View Full Version : When A-holes collide
tmleadr03
03-29-2014, 14:17
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XqZoaWKv2k#t=105
Saw this, this morning. Wish the lady could film better. At least it looks like her poor filming is due to trying to concentrate on her driving. Wonder why it is titled Redneck roadrage though?
Rooskibar03
03-29-2014, 14:20
She's driving slow in the passing lane with her focus being on her phone and filming.
Tickets for both parties as far as I'm concerned.
tmleadr03
03-29-2014, 14:20
Saw this, this morning. Wish the lady could film better. At least it looks like her poor filming is due to trying to concentrate on her driving. Wonder why it is titled Redneck roadrage though?
F250. I think that is considered a redneck tuck.
Looks like surface streets to me. What ticket would you give the lady filming? Besides something related to using a mobile device while driving.
hghclsswhitetrsh
03-29-2014, 14:26
Honestly is it worth it to keep driving slow in the passing lane to prove a point, you're the aggressor at this point. People think they're invincible because they're in a car. You wanna ride my ass? Fine I will pull over and let you pass me, go on big boy. You so bad. Ain't worth my life, or my passengers life to get into a road rage incident or an accident. Sometimes being the bigger man means to be a little passive.
She was passing other, slower vehicles in the right lane, and notice she stopped in a left turn lane. She was intending to turn left at that spot to begin with. People that get pissed off by the driving of others amuse me, I learned how to go around them long ago.
The dick in the truck deserved what he got, IMO. When she stopped she should have got out and mooned him.
ZERO THEORY
03-29-2014, 14:54
I try not to play the road rage game. There was a woman who used to work for our company who flipped off some guy who cut her off on the highway. He got behind her, followed her to a client's place of business, then punched her and smashed her head repeatedly into the door of her company vehicle.
He was later caught and charged via security camera footage from the parking lot, but that doesn't undo potentially being killed all for half a second of inconvenience.
Honestly is it worth it to keep driving slow in the passing lane to prove a point, you're the aggressor at this point. People think they're invincible because they're in a car. You wanna ride my ass? Fine I will pull over and let you pass me, go on big boy. You so bad. Ain't worth my life, or my passengers life to get into a road rage incident or an accident. Sometimes being the bigger man means to be a little passive.
Agreed.
Limited GM
03-29-2014, 20:52
Honestly is it worth it to keep driving slow in the passing lane to prove a point, you're the aggressor at this point. People think they're invincible because they're in a car. You wanna ride my ass? Fine I will pull over and let you pass me, go on big boy. You so bad. Ain't worth my life, or my passengers life to get into a road rage incident or an accident. Sometimes being the bigger man means to be a little passive.
This^
For the record, I HATE when people drive in the passing lane when they are not pass. HATE IT. The other day some prick was going super slow on purpose on I-25. However, on surface streets, it's not as big of a deal as it is usually easier to go around them. It IS annoying when people match speed with the person next to them and block everyone, even on surface streets. The article accompanying this was saying that the road conditions were slick, which seem to be supported by the part where the guy lost control doing a simple lane change.
USMC_5-Echo
03-29-2014, 22:04
Honestly is it worth it to keep driving slow in the passing lane to prove a point, you're the aggressor at this point. People think they're invincible because they're in a car. You wanna ride my ass? Fine I will pull over and let you pass me, go on big boy. You so bad. Ain't worth my life, or my passengers life to get into a road rage incident or an accident. Sometimes being the bigger man means to be a little passive.
"I couldn't move over because there were trucks in the right lane, and I sure as heck wasn't going to speed on a rainy day with the roads being as slick as they were. I was turning left in about a half-mile when this happened."
from here: http://www.wfla.com/story/25094121/tampa-road-rage-incident-shows-instant-karma-in-viral-video
If she is passing people that are in the right lane then she is abiding by the law and there is no issue. Now if she was driving in the left lane for no reason and not actively passing people, like I see so many drivers do here in Colorado, then technically yes she is impeding traffic and being an all around turd.
hghclsswhitetrsh
03-29-2014, 22:08
Sure by law she was in the right. But sometimes you have to merge over and let some hothead pass you and get there 30 second later, or be tommy tough tits and get beat by a Louisville slugger on the side of the road. There's a place and time to be confrontational, the road is never the place.
Colorado Osprey
03-29-2014, 22:10
What ticket would you give the lady filming?
42-4-1401 Reckless Driving for filming while driving
42-4-1402 Careless Driving
These I would have to look up:
Impeding Traffic for causing traffic flow to slow (yes, even if they are speeding... clear in the video)
Improper use of the passing lane... after the right lane was clear she failed to move over... and then actually stopped in the passing lane
Is that enough?
Not saying somebody is going to write that many tickets, but these are tickets that can be issued.
Will she be convicted of all if taken to court... not a chance. Probably all thrown out.... but she could have been ticketed in Colorado.
In any certain circumstance while driving, most drivers break traffic laws about every 30 seconds to 1 min. If and LEO want to yank someone over, it is just a matter of waiting. I used to give drivers 4-5 different violations before even pulling them over. (most had no idea they were even breaking a traffic law)
USMC_5-Echo
03-29-2014, 22:11
Very true and I totally agree. But giving the benefit of the doubt, what if she had just finished passing the trucks but this guy was tailgating her the entire time? I'm not necessarily taking either side but obviously this tough guy couldn't wait long enough for her to get over....maybe he should left 5 minutes earlier if he was in such a hurry
42-4-1401 Reckless Driving for filming while driving
42-4-1402 Careless Driving
These I would have to look up:
Impeding Traffic for causing traffic flow to slow (yes, even if they are speeding... clear in the video)
Improper use of the passing lane... after the right lane was clear she failed to move over... and then actually stopped in the passing lane
Is that enough?
No, not even close. Where is the evidence that she was driving recklessly or carelessly? There was no contact between the vehicles and her video shows that she maintained her lane, and speed, the entire time. Not to mention that she wouldn't be charged with both.
What passing lane? This is surface streets with turn lanes on both sides, intersections, and traffic lights. It wasn't very long before the guy was able to go around her, then he didn't even pass initially. He accelerated and decelerated just to flip her off. It'd be tough to prove she was impeding much of anything, especially considering he was able to be on three sides of her in a relatively short time frame.
Great-Kazoo
03-29-2014, 22:18
42-4-1401 Reckless Driving for filming while driving
42-4-1402 Careless Driving
These I would have to look up:
Impeding Traffic for causing traffic flow to slow (yes, even if they are speeding... clear in the video)
Improper use of the passing lane... after the right lane was clear she failed to move over... and then actually stopped in the passing lane
Is that enough?
No more calls we have a winner.
15 or more under the speed limit is impeding the flow of traffic. Told a CSP that one day as he was dicking around in the right lane, doing 45 on I 25.
15 or more under the speed limit is impeding the flow of traffic. Told a CSP that one day as he was dicking around in the right lane, doing 45 on I 25.
Adverse road conditions tend to throw a wrench in this.
USMC_5-Echo
03-29-2014, 22:23
Seeing how that is in the "sunshine state" there's no telling how much oil was pulled up to the surface by the rain as well.
Great-Kazoo
03-29-2014, 22:24
Adverse road conditions tend to throw a wrench in this.
Traveling to fast for road conditions sure. On dry pavement pull over or get a ride.
More proof that fords are junk!
Both of the drivers were idiots and at fault in this one. His stupidity when he finally got to pass was all his own fault though, well his and ford for making trucks with pathetic traction control.
I miss the fishing in FL. I don't miss anything else.
More proof that fords are junk!
Both of the drivers were idiots and at fault in this one. His stupidity when he finally got to pass was all his own fault though, well his and ford for making trucks with pathetic traction control.
You're absolutely right. Had he been in a Chevy, the faulty ignition would have turned his vehicle off and he would not have passed her, flipped the bird, or crashed.
You're absolutely right. Had he been in a Chevy, the faulty ignition would have turned his vehicle off and he would not have passed her, flipped the bird, or crashed.
Yep, just have to look at the bright side! And dodge was excited because they take all the parts off wrecked fords and sell them as new on their trucks!
rockhound
03-30-2014, 11:13
she was turning left in about a half mile, then why is she riding in the fast lane?
looked as though she had plenty of opportunity to pull over and let the faster vehicle pass her, common courtesy, even if i am passing people in the fast lane i will slide over for a faster vehicle, she is the aggressor in my opinion, the guy in the truck is a dick, but his actions were brought on by her passive aggression trying to keep him from proceeding past her, she may not have had her finger out, but she was trying to control another driver,
i am sure she only started filming after she had impeded his path long enough to get him riled up.
she is just as guilty,
in the video it appear that she may have even sped d up once he went to pas her, his truck slows up like she had stuffed him behind another vehicle to keep him from getting by. this is just as agressive as him trying to drive to fast for conditions.
she was turning left in about a half mile, then why is she riding in the fast lane?
looked as though she had plenty of opportunity to pull over and let the faster vehicle pass her, common courtesy, even if i am passing people in the fast lane i will slide over for a faster vehicle, she is the aggressor in my opinion, the guy in the truck is a dick, but his actions were brought on by her passive aggression trying to keep him from proceeding past her, she may not have had her finger out, but she was trying to control another driver,
i am sure she only started filming after she had impeded his path long enough to get him riled up.
she is just as guilty,
in the video it appear that she may have even sped d up once he went to pas her, his truck slows up like she had stuffed him behind another vehicle to keep him from getting by. this is just as agressive as him trying to drive to fast for conditions.
[facepalm]
What fast lane? IT IS ON SURFACE STREETS. There is no dang fast lane guys.
What part of that don't you understand?
I'm not defending the cumb dunt, I hate left lane hogs, but c'mon already.
Too many of you make too many assumptions as well. Best to go armchair quarterback the gunshow ND thread.
rockhound
03-30-2014, 11:36
watch the video again, that is not a surface street, rural road maybe, no businesses in the background, all jungle and wide median, there are some turning lanes, but she is not drving down colfax, she is doing 60, no way that is surface street, i would liken it to maybe 285 through conifer and bailey, or maybe 24 headng to woodland park, she should not be blocking the passing lane
speedysst
03-30-2014, 12:27
Ive never seen so many people so uptight about how other people drive. FFS you people need to calm the hell down. "He was driving too slow in the "fast" lane. She was a left lane hog. I HATE when people go slower than me in the wrong lane according to MY driving rules."
Ive never seen so many people so uptight about how other people drive. FFS you people need to calm the hell down. "He was driving too slow in the "fast" lane. She was a left lane hog. I HATE when people go slower than me in the wrong lane according to MY driving rules."
If everyone would just get off the roads and out of my way, all the problems would be solved!
Eggysrun
03-30-2014, 18:59
I suspect a lot of time passed while this lady was ignoring the rules of the road until she decided to record the guy. The only evidence from this incident was when the lady started recording, I would guess the guy explaining what happen would paint a different picture than a partial video of the incident.
I suspect a lot of time passed while this lady was ignoring the rules of the road until she decided to record the guy.
I suspect this as well. If you take a picture of one car riding another car's ass, how would you tell the difference between one car holding up traffic and another car just riding ass?
For the record, this lady is dumb, bad driver, etc. She's just not liable for any part of this accident in any way, shape, or form.
Aloha_Shooter
03-30-2014, 19:36
Just how fast do you need to be passing traffic in the right lane to satisfy some of you people? Passing slower traffic doesn't mean you have to hot rod it just to satisfy some impatient a-hole behind you.
Here's a clue: plan your trip so you don't have to speed or crawl up other people's rears to get where you want on time.
rockhound
03-31-2014, 05:59
i am not saying she needs to drive faster, she need to slide over and politley let him pass, she is not a cop and she is not there to make sure he doesn't speed, I am also not saying that she is responsible for his accident other than she is being passive aggressive, when someone is obviously wanting to pass, the rules of the road say let him pass, impeding traffic in the passing lane, traveling too long in the passing lane is also a ticketable offense. i know people that have gotten pulled over for this kind of driving right here in colorado. (traveling too long in the passing lane)
just because you are doing 5 over in the passing lane does not mean that you should sit there and prevent others from passing you.
the guy in the truck is a dumbass, there is no doubt, but my guess is she has been blocking his path and dicking with him for quite some time prior to his actions we see on the video. her attitude about being so superior in her driving and the fact that she had the right to be in that lane comes accross very strong in the video. she got so upset because he came up too close behind her in an effort to let her know he wanted to pass, maybe even flashed his lights to let her know he wanted to get by her, so she put on her attitude and stayed in his way for miles.
if there were a way to verify it i would be willing to bet a $100 that is how this all went down.
Its funny how you all are saying she's driving too slow yet the person who is driving faster than her ends up in the ditch.....
Maybe she was driving as fast as the conditions allowed?????? Road was wet after all. (Just a thought! )
And if I'm turning in a 1/2 mile I'm not going to get over because some asshole wants to go fast with his "penis extension"
Dude is a dick that has serious mental issues. It takes a special breed to drive like that and the flip the bird to random strangers.
Its funny how you all are saying she's driving too slow yet the person who is driving faster than her ends up in the ditch.....
Maybe she was driving as fast as the conditions allowed?????? Road was wet after all. (Just a thought! )
And if I'm turning in a 1/2 mile I'm not going to get over because some asshole wants to go fast with his "penis extension"
Dude is a dick that has serious mental issues. It takes a special breed to drive like that and the flip the bird to random strangers.
It it doesn't matter. Logic, what happened prior to the video, who instigated, who crashed, nothing. The only thing that matters is that women are worse drivers and she is obviously at fault!
/sarcasm if anybody can't catch on.
It it doesn't matter. Logic, what happened prior to the video, who instigated, who crashed, nothing. The only thing that matters is that women are worse drivers and she is obviously at fault!
/sarcasm if anybody can't catch on.
That's exactly what I was trying to say all along.... It just didn't come out right.....https://www.ar-15.co/images/smilies/325991.gif
Regardless of who's fault, or Ford vs Chevy vs Dodge truck, video was funny. [LOL]
This guy needs to drive a car/truck with < 150hp with $100,000 traction control on it as an option.
rockhound
04-01-2014, 07:14
Its funny how you all are saying she's driving too slow yet the person who is driving faster than her ends up in the ditch.....
Maybe she was driving as fast as the conditions allowed?????? Road was wet after all. (Just a thought! )
And if I'm turning in a 1/2 mile I'm not going to get over because some asshole wants to go fast with his "penis extension"
Dude is a dick that has serious mental issues. It takes a special breed to drive like that and the flip the bird to random strangers.
all true, does not change the fact that she was being inconsiderate. just because you are the one driving properly for condition doesn't mean cock blocking the guy that wants past you. guy is a dick no doubt, but his attitude would probably be different if she was courteous enough to let him past. she was just as big a dick.
there is a reason that driving too long in the right lane can get you a ticket
all true, does not change the fact that she was being inconsiderate. just because you are the one driving properly for condition doesn't mean cock blocking the guy that wants past you. guy is a dick no doubt, but his attitude would probably be different if she was courteous enough to let him past. she was just as big a dick.
I don't think she was inconsiderate at all.
Going the speed limit and wanting to turn left in a little bit doesn't mean your inconsiderate to not move over for some DB.
I think the inconsiderate one was the one that was tail gating people, flipping the bird to complete strangers, and speeding around people putting other peoples lives at risk... He could have killed someone when he lost control, yet you people believe she is "inconsiderate"??????
rockhound
04-01-2014, 07:41
yes i do,
you are also inconsiderate when you dont move into the right lane to allow someone to merge on to the highway, you are incondierate when you don't signal your intentions to turn, you are inconsiderate for a lot of reason when driving,
just becasue you are driving a safer speed and feel you have the right to be in that lane does not mean you do. you are supposed to yield the left lane to those that are traveling faster than you. it is the passing lane, she should have when safe to do so moved over to let him by.
if you dont get that then you are just as inconsiderate a driver.
I never said he was not a dick that is undisputed, but there is also no doubt in my mind she did everything she could to exaserbate the situation. she does not have the right to just drive along and cock block traffic.
According to this link http://jalopnik.com/5501615/left-lane-passing-laws-a-state-by-state-map all but 5 states have laws regarding traveling in the right lane. And 6 states INCLUDING COLORADO the law says you must yield to faster traffic.
I am not trying to be antogonistic, but if you think she has the right to just sit there in that lane and that she has not done something wrong you are absolutley incorrect. and if you are the kind of driver that will sit there in the passing lane for miles because you are "going fast enough" you are also being a dick.
even wikipedia has a whole page devoted to left hand etiquette and no where in any country or state cited on the page does it say that cock blocking in the left lane is acceptable behavior, tailgating and flashing your lights is a commaon way to let the offender of your desire to pass,
just because you are doing 5 over in the passing lane does not mean that you should sit there and prevent others from passing you.
Unless you're actively passing... I've been on I-70 coming down Mt. Vernon canyon at about 70MPH (speed limit 65) and actively passing people in the left lane and had people get pissed behind me because they wanted to pass. As soon as I completed passing, I moved over, yet they still were angry. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. You can't please everyone all the time.
Unless you're actively passing... I've been on I-70 coming down Mt. Vernon canyon at about 70MPH (speed limit 65) and actively passing people in the left lane and had people get pissed behind me because they wanted to pass. As soon as I completed passing, I moved over, yet they still were angry. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. You can't please everyone all the time.
Screw you you inconsiderate bastard!!![ROFL1]
Screw you you inconsiderate bastard!!![ROFL1]
What can I say...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrgpZ0fUixs
rockhound
04-01-2014, 13:32
Unless you're actively passing... I've been on I-70 coming down Mt. Vernon canyon at about 70MPH (speed limit 65) and actively passing people in the left lane and had people get pissed behind me because they wanted to pass. As soon as I completed passing, I moved over, yet they still were angry. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. You can't please everyone all the time.
and that is perfectly acceptable, and no you can't please everyone.
the lady in the video says she was going to turn left in about a half mile, her video is 2 minutes long, at 60 mph that is two miles, and she had obviously been there for a while. i submit she had time to clear the lane as she is supposed to and that she is partially to blame
spqrzilla
04-01-2014, 16:36
About a decade back, I was once driving on I25 in a two lane stretch in the left lane. Fair amount of traffic although moving well. I'm at normal following distance of the car ahead of me and we are pacing or slowly passing the traffic in the #2 lane. Clown crawls up my backside and flashes his lights at me. No, I don't have to clear the lane just because you want to be in front of me.
Various gestures and feigned assaults on my vehicle later, including the clown getting very close to me putting my initials in his vehicle with my .45 for future reference, CSP pulls him over and prones him out. The subsequent fiasco with DA reminds me of what a clown show that office is ...
osok-308
04-01-2014, 18:08
Should have let the guy pass. The other guy was a jerk for sure. But using your phone while driving is probably just as dangerous.
and that is perfectly acceptable, and no you can't please everyone.
the lady in the video says she was going to turn left in about a half mile, her video is 2 minutes long, at 60 mph that is two miles, and she had obviously been there for a while. i submit she had time to clear the lane as she is supposed to and that she is partially to blame
This is my point!
Should have let the guy pass. The other guy was a jerk for sure. But using your phone while driving is probably just as dangerous.
So dangerous she didn't even end up in the ditch!
Aloha_Shooter
04-01-2014, 18:23
No, I don't have to clear the lane just because you want to be in front of me.
^This. I've received a few tickets over the years, all for exceeding the speed limit (even when I felt I was going with the flow of traffic but I'm sure the out-of-state plates were just a coincidence), none for impeding the flow. I haven't been able to view the specific video in question but there have been a lot of open-ended statements here about having a duty to pull over. I don't have a duty to pass the traffic on the as fast as random a-hole behind me wants me to pass them as long as I AM passing.
If you crawl up my ass when I'm legitimately passing traffic in the right lane, you are being inconsiderate -- take that shit to San Francisco. If you're flashing your lights at me to yield when there's no safe way to yield (and I don't consider a 1.5-car-length gap to be a safe place to pull into), you are being inconsiderate. If you expect me to break the law and drive unsafely just because you failed to plan properly and are in a hurry, you are being inconsiderate. If you are using your damned phone to video, take pictures, sext your boyfriend, etc. while driving, you are being inconsiderate (yeah, I'm not keen on her recording his experience for 2 minutes while driving unless she had it in a hands-free holder or something like that).
I currently have a claim where one driver was driving slow, then speeding up to over 100 miles an hour every time another driver tried to pass. On the third try, the driver attempting to pass lost control and rolled into a ditch. She doesn't think the accident is her fault for some reason.
She is going to be disappoonted. That other car was being 100 times the dick the lady in this video was being, but they still didn't cause the passing driver to wreck into the ditch.
rockhound
04-02-2014, 07:45
^.
If you crawl up my ass when I'm legitimately passing traffic in the right lane, you are being inconsiderate -- take that shit to San Francisco. If you're flashing your lights at me to yield when there's no safe way to yield (and I don't consider a 1.5-car-length gap to be a safe place to pull into), you are being inconsiderate. If you expect me to break the law and drive unsafely just because you failed to plan properly and are in a hurry, you are being inconsiderate. If you are using your damned phone to video, take pictures, sext your boyfriend, etc. while driving, you are being inconsiderate (yeah, I'm not keen on her recording his experience for 2 minutes while driving unless she had it in a hands-free holder or something like that).
all true, i am not saying that every situation requires that you move out of the way, but most of that 2 miles long video she had room to move over and it was obviously going on for way longrt than that, she does not have the right to just sit that lane at 60 and not yield to traffic.
colorado requires you yield the lane to faster traffic. that does not mean that the faster driver is correct in every situation.
rockhound
04-02-2014, 07:47
I currently have a claim where one driver was driving slow, then speeding up to over 100 miles an hour every time another driver tried to pass. On the third try, the driver attempting to pass lost control and rolled into a ditch. She doesn't think the accident is her fault for some reason.
She is going to be disappoonted. That other car was being 100 times the dick the lady in this video was being, but they still didn't cause the passing driver to wreck into the ditch.
no one said she is at fault for the accident, what i am saying is her passive aggressive "i am driving five over so you're just going to have to stay behind me" driving contributed to the negative attitude she was receiving from the other driver
that is all.
the bottom line is, just because you are driving five over in the fast lane does not mean that when you have the right to drive in the fast lane forever. you are to pass the vehicles impeding your way and the move right until another vehicle impedes your way and the use that lane to again pass. if a nother vehicle is moving faster than you and you have a clear right lane you are required in mnay states to yield the lane to the faster vehicle. blocking that lane for an extended period of time is illegal in many cases and inconsiderate.
all true, i am not saying that every situation requires that you move out of the way, but most of that 2 miles long video she had room to move over and it was obviously going on for way longrt than that, she does not have the right to just sit that lane at 60 and not yield to traffic.
colorado requires you yield the lane to faster traffic. that does not mean that the faster driver is correct in every situation.
This is for you...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELZQ-Z6lASI
[Beer]
rockhound
04-02-2014, 07:59
that was a great video
all true, i am not saying that every situation requires that you move out of the way, but most of that 2 miles long video she had room to move over and it was obviously going on for way longrt than that, she does not have the right to just sit that lane at 60 and not yield to traffic.
colorado requires you yield the lane to faster traffic. that does not mean that the faster driver is correct in every situation.
On Highways posted 65MPH or more, conditions and traffic permitting.
Colorado, as does most states, already has a law on the books regarding impeding traffic. Road rage incidents in recent years past, including at least one that caused death, prompted an enhancement to the law to attempt to keep the left lane losers out of the hammer lane.
Just posting the facts.
What is Colorado's Left Lane Law?
42-4-1013 (1) - Passing Lane (Left Lane Law) " A person shall not drive a motor vehicle in the passing lane of a highway if the speed limit is sixty-five miles per hour or more unless such person is passing other motor vehicles that are in a nonpassing lane or turning left, or unless the volume of traffic does not permit the motor vehicle to safetly merge into a nonpassing lane."
A brochure about Colorado's Left Lane Law, created by the Colorado State Patrol, is available by clicking here.
rockhound
04-03-2014, 13:38
this is true about the 65 mph roads and the law, however I know people that have gotten pulled over and ticketed on roads that are not posted at 65 mph. using the passing lane and impeding traffic on a road such as 285, hwy 93 in areas that have multiple travel lanes will get you a ticket. the law says you must pull over on 65 mph roads, but does not give you the right to impede traffic on other roads.
this is true about the 65 mph roads and the law, however I know people that have gotten pulled over and ticketed on roads that are not posted at 65 mph. using the passing lane and impeding traffic on a road such as 285, hwy 93 in areas that have multiple travel lanes will get you a ticket. the law says you must pull over on 65 mph roads, but does not give you the right to impede traffic on other roads.
Perhaps I did not word the post well. Colorado already had a law on the books regarding impeding traffic ON ANY ROADWAY.
The new left lane law does specify 65MPH or over as a condition. I would be willing to bet both the new and old statutes are still on the books and anyone could be cited for either.
I'm also keenly aware of citations that have been issued for impeding prior to the new law as a friend's son received one on I-25 in heavy traffic years ago.
Just FYI, I lived in DE for three years (MIL) and the Polezi over there don't fuck around when it comes to blocking the left lane. I can speak from experience they also don't take kindly to pulling a genset trailer @100MPH. :D
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.