Universal Background check law in Nevada will NOT go into effect as the FBI will not pay for it.

[SG1]

http://ag.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/agnvgov/Content/Publications/AGO_2016-12.pdf


Goes to show you that 2016 is the year of Miracles, now lets free your state next.

[Great-Kazoo]

If it saves one tax dollar, isn't it worth it.

[Rumline]

LMAO!! This just made my day.

Was that requirement that dealers contact NICS directly inserted as a poison pill? If so, genius move.

[Martinjmpr]

http://pedestriantv-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images%2Farticle%2F2015%2F12%2F23%2Fchristmasmirac le1.gif

[spqrzilla]

LMAO!! This just made my day.

Was that requirement that dealers contact NICS directly inserted as a poison pill? If so, genius move.

No, Bloomberg's lawyers are incompetent.

[Skip]

No, Bloomberg's lawyers are incompetent.

But they did it in CO "right" by taxing the Constitutionally protected natural right. So what happened in NV?

[SG1]

If it saves one tax dollar, isn't it worth it.


LOL!

[SG1]

But they did it in CO "right" by taxing the Constitutionally protected natural right. So what happened in NV?

Poll tax lawsuit time.

More or less the FBI would be forced to pay for Private sale NICS checks, they said "No, we are not required to do so" and sense they are not paying for/will do it the AG said "we will not enforce it as it can not be enforced".


http://www.ammoland.com/2016/12/nevada-attorney-general-says-question-one-background-check-law-unenforceable/#axzz4UGSRQDgd

[Zundfolge]

But they did it in CO "right" by taxing the Constitutionally protected natural right. So what happened in NV?

The Nevada law specifically says FBI via NICS has to do the BGC, in CO it specified the state BGC system (which is why the "fee" was added). Frankly Bloomberg had help from Quislings in the CO legislature that he didn't get in NV because NV was a ballot initiative (with no input from the local legislature).

[Skip]

The Nevada law specifically says FBI via NICS has to do the BGC, in CO it specified the state BGC system (which is why the "fee" was added). Frankly Bloomberg had help from Quislings in the CO legislature that he didn't get in NV because NV was a ballot initiative (with no input from the local legislature).

Well that explains the bulk of it but I'm surprised those opportunists didn't seize the moment to create a new state level bureaucracy and make gun owners pay for it.

I think Bloomtard had help from more than just the Dems in the state house. I think they had help from CBI, IMHO. These are people who didn't even understand what gun control measure they were voting for (how firearms/mags work). It was Rhonda herself that even got confused on what weapon was used in the murder of her son.

[Zundfolge]

...I'm surprised those opportunists didn't seize the moment to create a new state level bureaucracy and make gun owners pay for it...

The argument is that if it would have raised taxes or cost the state any money it would have lost (it won by less than 1% of the vote).

[Skip]

The argument is that if it would have raised taxes or cost the state any money it would have lost (it won by less than 1% of the vote).

But there's no limit to what gun owners can be charged. That's something I find ridiculous.

There was a case this year where a $1,000 excise tax was stricken down for being excessive (http://www.guns.com/2016/09/30/court-finds-1k-excise-tax-on-handguns-to-be-unconstitutional/) but there seems to be a lot of room between $25 and $1,000.

Like SP1 said on page 1, a $0.01 poll tax would be declared unConstitutional in a heartbeat.

[SG1]

But there's no limit to what gun owners can be charged. That's something I find ridiculous.

There was a case this year where a $1,000 excise tax was stricken down for being excessive (http://www.guns.com/2016/09/30/court-finds-1k-excise-tax-on-handguns-to-be-unconstitutional/) but there seems to be a lot of room between $25 and $1,000.

Like SP1 said on page 1, a $0.01 poll tax would be declared unConstitutional in a heartbeat.

That is what you have to love about leftists, their mental gymnastics are just amazing...

A $0.01 poll taxes in unconstitutional but a $200 on the right to keep and bare arms is.

The right to abortion or gay marriage is clearly found in the Constitution but machine guns are not protected.

Illegals have the right to all sorts of tax payer funded programs but we can not deny them any thing because they are a protected class and if we do WE are the criminals...

[JohnnyDrama]

I reckon if gun owners had to pay $200.00/year to exercise their "right", there would be much greater turn out by gun owners come election time.

[Aloha_Shooter]

A $0.01 poll taxes in unconstitutional but a $200 on the right to keep and bare arms is.

I think you can go sleeveless any time you want without paying any additional taxes ...

[ROFL1][ROFL3][ROFL2]

[SG1]

I reckon if gun owners had to pay $200.00/year to exercise their "right", there would be much greater turn out by gun owners come election time.

...NFA ring a bell?


Walking up in a new year a little bit freer then last year, and only 20 days before the God Emperor takes the throne!

[milwaukeeshaker]

You mean LEAVES the throne.

[SG1]

You mean LEAVES the throne.

No, I mean Trump is the God Emperor, its a War Hammer reference.