Log in

View Full Version : Sheriff Justin Smith calls out threats from the cockroach and the civilian national security force



DavieD55
02-09-2015, 23:07
How about a round of applause for Larimer County Sheriff Justin Smith.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/02/sheriff-calls-veiled-threats-americas-police-obamas-homeland-security-secretary/


Justin Smith recently called out the veiled threats of Jeh Johnson, Obama's Homeland Security Secretary.In a letter to sheriffs across the country, Johnson wrote the following:Press OfficeU.S. Department of Homeland Security Press ReleaseFeb. 3, 2015Contact: DHS Press Office, STATEMENT BY SECRETARY JEH C. JOHNSON ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF OUR HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT-MAKING WITHOUT A DHS APPRORPIATIONS BILLIn recent days I have repeatedly stressed the need for a DHS appropriations bill for FY 2015, unburdened by politically charged amendments that attempt to defund our executive actions on immigration reform. The President has made plain that he will veto a bill that includes such language.As long as this Department -- which interfaces with the public more than any other -- is funded by a continuing resolution, there are a whole series of activities vital to homeland security and public safety that cannot be undertaken.One of the many consequences of operating on a continuing resolution is our inability to fund new non-disaster grants to state, local and tribal governments, law enforcement, emergency response officials and fire departments. Every governor, mayor, police chief, county sheriff, emergency manager and fire chief should care about this. These officials know that the grants we provide help them protect their communities. For example, last week when I visited the multi-agency coordinating center in Phoenix responsible for the security of the Super Bowl, officials pointed out to me that almost all the surveillance and communications equipment there was funded by the Department of Homeland Security.Here are some other examples of the types of state, local and tribal government activities vital to homeland security and public safety that are funded by grants from this Department:

• salaries for state and local emergency managers in all 50 states, U.S. territories and the District of Columbia;
• new communications equipment for over 80 public safety agencies in the Los Angeles area to replace aging and incompatible radio systems;

• surveillance cameras and environmental sensors used by the New York City Police Department to detect in real time potential terrorist activity;

• increased security for the MTA, PATH trains and tunnels in the New York City area;

• improved campus security at K-12 public schools, colleges and universities in the state of Florida;

• K-9 units to detect explosive ordinance in the state of Massachusetts;

• upgraded oxygen masks and tanks for over 30 firefighter and law enforcement agencies in the Denver metropolitan area;

• the Arizona Counterterrorism Fusion Center, which provides intelligence and information from this Department to state and local law enforcement there;

• fifteen mobile command centers for possible catastrophic incidents in the state of Kentucky;

• 150 firefighter jobs in the city of Detroit; and

• bomb squads in the state of Idaho.On behalf of the men and women of this Department who work every day to keep the homeland safe, I urge that Congress pass an appropriations bill for this Department, free of politically charged amendments to defund our executive actions.

Time is running short.According to Sheriff Smith, "The memo attempted to intimidate us into supporting the president's dangerous an [sic] irresponsible executive actions establishing executive amnesty for millions of illegal aliens by threatening to cut public safety grants if Congress didn't rubber stamp the president's executive overreach in the 2015 DHS budget, being debated under the Capitol dome currently."Smith called the letter a "veiled threat.

""His letter made it clear that if Congress didn't send President Obama the DHS funding bill that he wanted (rubberstamping the president's executive amnesty), local and state public safety agencies would not receive federal grants they were counting on because the president would veto the DHS funding bill," said Smith.

Smith challenged his fellow law enforcement executives to "stand resolute and not cave to these childish, playground bully threats from the administration."He then had a warning for Secretary Johnson: "Mr. Johnson, please show some integrity and stop with the threats.

Sheriffs don't take kindly to them."Somehow, this administration and Congress can find the means to pass a $1 trillion continuing resolution with all sorts of unconstitutional spending, including Obama's illegal and unconstitutional executive amnesty and Obamacare. Yet, when it comes to actually providing for what the Executive Branch is entrusted with, enforcement of the law, they threaten the funding of sheriffs.

This is shameless conduct and dare I say, criminal conduct from an already exposed criminal administration.When are the American people going to have enough of it?

Great-Kazoo
02-09-2015, 23:42
As long as Smith doesn't get any allegations of sexual harasment or other nefarious doings while in office (Like Terry) he'll do good. UNFORTUNATELY The Progressives of Ft. Collins / Pat Stryker (Bohemian Foundation) have a serious mad on for Smith. The boulderforniai of Ft Fun now has a strong grip on the city and county. We shall see what happens down the road.

newracer
02-09-2015, 23:55
As long as Smith doesn't get any allegations of sexual harasment or other nefarious doings while in office (Like Terry) he'll do good. UNFORTUNATELY The Progressives of Ft. Collins / Pat Stryker (Bohemian Foundation) have a serious mad on for Smith. The boulderforniai of Ft Fun now has a strong grip on the city and county. We shall see what happens down the road.

Yet he ran unopposed the last election.

Hound
02-10-2015, 00:14
It seems to me if Congress passes a bill to fund DHS with a limitation stopping the amnesty, that is their right per the Constitution and in fact job. If Obama wants to veto it and shut down DHS that is his right under the Constitution. This will mean that Congress has done it's job and cannot be blamed for shutting down anything. That will be Obama's water to carry..... No matter how wet he wants to get before he figures out he is wrong.

Great-Kazoo
02-10-2015, 00:47
Yet he ran unopposed the last election.

To date, yes. Those progressives are a patient bunch. AND very well funded / organized.

Aloha_Shooter
02-10-2015, 01:36
Quit calling them progressives. I know they want to steal that moniker but they are regressive Stalinists or Maoists. There is no progress whatsoever in their platform.

Great-Kazoo
02-10-2015, 08:00
Quit calling them progressives. I know they want to steal that moniker but they are regressive Stalinists or Maoists. There is no progress whatsoever in their platform.

True , true

Zundfolge
02-10-2015, 09:23
Quit calling them progressives. I know they want to steal that moniker but they are regressive Stalinists or Maoists. There is no progress whatsoever in their platform.

Yeah, I know, but we have to call them SOMETHING that people will recognize ... and they're the most illiberal people on the planet so I'm not keen on calling them "liberals" ... and the left vs right paradigm of political ideologies is a sham designed to make mainstream conservatism appear to be closer to Nazism, so I don't like "leftist" either.

Calling them "progressives" does tie them to the early 20th century Progressive movement and the likes of Woodrow Wilson (which IS their political ancestry).

bryjcom
02-10-2015, 09:30
Quit calling them progressives. I know they want to steal that moniker but they are regressive Stalinists or Maoists. There is no progress whatsoever in their platform.

I either call them progressives or authoritarians.

Progressives is what they called themselves when they championed eugenics programs back in the 20 and 30s so I think its a good reminder to remind the American public of that bit of history.

I, however, NEVER call them "Liberals" and quite frankly nobody else should either. They are the farthest thing from actually being "liberal"

roberth
02-10-2015, 11:10
Call them communists, that is what they are, they should embrace the 100 million+ humans they have murdered in the last century alone.

Bailey Guns
02-10-2015, 12:17
WTF ever. Liberals, progressives, communists, socialists...they all make me miserable.

Argue the semantics all you want...when you say "liberal" or "progressive" in a conversation today, everyone knows what you mean by that and they know it isn't a good thing.

Great-Kazoo
02-10-2015, 12:59
WTF ever. Liberals, progressives, communists, socialists...they all make me miserable.

Argue the semantics all you want...when you say "liberal" or "progressive" in a conversation today, everyone knows what you mean by that and they know it isn't a good thing.

I've called them flag burners and some members of this forum (You know who you are) got all vaginally irritated over it.

roberth
02-10-2015, 13:09
I've called them flag burners and some members of this forum (You know who you are) got all vaginally irritated over it.

Aw, you spoke the truth and they didn't like it. Poor babies, maybe they should go read something else like HuffPo so their poor little feelers won't get hurt. Reminds me of the asshats who think they can be pro-2A and communist simultaneously.