View Full Version : Did we hate Gardner already?
Co sponsoring dumb Dream act bill.....
http://www.9news.com/news/local/next/sens-bennet-gardner-decide-to-co-sponser-dream-act-2017/471293915
It sounds good and all, until you look at the numbers of illegals we have. (Over 35 mill, forget exact number here at 4am) And that it continues to give incentive for under age coyote running or otherwise get here plant seed and bingo bango with some time a citizen. (Who shelters with and later can shelter others running the border potentially) Not sure on the specifics of say someone 15yrs old or whatever gets Dreamed, do they become ward of state or do illegal parents get to stay because you can't possibly tear them apart for criminal acts.....?
hurley842002
09-06-2017, 05:54
I've despised him for awhile now, but in his defense, he's just doing what any smart rino would do considering how blue Colorado is.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
The Gardner snake is pretty common in Colorado.
Marine24
09-06-2017, 07:51
Interesting requirements:
- Arrive in the US before turning 18
- Graduate high school or obtain a GED
- Pursue higher education, work lawfully for at least three years or serve in the military
- Pass security and background checks
- Demonstrate a proficiency in English and a knowledge of U.S. history
Zundfolge
09-06-2017, 09:22
I hated him before I voted for him.
I'll gladly vote for a decent challenger to him during the primaries, but I don't want the D's to get control of the Senate so I'll still vote for his stupid ass in the general so that doesn't happen.
He's a cuck ... just look at his goofy little cuck face.
I hated him before I voted for him.
I'll gladly vote for a decent challenger to him during the primaries, but I don't want the D's to get control of the Senate so I'll still vote for his stupid ass in the general so that doesn't happen.
He's a cuck ... just look at his goofy little cuck face.
Agreed, he is a weasel but he is a better option than any (D). In spite of their failings I still want the GOP to be in control of the committees and such.
sellersm
09-06-2017, 09:40
100% of illegal immigrants have committed a crime. Period. The crimes of parents will always affect children. Period. It's never been the .gov job to change that natural law of consequence: just because they have tried to change it in the past doesn't make it right. Nor does mean they should start trying to change it now. 100% is on the parents who made their choices...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hurley842002
09-06-2017, 09:48
Some of these "dreamers" appear to be nearly my age (early 30's), my question is, what have they been doing all these years that has inhibited them from acquiring full citizenship? Saw one of them crying on the news a couple days ago, zero sympathy dude.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
DenverGP
09-06-2017, 11:42
I don't want the D's to get control of the Senate
I thought the same way, but the R's we've got have done nothing with control of the house/senate/white house.
They are worthless.
Zundfolge
09-06-2017, 12:49
I thought the same way, but the R's we've got have done nothing with control of the house/senate/white house.
Yes the R's have done nothing ... but the D's will do something ... lots of somethings ... lots of very bad somethings. I don't really want to die in a civil war/revolution/insurrection so lets keep those pieces of shit out of power as long as we can (even if it means we have do-nothings in their place).
thedave1164
09-06-2017, 14:01
He was a d before he was an r
Great-Kazoo
09-06-2017, 15:00
He was a d before he was an r
As with Trump. But most people don't want to hear that.
As with Trump. But most people don't want to hear that.
Yup.
He appeared willing to negotiate with Republicans and Democrats on a DACA solution — even willing to add border security funding to help sell the measure to offer amnesty to DACA recipients.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/06/donald-trump-wants-permanent-daca-deal-where-everybody-is-happy/
I don't want a deal, I want them and rest of the illegals out of my country.
Yes the R's have done nothing ... but the D's will do something ... lots of somethings ... lots of very bad somethings. I don't really want to die in a civil war/revolution/insurrection so lets keep those pieces of shit out of power as long as we can (even if it means we have do-nothings in their place).
Agreed.
hurley842002
09-06-2017, 16:45
I don't want a deal, I want them and rest of the illegals out of my country.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170906/6eacf0455c62c845c2a9fd001dc07545.jpg
thedave1164
09-06-2017, 17:11
Any time you hear "bipartisan" flowing from a r's mouth, it means the country gets screwed again
Some of these "dreamers" appear to be nearly my age (early 30's), my question is, what have they been doing all these years that has inhibited them from acquiring full citizenship? Saw one of them crying on the news a couple days ago, zero sympathy dude.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
I believe that they would have to 1st leave the country and then enter the immigration lottery.. That's why.
BPTactical
09-08-2017, 19:16
From about 20 Minutes after he was sworn in....
I hate all professional liars and ass kissers, otherwise know as politicians
Zundfolge
09-09-2017, 19:09
He was a d before he was an r
To be fair, so was Andrew Breitbart, Bill Whittle, Evan Sayet, Jon Voight and Ronald Reagan (among other great patriots). But in Gardner's case I think he's a big self serving phony.
Wrote to him after the Charlottesville riot when he announced that he wanted President Trump to denounce white supremecists after Trump had already spoken out against all kinds of racists and rioters.
Finally got a reply back in which he says, largely by omission, that he strongly opposes white supremecists and white racists but has no issue with Antifa, black racists, and leftist terrorists. Gardner was unable to make a statement against ALL rioters and troublemakers.
To be fair, so was Andrew Breitbart, Bill Whittle, Evan Sayet, Jon Voight and Ronald Reagan (among other great patriots). But in Gardner's case I think he's a big self serving phony.
You nailed it.
Wrote to him after the Charlottesville riot when he announced that he wanted President Trump to denounce white supremecists after Trump had already spoken out against all kinds of racists and rioters.
Finally got a reply back in which he says, largely by omission, that he strongly opposes white supremecists and white racists but has no issue with Antifa, black racists, and leftist terrorists. Gardner was unable to make a statement against ALL rioters and troublemakers.
Gardner is so stupid he doesn't know that he has more to fear from Antifa, black racists, and leftist terrorists.
Mark Udall approves this thread. [hahhah-no]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaTojwO1eHc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaTojwO1eHc
Kind of topical...
If Camilo Casas is elected to city council in Boulder, Colorado, this November, he doesn't plan to make any decisions himself. If he wins, Casas will instead give up his vote to Parti.Vote, a "liquid democracy" app he built to change how government functions.
This is how it will work: If more than 50 percent of people in his community vote "yes" on an issue through the app, Casas will vote the same way they do. Only in the event of a tie would he be forced to make a decision based on his own beliefs.
In order to avoid fraud, Casas' team will vet signups on Parti.Vote against the Colorado Secretary of State's publicly available voter rolls. In the future, Casas told me he wants to utilize biometrics for verification, possibly using something like Apple's Face ID technology.
More at link: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/59dnbb/colorado-political-candidate-promises-to-give-his-seat-to-an-app
This seems like such a bad idea. However, if some unscrupulous conservative type were to crack the app... well, things would get interesting.
This seems like such a bad idea.
Whattya mean, it's a great way to implement democracy. Of course we don't live in a democracy.
Wonder how he'll implement holding to his oath of office if an unconstitutional issue garners enough "yes" votes.
Oh yhea, I forgot, no one honors their oath anymore.
O2
Yeah, a great way to institute mob rule. Would suck to be in the minority.
We could all move to boulder and really screw with the guy.
Zundfolge
10-19-2017, 08:07
We could all move to boulder and really screw with the guy.
Ugh, I can't even drive through Boulder without feeling ill ... I can't imagine that moving there would do anything but screw myself.
Ugh, I can't even drive through Boulder without feeling ill ... I can't imagine that moving there would do anything but screw myself.
One does not need to screw oneself when in Sodom or Gomorrah. The residents are more than willing to assist.
Zundfolge
10-19-2017, 09:58
One does not need to screw oneself when in Sodom or Gomorrah. The residents are more than willing to assist.
LOL and Eew.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.