A tale of two headlines

[funkymonkey1111]

Investor's headline, which is really an article on business performance, states: "Smith & Wesson, Sturm Ruger Crash As Background Checks At Decade Low"

http://www.investors.com/news/smith-wesson-shares-plummet-xx-cut-key-level-on-downgrades/


Yet, we know that there have been record checks month after month: "FBI: March Was 11th Month of Record Background Checks"

http://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2016/04/04/fbi-march-was-11th-month-of-record-background-checks/



I guess even when you're purportedly writing a business performance article you still have to spew your political slant

[theGinsue]

Time and again it's been proven that nothing more than a rumor of poor sales or prospective sales is enough to cause a company's stock to crash. This writer, editor(s), publisher know this as well as anyone and apparently they have an anti-gun agenda to push.

[Irving]

Looks like they both say that March was the peak to me.

[Big E3]

This appears to clearly be an effort to reduce stock prices in order to buy cheap before the November election gun sales bonanza. I'm going to keep my eye on these stocks just in case it works.