View Full Version : Very sad: Collins Foundation B-17 crashes
DenverGP
10-02-2019, 13:03
https://www.wfsb.com/news/five-people-killed-in-b--crash-at-bradley/article_d514bd24-e51d-11e9-b6ac-47e02ec67428.html
http://magaimg.net/img/93l5.jpg
(https://www.wfsb.com/news/five-people-killed-in-b--crash-at-bradley/article_d514bd24-e51d-11e9-b6ac-47e02ec67428.html)
Bailey Guns
10-02-2019, 13:09
I was heartbroken when I heard the news this morning.
Sad. Every day we lose more of our history from WWII; reminds me to appreciate that history while it’s here, wether it be found in inanimate objects or in its human form.
Saw this in the news this morning. My first and primary concern is to those that died or were injured in the crash. I also feel bad about losing the historic aircraft. Prayers go out to the families affected.
Ugh. This is such a bummer.
BPTactical
10-02-2019, 16:15
Very sad.
Brings up a critical argument.
Is there a time when these ol birds should be retired to a museum? Looking at both sides of the coin, these AC were never intended with longevity a priority. But then again on many of them so little of the original AC remains?
The question is really, what's the source of the accident?
Was it the result of a mechanical failure?
If so, was the failure in components that are antique, or ones that are newly made?
Presumably the FAA has to certify them for airworthiness, so is there an issue here that could be addressed?
I don't know, and can't even pretend to have the answers here. The loss of life and of an historic aircraft really hurts though.
Based on an educated eyewitness, it lost the #3 engine (inboard, starboard) shortly after takeout - flameout and smoke, etc. It then began a wide circle to land back at the airport.
There's no evidence it suffered anything other than an engine failure.
A big problem I see with these warbirds is not their reliability - these were over engineered and are well maintained - a big issue is who is flying the things. Normally you see guys that are 60, 70+ in the pilots seat. E.g. the ones with enough street cred in the orgs and enough time to put in because they are retired. They wouldn't have any of them young whippersnappers (50 or under) in the hot seat if they could help it.
An investigation will surely bring final answers here, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say a) yes the plane had an issue, but a skilled pilot should've been able to safely land it. I'm betting they panicked a bit and landed despite not having great alignment. Probably should have powered through, and done a nice big turn to get it right, even if there was an outright fire on the #3, they had time. I hate to say it too, but yeah, the OG's might have experience, but these old pilots have drastically delayed reaction times.
I don't see any reason to stop flying them, if we address the pilot issue. The failure rate on these guys is far lower than many more modern planes (C-130 comes to mind). They can't corrode, and with multiengines, you SHOULD be able to recover from a single engine loss. With regular maintenance and stripping on schedules, I don't know that you could ever wear out their airframe.
Definitely saddened by the loss of life, and the aircraft. There was one flying in these parts just two weeks ago, different org though.
Oh man, not the Nine-Oh-Nine.....how sad.....
https://youtu.be/H-uZoTDFs4M
Bailey Guns
10-02-2019, 18:16
What a great video, rondog. Makes me even more sad.
What a bummer.
My wife and I were kayaking at Cherry Creek res a few years ago , I heard a B-17 coming and told her to watch as it flew over because it might be the first and last time in her life to see one flying. Rip big fella.
Based on an educated eyewitness, it lost the #3 engine (inboard, starboard) shortly after takeout - flameout and smoke, etc. It then began a wide circle to land back at the airport.
There's no evidence it suffered anything other than an engine failure.
A big problem I see with these warbirds is not their reliability - these were over engineered and are well maintained - a big issue is who is flying the things. Normally you see guys that are 60, 70+ in the pilots seat. E.g. the ones with enough street cred in the orgs and enough time to put in because they are retired. They wouldn't have any of them young whippersnappers (50 or under) in the hot seat if they could help it.
An investigation will surely bring final answers here, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say a) yes the plane had an issue, but a skilled pilot should've been able to safely land it. I'm betting they panicked a bit and landed despite not having great alignment. Probably should have powered through, and done a nice big turn to get it right, even if there was an outright fire on the #3, they had time. I hate to say it too, but yeah, the OG's might have experience, but these old pilots have drastically delayed reaction times.
I don't see any reason to stop flying them, if we address the pilot issue. The failure rate on these guys is far lower than many more modern planes (C-130 comes to mind). They can't corrode, and with multiengines, you SHOULD be able to recover from a single engine loss. With regular maintenance and stripping on schedules, I don't know that you could ever wear out their airframe.
Definitely saddened by the loss of life, and the aircraft. There was one flying in these parts just two weeks ago, different org though.
I flew the Collings Foundation P51 Toulouse Nuts last summer, the majority of the pilots they use are volunteers that are obviously type certified in the aircraft. The pilot of my P51 flight was a commercial airliner pilot in his 50s that had 30 years of experience in the P51 on top of his 30+ years as an airline pilot. The pilots of the B17 (Nine O Nine) and the B24 were of similar experience. They have multiple flight crews that switch out every other flight so that they stay fresh. The guys flying these things aren’t WW2 / Korean war vets, most of them are current commercial and military pilots with extensive flying experience.
The guys flying these things aren’t WW2 / Korean war vets...
Not many of them still alive, much less flight ready.
Nothing compares to walking around one of these planes and connecting to it as a piece of history.
But most of all, thoughts to the lost and injured, too sad.
Really sad. A few years ago I took a tour of the Aluminum Overcast when it was at Centennial Airport. There was a Pilot there that had completed 20+ missions in B-17 E?s and G?s. Gentlemen was 96 years young when my Wife and I met him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GeorgeandSugar
10-03-2019, 17:42
Tragic! Losing history and remembrance of the Greatest Generation.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.