Cop hits guy with squad car

[RblDiver]

Well, since we lost that month's worth of other threads, I can't just attach this to them, so here's a new one. This one's interesting: If all you had was the short video of the cops, it might (I suppose) look excessive. But hearing what all this guy did that day (rob a 7-11 in his undies, set fire to a church, break into a home, steal a car, steal a rifle and ammo from Wal-Mart, point the gun at cops, then fire it into the air).....yeah, I'm fully on the officer's side in this case.

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/15/video-the-obligatory-arizona-cop-stops-armed-perp-by-hitting-him-with-his-squad-car-clip

[hollohas]

Yup, that's certainly one way to stop a BG. Too bad the car had to go through the wall though...

[Wulf202]

Make it socially unacceptable to shoot someone who needs it. This is what happens.

[BushMasterBoy]

Bump

[Sawin]

Make it socially unacceptable to shoot someone who needs it. This is what happens.

Yep... a bullet costs tax payers a whole lot less than a squad car and property damage repairs....

[bryjcom]

Usually it's best to avoid deadly force until absolutely needed. Good job to the officer

[mackbamf]

Beep beep motherfucker...

[Dr_Fwd]

Good job. That oficer just prevented a long, dangerous stand off with an armed mofo that could have potentially ended very bad...
"The gun is loaded.. - stay clear." Whack! "Bring him down" Simple and effective.

[BPTactical]

Beep beep motherfucker...

LOL




"I was just enforcing the law....."
"What law?"

"Newton's Law!"



Good hit

[Wulf202]

I don't know why they didn't list this as a half black car if color matters so much

[stoner01]

He was shootable therefore he was runoverable

[Bailey Guns]

Bowling for Bad Guys. And that was a strike!

[GilpinGuy]

I saw this this morning and it made my day. Especially with the puss bag cop screaming "stand down, stand down" or whatever over and over while he followed the scumbag at a crawl. Was he just waiting to get shot or what? DO SOMETHING asshole!

The hero hit the gas and situation OVER. Nicely done.

[HoneyBadger]

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes...

[TEAMRICO]

Out of nowhere..."LEEEEROOOOOOOOY JENKINSSSSSSSS!!!!!!"

[GilpinGuy]

Out of nowhere..."LEEEEROOOOOOOOY JENKINSSSSSSSS!!!!!!"

Waaa@aahahahahahahaaa!

[osok-308]

Usually it's best to avoid deadly force until absolutely needed. Good job to the officer

I do believe that hitting a suspect with a car can be considered lethal force as well. This guy just happened to not die. Good job on the police for using what resources were available to them.

[CapLock]

If that were a block wall I built the cop
Would be hurt or dead. No steel or concret inside. Not
All construction is Haiti style. Something to think about If
Your ever in that position lol.

[Singlestack]

Good thinking by the cop and imo an appropriate response. While there are idiots who will claim excessive force, their opinion is null and void. I wonder what was going through the perps head when he heard the engine tone of the cruiser bearing down at him?

[sniper7]

That was an awesome video to watch.

[Ronin13]

The State Trooper teaching my LE driving course did say "If you have a threat with a gun and you're in your car, would you get out and engage? Hell no, you have a 3,000lb hunk of steel you can use as a weapon." It takes substantially less skills under stress to depress a gas pedal than a trigger, and with that big of an object there is a lot more room for error than a 147gr bullet.

[Jer]

I've been seeing this video making the rounds on all sorts of social media with a lot of high five-ing and chest thumping going on. Before I say the next statement please believe that I have many close friends in LE and I respect what they do and am often the first one to defend them against those who hate the uniform often because they can't exercise self control in an effort to keep from breaking the law. Was this really the best way to resolve the situation? When I look at this video my first reaction was: what if there was someone else within about a 25-30' path that car just bashed through? A small child playing in the front yard or some other innocent person who was hiding in fear when they heard the gun shots, perhaps laying under a vehicle or behind the wall or something. Then what? We still all chest thumping if his actions killed three people? I can live with a stray bullet from a firearm because that's a more effective method of dealing with such problems. You train regularly using firearms with this exact situation in mind. He effectively used a rocket launcher to dispatch a fly and in this case there was no collateral damage as a result so the explosion is entertaining but if there had been collateral damage... then what? Let's be realistic, it's hard to control a 5,000lb car at that speed and if there had been an innocent nearby he couldn't have simply swerved to avoid them if they were in the direct path of that car. As soon as he left the road at that speed he was no longer in control and anyone who says he was would have just as much luck convincing me he could have bent the bullet after firing it to avoid innocent bystanders. I'm glad it all worked out for everyone (after the not-so-small tab of damages is paid by tax payers) but this could have very easily had a gruesome result and I don't think people would have been so gung ho on his actions. In this day & age of cop hating reporting I'm VERY glad for everyone involved and everyone who wears a badge that this worked out but had it not it would have been yet another black eye on the profession and I'm not sure how that would have swung the pendulum in light of recent events. I guess I'm saying that the more I see it the less I support the actions of that officer. In fact, the immediate reaction from the to p radio chatter of the officer in charge of the scene seem to echo this same sentiment. I'm just not sure this is the best example of police control for those bringing it into question right now.

[KestrelBike]

what if there was someone else within about a 25-30' path that car just bashed through? A small child playing in the front yard or some other innocent person who was hiding in fear when they heard the gun shots, perhaps laying under a vehicle or behind the wall or something. Then what?

I'm glad you brought up the "stray bullet from a firearm" because I was going to, for you. How much risk did you want that cop to take? The media is calling it a rifle (I don't know what rifle it was, if it really was a rifle and not a shotgun/derringer/etc) so I'll assume that it has a typical rifle's penetration power. So at any point that the cop decides to stop his car, get out, draw down, aim, make the split-second decision to pull the trigger, all that perp had to do was take half a second to turn around, raise the rifle and get a lucky shot off (and we know that rifles are a hell of a lot easier to aim than handguns for newbs like this perp probably was). The cop took the opportunity he had when more peaceable methods were *not* working, he also took the opportunity when no one was around. Yes, he did hit the wall, but I don't think he did it intentionally going for bonus points. Hell, I bet he didn't even notice the wall, he was probably too concerned thinking "how are they going to judge me for neutralizing this threat" or "ok I better stop this threat before we get into an area where the streets are not so clear of people." That cop's entire LIFE is one of risks, decisions, luck, and consequences. What if the perp had turned around as the car was coming at him, brought the rifle up only halfway before letting off a shot, and the bullet went into a home and took the top half of a kid's head off? The cop recognized the threat from that unstable criminal. He neutralized the threat. Zero collateral human damage was sustained. Be happy.

[Jer]

I'm glad you brought up the "stray bullet from a firearm" because I was going to, for you. How much risk did you want that cop to take? The media is calling it a rifle (I don't know what rifle it was, if it really was a rifle and not a shotgun/derringer/etc) so I'll assume that it has a typical rifle's penetration power. So at any point that the cop decides to stop his car, get out, draw down, aim, make the split-second decision to pull the trigger, all that perp had to do was take half a second to turn around, raise the rifle and get a lucky shot off (and we know that rifles are a hell of a lot easier to aim than handguns for newbs like this perp probably was). The cop took the opportunity he had when more peaceable methods were *not* working, he also took the opportunity when no one was around. Yes, he did hit the wall, but I don't think he did it intentionally going for bonus points. Hell, I bet he didn't even notice the wall, he was probably too concerned thinking "how are they going to judge me for neutralizing this threat" or "ok I better stop this threat before we get into an area where the streets are not so clear of people." That cop's entire LIFE is one of risks, decisions, luck, and consequences. What if the perp had turned around as the car was coming at him, brought the rifle up only halfway before letting off a shot, and the bullet went into a home and took the top half of a kid's head off? The cop recognized the threat from that unstable criminal. He neutralized the threat. Zero collateral human damage was sustained. Be happy.

A couple of things to address here.

First of all, you talk about the amount of risk a cop should take.... how much personal risk would that cop have taken had that wall been placed properly w/rebar & concrete? There was no way he could know that. So he was lucky as hell to be alive or not horribly mangled due to a wall being improperly installed. Had the owner of said wall taken the time or spent the money to install it properly we would be having an entirely different conversation about the cop's safety.

Next up, the perps gun/rifle/rocket launcher. Does it matter? The threat is a threat and you use the most effective means available to you to neutralize the threat. A large portion of consideration of 'effective' has to be control especially when we're talking a residential area. If you plan to tell me that hurtling a cruiser off the road onto curbs/lawns/walls/driveways & homes at highway speeds provides more control over a firearm... I'm going to have to disagree. How many videos have we seen with cops shooting at bad guys who are returning fire? It's obviously not an ideal situation but comes with the territory. These aren't carnie workers we're talking about these are trained law enforcement officers. I'll take my chances with one of them and a firearm over one of them using their vehicle in this situation. That's not to say that it can't be used in a different situation like a highway or parking lot or something but, just like a firearm, you need to know your possibility of collateral damage before using chosen method to save lives when your very method could cost them. He had no way of knowing what was beyond that wall from his angle and therefore he chose to ignore his intended target's foreground and background. At least with a firearm he's trained to take that into account and would likely have been checking the background as part of his training. After all, you don't rise to the occasion you fall back to your training in high-stress situations. What if there was a couple little girls who were playing with chalk in that drive-way when the shots rang out and they took shelter behind that wall? We'd be having a different conversation.

Up next, you discuss that he didn't intentionally hit the wall for bonus points. You just made my point. Once you choose to accelerate your car off-road towards homes you are no longer in control. You can't be. If you've ever been in a vehicle that has left the roadway at a high rate of speed you know exactly what I'm talking about. You're quite literally at the mercy of momentum & physics. In this case it happened to work out but that's only due to luck. There's very limited amout of 'skill' involved with choosing this method as means of threat neutralization. This is why it's so rarely chosen as compared to something cleaner and easier to control like a firearm.

I am happy that zero collateral human damage was done but that's more a luck than training/decision making. I'd prefer that peace keepers exercise more prudent decision making ESPECIALLY in the current anti-cop climate. Can you imagine had the officer NOT been lucky and any one of the above scenarios I outlined actually happened? With the flack LEO's are getting right now for doing their job properly and prudently can you imagine the outrage if GTA officer here had actually struck an innocent or several innocent people? I'd hate to be in uniform and trying to explain his actions in that case and I think we need to examine ALL possible outcomes of decisions before we label someone a hero. I applaud the decision to take action. I applaud that nobody else was hurt. What I'm worried about is passing this video around like it is the new training video for how to deal with this situation. IMO this is dangerous and this outcome could have been horrific and the fact that it wasn't was put purely in the hands of fate/luck.

I see a lot of those who wear the badge passing this video around and I'm worried about the precedent that could be set especially given today's anti-LEO political climate. IMO the LE community can ill afford a gung ho decision like this that goes wrong and there's far too much room for something like this to go wrong.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Yep... a bullet costs tax payers a whole lot less than a squad car and property damage repairs....

Not after the lawsuits and Al Sharpton entourage it doesn't. Just ask Ferguson what the bullets in Mike Wilson cost even though every one of them was justified.

[Irving]

Jer, couldn't you realistically take this position for every single event ever? Do you feel the same way about that pilot that landed the plane in the Hudson? That could have been a total disaster and everyone would have said what a fool he was. It seems like the line between heroism and foolishness is extremely thin.

On a side note, could you imagine taking an action scene out of a James Bond or other similar movie, where the good guy muses his mark by half a second through out the scene? It'd look like Benny Hill footage. There is probably a decent amount of luck involved in a lot of heroism.

[Jer]

Jer, couldn't you realistically take this position for every single event ever? Do you feel the same way about that pilot that landed the plane in the Hudson? That could have been a total disaster and everyone would have said what a fool he was. It seems like the line between heroism and foolishness is extremely thin.

Sully didn't have any other choice. This guy did. Not the same comparison.

[Irving]

Sully didn't have any other choice. This guy did. Not the same comparison.

I knew you'd say that. Of course he had other choices. It looked like there weren't any other good choices, and of course it was presented that way after everything turned out just fine. There are always other choices.

[hurley842002]

I knew you'd say that. Of course he had other choices. It looked like there weren't any other good choices, and of course it was presented that way after everything turned out just fine. There are always other choices.
You've been on this forum quite awhile Irv, don't you know there is no arguing with Jer.......

[Irving]

I absolutely know that. It might seem foolish to try, but in the rare event I get lucky and convince him, I'll end up a hero. We all take risks.

[Jer]

You are welcome to argue with me just don't present silly analogies that don't remotely apply to the situation as fact. You guys are welcome to think/say whatever you want but in a situation where a guy is lucky at best and a danger at worst I'm not sure why we're applauding his actions & calling him a hero in a time when those who wear a badge can ill afford yet another black eye.

[Jer]

I absolutely know that. It might seem foolish to try, but in the rare event I get lucky and convince him, I'll end up a hero. We all take risks.

Hey, as long as nobody innocent is harmed in the attempt... have at it. lol

[Irving]

You are welcome to argue with me just don't present silly analogies that don't remotely apply to the situation as fact.

This is what you are doing. You're comparing his actions to a situation that never existed. There was no person crouching behind the wall. The wall didn't have re-bar in it. No innocents were involved at all. So why even bring up the what-if's at all? It's too easy to say, "Well, if there was a double stroller holding twins just behind the wall, you'd all be singing a different tune." Sure, that's probably true, but that's not what happened, so why go to the effort to present it? I think it's okay to be happy about things that worked out, instead of worrying about events that never took place. There is enough stuff that does go wrong every day to spend time on the stuff that doesn't.

[HoneyBadger]

This is what you are doing. You're comparing his actions to a situation that never existed. There was no person crouching behind the wall. The wall didn't have re-bar in it. No innocents were involved at all. So why even bring up the what-if's at all? It's too easy to say, "Well, if there was a double stroller holding twins just behind the wall, you'd all be singing a different tune." Sure, that's probably true, but that's not what happened, so why go to the effort to present it? I think it's okay to be happy about things that worked out, instead of worrying about events that never took place. There is enough stuff that does go wrong every day to spend time on the stuff that doesn't.

This is a good point, but I think the hypotheticals do serve to point out that it is unlikely that the cop in question knew all the answers as he charged in at a relatively high speed.

I think the outcome is good, but it is purely speculative to presume that you knew it would end exactly this way.

[Irving]

If the cop knew all the answers, he would have called in sick that day and let someone else get into that situation.

[HoneyBadger]

If the cop knew all the answers, he would have called in sick that day and let someone else get into that situation.

That's why I keep getting the crap piled on me at work... I never call in sick! [ROFL1]

Either way, I think we can all agree that hypotheticals have limited application to this scenario.

I think we can also agree that the scenario presents a very difficult and complicated decision that does not necessarily leave much time for deliberation before action.

[Graves]

You are welcome to argue with me just don't present silly analogies that don't remotely apply to the situation as fact. You guys are welcome to think/say whatever you want but in a situation where a guy is lucky at best and a danger at worst I'm not sure why we're applauding his actions & calling him a hero in a time when those who wear a badge can ill afford yet another black eye.

Jer welcoming somebody to an argument??!

http://s3-static-ak.buzzfed.com/static/campaign_images/terminal05/2012/8/31/17/things-that-blew-your-mind-when-you-were-a-kid-1-30991-1346448555-3_big.jpg




























Jk lol.

[Chad4000]

This is a good point, but I think the hypotheticals do serve to point out that it is unlikely that the cop in question knew all the answers as he charged in at a relatively high speed.

I think the outcome is good, but it is purely speculative to presume that you knew it would end exactly this way.

this

[Aloha_Shooter]

This is a good point, but I think the hypotheticals do serve to point out that it is unlikely that the cop in question knew all the answers as he charged in at a relatively high speed.

You never know all the answers when you have to take action. This is as true of law enforcement as it is of combat. I think the best measure of the situation was his Chief of Police's initial reaction was "oh damn" but the Chief supported the cop after carefully considering the overall situation and facts. This coming from a position that is usually politically appointed (just look at the scurrilous remarks from the Milwaukee Chief of Police as a contrast!) and a time when police are coming under increased scrutiny and (undeserved) criticism. It would have been very easy for the Chief to take his officer to task but he didn't.

[Dave_L]

Bad guy down, no good people hurt. We can play the "what if" game all day but the reality is that his actions ended the situation with no innocents being hurt. Can't we just leave it at that?

If we want to guess on possible outcomes before taking action, why are there high speed pursuits? That endangers the public on lots of levels. The cops shouldnt even pursue if that happens because there *might* be a pedestrian somewhere crossing the street that might get hit, or maybe a mini van full of toddlers gets smashed? Too many what ifs, better just not act.

ETA: If innocents get hurt, there are consequences to that officer. Obviously, this cop felt the potential risk of that was overruled by the threat in front of him. That why he gets paid to be a cop, to make those choices.

[Bailey Guns]

Jer built a strawman the Wizard of Oz would be proud of. We can "what if" the situation to death.

What if the officer did what he thought was right, used a level of force appropriate to stop the threat, didn't harm any innocents and he was cleared of any wrongdoing? Oh, wait...

[GilpinGuy]

Seriousy TLDR. Paragraphs man. Unreadable.

[Bailey Guns]

Sully didn't have any other choice. This guy did. Not the same comparison.

Yes, he did. The information's been out for a while. Here's one article:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703612804575222482042335978


But tucked inside thousands of pages of testimony and exhibits are hints that, in hindsight, the celebrated pilot could have made it back to La Guardia Airport. Pilots who used simulators to recreate the accident—including suddenly losing both engines after sucking in birds at 2,500 feet—repeatedly managed to safely land their virtual airliners at La Guardia.


The results haven't changed the conclusions of National Transportation Safety Board investigators or outside aviation-safety experts, who unanimously agree that Mr. Sullenberger made the right call to put his crippled jet down in the river. Neither he nor his first officer, Jeffrey Skiles, had any assurance that the Airbus A320—which suddenly turned into a 70-ton glider—would be able to clear Manhattan's skyline had they tried to return to the Queens airport they left minutes before.

"The downside risk of being wrong was catastrophic" considering the potential for fatalities to bystanders, according to safety consultant John Cox, an ex-Airbus pilot at the same airline. Mr. Sullenberger "could have made a different call," said Kitty Higgins, a former safety board member, "but his decision used the best information he had . . . and was based on his experience and instincts."

My business partner is an Airbus pilot/instructor. He was able to land at La Guardia. However, Sullenberger made a decision and executed his plan. It worked. Just like the cop did.

[HoneyBadger]

You never know all the answers when you have to take action.
This is exactly my point. [Beer]

BG, thanks for posting that about Sully's scenario. Perfect example of taking what information you have and making the best of it.

[osok-308]

We can play "what if" for days. The reality is that the officer used the best tool for the job at the time. He prevented further escape and injuries. There is the possibility that there could have been someone behind the wall, but there wasn't, just like had he pulled a gun, there'd be the possibility that he'd miss and hit someone. There isn't such thing as risk elimination in situations like this, only risk mitigation.

[Hound]

Sounds like a good stop to me. Guy was out of control and going for more. He did not want to shot into a possible crowd but still wanted to stop the BG. This goes under play stupid games....... IMHO.

[jerrymrc]

I am surprised nobody has made the comparison yet. The Policeman did nothing wrong, that car just went on a off course trip all on its own. Just ban the cars and the streets will be safer for all of us.[beatdeadhorse][Flower]