View Full Version : Republican party follies
milwaukeeshaker
10-10-2016, 18:31
As a lifelong Republican I just cannot figure out WTF the "leaders" of this party are doing. They are now attempting to give the FN election to Hillary. Who gives a s---t what Trump said 11 years ago? What about all the lies and crimes Hillary has committed? Why doesn't anyone in the party remind the voters about Bengahzi, or any of the other myriad of crimes the Clintons have committed??? Why would the Repubs be so stupid as to commit Hari Kiri at the last hour, abandon Trump, and literally try to give Clinton the election? I can only conclude that there is NO difference between the parties. I am seriously thinking of reregistering as an independent. I am sick of watching my party of choice implode due to the RINOS running the show. This is NOT the party I joined in the 60's. Rant over.
Zundfolge
10-10-2016, 19:06
I'm beginning to think its time for a new "Meeting Under The Oaks" ... and we need to throw the GOP down the same hole they threw the Whigs.
Great-Kazoo
10-10-2016, 19:31
WHY?
because the R's cannot control Trump. Meaning their lobby money, pork barrel bills, side cash would sooner or later come to a stop. If H wins, it's business as usual.
Anyone that believes ANY politician is in it for the people is living in a dream world.
Slightly OT: Until this election cycle Trump was a Democrat. I believe he ran as a R because the D's told him this was Hillary's time.
milwaukeeshaker
10-10-2016, 19:47
At this point I can believe anything. It sure looks as if the GOP is deliberately sinking their own ship. If this proves out true, I'm "jumping ship".
Bailey Guns
10-10-2016, 20:13
Yep...lifelong R here, too. If you would've told me this would happen I would've never believed it. The R party has turned into a monumental goat fuck. Donald Trump is the result of that. The party created the monster by failing the people who've supported it for so long. And now they can't control it. After 8 years of Hillary or whatever surrogate takes over for her when her health fails, the R party will be entirely irrelevant. This isn't a temp change between election cycles...this is a multi-generational change that will make this country unrecognizable to most of us old-timers. Hell...it's practically happened already.
I seriously don't get why republicans aren't shouting from the rooftops about how corrupt and inept HRC is...for crying out load. There is so much bad about that woman it's a never ending supply of ammunition. But, no...they're too busy worrying about what a couple of guys said in what they thought was a private environment. Was it distasteful and crude? Of course. Does it hold a candle to most things Hillary or her scumbag husband have done? Not even close.
Fuckin' insane.
Yep...lifelong R here, too. If you would've told me this would happen I would've never believed it. The R party has turned into a monumental goat fuck. Donald Trump is the result of that. The party created the monster by failing the people who've supported it for so long. And now they can't control it. After 8 years of Hillary or whatever surrogate takes over for her when her health fails, the R party will be entirely irrelevant. This isn't a temp change between election cycles...this is a multi-generational change that will make this country unrecognizable to most of us old-timers. Hell...it's practically happened already.
I seriously don't get why republicans aren't shouting from the rooftops about how corrupt and inept HRC is...for crying out load. There is so much bad about that woman it's a never ending supply of ammunition. But, no...they're too busy worrying about what a couple of guys said in what they thought was a private environment. Was it distasteful and crude? Of course. Does it hold a candle to most things Hillary or her scumbag husband have done? Not even close.
Fuckin' insane.
https://cdn.meme.am/instances/64923756.jpg
GilpinGuy
10-11-2016, 01:44
I can only conclude that there is NO difference between the parties. I am seriously thinking of reregistering as an independent.
There are differences, but they are minor at this point. In the grand scheme, no difference: ever bigger government, less liberties (Patriot Act, etc.), more taxes, never ending warfare, increased regulation. They all get together at the same cocktail parties and laugh at us peasants while living high on the hog on our dime. Leeches.
The very day the R's didn't let me have my say in the primaries in CO I unregistered as a Republican. Fuck them.
I imagine because Trump is a piece of sh*t!!!! There is nobody that hates the hildabeast as much as I do, and it sickens me that she is going to be the president. However, my anger is directly toward those who nominated Trump. That guy is a lying, cheating, womanizing, egotistical piece of sh*t that I wouldn't trust with a potato gun in a padded room. He is as big of a clusterf*ck move as Dan Maes was in the 2010 Colorado election. It should come as no surprise that people hate him and that leadership wants to distance themselves from him. Trump is an absolutely horrible candidate in a year that HRC could have been beaten. The notion that somehow Trump would work for the people and end political corruption and DC power brokering...BS!!! Seriously, that is total BS...that guy would walk over and swindle anybody to make a buck as well as sh*t on anybody to stroke his ego; he would sell out this country in a heartbeat if it suited his purpose. I don't know if I am going to swallow that softball size pill and fill in the circle next his name or not. I am seriously struggling with that because HRC is disastrous too, but I am really pissed that I am faced with an impossible decision between the two. This election truly sucks, and the outcome will seriously hurt our country.
For those that don't like the Republican Party. Fine, get involved in the party and help fix it. The party or the name doesn't really matter, but we need to unite in order to stop what is happening. But, if all those right of center want to keep fighting amongst themselves, then we can just watch the socialistic globalists transform our country into their image while we just sit back and complain about it.
IMO, it doesn't really matter who the fuck you vote for anymore, it's already been decided long ago. The whole voting process is meaningless anymore, it's just a feel-good sham to placate the peasants and make us feel like we matter. We don't, we haven't for many, many years. The only way to change things would be another armed revolution. It's no wonder they so desperately want to disarm us.
I think they're giving up on Trump so they can try to protect down-ballot candidates and "save the image" of the party for the next go-around. The only problem is that people are sick of the insider statist RINOs, so protecting that aspect of the party is only going to hurt them (and us) in the long run.
If there's any silver lining to Trump's candidacy, maybe it will be to accelerate the destruction of the current Republican party.
But, if all those right of center want to keep fighting amongst themselves, then we can just watch the socialistic globalists transform our country into their image while we just sit back and complain about it.
Then there's this. Maybe it won't matter if the GOP ever gets reformed because after Hillary wins, the country will likely be under single-party rule for the next 20+ years.
IMO, it doesn't really matter who the fuck you vote for anymore, it's already been decided long ago. The whole voting process is meaningless anymore, it's just a feel-good sham to placate the peasants and make us feel like we matter. We don't, we haven't for many, many years. The only way to change things would be another armed revolution. It's no wonder they so desperately want to disarm us.
I don't disagree; i've been saying for a long time that the only way to get somebody as unlikeable as the Hildabeast elected, is to run somebody against her that people like even less. At some point people will need to decide if we are going to take back this country or not...the means and result may be very unpleasant.
I'm voting for theGinsue this year anyways. I'm hoping maybe cstone is in the ticket as well.
Is this the part where I mention voting 3rd party because he's the candidate that closest resembles my idea of leadership for this country & everyone attacks me mercilessly for 'throwing my vote away' or some such shit?
Jer, honestly, there is not a person running I can support regardless of letter behind their name. It is almost like the politicians all got together and decided to let us "vote" for the worst of the worst.
I'm voting for theGinsue this year anyways. I'm hoping maybe cstone is in the ticket as well.
theGinsue for president
Is this the part where I mention voting 3rd party because he's the candidate that closest resembles my idea of leadership for this country & everyone attacks me mercilessly for 'throwing my vote away' or some such shit?
In a national election with so many different viewpoints, I can rally behind 50-75% of what I want as opposed to 0% of what I want. However, this year; I don't even get the lesser of two evils.
Ann Barnhardt's take on it is chilling, and she is quite often correct in her predictions:
http://www.barnhardt.biz/2016/10/10/kayfabe-notes-trumps-true-motivation-and-other-notes/
Entire article is worth a read.
...
Now to the “winning and losing”. This is all fake. Clinton is going to “win” and was always going to win no matter what because the elections themselves are a sham. I know this is really, really hard for Americans to come to grips with, but these national-level elections are all bullshit and have been for a while. Donald Trump wants NOTHING TO DO with being “president” of the former-United States. Think about it. What person in their right mind would want to be “president” over the next four years, as the catastrophic destabilization, the aggressive execution of the Cloward-Piven strategy comes to full flower? As I said from the beginning, the Obama regime would incite a race-based civil war inside the U.S., while simultaneously destabilizing the rest of the world AND reforming and arming a new islamic Caliphate. Check. The Obama regime also executed the Cloward-Piven Strategy upon the U.S. economy AND healthcare delivery system. This was done in a two-pronged attack, namely Obamacare and the dissolving of the Mexican border. Check.
Don’t you realize that if Trump “won” and was “president” for the next four years that he would be blamed for all of the shit-hitting-the-fan that is going to happen? It would DESTROY HIS BRAND. Now, if Trump “loses”, as was always the plan betwixt him and the Clintons, he STILL has all of the cache of being a nominee for “president”, and still gets his brand transformed into that of “global statesman”, but instead of being blamed for all of the “shit hitting the fan” over the next four years, will instead be able to sit back, go on TeeVee, and EVERY TIME SOMETHING HORRIBLE HAPPENS, Trump will say, “If I had been President, that wouldn’t have happened. If I had been President, I would have prevented that….” And thus his brand will increase ALL THE MORE with each coming catastrophe. Ka-ching, ka-ching, ka-ching. Folks, Trump only truly wins, if he “loses”.
...
SMOD 2016.
I tried to give L a go this year. But seriously, how is that ticket even pretending to be libertarian?
Here is a good summary of this year by a fellow Coloradan.
https://accordingtohoyt.com/2016/10/11/2016-the-show/
Scanker19
10-11-2016, 11:19
I'm voting for Roseanne again.
Is this the part where I mention voting 3rd party because he's the candidate that closest resembles my idea of leadership for this country & everyone attacks me mercilessly for 'throwing my vote away' or some such shit?
Lol
I seriously doubt Trump wants to give up his current lifestyle to be the POTUS. He'll likely take full credit for getting the Clintons back to the white house while destroying the Republican party when he loses.
Great-Kazoo
10-11-2016, 13:54
I seriously doubt Trump wants to give up his current lifestyle to be the POTUS. He'll likely take full credit for getting the Clintons back to the white house while destroying the Republican party when he loses.
the R party was in shambles way before trump received the nomination. He's one of the last nails in the coffin.
the R party was in shambles way before trump received the nomination. He's one of the last nails in the coffin.
True, but that won't keep him from trying to take credit.
Great-Kazoo
10-11-2016, 15:24
True, but that won't keep him from trying to take credit.
It's going to be YUGE, so YUGE i can't even tell you how YUGE it's going to be.
It's going to be YUGE, so YUGE i can't even tell you how YUGE it's going to be.
And will the Mexican gov't be paying for this yuge thing as well?
I seriously doubt Trump wants to give up his current lifestyle to be the POTUS. He'll likely take full credit for getting the Clintons back to the white house while destroying the Republican party when he loses.
If that statement were proven true, it would not surprise me in the least.
milwaukeeshaker
10-11-2016, 16:14
C'mon be real. These sheeple aren't going to do anything. Give them beer, cigarettes, and sports and they will stay placated.
I don't disagree; i've been saying for a long time that the only way to get somebody as unlikeable as the Hildabeast elected, is to run somebody against her that people like even less. At some point people will need to decide if we are going to take back this country or not...the means and result may be very unpleasant.
Bailey Guns
10-11-2016, 16:40
IMO, it doesn't really matter who the fuck you vote for anymore...
Of course it does. That's how we got Trump as the R nominee. Again...him being the nominee can't be blamed on the R party "leadership". There were some good choices in the mix of 17 candidates. This is squarely on the voters. Of course, the voters only voted for him because the party "leadership" has so totally betrayed the people on the right.
Zundfolge
10-12-2016, 10:05
These conspiracy theories that Trump is a Hillary plant, or he doesn't really want to be president just launch [insert business venture here] make as much sense as Elvis being the shooter on the Grassy Knoll.
He wants to be president, he's invested way too much in his campaign to be just a plant and stands to lose a LOT if he loses (he's burned his bridge to the entertainment world, that's for sure and probably burned his bridge to the NYC power structure, which he needs to continue development in NYC) ... and frankly he would just drop out now if he was just a plant (Mike Pence isn't going to win on his own).
Whether he can win or not, whether he's a good guy or not, none of this means that he's throwing the election on purpose. The idea is just silly.
(Mike Pence isn't going to win on his own)
Just curious: why not?
Zundfolge
10-12-2016, 10:30
Just curious: why not?
Because at this point he wouldn't even be on the ballots ... all the votes for "Trump-Pence" would be thrown out and we'd be left writing Pence in, which never works.
LOL, well that was a very clear and concise answer. Didn't think of that. Thanks.
These conspiracy theories that Trump is a Hillary plant, or he doesn't really want to be president just launch [insert business venture here] make as much sense as Elvis being the shooter on the Grassy Knoll.
He wants to be president, he's invested way too much in his campaign to be just a plant and stands to lose a LOT if he loses (he's burned his bridge to the entertainment world, that's for sure and probably burned his bridge to the NYC power structure, which he needs to continue development in NYC) ... and frankly he would just drop out now if he was just a plant (Mike Pence isn't going to win on his own).
Whether he can win or not, whether he's a good guy or not, none of this means that he's throwing the election on purpose. The idea is just silly.
Other than seeing footage of him endorsing the Clintons way back when, I personally don't have enough information to belive he's a Clinton plant. I'd just like to clarify that I wouldn't be surprised to see him play it off as though he meant to lose if that is what in fact happens come November. I also think he can afford to ride this venture out pretty far in an attempt to stay relevant.
Great-Kazoo
10-12-2016, 13:04
Other than seeing footage of him endorsing the Clintons way back when, I personally don't have enough information to belive he's a Clinton plant. I'd just like to clarify that I wouldn't be surprised to see him play it off as though he meant to lose if that is what in fact happens come November. I also think he can afford to ride this venture out pretty far in an attempt to stay relevant.
You and Z didn't know him or of him in NY. I did. he's not an R never will be ab R or as i have posted numerous times ...Only ran as an R because the D's had the HRC fix in for the long game.
It isn't uncommon for folks to flip flop at all. The differences between the two parties have become almost trivial. Like I said, Jim, I don't have enough info to say one way or the other. Unfortunately neither would surprise me.
Zundfolge
10-12-2016, 13:36
I'd just like to clarify that I wouldn't be surprised to see him play it off as though he meant to lose if that is what in fact happens come November.
Maybe,
I also think he can afford to ride this venture out pretty far in an attempt to stay relevant.
His business will be ruined if he loses. Like I said before, he's burned the bridges with the leftist run entertainment industry (they act like they hate him worse than Bush) and he's burned the bridges with the liberal run NYC government so he's going to have a much harder time developing anything in NYC.
You and Z didn't know him or of him in NY. I did. he's not an R never will be ab R or as i have posted numerous times ...Only ran as an R because the D's had the HRC fix in for the long game.
There are a lot of great voices on the right that used to be libs. Bill Whittle, Andrew Breitbart, Evan Sayet, Thomas Sowell, David Horowitz, Milton Friedman, Dennis Prager ... the list goes on. Its entirely possible that he has come around to the conservative way of thinking. Also to say that "he's not an R never will be ab R" ... first that's not true, he's called himself a Republican long before running for office but at this point the R's are pretty screwed up ... I've been registered as an R since 1987 (when I turned 18) and have considered myself one since long before that ... I'm seriously considering dropping my party affiliation as its pretty clear that the GOP is run by Democrats now.
For conservatives that oppose Trump I have two questions for you. 1) Did you vote for McCain and 2) Did you vote for Romney ... because as of today I'd say Trump looks more conservative than both of those losers.
hurley842002
10-12-2016, 13:57
Yeah I don't buy the "once a D, always a D" statement. My mother was a D since 82 or thereabouts, and within the last ten years has changed to Republican. Both parties have evolved and don't necessarily represent what they once did.
spqrzilla
10-12-2016, 14:16
The bottom line is that Trump is about Trump. The reason he has failed to get ahead of Hillary ( the worst candidate the Democrats have run in my lifetime ) is that he thinks he can manipulate the media but is in fact easily trolled into the Clinton machine media traps.
Trump thinks he is smarter than everyone who has actually run a national campaign, refuses to build any kind of ground game (which is how Obama beat Romney in an election Romney should have won) and continues to self destruct.
Trump will lose in November in the biggest landslide since McGovern's loss. Why is the GOP establishment running in circles? Because Trump's incompetence now threatens the GOP hold on the Senate and House.
The bottom line is that Trump is about Trump. The reason he has failed to get ahead of Hillary [He has remained ahead of Hillary - do you really believe the media polls?]( the worst candidate the Democrats have run in my lifetime ) is that he thinks he can manipulate the media [He has successfully trolled the media for months - Bills babes was his latest success] but is in fact easily trolled into the Clinton machine media traps [name one "trap" that has hurt Trump. He always turns them around].
Trump thinks he is smarter than everyone who has actually run a national campaign, refuses to build any kind of ground game [He has had so many rallies in just about every state in the Union it's hard to keep track, and he continues to set attendance records - what are you talking about?] (which is how Obama beat Romney in an election Romney should have won) and continues to self destruct [ When CNN and MSNBC say Trump is "self destructing," you can bet he is not].
Trump will lose in November in the biggest landslide since McGovern's loss [You got that backwards]. Why is the GOP establishment running in circles? [ Because they are about to lose control of the money trough ]Because Trump's incompetence now threatens the GOP hold on the Senate and House [Their own treachery caused their demise. We gave them the House in 2008 - they did nothing to stop Obama. We gave them the Senate in 2012 - they've done nothing].
Your post sounds like a summary of CNN and MSNBC political news hour. Do you really believe them?
spqrzilla
10-12-2016, 14:58
davsel,
Rallies are not votes. If you don't trust polls, fine. But then you have what, exactly, to show that Trump is "ahead" of Hillary? Zipola.
Look at Stephen Green's analysis of the current electoral college voting lineup:
https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2016/10/12/wargaming-the-electoral-college-44/
Trump's incompetence has put Utah in doubt. And what is Trump going to do to turn this around? Ohio has started early voting.
And your attempt to refute my comment about Trump's non existent ground game with rallies is completely irrelevant.
Here is an example of how much of a catastrophe Trump's failure really is:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/florida-dems-register-60x-more-voters-than-gop-in-past-month/article/2604323
Rallies are exactly votes. Everything else is manipulated and "reported" by the media - who is in bed with Hillary. Polls? Really?
The only numbers that we can be reasonably certain of are primary votes, rally attendance, and registered voters. Trump is breaking all records in each of these. Hillary's numbers are pathetic across the board.
If Trump makes it to Nov 8th, he can't lose.
Guess we'll see what happens in 28 days.
spqrzilla
10-12-2016, 15:33
No, rally attendance shows that there are a bunch of people want to see the circus. It does not tell us how many people are going to vote in the general election.
In 2012, I had convinced myself that the polls were undercounting GOP votes. And the last four years of President Romney's administration proves I was right.
I believe the problem has been discovered:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3834609/Map-shows-Clinton-win-presidency-MAJOR-landslide-women-voted.html
Here is an example of how much of a catastrophe Trump's failure really is:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/florida-dems-register-60x-more-voters-than-gop-in-past-month/article/2604323
If you dig a bit deeper into the Washington Examiner article, you'll find the data came from the Florida Division of Elections which includes the following disclaimer in regards to their data:
DISCLAIMER: The Florida Third Party Voter Registration (3PVRO) database is not intended, nor should it be used, as a source for Florida voter registration statistics. The 3PVRO database reflects the cumulative number of voter registration applications submitted by a 3PVRO to the state since the time of a 3PVRO’s registration. Please note that a voter application submitted by a political party does not necessarily translate directly into a voter registered for that party as all 3PVROs must collect and submit registrations regardless of party affiliation.
However, you can look at the early voting data from the same site and get a different picture of what is really going on in Florida:
https://countyballotfiles.elections.myflorida.com/FVRSCountyBallotReports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats
Bailey Guns
10-12-2016, 16:57
In 2012, I had convinced myself that the polls were undercounting GOP votes. And the last four years of President Romney's administration proves I was right.
You're not the only one. I listened to all the experts like Dick Morris who kept insisting the polls were doing this or that or weren't accurate for one reason or another. Turns out the polls weren't accurate. Obama won bigger than all the polls said he would. I believe the polls this time. I hope I'm wrong...but I think Trump is gonna lose big. Probably by 8 or 10 points. As it stands now, anyway. A lot can happen in 28 days.
HoneyBadger
10-12-2016, 18:45
However, you can look at the early voting data from the same site and get a different picture of what is really going on in Florida:
https://countyballotfiles.elections.myflorida.com/FVRSCountyBallotReports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats
Ironic and sad that "Gadsden County, FL" is strongly favoring Hillary so far on the early votes.
Zundfolge
10-12-2016, 20:24
In 2012, I had convinced myself that the polls were undercounting GOP votes. And the last four years of President Romney's administration proves I was right.
My suspicion is that the polls now and in 2012 WERE undercounting GOP votes ... but that's because they have to rig the polls so that they line up with the rigged election results.
OR, America is dead and full of dumbasses
As for the size of the crowds at the rallies, all those measure is enthusiasm ... an enthusiastic vote for Trump counts just as much as an "oh well I guess I'm voting for Hillary".
I believe the problem has been discovered:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3834609/Map-shows-Clinton-win-presidency-MAJOR-landslide-women-voted.html
So we need a reverse suffrage movement stat.
My suspicion is that the polls now and in 2012 WERE undercounting GOP votes ... but that's because they have to rig the polls so that they line up with the rigged election results.
OR, America is dead and full of dumbasses
As for the size of the crowds at the rallies, all those measure is enthusiasm ... an enthusiastic vote for Trump counts just as much as an "oh well I guess I'm voting for Hillary".
People don't understand and don't want to understand the value of their natural rights and they'll give their own rights away for the micro-thin veil of security. They don't want to understand because that means they'll be responsible for their own actions and we can't have that now can we.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/100000-pa-democrats-switch-gop-240000-new-voters-join-pa-republican-party/
Nearly 100,000 Pennsylvania Democrats have switched to Republican since the beginning of the year.
What’s more: The Pennsylvania Republican party says more than 240-thousand new voters have joined the party since last November.
The state Republican party says that the surge in Republican registrations is nearly twice the number of newly registered Republicans compared to both the 2008 and 2012 numbers combined.
The party says the new numbers come from the Pennsylvania Department of State which shows that 97,607 Democrats have actually switched to Republican.
Numbers also show that 38,020 Republicans actually switched to Democrats.
nogaroheli
10-13-2016, 15:06
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/100000-pa-democrats-switch-gop-240000-new-voters-join-pa-republican-party/
And he's still getting slaughtered there.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/pa/pennsylvania_trump_vs_clinton-5633.html
Trump is toxic now and he's taking the down ticket R's with him. He's burning the whole nasty Republican mess down in the process- except Hillary and the Dems are going to be the ones smiling after the fires go out.
[ROFL1] Media took a poll [ROFL1]
So we need a reverse suffrage movement stat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1J8uX9_-Bg
I'm pretty sure there was also an episode of The Man Show where they did the same thing.
I'm pretty sure there was also an episode of The Man Show where they did the same thing.
Video kinda makes the participants appear somewhat uneducated on matters of a political nature.
Weird.
nogaroheli
10-13-2016, 15:55
[ROFL1] Media took a poll [ROFL1]
I know you think the polls are skewed, however rally turnout is hardly the empirical data to make bets on. Bernie Sanders would agree with me after having huge voter turnout that didn't translate into real, tangible votes. Many of the attendees are already on the politicians side, they're already supporting them, the rally isn't an indicator of how many new people are coming over that politicians side. In 2012 Romney killed it in turnout at his Pennsylvania rallies and then proceeded to get beat by 5 points in the election.
How much do you think the polls are skewed? 2%? 5%? Trump's losing by more than those numbers in key states- and it's getting worse. I despise Hillary and think that she is evil incarnate but looking at the data I honestly see no way for him to get to 270.
spqrzilla
10-13-2016, 16:47
Jim Hoft ... uh, sure. Go with that.
Zundfolge, the Free Shit Brigades are winning, I'm sad to say.
milwaukeeshaker
10-14-2016, 14:12
This!![Beer]
Your post sounds like a summary of CNN and MSNBC political news hour. Do you really believe them?
So we need a reverse suffrage movement stat.
No, we don't. You start revoking rights, where's it going to stop?
You do NOT want to try to take away women's rights. You just don't.
Let's see if the worm turns after these slew of WikiLeaks makes its way across social media...
No, we don't. You start revoking rights, where's it going to stop?
You do NOT want to try to take away women's rights. You just don't.
I was being sarcastic ....
I was being sarcastic ....
Okay.
It's hard to tell without any sort of indicators, such as emoticons or something added to show sarcasm.
theGinsue
10-15-2016, 13:07
I'm voting for theGinsue this year anyways. I'm hoping maybe cstone is in the ticket as well.
theGinsue for president
You know, I've considered getting into politics to fix the broken shit. If I thought I could beat the system and get into any political office that could lead to the Presidency or even Congress, I'd do it - and I'd take many from this site with me. I don't always know th right answer to a situation but I know plenty of folks here and elsewhere who'd be tremendous staff/cabinet members. (Cstone could have any position in my administration he wants.)
The trick is getting on the ticket. Given that I'm not an establishment party member, that'd be essentially impossible. So, I just sit by and watch the establishment continue to take our country down the toilet.
Have you ever read "All The King's Men" Ginsue?
Have you ever read "All The King's Men" Ginsue?
Unless there's lots of pictures he probably hasn't.
[Neene1]
theGinsue
10-15-2016, 18:40
I'm voting for theGinsue this year anyways. I'm hoping maybe cstone is in the ticket as well.
theGinsue for president
Have you ever read "All The King's Men" Ginsue?
No, but it is on my list.
Unless there's lots of pictures he probably hasn't.
[Neene1]
Ouch! I'd ban you but you're right.
Ouch! I'd ban you but there's no picture for the ban button.
FTFY
DavieD55
10-16-2016, 09:01
You know, I've considered getting into politics to fix the broken shit. If I thought I could beat the system and get into any political office that could lead to the Presidency or even Congress, I'd do it - and I'd take many from this site with me. I don't always know th right answer to a situation but I know plenty of folks here and elsewhere who'd be tremendous staff/cabinet members. (Cstone could have any position in my administration he wants.)
The trick is getting on the ticket. Given that I'm not an establishment party member, that'd be essentially impossible. So, I just sit by and watch the establishment continue to take our country down the toilet.
[Awesom]
Okay.
It's hard to tell without any sort of indicators, such as emoticons or something added to show sarcasm.
Sorry, next time I will use proper signage [Sarcasm2]
3:00 AM sitting post in the South grounds of the White House, I would sometimes wonder why any sane, intelligent individual would want to live there.
The answer is pretty obvious and became more obvious everyday as I drove home from work.
I wouldn't wish that job on anyone I actually like or respect.
We get the government we deserve.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.