View Full Version : Oh look, Arvada makes history!
BPTactical
11-10-2018, 18:50
Along with the new Governors...."preferences" Arvada got a special one elected too:
https://www.coloradoindependent.com/2018/11/08/first-transgender-colorado-arvada/
Let's celebrate "Diversity".
Let's celebrate mental illness.
For Chrissakes, enough of this crap already.
Zundfolge
11-10-2018, 20:25
Why is it that all of the m-to-f trannies I've ever met take stripper names?
beast556
11-10-2018, 20:26
Unfortunately this is just the beginning. It's gonna get really really bad here in the years to come.
Swell, these people make up less than 3% of the US population and transsexuals are a much lower percentage.
Why would anyone want a mental defective like that in any leadership position.
emiller35
11-10-2018, 21:53
Again, welcome to Rome.
This
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BushMasterBoy
11-10-2018, 22:33
Reminds me of this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHTPLpY8mBI
We could make Colorado too cool for them to want to live here. IDK how but they are transforming Colorado into a California shithole jr. to attract like minded people.
Grant H.
11-11-2018, 00:01
Co is screwed.
At least until one of two things comes to pass:
1. The end of the world (EMP, Return of the Messiah, etc)
2. The next American Civil War.
I have close friends that live in this district. They are not impressed...
OtterbatHellcat
11-11-2018, 00:19
Forefathers...….[facepalm]
StagLefty
11-11-2018, 09:01
Can't wait for the Govenor's Ball next year !!! [Sarcasm2]
I honestly don't really care about gender or sexuality being part of a candidates life. Just don't try to make it part of their "qualifications" to get elected. It has absolutely nothing to do with the ability to govern.
Co is screwed.
At least until one of two things comes to pass:
1. The end of the world (EMP, Return of the Messiah, etc)
2. The next American Civil War.
I have close friends that live in this district. They are not impressed...
More like disgusted.
Zundfolge
11-11-2018, 10:06
IDK how but they are transforming Colorado into a California shithole jr. to attract like minded people.
Weed ... "The Blueprint" (https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-Democrats-Colorado-Republicans-Everywhere/dp/1936218003)... easily manipulated 100% mail in ballot ... next steps, eliminate TABOR and pass more gun control (to make it unpalatable for Republicans to live here).
I honestly don't really care about gender or sexuality being part of a candidates life. Just don't try to make it part of their "qualifications" to get elected. It has absolutely nothing to do with the ability to govern.
How bout Pedophiles, or people who think they are Jesus, or S&M folks, or the guy down by the river with the manikin wife in his tent?
Just because the WHO said being a tranny is no longer considered a mental illness, doesn't make it so.
BTW, the de-listing just happened in June of 2018.
The new mental illness is that of people not acknowledging the fact that not all people are fit to govern, and it is one of the only contagious mental illnesses.
BPTactical
11-11-2018, 11:16
How bout Pedophiles, or people who think they are Jesus, or S&M folks, or the guy down by the river with the manikin wife in his tent?
Just because the WHO said being a tranny is no longer considered a mental illness, doesn't make it so.
BTW, the de-listing just happened in June of 2018.
The new mental illness is that of people not acknowledging the fact that not all people are fit to govern, and it is one of the only contagious mental illnesses.
Hammer, meet nail.
How bout Pedophiles, or people who think they are Jesus, or S&M folks, or the guy down by the river with the manikin wife in his tent?
Just because the WHO said being a tranny is no longer considered a mental illness, doesn't make it so.
BTW, the de-listing just happened in June of 2018.
The new mental illness is that of people not acknowledging the fact that not all people are fit to govern, and it is one of the only contagious mental illnesses.
Times change. Being gay was considered a mental illness and widely criminalized for ages too. Somebody being transgender, gay, or into S&M neither picks my pocket or breaks my leg. As gun owners are being increasingly demonized (how many of you have heard a joke from someone who found out you own guns to the effect of "oh better not make you mad!") we might want to want to steer away from equating perfectly legal states of being that do not impact us to the worst elements of humanity such as pedophiles.
Weed ... "The Blueprint" (https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-Democrats-Colorado-Republicans-Everywhere/dp/1936218003)... easily manipulated 100% mail in ballot ... next steps, eliminate TABOR and pass more gun control (to make it unpalatable for Republicans to live here).
I have heard that before. Recently when I went to a public speaking event I overheard the Dems lament over tabor and how hard it was to raise money. I laughed in their face. And told them to cut spending if you need more money. I pay $140 for a 25 yo pickup, because of fee's. I have to get emissions every year at $45 -$75 a pop. I have seen CDOT reject loads of concrete, because its hard to work with and they still signed off on the ticket. So they ordered a new truck and paid for the old one to the cost of $3,000. And that is just what I've seen. I'm sure there are other things like that happening more and often. Its not their money and there will be more money to come.
Times change. Being gay was considered a mental illness and widely criminalized for ages too. Somebody being transgender, gay, or into S&M neither picks my pocket or breaks my leg. As gun owners are being increasingly demonized (how many of you have heard a joke from someone who found out you own guns to the effect of "oh better not make you mad!") we might want to want to steer away from equating perfectly legal states of being that do not impact us to the worst elements of humanity such as pedophiles.
I heard jokes about being a gun owner. "I better not make you mad... or I'm coming to your house when the zombies come."
I just reply, "That's good advice for anyone." and "You better bring your cute sister..."
But the truth is there is room for the good people to be saved from those bent on doing them harm so I just mention to them "Next time you see me carrying in groceries or moving something around heavy. Coming over to help will get more respect from me than just showing up asking for shelter from SJW or zombies. But I repeat myself."
Times change. Being gay was considered a mental illness and widely criminalized for ages too. Somebody being transgender, gay, or into S&M neither picks my pocket or breaks my leg. As gun owners are being increasingly demonized (how many of you have heard a joke from someone who found out you own guns to the effect of "oh better not make you mad!") we might want to want to steer away from equating perfectly legal states of being that do not impact us to the worst elements of humanity such as pedophiles.
Unlike our flawed legislature, the laws of nature cannot be updated as times change.
Wearing makeup and lopping off your genitalia does not make you a woman.
It does however make sane society recognize you have a severe mental illness, and your every decision should be in question.
How bout Pedophiles, or people who think they are Jesus, or S&M folks, or the guy down by the river with the manikin wife in his tent?
Just because the WHO said being a tranny is no longer considered a mental illness, doesn't make it so.
BTW, the de-listing just happened in June of 2018.
The new mental illness is that of people not acknowledging the fact that not all people are fit to govern, and it is one of the only contagious mental illnesses.
Bringing up pedophilia is pretty far off base from what I'm saying. So what if someone is I to S&M. What I'm trying to say is that electing someone because they are transgender is stupid. I don't think it's a qualification people should be voting on. I don't think it's a disqualification either. I want someone who can do the job that I want done.
Someone with a mental illness should not be allowed to serve in elected offices.
Yes, I went there. These people are effed in the head.
Romans 1: 28-32 (NKJV) (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans+1&version=NKJV)
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
If we're using the bible as a tool to go after people, I'm at the gym on the sabbath, does working out require my death as per Exodus 35:2 or only the people who verified my membership?
If we're using the bible as a tool to go after people, I'm at the gym on the sabbath, does working out require my death as per Exodus 35:2 or only the people who verified my membership?
Old Testament law for the Jews. No longer applies.
There are some really good bible courses offered through Colorado Christian University.
I sure wish we had more Blue Laws, said no one ever.
Grant H.
11-11-2018, 14:19
Old Testament law for the Jews. No longer applies.
There are some really good bible courses offered through Colorado Christian University.
I'll be in the minority here, but you might want to revisit what the meaning of "the same yesterday, today, and forever"...
I know, dispensationalism... Doesn't even begin to jive with scripture...
Grant H.
11-11-2018, 14:23
Bringing up pedophilia is pretty far off base from what I'm saying. So what if someone is I to S&M. What I'm trying to say is that electing someone because they are transgender is stupid. I don't think it's a qualification people should be voting on. I don't think it's a disqualification either. I want someone who can do the job that I want done.
It's not though...
They normalized homosexuality.
They've now normalized transgender mental insanity.
We've already seen small segments of society start advocating for pedophilia...
How come no one ever talks about normalizing down syndrome?
Old Testament law for the Jews. No longer applies.
There are some really good bible courses offered through Colorado Christian University.
Setting aside those who do not believe in the authenticity of the new testament, backing up "natural laws" with biblical verses, that as you say can be superseded/no longer apply, absolutely would leave the door open to changes in "natural laws" over time and in keeping with societal developments and changes in norms/morals. Working on the sabbath (or the ability to) hurts me about as much as people being able to be transgender, which is not at all.
As a disclaimer, I was raised in a dual catholic/protestant household, was confirmed, went to various protestant functions as well, and was thoroughly exposed to religion, and do not intend any insult to a persons belief system, nor how the church/whatever religious organization wants to conduct it's internal affairs. As an adult I do not believe in a higher power, nor do I recognize the authority of any religious text to govern our society or enforce norms. I'm not transgender nor any other disputed category here, but I' think a persons ability to live how they want without hurting others falls quite clearly into their ability to pursue happiness and is in keeping with the values this country was founded upon (some of which, yes, were religious based and as with the pursuit of happiness phrase do mention a creator).
I find it ironic that a unique command to rest is seen as a downer in a world working itself to death. Lol
Anyway, I feel like a winner so I expect everyone with ratify my internal confusion to manifest externally in 2020.
...but I' think a persons ability to live how they want without hurting others falls quite clearly into their ability to pursue happiness and is in keeping with the values this country was founded upon (some of which, yes, were religious based and as with the pursuit of happiness phrase do mention a creator).
I think Worldview is important to understand of each other when discussing certain topics and certainly politics. I believe in the Bible and God, but I also fully agree with the statement you made I quoted above. I think that far too many Christians have attempted to legislate morality as opposed to create the laws which are equally palatable and acceptable to all persons who desire to live at peace with their neighbors. In fact, loving our neighbor (regardless of their view of God and religion) is a command of Christians.
Laws based on the written Constitution I am fine with. Laws that go beyond that I am not okay with. I am also a proponent of States rights, another area where the Fed has butted in and trampled the 10th amendment. The Defense of Marriage Act, in my opinion was wrong and should have remained at the state level. Same sex marriage never should have been a Federal issue IMHO. I believe that life starts at conception and that the being conceived is human. That is based on two perspectives, both my religious and my scientific perspective. If it was only a religion one, that would be a problem for me to argue against abortion. But the textual basis of our laws, and of Roe V. Wade are, in so many cases at odds with each other. With the changes in technology, it is clear the being is, at conception, both human and living...so much so that I believe any rational person can see that abortion is in conflict with the Constitution. A religious argument was made, and that was an error. When it comes to gun control, the Constitution is more forceful than the Bible. While the Bible certainly allows for defense of property and person, it also tells Christians to be subject to the authority over them. Frankly, it is one area where the rights afforded to me as an American are stronger than those I can claim as a Christian.
That I do not ascribe to only a religious evaluation of laws certainly may allow things which would be sin for me, but that is okay with me. It is clear that non-Christians also considered the Constitution from their own perspectives and found it to be the best that could be agreed upon. My dispute with the Progressive left is that they have no regard for the Constitution. Further, that the bulk of the Democrat Party follows their lead and does not consider the implications.
I think Worldview is important to understand of each other when discussing certain topics and certainly politics. I believe in the Bible and God, but I also fully agree with the statement you made I quoted above. I think that far too many Christians have attempted to legislate morality as opposed to create the laws which are equally palatable and acceptable to all persons who desire to live at peace with their neighbors. In fact, loving our neighbor (regardless of their view of God and religion) is a command of Christians.
Laws based on the written Constitution I am fine with. Laws that go beyond that I am not okay with. I am also a proponent of States rights, another area where the Fed has butted in and trampled the 10th amendment. The Defense of Marriage Act, in my opinion was wrong and should have remained at the state level. Same sex marriage never should have been a Federal issue IMHO. I believe that life starts at conception and that the being conceived is human. That is based on two perspectives, both my religious and my scientific perspective. If it was only a religion one, that would be a problem for me to argue against abortion. But the textual basis of our laws, and of Roe V. Wade are, in so many cases at odds with each other. With the changes in technology, it is clear the being is, at conception, both human and living...so much so that I believe any rational person can see that abortion is in conflict with the Constitution. A religious argument was made, and that was an error. When it comes to gun control, the Constitution is more forceful than the Bible. While the Bible certainly allows for defense of property and person, it also tells Christians to be subject to the authority over them. Frankly, it is one area where the rights afforded to me as an American are stronger than those I can claim as a Christian.
That I do not ascribe to only a religious evaluation of laws certainly may allow things which would be sin for me, but that is okay with me. It is clear that non-Christians also considered the Constitution from their own perspectives and found it to be the best that could be agreed upon. My dispute with the Progressive left is that they have no regard for the Constitution. Further, that the bulk of the Democrat Party follows their lead and does not consider the implications.
I'm sure there are individual policy points we disagree on but I absolutely appreciate this view and this is a well done post.
Great-Kazoo
11-11-2018, 19:32
I'm sure there are individual policy points we disagree on but I absolutely appreciate this view and this is a well done post.
I like and agree with both of yours & mark's post. Ideas / beliefs laid out in a simple manner with no name calling, SCREAMING! or anything else but how each of you feel. AS i'm sure others do too.
BushMasterBoy
11-11-2018, 20:02
If she paid for that, I would ask for a refund.
76559
Great-Kazoo
11-11-2018, 20:07
If she paid for that, I would ask for a refund.
76559
Don't be a dick ;)
Refund, i see a lawsuit.
OtterbatHellcat
11-11-2018, 23:33
I saw a video of the guy... and I don't like what I saw, but I also don't like what he said and how he said it.
Seemed to have a really "entitled" attitude about all the bullshit stigma that he damn well knows is in play here. That pisses me off.
The person the majority of the people voted for, won.
OtterbatHellcat
11-11-2018, 23:38
Yep.
BPTactical
11-12-2018, 16:54
The person the majority of the people voted for, won.
Uhmm, its about who counts the votes....
Romans 12: 9 (NKJV) (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+12&version=NKJV)
Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil. Cling to what is good.
2 John 1:4-11 (NKJV) (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20John+1&version=NKJV)
I rejoiced greatly that I have found some of your children walking in truth, as we received commandment from the Father. And now I plead with you, lady, not as though I wrote a new commandment to you, but that which we have had from the beginning: that we love one another. This is love, that we walk according to His commandments. This is the commandment, that as you have heard from the beginning, you should walk in it.
For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. Look to yourselves, that we do not lose those things we worked for, but that we may receive a full reward.
Whoever transgresses and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God. He who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into your house nor greet him; for he who greets him shares in his evil deeds.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.