PDA

View Full Version : Article: Feminism has slain our protectors



45XD
10-31-2014, 09:49
So this article is a few months old, but I stumbled across it yesterday when I was supposed to be paying attention in a meeting but was roaming the internet instead. Might be preaching to the choir, but I liked it so wanted to attach it here:

http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/feminism-has-slain-our-protectors/

REAL AMERICA Feminism has slain our protectors Exclusive: Patrice Lewis on why 'the barbarians at the gates' are more dangerous today Published: 09/12/2014 at 8:23 PM http://www.wnd.com/files/2011/12/Patrice-Lewis_avatar.jpg Patrice Lewis (http://www.wnd.com/author/plewis/) About | Email (plewis@wnd.com) | Archive (http://www.wnd.com/author/plewis/?archive=true) Patrice Lewis is a freelance writer whose latest book is "The Simplicity Primer: 365 Ideas for Making Life more Livable." (http://superstore.wnd.com/books/WND-Books/The-Simplicity-Primer-AutographedPaperback) She is co-founder (with her husband) of a home woodcraft business. The Lewises live on 20 acres in north Idaho with their two homeschooled children, assorted livestock, and a shop that overflows into the house with depressing regularity. Visit her blog at www.rural-revolution.com (http://www.rural-revolution.com/).


I admire men.
Specifically, I admire men who are controlled, confident and who fulfill their biological destiny as protectors and providers. Men are essential for training boys to tame the testosterone and channel their natural strengths and aggressiveness in appropriate ways. Trained men are, in the words of columnist Dennis Prager, (http://www.wnd.com/2010/01/122350/) the glory of civilization. (It goes without saying that untrained men are its scourge, but that’s another column.)


Men – trained, manly men – are necessary for a balanced society. They take on the tough ugly hard jobs women can’t or won’t do. They mine our coal and fight our fires and protect our shores and fix our engines and rescue our butts when we’re in danger. They truck our goods and clean our pipes and wire our homes. They plow fields and grow food. They butcher livestock so we can buy meat in tidy sanitized packages in the grocery store and pretend it never came from a cow.
I’m not saying women can’t be found in those fields; but let’s be honest: The vast majority of workers in hard, dangerous, dirty and heavy fields are men. They deserve our praise and gratitude.
Which is why I get so ticked off when feminists belittle men. These kinds of women don’t admire manly men who protect and provide. Feminists don’t want warriors; they want servants who will kowtow to their emotions and feeeeeeelings. They prefer emasculated androgynous guys who wouldn’t know one end of a rifle from the other. Guys who watch chick flicks with them. Guys who know what temperature to wash the dainties. Guys who are preoccupied with “social justice” and bringing their carbon footprint down to zero.
Now of course I’m taking things to extremes, but it’s to make a point. For the last 50 years – essentially my lifetime – there has been a war on manliness. Women were told they didn’t need a man, even to raise children. The family unit was attacked, mocked and dismantled so that children lost their mooring and grew up disoriented and adrift, unsure of their biological roles.
The result is we’ve lost a great number of our nation’s providers and protectors. We’ve raised generations of boys who were encouraged to embrace their feminine side, to be sensitive and emotional, and to look with horror at anything aggressive. Indeed aggressiveness, no matter how properly channeled, is still looked at with revulsion by feminists. Boys are punished for being boys and indulging in boyish activities. Instead, boys are trained to be girlish.


WND Books’ latest release on feminism confronts the harridans head on – the Politichicks team up in “What Women Really Want”

(http://superstore.wnd.com/books/What-Women-Really-Want-AutographedHardcover)

Consequently, America has become a wimpy society dominated by women. Women (y’know, those “strong confident women”) don’t want protection from men – that’s too old-fashioned and barbaric. Warriors in uniform are turned away (http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/26491600/army-officer-is-told-he-cant-enter-his-daughters-high-school-because-hes-wearing-his-uniform) lest those uniforms “offend” someone. Our society thinks we’ve “progressed” beyond the need to protect ourselves. It claims we’ll be “safer” if we don’t have access to those evil awful nasty guns … which, as everyone knows, are merely phallic representations of the male ego. Yuck.
Feminism and its corollary, political correctness, have slain our protectors – not literally (unless you count abortion) but metaphorically. Feminism has had such a strong influence on everything from how boys are raised to what national policy is instigated that we have achieved a state of spectacular wimpiness. Political correctness has now such a strong grip on our country that we can no longer call an enemy an enemy because that’s “intolerant.”
But now we’re facing a threat … and we have no warriors to protect us.
Ever hear the term “the barbarians are at the gate”? It refers to the Mongol “horde” that ravaged Asia and eastern Europe during the Middle Ages. The Mongols were tough uncivilized warriors who brutally cut down anyone who stood in their way. The “civilized” countries of Europe looked at the approaching horde with panic because they knew their courtly, politically correct knights had no way to repulse these violent bands of men who had a simple, single goal: to conquer. In short, when the barbarians were at the gate, you had something to worry about.
It’s not hard to draw parallels to America today. Our warriors are gone. Our men are too courtly and politically correct to repulse the barbarians at the gate who have a simple, single goal: to conquer.
Ironically, feminists have gotten what they wanted: a neutered society where men are deprived of the means and motivation to protect us. They’ve made testosterone something to be ashamed of, which means we’re leaving ourselves wide open to men who aren’t ashamed of their testosterone and who don’t have self-control or civilizing influences. These are men who don’t care about feeeeelings and emotions, about feminism or political correctness or carbon footprints or social justice. These uncontrolled, uncivilized men are inside and outside of our borders, poised and waiting. Without our warriors, our nation is laid bare to savages who will not hesitate to use their testosterone-induced strength to conquer and enslave.
Where will women be then?
It’s important to remember: With the exception of superior firepower and military strength, a nation cannot be conquered when it is disciplined, controlled, responsible, self-reliant and has a strong warrior class. But when a nation is rotting from within, it is ripe for conquest. I ask you: Who is causing our nation to rot from within?
I leave you with the sobering quote from Marcus Tullius Cicero, (http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Marcus.Tullius.Cicero.Quote.B6EA) attributed to a speech in the Roman Senate around 58 B.C.:
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”
We don’t need feminism. We need our protectors back.

Media wishing to interview Patrice Lewis, please contact media@wnd.com.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/feminism-has-slain-our-protectors/#PPJRatrylfRogMwF.99

wctriumph
10-31-2014, 09:54
I have commented on this before and I blame the French for inventing Romance and the rise of feminism. Mostly I blame men for going along with all this.

It is simple:

Women want to feel secure

Men want to feel significant

roberth
10-31-2014, 10:03
I have commented on this before and I blame the French for inventing Romance and the rise of feminism. Mostly I blame men for going along with all this.

It is simple:

Liberal women want to feel secure and will sacrifice the nations liberty for their security.

Men who are pansies want to feel significant, men who are men ARE significant

My interpretation. :)

TheGrey
10-31-2014, 11:10
I agree with a lot of what the article says. There's been a movement of degradation of respect over the past 20 years, making men the butt of jokes, of stereotypes of guys that are helpless to do anything on their own, and a pervading sense that men are simply clowns that never reach maturity. We see it in commercials, we see it in "romantic comedies" and people are starting to believe it.

I've grown up with a different definition of feminism than media has presented: feminism means that a woman isn't stopped by her gender. If a woman wants to be a miner, for instance, it will not be her gender that stops her. But a woman is still supposed to be a gracious person, polite and respectful to men and women alike. I don't know where the scorn for men comes from, and the idea of disrespect for either gender doesn't make sense to me. It's counter-productive and causes no end to strife. If a woman wants to be a stay-at-home wife or mother and it works, why is it anyone else's concern? If a woman wants to be a police officer, a mechanic, a politician or a miner, why is it anyone's concern? It doesn't make her better or worse than anyone else.

SamuraiCO
10-31-2014, 12:18
I leave you with the sobering quote from Marcus Tullius Cicero, (http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Marcus.Tullius.Cicero.Quote.B6EA) attributed to a speech in the Roman Senate around 58 B.C.:
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”


Wow sounds like the Democrat party and their treatment of their constituents.

It also helps explain why young unmarried women vote Dem and once they are married tend to vote Republican.

norcalsilverfox
11-03-2014, 15:40
^^^Great quote...that applies so in many times & places in this world. Great article, thx op...so true.

theGinsue
11-03-2014, 20:27
Adding on to what TheGrey said, for several years now I've unsuccessfully been trying to get my wife to see just how prevalent this man bashing actually is.

Look at almost every (if not every) sitcom. A couple of my wife's favorites were/are Everybody Loves Raymond & King of Queens. These shows make the men out to be buffoons & the women out to be intelligent & balanced. Hell, even everyone's beloved Home Improvement did this to most every man/boy on the show - with the exception of the androgynous Al & good neighbor Wilson.

You've got the multiple Lifetime networks with 80% of their shows demonstrating how evil and dangerous men/husbands are. Oh sure, 15% are about dangerous women and 5% are just feel good shows, but the balance shows a clear anti-man agenda.

I was raised to treat everyone, particularly women, with respect until such time as they've clearly demonstrated they aren't worthy of that respect. However, even if a woman didn't garner respect by virtue of her personality, she usually (with some exceptions) maintained the respect from simply being a lady. But, demonstrating respect for others by no means meant being anything less than a hard working, sweat covered (when appropriate), manly man who got his hands dirty doing a mans job.

It's going to take something very serious to change the course of the pussification (you're damned right I used that word) of America.

norcalsilverfox
11-03-2014, 20:46
^^^Hell ya...it's gone so far, I cannot even relate to the males in the generation below my X gen. They seem too busy waxing, eye brow plucking, tanning etc to even sit and have descent conversations...its all about selfies, Facebook, Twitter etc. Wtf lol...and I have to add per wife...she's all aboard the author's thoughts on the subject. [emoji2]

rbeau30
11-03-2014, 20:46
This is all why, as a male I have to work 5 times as hard to get equal parenting time with my children, and still loose them.
This is why, My ex-wife can be a professional student and not work a job to support our children while I get turned into a paycheck.
This is why, my ex wife can quit her job and I have to pay more child support. Even though I have an associates degree in IT and she has a Bachelors in Accounting.
This is why she is now able to pursue a MASTERS degree now and still not work while I continue to be a paycheck.

This is why, If I were to quit my job so I can go to school full time like she has been doing for the last 4 years I would go to jail for being under employed.

Jesus-With-A-.45
11-03-2014, 22:34
This is all why, as a male I have to work 5 times as hard to get equal parenting time with my children, and still loose them.
This is why, My ex-wife can be a professional student and not work a job to support our children while I get turned into a paycheck.
This is why, my ex wife can quit her job and I have to pay more child support. Even though I have an associates degree in IT and she has a Bachelors in Accounting.
This is why she is now able to pursue a MASTERS degree now and still not work while I continue to be a paycheck.

This is why, If I were to quit my job so I can go to school full time like she has been doing for the last 4 years I would go to jail for being under employed.\\

I know it doesn't help, but I feel your pain brother.

Irving
11-03-2014, 22:42
This is all why, as a male I have to work 5 times as hard to get equal parenting time with my children, and still loose them.
This is why, My ex-wife can be a professional student and not work a job to support our children while I get turned into a paycheck.
This is why, my ex wife can quit her job and I have to pay more child support. Even though I have an associates degree in IT and she has a Bachelors in Accounting.
This is why she is now able to pursue a MASTERS degree now and still not work while I continue to be a paycheck.

This is why, If I were to quit my job so I can go to school full time like she has been doing for the last 4 years I would go to jail for being under employed.

Clearly the answer is to create an on-line dating profile for her, so you can get her re-married asap.

rbeau30
11-03-2014, 22:45
\\

I know it doesn't help, but I feel your pain brother.


And supposedly this state is "cutting edge in Father's rights".

TheGrey
11-03-2014, 22:59
On behalf of responsible womenkind, I extend a profound apology to the men that have been sorely abused, by dint of having a Y chromosome. It is frustrating beyond belief to watch these people degrade men with the thinly-veiled contempt of spoiled children. Please know that Hollywood, that bastard collective that has elected itself to be a mouthpiece to champion problems that it creates on its own, does NOT speak for all of us.

I believe that deep down, most of us have the same hopes and dreams. Right now, it appears that the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, and things are getting very extreme. It's ugly, and will get uglier until the pendulum begins moving back to the middle.

Know that we're not all man-hating bitches. That doesn't mean that I won't call someone out on something I disagree with...but it sure won't be because of the male/female factor. :)

hollohas
11-04-2014, 20:22
I have been reading Patrice Lewis' blog for years. She does a lot of writting for other websites and I love many of her past essays, including this one.

Cujo0920
11-05-2014, 08:20
One of the many reasons I despise the Disney Channel is that on all their shows aimed at kids, i.e. mine, they show the fathers as bumbling doofuses, while the moms are always wise, grounded, witty, and the true heads of the household.