on the content of the draft letter. When we asked what other action the state plans to take against owners of unregistered so-called “assault rifles, the spokesperson said we should contact the governor’s office because that’s where they get their orders from.
It’s not clear if the letter published by the Capitalism Institute is authentic, though we can confirm a draft letter does exist.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/26/is-gun-confiscation-on-the-way-in-connecticut-see-the-notices-the-state-is-reportedly-sending-to-owners-of-illegal-firearms/
Correction, that letter has not been vetted as being the actual letter, although one has been drafted, it has not been sent out. Any friends/family in CT, now would be the time to get the hell out!

<MADDOG>
03-03-2014, 18:17
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMQoJAuKrik

buffalobo
03-03-2014, 19:02
^^^^^Now if 10 million more citizens make the same stand.

Lobbed from my electronic ball and chain

brutal
03-03-2014, 19:16
New development.

"Home Addresses of CT Legislators Who Voted in Favor of Gun Registration Posted By Patriot Activist"

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/2nd-amendment-2/retaliation-home-addresses-ct-legislators-voted-favor-gun-registration-posted-patriot-activist/

<MADDOG>
03-03-2014, 19:30
New development.

"Home Addresses of CT Legislators Who Voted in Favor of Gun Registration Posted By Patriot Activist"

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/2nd-amendment-2/retaliation-home-addresses-ct-legislators-voted-favor-gun-registration-posted-patriot-activist/

Ooooo....

And just to help the SEO, I'll quote it! :D

ChunkyMonkey
03-03-2014, 19:52
New development.

"Home Addresses of CT Legislators Who Voted in Favor of Gun Registration Posted By Patriot Activist"

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/2nd-amendment-2/retaliation-home-addresses-ct-legislators-voted-favor-gun-registration-posted-patriot-activist/

Damn.. how many of reps do they have?


CT State Senators voting Yes on “An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety, also known as Public Law 13-3 or Connecticut Senate Bill No. 1160,” 3 April 2013. List includes home addresses. Photos and home phone numbers of these tyrants are available here: http://www.cbia.comJohn W. Fonfara, 99 Montowese St., Hartford 06114-2841
Eric D. Coleman, 77 Wintonbury Ave., Bloomfield 06002-2529
Andrea Stillman, 5 Coolidge Ct., Waterford 06385-3309
Gary LeBeau, 501 Canyon Ridge Dr., Broad Brook 06016-5602
Kevin Kelly, 240 York St., Stratford 06615-7952
Steve Cassano, 1109 Middle Tpke, E Manchester 06040-3703
Anthony J. Musto, 15 Maymont Ln., Trumbull 06611-2111
Beth Bye, 99 Outlook Ave., West Hartford 06119-1432
Andres Ayala, PO Box 55106, Bridgeport 06610-5106
Terry B. Gerratana, 674 Lincoln St., New Britain 06052-1833
Michael A. McLachlan, 47 W Wooster St., Danbury 06810-7731
Bob Duff, 50 Toilsome Ave., Norwalk 06851-2425
Toni Boucher, 5 Wicks End Ln, Wilton 06897-2633
Paul Doyle, 38 Thornbush Rd., Wethersfield 06109-3554
Carlo Leone, 88 Houston Ter., Stamford 06902-4449
Toni N. Harp (no longer in the Legislature, she is now the Mayor of New Haven, CT).
John McKinney, 986 S Pine Creek Rd., Fairfield 06824-6348
Martin M. Looney, 132 Fort Hale Rd., New Haven 06512-3630
Donald E. Williams, Jr., 41 Malbone Ln., Brooklyn 06234-1563
Edward Meyer, 407 Mulberry Point Rd., Guilford 06437-3204
Dante Bartolomeo, 167 Reynolds Dr., Meriden 06450-2568
Gayle Slossburg, 14 Honeysuckle Ln., Milford 06461-1671
Joan V. Hartley, 206 Columbia Blvd., Waterbury 06710-1401
Leonard Fasano, 7 Sycamore Ln., North Haven 06473-1283
Joseph J. Crisco, Jr., 1205 Racebrook Rd., Woodbridge 06525-1822
L. Scott Frantz, 123 Meadow Rd., Riverside 06878-2521
CT House members voting Yes on “An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety, also known as Public Law 13-3 or Connecticut Senate Bill No. 1160,” 3 April 2013.
Photos and home phone numbers of these tyrants are available here:
http://www.cbia.com
Catherine Abercrombie, 64 Parker Ave., Meriden 06450-5945
Ernest Hewett, 29 Colman St., New London 06320-3558
Peter Tercyak, 150 Belridge Rd., New Britain 06053-1008
Brenda Kupchick, 85 Liberty St., Madison 06443-3258
William Tong, 99 Chestnut Hill Rd., Stamford 06903-4030
Gary Holder-Winfield, 480 Winchester Ave., New Haven 06511-1920
James Albis, 369 Coe Ave., Apt 14, East Haven
David Alexander, 277 Pearl St., Enfield 06082-4368
Bryan Hurlburt (Stepped down to take a position with the USDA’s Farm Service Agency.)
Diana Urban, 146 Babcock Rd., North Stonington 06359-1334
Gail Lavielle, 109 Hickory Hill Rd., Wilton 06897-1135
Claire Janowski, 263 Hany Ln., Vernon 06066-2740
Edwin Vargas, 141 Douglas St., Hartford 06114-2422
Angel Arce, 248 Franklin Ave., Hartford 06114-1841
Susan Johnson, 120 Bolivia St., Willimantic 06226-2818
Joe Verrengia, 160 Colonial St., West Hartford 06110-1814
David Arconti, Jr., 141 Great Plain Rd., Danbury 06811-3844
Tom Vicino, 92 Carter Hill Rd., Clinton 06413-1230
Joe Aresimowicz, 248 Lower Ln., Berlin 06037-2231
David Kiner, 5 Cranberry Hollow, Enfield 06082-2200
Toni Walker, 1643 Ella T Grasso Blvd., New Haven 06511-2801
Patricia Widlitz, 12 Island Bay Cir., Guilford 06437-3058
Timothy Larson, 33 Gorman Pl., East Hartford 06108-1450
Christina Ayala, 506 Brooks St., Bridgeport 06608-1303
Terry Backer, 125 Jefferson St., Stratford 06615-7810
Roland Lemar, 6 Eld St., New Haven 06511-3816
Roberta Willis, PO Box 1733, 30 Upland Meadow Rd., Lakeville 06039-1733
Tom O’Dea, 37 Holly Rd., New Canaan 06840-6406
David Baram, 5 Warbler Cir., Bloomfield 06002-2233
Matthew Lesser, 1160 S Main S.,t Apt 110, Middletown 06457-5034
Christopher Wright, 35 Ruth St., Apt 49, Bristol 06010-3218
Arthur O’Neill, 617 Bucks Hill Rd., Southbury 06488-1952
Brian Becker, 14 Candlewood Dr., West Hartford 06117-1009
Rick Lopes, 208 S Mountain Dr., New Britain 06052-1514
Elissa Wright, 51 Pearl St., Groton 06340-5732
Elizabeth “Betty” Boukus, Legislative Office Bldg., Rm 4017, Hartford 06106
Geoff Luxenburg, 45 Chatham Dr., Manchester 06042-8522
James Maroney, 22 Saranac Rd Milford 06461-9401
Larry Butler, 70 Blackman Rd., Waterbury 06704-1203
Juan Candelaria, 28 Arch St., New Haven 06519-1511
Brandon McGee, 43 Warren St., Hartford 06120-2117
Robert Megna, 40 Foxon Hill Rd., Unit 54, New Haven 06513-1166
Charles “Don” Clemons, 130 Read St., Bridgeport 06607-2021
Michelle Cook, 499 Charles St., Torrington 06790-3420
Patricia Miller, 95 Liberty St., Apt A4, Stamford 06902-4732
John Shaban, 29 Ledgewood Rd., Redding 06896-2916
Bill Aman, 878 Strong Rd., South Windsor 06074-2006
Philip Miller, 24 Bushy Hill Rd., Ivoryton 06442-1108
Victor Cuevas, 17 Keefe St., Waterbur,y 06706-1616
Mike D’Agostino, 575 Ridge Rd., Hamden 06517-2519
Russ Morin, 495 Brimfield Rd., Wethersfield 06109-3209
Richard Smith, 25 Jeremy Dr., New Fairfield 06812-2109
Prasad Srinivasan, 268 Grandview Dr., Glastonbury 06033-3946
Bruce Morris, 315 Ely Ave., Norwalk 06854-4619
Stephen Dargan, 215 Beach St., West Haven 06516-6133
Paul Davis, 335 Smith Farm Rd., Orange 06477-3127
Ted Moukawsher, 48 W Elderkin Ave., Groton 06340-4933
Mitch Bolinsky, 3 Wiley Ln., Newtown 06470-1812
Stephen Walko, 7 Charter Oak Ln., Greenwich 06830-6911
Mike Demicco, 6 Deborah Ln., Farmington 06032-3031
Mary Mushinsky, 188 S Cherry St., Wallingford 06492-4016
Patricia Dillon, 68 W Rock Ave., New Haven 06515-2221
Sandy Nafis, 49 Whitewood Rd., Newington 06111-2133
Larry Cafero, Jr., 6 Weed Ave., Norwalk 06850-2224
Terrie Wood, 50 Saint Nicholas Rd., Darien 06820-2823
Joe Diminico, 26 Finley St., Manchester 06040-5616
David Yaccarino, 1804 Hartford Tpke., North Haven 06473-1248
Elaine O’Brien, 1321 Hill St., Suffield 06078-1024
Kim Fawcett, 234 Collingwood Ave., Fairfield 06825-1877
Chris Perone, 8 E. Rocks Rd., Norwalk 06851-2919
Christie Carpino, 29 Sovereign Rd., Cromwell 06416-1136
Lonnie Reed, 60 Maple St., Apt. 44, Branford 06405-3562
Andy Fleischmann, 25 Sherwood Rd., West Hartford 06117-2739
Mae Flexer, 452 Main St., Danielson 06239-2104
Emmett Riley, 150 Yantic St., Unit 160, Norwich 06360-4248
Daniel Fox, 14 Carter Dr., Stamford 06902-7013
Matt Ritter, 169 N Beacon St., Hartford 06105-2246
J. Brendan Sharkey, 600 Mount Carmel Ave., Hamden 06518-1606
Jason Rojas, 128 Langford Ln., East Hartford 06118-2369
Gerald Fox, III, 66 Fairview Ave., Stamford 06902-8129
Mary Fritz, 43 Grove St., Yalesville 06492-1606
Livvy Floren, 210 Round Hill Rd., Greenwich 06831-3357
Henry Genga, 5 Elaine Dr., East Hartford 06118-3515
John Frey, 2 Copps Hill Rd., Ridgefield 06877-4013
Linda Gentile, 158 Hodge Ave., Ansonia 06401-3236
Robert Sanchez, 269 Washington St., New Britain 06051-1024
Minnie Gonzalez, 97 Amity St., Hartford 06106-1001
Ezequiel Santiago, 991 State St., Bridgeport 06605-1504
Jeffrey Berger, 134 Gaylord Dr., Waterbury 06708-2181
Auden Grogins, 155 Brewster St., Apt 5L, Bridgeport 06605-3111
Hilda Santiago, 86 South Ave., Fl 3, Meriden 06451-7624
DebraLee Hovey, 296 Fan Hill Rd., Monroe 06468-1329
Bob Godfrey, 13 Stillman Ave., Danbury 06810-8007
Antonio Guerrera, 194 Catherine Dr., Rocky Hill 06067-1096
Brian Sear, 11 N Canterbury Rd., Canterbury 06331-1209
Elizabeth Ritter, 24 Old Mill Rd., Quaker Hill 06375-1319
Tony Hwang, PO Box 762, Fairfield 06824-0762
Joseph Serra, PO Box 233, Middletown 06457-0233
Gregg Haddad, 28 Storrs Heights Rd., Storrs Mansfield 06268-2322
John Hampton, 33 West Mountain, Simsbury 06092
Charlie Stallworth, 35 Wickliffe Cir., Bridgeport 06606-1929
Themis Klarides, 23 East Ct., Derby 06418-2640
Noreen Kokoruda, 85 Liberty St., Madison 06443-3258
Jonathan Steinberg, 1 Bushy Ridge Rd., Westport 06880-2104

Jack Hennessy, 556 Savoy St., Bridgeport 06606-4125

BPTactical
03-03-2014, 21:25
Damn.. how many of reps do they have?

Too many Chiefs and not enough Indians.......

trlcavscout
03-03-2014, 21:39
Some really sweet comments there:







[/FONT][/COLOR]Just.... wow. I'm really glad that our forum is better than that.


Give it time

trlcavscout
03-03-2014, 21:45
Your cop hater sarcasm is getting tiresome

Here is what you do. If a cop comes to confiscate your guns. Well its pretty clear there is a LAW that allows them to do so. So you MUST just hand them over, else you are a criminal and NOT a LAW ABIDING CITIZEN.

If you refuse well you are a douche and just giving the rest of us law abiding citizens a bad name you god damn fukking CRIMINAL.

You see they, the cops have no choice. Law is the Law.

So hand them over. That is the LAW. Then of course you should totally send as many sternly worded letters as you hvae stamps for. Petion the courts. If they ignore you - keep wrinting letters. Keep filing suits.

If you find yourself in the proverbial boxcar, well law is the law, you - obviously belong there as you would not be there if you did not break the law you damn criminal.

So keep writing those letters, after all just trough that door is a hot meal and a shower. And never ever ever question the cops that would confiscate guns. They are just like you and me trying to put food on the table - plus they keep the rest of us safe from your law breaking criminal ways.

Gezzus this site has turned into an anti-LEO site full of cop haters

Hope you all never need one.

you are kidding right? Hand them over and then ask for them back?

<MADDOG>
03-03-2014, 21:55
you are kidding right? Hand them over and then ask for them back?

I think its been established that comment was sarcasm on the highest level, and many of us fell for it...:D

wctriumph
03-03-2014, 22:08
^^^^^Now if 10 million more citizens make the same stand.

They can get in line behind me. I did not comply in CA and I will not comply here or anywhere else.


TEA

III

Zundfolge
03-05-2014, 13:01
Ok now the story has taken a hilarious turn.

source (http://www.callthecops.net/connecticut-halts-plans-round-firearms-finding-cops-state-list/)


Connecticut halts plans to round up firearms after finding most cops in the state are on the listConnecticut has been making news due to their hastily passed gun registration laws. According to some sources as few as 15% of gun owners have actually registered their firearms. News Blogs have been warning state officials are talking about mass confiscations of the unregistered firearms.


Plans for these confiscations hit a snag when a legislative intern dared to ask a question. “Who will be going door to door to take all the guns away?” asked the 21-year-old college senior.Reportedly multiple people in the room in the most sarcastic voices they could muster said “the police”.
The unnamed intern then pointed at the list and said, “my dad’s name is on the list, and he is the police chief. I see three other names on this list of family members, all cops.”
With in hours a print off of all sworn Law Enforcement officers in the state was obtained. Comparisons of the list of gun owners who failed to comply with registration requirements and sworn LEOs showed a startling figure. Just over 68% of Connecticut cops had failed to register firearms according to the new law.
An anonymous source in the Governors office said lawmakers were dumbfounded. “Someone suggest firing all the cops who failed to register. But the reality of hiring and training that many new police officers is not practical.” The source goes on to say “Senator [redacted to protect our source] said maybe we should issue an official order to all cops to comply with registration or face termination. I mean seriously these people are a special kind of stupid to think that gun-loving cops (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00BYE6PNC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00BYE6PNC&linkCode=as2&tag=politeac-20) are going to go along with this blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment.”
So now Connecticut is in little quagmire. The powers that be are making all kinds of threats, but there is no one to follow through on the threats.
No police officers or police administrators were willing to go on record for this story. Emails to members of the Connecticut legislator and Governors office were not returned by the time of publication.

HoneyBadger
03-05-2014, 13:04
Oh Jeezus, that is just too much to handle! [LOL]

Irving
03-05-2014, 13:09
That is fantastic news.

merl
03-05-2014, 13:14
If it sounds too good to be true....

http://www.callthecops.net/about-us/

Call the CopsThis site is a satire of the current state of Law Enforcement, Fire Fighting and Emergency Medical work. Stories posted here are not real and you should not assume them to have any basis in any real fact. Heck we tend to leave in spelling and grammer errors just to prove we is not the professional media. No reference of an individual, company, or government entity seeks to inflict malice or emotional harm.
Any statement made by authors on this page should not be considered the opinions of agencies they are employed by.

brutal
03-05-2014, 13:19
They probably have a waiver for active duty LE anyway. I mean, that's the way they roll right?

Anyone actually read the bill?

HoneyBadger
03-05-2014, 13:23
If it sounds too good to be true....

http://www.callthecops.net/about-us/


Awww bummer. [facepalm] Still funny though.

bobbyfairbanks
03-05-2014, 13:30
Looks like they got cold feet.

Zundfolge
03-05-2014, 14:27
Dammit ... duped by another satire site ... oh well, still funny :p

JoeT
03-07-2014, 12:30
They probably have a waiver for active duty LE anyway. I mean, that's the way they roll right?

Anyone actually read the bill?


While active they are exempt...as are active military. when they are no longer active they must register their stuff

lowbeyond
03-08-2014, 12:25
Sorry ya'll have not had tome to post lately..

one last thing... that guy in that video is a criminal, class D FELON !

I any case, thanks to irving for postng a link to that Donner thread i forgot about.

Apparently im a peckerwood now. [Flower] [LOL] Donno really what that is but i did find this neat-o t-shirt image


http://img0116.popscreencdn.com/161690976_peckerwood-t-shirts-peckerwood-shirts-tees.jpg

[JRope][JRope][JRope][JRope]

Zundfolge
03-08-2014, 20:36
Wow ... lowbeyond you're just plain evil and your continued presence on this forum disgusts me ... don't bother to respond, I won't see it.

brutal
03-08-2014, 22:38
HBAR,

I find it mildly amusing that your post count is stuck at 4. I'm guessing I missed the drama surrounding that. [mop]

Squeeze
03-09-2014, 01:25
<Insert Benny Hill Theme Music HERE>

http://i1094.photobucket.com/albums/i445/TangoDownPro/EatingPopcorn_zpsa7b00364.gif (http://s1094.photobucket.com/user/TangoDownPro/media/EatingPopcorn_zpsa7b00364.gif.html)

Rabid
03-11-2014, 03:18
“I’ve had contact with a police officer in my home town, I live in Branford, and his words straight out were, ‘I cannot wait to get the order to kick your door in,’”
http://www.storyleak.com/conn-cop-gun-owning-veteran-wait-get-order-kick-door/

BPTactical
03-11-2014, 07:17
http://www.storyleak.com/conn-cop-gun-owning-veteran-wait-get-order-kick-door/



ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

Molon labe  

(mo-lone lah-veh)

Two little words. With these two words, two concepts were verbalized that have lived for nearly two and a half Millennia. They signify and characterize both the heart of the Warrior, and the indomitable spirit of mankind. From the ancient Greek, they are the reply of the Spartan General-King Leonidas to Xerxes, the Persian Emperor who came with 600,000 of the fiercest fighting troops in the world to conquer and invade little Greece, then the center and birthplace of civilization as we know it. When Xerxes offered to spare the lives of Leonidas, his 300 personal bodyguards and a handful of Thebans and others who volunteered to defend their country, if they would lay down their arms, Leonidas shouted these two words back.
Molon Labe! (mo-lone lah-veh)

They mean, “Come and get them!” They live on today as the most notable quote in military history. And so began the classic example of courage and valor in its dismissal of overwhelming superiority of numbers, wherein the heart and spirit of brave men overcame insuperable odds. Today, there lies a plaque dedicated to these heroes all at the site. It reads: “Go tell the Spartans, travelers passing by, that here, obedient to their laws we lie.”

We have adopted this defiant utterance as a battle cry in our war against oppression because it says so clearly and simply towards those who would take our arms.

It signifies our determination to not strike the first blow, but also to not stand mute and allow our loved ones, and all that we believe in and stand for, to be trampled by men who would deprive us of our God-given – or natural, if you will – rights to suit their own ends

hatidua
03-11-2014, 09:04
http://www.storyleak.com/conn-cop-gun-owning-veteran-wait-get-order-kick-door/

-tip of the iceberg.

Zundfolge
03-11-2014, 09:30
http://www.storyleak.com/conn-cop-gun-owning-veteran-wait-get-order-kick-door/

Followup:
Officer that made threat on FB suspended for letting mask slip ... tipping hand to proles. (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/03/10/officer-reportedly-tells-citizen-i-give-my-left-n-to-bang-down-your-door-and-come-for-your-gun/)

Mtn.man
03-11-2014, 16:40
The cop admitted to being a "psycho" so he can't Legally own a gun.

Kick in the door kick in both nuts and remove his guns.