CNN gun control poll

[O2HeN2]

Let's tell 'em what we think (bottom right of page): http://edition.cnn.com/

O2

[Dave]

Not looking good early for us. Almost 2/3 of a little under 800 favor more gun control. Though being on the CNN website it's likely to attract more people of a liberal mindset anyway.

[Gman]

Conservatives don't do CNN.

Sent from my electronic leash.

[davsel]

US population ~ 313 Million
Votes ~ 800

= .00026%

And they say it's not a scientific poll. /sarc

[Great-Kazoo]

Conservatives don't do CNN.

Sent from my electronic leash.

+1

[Jesus-With-A-.45]

This poll is completely bogus! It's not recording votes properly, & is clearly skewed to show favor for gun control. I'm on another site & we hit that poll over a 100 x's & it never recorded our votes........

[Zundfolge]

Its tightening up :p

Does the United States need stricter gun control laws?
No 51% 546
Yes 49% 535

[TRnCO]

NO has 55% and yes 45% at the moment.

[hatidua]

Oops....me thinks the poll is not going how they had hoped :(

[RonMexico]

Paste the link and maybe more members here can sway the vote even more.
I clicked the link but my phone took me to the mobile homepage.

[Rucker61]

It's at 58% NO now.

[roberth]

It's at 58% NO now.

Yup.

[SouthPaw]

It is probably going to end like the one KDVR ran awhile back. Magically the those numbers we see now will flip flop right before it ends.

[kidicarus13]

It is probably going to end like the one KDVR ran awhile back. Magically the those numbers we see now will flip flop right before it ends.

After the "mail-in ballots" are counted.

[clodhopper]

Won't let me vote or see the results. Dunno if it is their website or my connection.

[hatidua]

-when poll doesn't go in the direction you want, you simply take the poll off the site [Flower]

[MrPrena]

Voted, Small sample still, but we need to show CNN and other anti-2a how united we are. :)

[Great-Kazoo]

63% NO

[BPTactical]

Hit it, as Jim said 63% no.
Even the Libtards are starting to get it, guns aren't the problem.

[Gman]

After the "mail-in ballots" are counted.
They'll be looking for dimpled chads next.

63% No
37% Yes

[HoneyBadger]

http://buzzpo.com/cnn-caught-red-handed-sabotaging-gun-control-poll/



It’s amazing how far the liberal gun-grabbing lefties will go to justify their agenda. Earlier today, CNN posted posted the poll (http://edition.cnn.com/index.html?mobile=0), “does the U.S. need stricter gun control?” Needless to say, their poll has some major issues, and some would say it’s downright sabotage!

The first problem, is that the poll is placed on CNN’s International Edition. It’s nowhere to be found on the CNN U.S. Edition! The U.S. Edition has the below section in the place where the poll is located on their International Edition!

Pardon me, but as an American, why would we care what foreigners think about our laws? The polls results were very heavily leaning towards “Yes,” until many gun-rights groups and social media pages began posting the voting link for all Americans to see.

The second major issue, is that many “No” votes are not being tallied. This was originally brought to attention by “The Truth About Guns” Facebook page. I initially had my doubts, so I began voting “No” from several different computers and mobile devices. Sure enough, the fans from “The Truth About Guns” are right on the money! Many of the “No” votes are not being counted!It’s liberal lunacy at it’s finest, but it’s also somewhat reassuring. The liberal main stream media knows the only way to push their gun-grabbing agenda, is to lie and cheat! Sorry CNN, epic fail. Game, set, match!

[hghclsswhitetrsh]

64% nay

[DavieD55]

67% [Coffee]

[ChunkyMonkey]

wth... Why they have the poll in the bottom corner of their INTERNATIONAL site? Why do I care what foreigners think.

[hatidua]

-the poll showed up on the default site this morning (www.cnn.com) but no longer shows up there on my browser. They must not like how I voted...

[wctriumph]

No - 67%
Yes - 33%

[Rooskibar03]

Troy industries linked from their Facebook as well.

[jerrymrc]

wth... Why they have the poll in the bottom corner of their INTERNATIONAL site? Why do I care what foreigners think.

This is why I luv ya. [Flower]

[Rooskibar03]

(Putting self in time out for repost)

[clodhopper]

Busted

http://buzzpo.com/cnn-caught-red-handed-sabotaging-gun-control-poll/

Repost. Honey badger beat you by a few hours. Be more on the ball next time. There are expectations around this place, after all.

[clodhopper]

Different device, different service and it still doesn't work for me. Can't vote or even see the results.

Must be referencing with NSA and blocking me. Jerks.

[JerryG]

Just voted
no 69%
yes 29%

[10mm-man]

^^^ Yep; just did too!

[Great-Kazoo]

I've voted 3x, one more and i'll be forced to register as a democrat.

[10mm-man]

I've voted 3x, one more and i'll be forced to register as a democrat.

Thought you already were......... [ROFL1][Beer]

[sniper7]

70/30 now.

[Dave]

I've voted 3x, one more and i'll be forced to register as a democrat.
Vote early, vote often.

Or you could just be like the woman in Cleveland who was "voting" for Obama under her family members' names because she "knows" that's how they would vote. Though they probably would, it's still a crime.

[Great-Kazoo]

Thought you already were......... [ROFL1][Beer]

IT'S FOR THE CHILDREN

https://sp1.yimg.com/ib/th?id=HN.608025953192444129&pid=15.1

[Fentonite]

69%.
I checked poll results before and after voting, and my vote didn't seem to get counted. Surprise.
45401

[Big E3]

I voted, wow over 3000 voted. I bet CNN is happy, they didn't even think 3000 people knew they were still around.

[GilpinGuy]

I voted, wow over 3000 voted. I bet CNN is happy, they didn't even think 3000 people knew they were still around.

Ha! How true. Douches...

[GilpinGuy]

I voted, wow over 3000 voted. I bet CNN is happy, they didn't even think 3000 people knew they were still around.

Ha! How true. Douches...

After I voted yesterday I immediately came back here without looking at one single article on there. Nice try.

And wtf with the double post? Probably operator error.