PDA

View Full Version : White House Accused of Federal Crime in Specter, Bennet Races



funkfool
02-23-2010, 11:54
Just got this email:
This story is sure causing a lot of buzz...could THIS be the crime that finally starts Impeachment hearings? If so, let's hope they don't hurry and rush through an "inoculation" impeachment process, to ensure that once the voters have their say, they can't claim they've "already been through all of that."

Here's the explosive story:

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/22/specter-race-scandal-sestak-ac (http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/22/specter-race-scandal-sestak-ac)
White House Accused of Federal Crime in Specter, Bennet Races (http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/22/specter-race-scandal-sestak-ac)
By Jeffrey Lord (http://spectator.org/people/jeffrey-lord) on 2.22.10 @ 6:09AM
"Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." -- 18 USC Sec. 211 -- Bribery, Graft and Conflicts of Interest: Acceptance or solicitation to obtain appointive public office
"In the face of a White House denial, U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak stuck to his story yesterday that the Obama administration offered him a "high-ranking" government post if he would not run against U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania's Democratic primary."
-- Philadelphia Inquirer
February 19, 2010
"D.C. job alleged as attempt to deter Romanoff"
--Denver Post
September 27, 2009


A bombshell has just exploded in the 2010 elections.

For the second time in five months, the Obama White House is being accused -- by Democrats -- of offering high ranking government jobs in return for political favors. What no one is reporting is that this is a violation of federal law that can lead to prison time, a fine or both, according to Title 18, Chapter 11, Section 211 of the United States Code.

The jobs in question? Secretary of the Navy and a position within the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The favor requested in return? Withdrawal from Senate challenges to two sitting United States Senators, both Democrats supported by President Obama. The Senators are Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania and Michael Bennet in Colorado.

On Friday, Pennsylvania Congressman Joe Sestak, the Democrat challenging Specter for re-nomination, launched the controversy by accusing the Obama White House of offering him a federal job in exchange for his agreeing to abandon his race against Specter.

In August of 2009, the Denver Post reported last September, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Jim Messina "offered specific suggestions" for a job in the Obama Administration to Colorado Democrat Andrew Romanoff, a former state House Speaker, if Romanoff would agree to abandon a nomination challenge to U.S. Senator Michael Bennet. Bennet was appointed to the seat upon the resignation of then-Senator Ken Salazar after Salazar was appointed by Obama to serve as Secretary of the Interior. According to the Post, the specific job mentioned was in the U.S. Agency for International Development. The Post cited "several sources who described the communication to The Denver Post."

The paper also describes Messina as "President Barack Obama's deputy chief of staff and a storied fixer in the White House political shop." Messina's immediate boss is White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel.

Sestak is standing by his story. Romanoff refused to discuss it with the Denver paper. In both instances the White House has denied the offers took place. The Sestak story in the Philadelphia Inquirer, reported by Thomas Fitzgerald, can be found here (http://www.philly.com/inquirer/home_top_stories/20100219_Sestak_says_federal_job_was_offered_to_qu it_race.html), While the Denver Post story, reported by Michael Riley, from September 27, 2009, can be read here (http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_13429758).

In an interview with Philadelphia television anchor Larry Kane, who broke the story on Larry Kane: Voice of Reason, a Comcast Network show, Sestak says someone -- unnamed -- in the Obama White House offered him a federal job if he would quit the Senate race against Specter, the latter having the support of President Obama, Vice President Biden and, in the state itself, outgoing Democratic Governor Ed Rendell. Both Biden and Rendell are longtime friends of Specter, with Biden taking personal credit for convincing Specter to leave the Republican Party and switch to the Democrats. Rendell served as a deputy to Specter when the future senator's career began as Philadelphia's District Attorney, a job Rendell himself would eventually hold.

Asked Kane of Sestak in the Comcast interview:

"Is it true that you were offered a high ranking job in the administration in a bid to get you to drop out of the primary against Arlen Specter?"

"Yes" replied Sestak.

Kane: "Was it Secretary of the Navy?"

To which the Congressman replied:

"No comment."

Sestak is a retired Navy admiral.

In the Colorado case, the Post reported that while Romanoff refused comment on a withdrawal-for-a-job offer, "several top Colorado Democrats described Messina's outreach to Romanoff to The Post, including the discussion of specific jobs in the administration. They asked for anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject."

The Post also noted that the day after Romanoff announced his Senate candidacy, President Obama quickly announced his endorsement of Senator Bennet.

The discovery that the White House has now been reported on two separate occasions in two different states to be deliberately committing a potential violation of federal law -- in order to preserve the Democrats' Senate majority -- could prove explosive in this highly political year. The 60-seat majority slipped to 59 seats with the death of Senator Edward Kennedy, a Democrat, and the election of Republican Senator Scott Brown. Many political analysts are suggesting Democrats could lose enough seats to lose their majority altogether.

This is the stuff of congressional investigations and cable news alerts, as an array of questions will inevitably start being asked of the Obama White House.

Here are but a few lines of inquiry, some inevitably straight out of Watergate.

* Who in the White House had this conversation with Congressman Sestak?

* Did Deputy Chief of Staff Messina have the same conversation with Sestak he is alleged to have had with Romanoff -- and has he or anyone else on the White House staff had similar conversations with other candidates that promise federal jobs for political favors?

* They keep logs of these calls. How quickly will they be produced?

* How quickly would e-mails between the White House, Sestak, Specter, Romanoff and Bennet be produced?

* Secretary of the Navy is an important job. Did this job offer or the reported offer of the US AID position to Romanoff have the approval of President Obama or Vice President Biden?

* What did the President know and when did he know it?

* What did the Vice President know and when did he know it? (Note: Vice President Biden, in this tale, is Specter's longtime friend who takes credit for luring Specter to switch parties. Can it really be that an offer of Secretary of the Navy to get Sestak out of Specter's race would not be known and or approved by the Vice President? Does Messina or some other White House staffer -- like Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel -- have that authority?)

* What did White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel know, and when did he know it?

* What did Congressman Sestak know and when did he know it? Was he aware that the offer of a federal job in return for a political favor -- his withdrawal from the Senate race -- could open the White House to a criminal investigation?

* What did Senator Specter know about any of this and when did he know it? .

* What did Governor Rendell, who, as the titular leader of Pennsylvania Democrats, is throwing his political weight and machine to his old friend Specter, know about this? And when did he know it?

* Will the Department of Justice be looking into these two separate news stories, one supplied by a sitting United States Congressman, that paint a clear picture of jobs for political favors?

* Will Attorney General Holder recuse himself from such an investigation?

While in recent years there have been bribery scandals that centered on the exchange of favors for a business deal (Democrat William Jefferson, a Louisiana Congressman) or cash for earmarks (Republican Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham), the idea of violating federal law by offering a federal job in return for a political favor (leaving two hotly contested Senate races in this instance) is not new.

Let's go back in history for a moment.



It's the spring of 1960, in the middle of a bitter fight for the Democratic presidential nomination between then Senators John F. Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, Lyndon Johnson, Stuart Symington and the 1952 and 1956 nominee, ex-Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson.
Covering the campaign for what would become the grandfather of all political campaign books was journalist and JFK friend Theodore H. White. In his book, the Pulitzer Prize-winning The Making of the President 1960, published in 1961, White tells the story of a plane flight with JFK on the candidate's private plane The Caroline. The nomination fight is going on at a furious pace, and White and Kennedy are having another of their innumerable private chats for White's book while the plane brings JFK back from a campaign swing where he spoke to delegates in Montana.
The subject? Let's let White tell the story.
The conversation began in a burst of anger. A story had appeared in a New York newspaper that evening that an Eastern Governor had claimed that Kennedy had offered him a cabinet post in return for his Convention support. His anger was cold, furious. When Kennedy is angry, he is at his most precise, almost schoolmasterish. It is a federal offense, he said, to offer any man a federal job in return for a favor. This was an accusation of a federal offense. It was not so.
Let's focus on that JFK line again:
"It is a federal offense, he said, to offer any man a federal job in return for a favor."
With a fine and jail time attached if convicted.
What Larry Kane discovered with the response of Congressman Sestak -- and Sestak is sticking to his story -- combined with what the Denver Post has previously reported in the Romanoff case -- appears to be a series of connecting dots.
A connecting of dots -- by Democrats -- that leads from Colorado to Pennsylvania straight into the West Wing of the White House.
And possibly the jail house.
"It is a federal offense," said John F. Kennedy, "to offer any man a federal job in return for a favor."
And so it is.
Jeffrey Lord is a former Reagan White House political director and author.

refryguy
02-23-2010, 12:10
Did anyone confirm this on snopes?

Irving
02-23-2010, 12:19
Hmmm, interesting.

funkfool
02-23-2010, 12:28
If it is bogus, there are a LOT of news site that got had...

Irving
02-23-2010, 12:36
That's what I was thinking.

sniper7
02-24-2010, 14:35
I would love to see some people go to jail!

cowboykjohnson
02-24-2010, 16:27
I would love to see some people go to jail!
[Beer] do they have an Oboma smiley to put in here? [Jail]

Troublco
02-24-2010, 17:14
Well, it'll be interesting to see where this goes. Maybe the same people in the Justice Department who dealt with the little election polling - Black Panther issue will be dispatched to investigate this too.

sniper7
02-24-2010, 23:09
[Beer] do they have an Oboma smiley to put in here? [Jail]


why, you couldn't see it with the dark background behind the bars[Swim][NoEvil]

funkfool
03-05-2010, 11:38
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/03/04/media-matters-admits-barack-obama-has-bribed-congressman-jim-matheson/
Media Matters ADMITS Barack Obama Has Bribed Congressman Jim Matheson (http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/03/04/media-matters-admits-barack-obama-has-bribed-congressman-jim-matheson/)

The Great Gavel Giveaway of 2010 is looking more and more like Gavelgate
Posted by Erick Erickson (http://www.redstate.com/erick/) (Profile (http://www.redstate.com/users/erick/))
Thursday, March 4th at 2:22PM EST


Media Matters, doing its typical shilling for the Obama Administration, threw up some lame talking points (http://mediamatters.org/research/201003040009) about Barack Obama appointing Scott Matheson, brother of Congressman Jim Matheson, to the federal bench.
The right has pointed out it has the appearance of bribery.
Today, trying to refute the accusation, Media Matters gives away the game. (http://mediamatters.org/research/201003040009) Casually in defending the appointment, Media Matters notes Scott Matheson told the White House in June of 2009 that he wanted Judge Michael McConnell’s job when it became available at the end of August 2009.
When does Barack Obama choose to appoint Scott Matheson?
Yesterday. The same day he has over the appointee’s brother, a congressman, to persuade the Congress to change his no vote on health care to a yes vote.
The Great Gavel Giveaway of 2010 is looking more and more like Gavelgate thanks to the industrious spinning of Media Matters trying to be helpful.
You know, giving Athena Innovative Solutions, Inc. defense contracts after $2 million in gifts to Duke Cunningham got Duke Cunningham thrown in jail. Giving a congressman’s brother life tenure on the federal bench in exchange for supporting the President’s legacy project is not much different.

cowboykjohnson
03-05-2010, 13:22
why, you couldn't see it with the dark background behind the bars[Swim][NoEvil]
eyes and teeth would be visible [Peep]

funkfool
03-19-2010, 22:11
Apparently Corruption and graft is the norm now....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/19/anatomy-scandal-curious-case-joe-sestaks-job-offer/

The allegation first surfaced in an interview Sestak gave last month to Philadelphia television anchor Larry Kane. A veteran journalist, Kane was previously best known for his coverage of The Beatles' 1964 American tour, and for a memorable appearance John Lennon made, delivering a zany weather report, on Kane's local Philadelphia TV broadcast in 1975.
"Were you ever offered a federal job to get out of this race?" Kane asked Sestak on an episode of Comcast Network's "Larry Kane: Voice of Reason."
"Yes," Sestak replied.
"Was it the Navy secretary?" Kane followed up.
"No comment," said Sestak, adding. "I would never get out for a deal. I'm in this for the Democratic principles."
"OK," Kane cut in. "But was there a job offered you by the White House?"
"Yes," Sestak replied.
Asked if it was a "big" job, Sestak declined further comment.
By Feb. 23, the allegation arose at the White House daily press briefing.
"I have seen some stuff that (Sestak) said, but I have not looked into this," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said.
Four more times over the next three weeks, Gibbs deflected reporters' questions about the Sestak allegation.

........
The public, Feldstein suggested, is unlikely to get too worked up about the Sestak allegation.
"This kind of 'I'll give you a job if you do X or Y,' or 'I'll give you a favor if you do X or Y' is the way Washington works, on both parties," he said. "Much as in the health care debate, when senators were bought off with exceptions in their states: Nebraska, Louisiana, and so forth. So, like sausage-making, it's not a very pretty sight."

Bailey Guns
03-20-2010, 04:50
The only place this is causing a stir is....nowhere, really. Because few people that can do anything about it care. This story has been carried on conservative blogs for a few weeks now and it's really gone nowhere.

I don't like it but this is politics as usual for DC. Obama is quite likely the most corrupt president we've ever had.

Remember in November.

Colorado Osprey
03-20-2010, 05:21
Did anyone confirm this on snopes?

Never use snopes to try and confirm or deny anything political.
The husband/wife team that runs snopes has but their own Liberal bias and have been caught on many subjects calling them false that are in fact true.

sniper7
03-20-2010, 15:31
eyes and teeth would be visible [Peep]


[ROFL1]

sniper7
03-20-2010, 15:31
The only place this is causing a stir is....nowhere, really. Because few people that can do anything about it care. This story has been carried on conservative blogs for a few weeks now and it's really gone nowhere.

I don't like it but this is politics as usual for DC. Obama is quite likely the most corrupt president we've ever had.

Remember in November.


I am truly hopeful he will go down as the worst president in history...even worse than carter.

jake
03-20-2010, 15:36
Never use snopes to try and confirm or deny anything political.
The husband/wife team that runs snopes has but their own Liberal bias and have been caught on many subjects calling them false that are in fact true.
Can you give some examples of things they have labeled false but are in fact true?