cebeu
02-08-2010, 14:15
Number of English-language learners on the rise in Colorado
By Jeremy P. Meyer
The Denver Post
Posted: 02/05/2010 01:00:00 AM MST
Updated: 02/05/2010 03:09:15 AM MST
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14337738 (http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14337738)
QUOTE: “One of the most vexing problems in public education is how to teach students who are not fluent in English.”
My question: Why? Why is this “most vexing?” This should not even be an issue, let alone a “vexing one.”
Oh…yeah…one of my answers (dumbass me); QUOTE: “Denver's bilingual program has been under a federal court order since 1999 to offer native-language instruction for English learners — the result of a lawsuit by Latino parents who alleged DPS discriminated against their children by segregating them…”
At the risk of coming across as callous and uncaring, and I do sincerely feel for youngsters caught-up in poor decision processes by their purported parents, this should not even be a discussion point for the Colorado (and American) constituency. Not my problem yet…politicians, the legal system and a burdensome culture of PC garishness make it mine (ours) to bear. Not just here in CO but across the nation.
How about this solution; throw out the court order (easier said than done) and if you’re a parent, you do whatever it takes to make sure your off-spring are prepared to learn in English. Not me, not the US / State educational systems, not the legal system…you. You put this obstacle in-front of your child via life decisions you made, you fix it. Go spend your money, your time and you do whatever you have to do to ensure your child can sit in a US classroom and be able to leverage all of the value and opportunity that privilege affords. Like it or not the language is English, at least for a few more years. And if one suggests they are "doing what it takes for their tike" by exploiting the Legal system to force institutional & budgetary compliance to implement parallel language systems as a solution, think again, your nothing but a drain on a once great society and you are a large part of the problem.*
Lastly, before anyone “goes Latino” on me and/or tries to tie this solely to legal/illegal immigration from Mexico, no, this dumbass mandate is much broader in context and should have far-reaching implications for all languages. Correct? That’s only fair, for all disenfranchised non-English speakers correct? Think about this fact, there are ~6500 spoken languages,~ 4000 of which have a substantial speaking population, who gets to decide who wins and who loses re: “bi-lingual” offerings in CO classrooms?
* DISCLAIMER: This rant has nothing to do with multi-lingual, multi-cultural curriculum and/or optional tracks promoting second language learning.
By Jeremy P. Meyer
The Denver Post
Posted: 02/05/2010 01:00:00 AM MST
Updated: 02/05/2010 03:09:15 AM MST
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14337738 (http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14337738)
QUOTE: “One of the most vexing problems in public education is how to teach students who are not fluent in English.”
My question: Why? Why is this “most vexing?” This should not even be an issue, let alone a “vexing one.”
Oh…yeah…one of my answers (dumbass me); QUOTE: “Denver's bilingual program has been under a federal court order since 1999 to offer native-language instruction for English learners — the result of a lawsuit by Latino parents who alleged DPS discriminated against their children by segregating them…”
At the risk of coming across as callous and uncaring, and I do sincerely feel for youngsters caught-up in poor decision processes by their purported parents, this should not even be a discussion point for the Colorado (and American) constituency. Not my problem yet…politicians, the legal system and a burdensome culture of PC garishness make it mine (ours) to bear. Not just here in CO but across the nation.
How about this solution; throw out the court order (easier said than done) and if you’re a parent, you do whatever it takes to make sure your off-spring are prepared to learn in English. Not me, not the US / State educational systems, not the legal system…you. You put this obstacle in-front of your child via life decisions you made, you fix it. Go spend your money, your time and you do whatever you have to do to ensure your child can sit in a US classroom and be able to leverage all of the value and opportunity that privilege affords. Like it or not the language is English, at least for a few more years. And if one suggests they are "doing what it takes for their tike" by exploiting the Legal system to force institutional & budgetary compliance to implement parallel language systems as a solution, think again, your nothing but a drain on a once great society and you are a large part of the problem.*
Lastly, before anyone “goes Latino” on me and/or tries to tie this solely to legal/illegal immigration from Mexico, no, this dumbass mandate is much broader in context and should have far-reaching implications for all languages. Correct? That’s only fair, for all disenfranchised non-English speakers correct? Think about this fact, there are ~6500 spoken languages,~ 4000 of which have a substantial speaking population, who gets to decide who wins and who loses re: “bi-lingual” offerings in CO classrooms?
* DISCLAIMER: This rant has nothing to do with multi-lingual, multi-cultural curriculum and/or optional tracks promoting second language learning.