PDA

View Full Version : Hillary Clinton: Gun culture 'way out of balance'



Ranger353
05-06-2014, 14:59
WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton said Tuesday the nation's gun culture has gotten "way out of balance" and the U.S. needs to rein in the notion that "anybody can have a gun, anywhere, anytime."
The former Secretary of State and potential 2016 Democratic presidential candidate said the idea that anyone can have a gun is not in the "best interest of the vast majority of people." But she said that approach does not conflict with the rights of people to own firearms.
Read more at http://gazette.com/hillary-clinton-gun-culture-way-out-of-balance/article/feed/115694#EohMg5iQhywIbGCp.99

What a troll! Remember this story when she is running for President because most Americans will not. The liberals will claim that she is being quoted out of context, BS! She will ban all but the most antiquated firearms if she gets a bill in front of her to sign.

blacklabel
05-06-2014, 15:28
Screw that pig.

USMC_5-Echo
05-06-2014, 15:35
Screw that pig.

With real screws? Cause nobody could pay me enough money to screw her!

blacklabel
05-06-2014, 15:38
http://www.spaansbabcock.com/cms/bestanden/imagecache/42c611d0-1564-49ad-acd2-8b76893f821d.jpg

USMC_5-Echo
05-06-2014, 15:43
That might still be a tad small [LOL]

vossman
05-06-2014, 18:11
Nice.


That might still be a tad small [LOL]

DOC
05-06-2014, 19:11
To quote a rapper "All she eats is dick and she's on a strict diet."

cstone
05-06-2014, 19:19
Hillary Rodham Clinton: Either she knew her husband was lying and cheating and she was complicit, or she didn't know her husband was lying and cheating and she is stupid. Either way, one of those conditions disqualify her from ever receiving my vote for any public office.

Generally I don't pay attention to people who have given me good reason not to pay attention to them.

buffalobo
05-06-2014, 19:29
This is my surprised face.

Lobbed from my electronic ball and chain.

kidicarus13
06-18-2014, 07:49
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/politics/2014/06/17/tsr-amanpour-clinton-town-hall-gun-laws.cnn.html

Great-Kazoo
06-18-2014, 07:55
Some sympathy for the lady guy's. After all, her and bill had to crawl out from destitution to get where they are today. That lack of money may have given them the outlook they have.

roberth
06-18-2014, 07:57
Planted question from a union stooge to an authoritarian looking for tyranny.

buffalobo
06-18-2014, 07:59
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/politics/2014/06/17/tsr-amanpour-clinton-town-hall-gun-laws.cnn.html
20 pounds of bullshit in a 10 pound bag.

lobbed from my electronic ball and chain

Irving
06-18-2014, 09:15
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/politics/2014/06/17/tsr-amanpour-clinton-town-hall-gun-laws.cnn.html

Made it 36 seconds. After more than two seconds of clapping, I was done.

ChunkyMonkey
06-18-2014, 09:20
well hey, we know CNN is 100% behind hillary

Ronin13
06-18-2014, 09:48
I swear, if Hillary is elected president America is over. Our best bet if that worst case scenario happens is to just go take over St. John's or something.

Hound
06-18-2014, 10:00
At least she is on record for her stance on guns. This will make it easy to call out in debates instead of the middle of the road answers that only get answered when they are in office.

SamuraiCO
06-18-2014, 10:18
She stated "We cannot let a minority of people -- and that's what it is, it is a minority of people -- hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people," on CNN.

"We're going to have to do a better job protecting the vast majority of our citizens, including our children, from that very, very, very small group that is unfortunately prone to violence and now with automatic weapons can wreak so much more violence than they ever could have before," Clinton said.

There is no doubt where she sits and stands on the topic.


Funny how they embrace the vocal minority with amnesty or gay rights now aday.

roberth
06-18-2014, 14:46
These people do not understand a few things about security and personal safety.

The very first thing they do not understand is that personal security starts with the individual. The awareness and ability to perform an act of self defense, be it running away or fighting, is done at the individual level. No amount of government can provide security to the individual. The government sure would like to give it try and these sheep will let it, and they'll watch it fail and think the answer is more bigger government.

The second thing about these people is that they don't want to be responsible for anything, including their own health and welfare. They are cowards and tyrants, always looking for someone else to blame for their own self-induced problems and imposing restrictions on free men who accept the risks of life as human beings.

The third thing is that they have no knowledge of the history of tyranny. They are wholly ignorant and they take delight in their own ignorance. Millions of them have died by hands of the people they thought would take care of them, they never learn, and so they deserve their fate.

68Charger
06-18-2014, 15:01
She's right- I'm tired of being terrorized by a minority of control freaks who think that I'm a criminal just because they don't understand my mentality... despite the many background checks, hoops they make me jump through, rights they've denied me, and things they've banned me from owning.

How is it that it's ok for them to attack one minority and deny our rights, but they protect another- calling anyone who questions that bigots?

Ridge
06-18-2014, 15:16
She stated "We cannot let a minority of people -- and that's what it is, it is a minority of people -- hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people," on CNN.

But enough about Congress...

roberth
06-18-2014, 16:41
But enough about Congress...


LOL - good one.

asmo
06-18-2014, 18:40
R8OPZjMde3c

kidicarus13
06-18-2014, 20:13
These people do not understand a few things about security and personal safety.

The very first thing they do not understand is that personal security starts with the individual. The awareness and ability to perform an act of self defense, be it running away or fighting, is done at the individual level. No amount of government can provide security to the individual. The government sure would like to give it try and these sheep will let it, and they'll watch it fail and think the answer is more bigger government.

The second thing about these people is that they don't want to be responsible for anything, including their own health and welfare. They are cowards and tyrants, always looking for someone else to blame for their own self-induced problems and imposing restrictions on free men who accept the risks of life as human beings.

The third thing is that they have no knowledge of the history of tyranny. They are wholly ignorant and they take delight in their own ignorance. Millions of them have died by hands of the people they thought would take care of them, they never learn, and so they deserve their fate.

Well stated

DOC
06-18-2014, 20:39
She hit all the buzz words. "Ban on Assault Weapons", "hi cap magazines" "do any good". She seemed well informed on what question to ask. I noticed her eyes drifting to one side. I wonder if the plant or stooge or usefull idiot was checking to seem if her brains were leaking out or if she was just telling the voices in here head to hold on a minute?

roberth
06-19-2014, 06:19
She hit all the buzz words. "Ban on Assault Weapons", "hi cap magazines" "do any good". She seemed well informed on what question to ask. I noticed her eyes drifting to one side. I wonder if the plant or stooge or usefull idiot was checking to seem if her brains were leaking out or if she was just telling the voices in here head to hold on a minute?

Probably reading a teleprompter, liberals don't have original thoughts when it comes to government.

merl
06-22-2014, 09:59
beware:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2014/06/22/324022617/hillary-clinton-the-inevitable-sure-seems-like-it

The jockeying for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination is already shaping up to be nothing like the 2008 contest. Indeed, it doesn't even resemble a contest. It's not going too far out on a limb to say that, unlike six years ago, the nomination is Hillary Clinton's for the taking, if she wants it.

In every polling matchup with a potential Republican nominee, Clinton enjoys a wide lead. Whether it's senators of Florida or of Kentucky, of New Jersey or former Florida Gov. , Clinton leads by double digits.

Cujo0920
06-22-2014, 10:19
And now the next generation of the horrific Clinton corruption machine is about to be thrust on the American body politic.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/10902554/Chelsea-Clinton-interview-I-will-always-work-harder-than-anyone.html

Shockingly, Hillary's propaganda tome, for which she was advanced $14 million (quite a favors being called in there, I'm guessing) has already been consigned to the deep discount rack.

http://www.amazon.com/Hard-Choices-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton/dp/1476751447/ref=zg_bs_books_14/181-4043368-3135715

merl
06-22-2014, 10:39
Every review on her book panned it.

Cujo0920
06-22-2014, 13:26
Ever noticed how many millions Bill and Hillary Clinton have collected outside of their "public service" jobs? Hillary collected $14 million just for this stinker of a book, which makes me wonder if this book deal, along with Bill's overpriced speeches, was their way of collecting on "services rendered" (like Bill Clinton's repeal of Glass-Stegal, which set the stage for unbridled Wall Street speculation and asset bubbles ever since) while in office.