Hillary ordered aide to send classified doc unsecured

[RblDiver]

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/01/08/whoa-hillary-e-mail-instructs-aide-to-transmit-classified-e-mail-without-markings/

Not sure if this thread goes here since L&P lists as being for "shooting sports," but it IS something political. Anyway, from the article, apparently Hillary sent an aide instructions to remove some classifying headers and transmit an item through an unsecured fax because they were having issues with the secured one.

I'd love to say game, set, match, but with Hill, we know that's not going to be the case. Deflect deflect deflect!

[RblDiver]

In further irony, why is that other state department person using personal email? http://hotair.com/archives/2016/01/08/hillary-wonders-why-is-a-state-department-employee-using-personal-e-mail/

[Aardvark]

Little people, like you and me and everyone on this board, wouldn't do something that will end us up in jail or end our careers UNLESS directly ordered by someone in a way up position. It's Always been my belief that the scabby, Mao-suit wearing, sell-out cur named Hillary, is the one that gave the orders to place the classified emails on the servers, and also put the classified on the servers herself.

[BPTactical]

Some animals are more equal then others....






....and don't you forget it!


My guess is eventually the email will be Hildabeasts downfall. It is getting too big to ignore.

[TFOGGER]

Don't kid yourself. Unless Hitlary severs the head of one of her political rivals on national television, she's going to be the D candidate, and most likely will be able to steal the election. God help us all.

[Zundfolge]

Once again, everyone will be relieved if hildabeast doesn't get the D nomination and Sanders does.

Much like they were relieved when "Barack Hussain Obama" got nominated over her.

Just remember, there are easily 20+ million people worse than her, and some of them are easier to elect. Sanders has some scary moon bat support, fewer skeletons in the closet, and stronger appeal to certain crowds, and I'd argue would be far worse for the country.... Not that hildabeast is good, in any fashion.

There is no such thing as a good Democrat.

[wctriumph]

There is no such thing as a good Democrat.

Hypothetically speaking, what about a ... wait a minute, they vote too don't they? Dang it, no way to get away from them, is there?

[Aloha_Shooter]

Much like they were relieved when "Barack Hussain Obama" got nominated over her.


Obama has probably been worse than hildabeast would have been. At the most hildabeast can pull is the "sexist" card, and nobody really toots that horn anymore. e.g. "If I had [another] daughter, she would look like the san bernardino oppressed muslim woman".

I actually voted for Obama ... in the 2008 Democratic primary ... because I figured no one was worse than Hillary. I stand by that assessment. Obama has been worse than I'd imagined, primarily because I hadn't figured the country would be stupid enough to re-elect him, but Hillary would have been far worse. Look at the damage she did to the country's national security just as Secretary of State and imagine what would happen if she was the actual President.

Obama is corrupt as hell and incompetent to boot but his corruption is limited to misusing the executive branch and powers he doesn't really have but Hillary is a whole other level of corruption and incompetence. About the only things she has proven any competence for are enrichening herself and her friends, lying even when she doesn't have to, and destroying the lives of anyone who posed a threat to her political ambitions. Anyone who even thinks briefly of voting for Hillary deserves to be mocked severely.

[hollohas]

I have predicted that Hillary wouldn't make it to the election for some time. I stand by that. I think the current admin hates her, the America public doesn't have the love affair with the Clinton's that they used to and this criminal investigation is just to daming. Sounds like the FBI is going to go after the Clinton foundation too now.

But, the main reason I think she wont be the nominee is that I have seen a lot more of the popular, hip, organic and grassroots support for Bernie. I see very, very few Hillary stickers. However I see tons of hip looking slogans for Bernie on stickers and t-shirts everywhere I go. Stickers on cars, on billboards, on street signs, on park benches... It's exactly what we saw with Obama. Feel the Bern.

Remember the teeshrits, hip slogans and highly effective marketing that was being done for Obama independent of his campaign? The slogans none of us will ever forget? Bern is getting the same thing. Fancy, pro-level guerrilla marketing being done independent from his campaign. Marketing that his campaign doesn't have to organize or pay for. This has all the same makings of a "surprise" loss for Hillary as the Obama nomination did.

In many ways it shows the hypocrisy of the Dems. The old, white guy gets the nod over the woman?

Also, a Bern nomination is almost scarier for the same reasons I mentioned above. He has young, dedicated support from the very vocal and effective grassroots liberal campaign activists. I think he has a good chance. This country is at a point a socialist could win. The enemy you know is better the enemy you don't know. And we don't know Bern like we do Hillary.

I mean, if not Hill, who else but Bern? Is there another secret liberal backup?

[hollohas]

PS - Everyone here should search "feel the bern" on Google images. It's the best way to see what kind of crazy marketing support he has.

[Aloha_Shooter]

I mean, if not Hill, who else but Bern? Is there another secret liberal backup?

Elizabeth Warren. They're salivating for a chance to put her in as their dream combination of Sanders' and Obama's ideologies with Hillary's gender thrown in for free. There are a lot of liberals wetting their pants right now over the whisper campaign of Sanders-Warren.

[Delfuego]

No one knows if it was classified, or what it was. you cannot believe either side. Don't post opinion as fact.

[hollohas]

Is it common practice to send unclassified talking point through secure fax?

[TFOGGER]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/07/former-federal-prosecutor-predicts-hillary-clinton-may-be-indicted-in-next-60-days-heres-why/


The leaking of the Clinton emails has been compared to as the next “Watergate” by former U.S. Attorney Joe DiGenova (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3387033/Former-federal-prosecutor-says-Hillary-indicted-60-days-FBI-compiles-overwhelming-evidence-against-her.html) this week, if current FBI investigations don’t proceed in an appropriate manner. The revelation comes after more emails from Hilary Clinton’s personal email have come to light.
“[The investigation has reached] a critical mass,” DiGenova told radio host Laura Ingraham when discussing the FBI’s still pending investigation. Though Clinton is still yet to be charged with any crime, DiGenova advised on Tuesday that changes may be on the horizon. The mishandling over the classified intelligence may lead to an imminent indictment, with DiGenova suggesting it may come to a head within 60 days.

I gotta think that would torpedo her chances as the D candidate...or not, considering their proclivity for ignoring the law...

Edit: changed the link to a more palatable source

[hurley842002]

I'm still in the camp of wanting Hillary to win the primary, I don't feel she's elect able amongst the independent and middle of the road voters in the general, I'm worried about "feeling the Bern".

[Great-Kazoo]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/07/former-federal-prosecutor-predicts-hillary-clinton-may-be-indicted-in-next-60-days-heres-why/



I gotta think that would torpedo her chances as the D candidate...or not, considering their proclivity for ignoring the law...

Edit: changed the link to a more palatable source

How many times Berry get elected in D.C EVEN AFTER that cocaine buy video.

Hillary will get the nod, as the fix has been in with the DNC chair DWS. The only up side is these "progressives" while in favor a a female president, HILLARY 2016! Have been witnessing the blatant disregard for Sanders. He could be caught xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. The headlines would read THANK GOD BILL CLINTON WASN'T CAUGHT WITH ANOTHER WOMAN.

[TFOGGER]

Apparently, mishandling classified information runs in the family...

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/03/as-first-lady-hillary-did-not-have-security-clearance-but-received-classified-information-anyway/?google_editors_picks=true


When Hillary Clinton was first lady, she did not have a security clearance, but she was “often provided” classified information, she told her longtime friend and ABC News host George Stephanopoulos in a long-forgotten Dec. 30, 2007 interview rediscovered by The Daily Caller.It was just weeks before the 2008 Iowa caucuses and Clinton was out touting her foreign policy experience, both as a senator from New York and as first lady. She wanted to be seen as the strong and experienced choice in contrast to upstart Barack Obama, then a senator from Illinois.
But during the interview (http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/story?id=4073183&page=1), video of which is no longer online, Stephanopoulos pointed to a New York Times article published that same month which downplayed Clinton’s foreign policy credentials.
The Times reported (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/26/us/politics/26clinton.html?_r=0):
FROM AROUND THE WEB








Sponsored Links by (http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/03/as-first-lady-hillary-did-not-have-security-clearance-but-received-classified-information-anyway/?google_editors_picks=true#)



But during those two terms in the White House, Mrs. Clinton did not hold a security clearance. She did not attend National Security Council meetings. She was not given a copy of the president’s daily intelligence briefing. She did not assert herself on the crises in Somalia, Haiti and Rwanda.
Clinton shot down the report in her interview with Stephanopoulos, telling the former Bill Clinton aide that her experience in the White House was “unique” and that she was a “part of making history.”
And to bolster her bona fides, Clinton bragged that she handled classified information — even without the security clearance.
“I had direct access to all of the decision-makers. I was briefed on a range of issues, often provided classified information,” she told Stephanopoulos, while acknowledging that she did not attend National Security Council meetings.
“I can imagine what the stories would have been had I attended a National Security Council meeting,” she said.
“And often when I traveled on behalf of our country, I traveled with representatives from the DOD, the CIA, the State Department,” she continued. “I think that my experience is unique, having been eight years in the White House, having, yes, been part of making history, and also been part of learning how to best present our country’s case. And now, seven years on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.”
The interview resurfaces as Clinton faces intense scrutiny over how she handled classified information when she was secretary of state on her home-brew email system, which involved the use of a personal email account. While Clinton certainly had a security clearance for the highest levels of classified information when she was in office, she has been heavily criticized for displaying a cavalier attitude towards the handling of sensitive government intelligence and information during her tenure.
More than 1,500 emails on Clinton’s server have been retroactively classified by the State Department. The Intelligence Community’s inspector general has said that two emails on Clinton’s server contained information that was classified as “Top Secret” when sent. And last week, the State Department said it was withholding 22 emails that traversed Clinton’s server in their entirety because they contained “Top Secret” information. The agency has not yet determined whether the information in those emails was classified when the emails were sent and received.
Whether or not Clinton’s handling of classified information as first lady was appropriate for her position depends upon how she obtained the information and who provided it to her, according to Bradley Moss, a national security expert and attorney who handles security clearance and Freedom of Information Act cases.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/03/as-first-lady-hillary-did-not-have-security-clearance-but-received-classified-information-anyway/#ixzz3z9JI8rXA

[Bailey Guns]

There is no such thing as a good Democrat.

100% factual and truthful.

[Zundfolge]

Stefan Molyneaux has just posted a nice outline of the whole mess.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl4RQg4Qfg0

[Bailey Guns]

Is there another secret liberal backup?

Joe Biden. Hillary could drop out for "health" reasons freeing her delegates to commit to Biden.

[roberth]

Yup, Joe is the secret liberal backup. I don't see Bloomberg being one right now, but liberals are predictable only in the evil they impose on others, so..........

[Aloha_Shooter]

Nope, the liberal wet dream is that Elizabeth Warren steps in. Even the Dems know Uncle Joe is crazy. I'm sure they'd prefer him to Bernie or Hillary but what they really want is to draft Warren so she can pick up the "first woman president" mantra and still go full-on socialist without sounding like (and having a 40 year track record of) a complete lunatic. There are a lot of Dems that might defect or at least stay home if Bernie is candidate who would turn out en masse for Warren.