HoneyBadger
04-21-2014, 19:51
Well, this caught my interest. And my skepticism.
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/something-huge-just-happened-and-the-mainstream-media-is-ignoring-it
The most important political development in 200 years was triggered last week, when the state legislature of Michigan became the 34 th state to demand a “Constitutional Convention” in the United States. Under Article 5 of the US Constitution, if 2/3rds of the states call for such a convention, (meaning 34 states) it MUST take place. During such a convention, the ENTIRE Constitution can be changed; nothing is off-limits. This would even allow the States to dismantle the federal government without its consent, and repudiate the debt which that government has incurred! When it voted for the convention last week, Michigan became the 34 th state, thus meeting the requirement.
A goal has been reached behind what would be an unprecedented effort to amend the U.S. Constitution, through a little-known provision that gives states rather than Congress the power to initiate changes. This is the most significant political development in the entire world in the last 200 years.
Read more... (http://www.politicalears.com/blog/something-huge-just-happened-and-the-mainstream-media-is-ignoring-it/?utm_content=buffer60170&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer)
Okay, after from further digging, this appears to have some legitimacy:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/02/rare-option-forcing-congress-to-meet-change-constitution-gains-momentum/
http://www.mlive.com/lansing-news/index.ssf/2014/04/accidental_history_how_michiga.html
http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2014/04/unraveling-part-of-a-new-constitution-convention-riddle/
If two-thirds of the states indeed have applied, the ball is presumably in Congress' court to call the convention.
But Article V is rather vague, and it's ultimately unclear whether 34 states have technically applied. In the past, states like Oregon, Utah and Arizona have quietly voted to approve the provision in their legislature.
But some of the 34 or so have rescinded their requests. Others have rescinded, and then re-applied.
Alabama rescinded its request in 1988 but in 2011, lawmakers again applied for a convention related to an amendment requiring that the federal budget be balanced. It was a similar story in Florida in 2010.
Louisiana rescinded in 1990 but lawmakers have tried several times, unsuccessfully, to reinstate the application since then.
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/something-huge-just-happened-and-the-mainstream-media-is-ignoring-it
The most important political development in 200 years was triggered last week, when the state legislature of Michigan became the 34 th state to demand a “Constitutional Convention” in the United States. Under Article 5 of the US Constitution, if 2/3rds of the states call for such a convention, (meaning 34 states) it MUST take place. During such a convention, the ENTIRE Constitution can be changed; nothing is off-limits. This would even allow the States to dismantle the federal government without its consent, and repudiate the debt which that government has incurred! When it voted for the convention last week, Michigan became the 34 th state, thus meeting the requirement.
A goal has been reached behind what would be an unprecedented effort to amend the U.S. Constitution, through a little-known provision that gives states rather than Congress the power to initiate changes. This is the most significant political development in the entire world in the last 200 years.
Read more... (http://www.politicalears.com/blog/something-huge-just-happened-and-the-mainstream-media-is-ignoring-it/?utm_content=buffer60170&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer)
Okay, after from further digging, this appears to have some legitimacy:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/02/rare-option-forcing-congress-to-meet-change-constitution-gains-momentum/
http://www.mlive.com/lansing-news/index.ssf/2014/04/accidental_history_how_michiga.html
http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2014/04/unraveling-part-of-a-new-constitution-convention-riddle/
If two-thirds of the states indeed have applied, the ball is presumably in Congress' court to call the convention.
But Article V is rather vague, and it's ultimately unclear whether 34 states have technically applied. In the past, states like Oregon, Utah and Arizona have quietly voted to approve the provision in their legislature.
But some of the 34 or so have rescinded their requests. Others have rescinded, and then re-applied.
Alabama rescinded its request in 1988 but in 2011, lawmakers again applied for a convention related to an amendment requiring that the federal budget be balanced. It was a similar story in Florida in 2010.
Louisiana rescinded in 1990 but lawmakers have tried several times, unsuccessfully, to reinstate the application since then.