View Full Version : Rapist Deported 9 Times -
ChunkyMonkey
05-23-2010, 12:21
http://www.king5.com/news/local/Investigators-Edmonds-rape-suspect-deported-nine-times-94637479.html
Investigators: Edmonds rape suspect deported nine times
by CHRIS INGALLS / KING 5 News
Posted on May 21, 2010 at 8:16 PM
Updated yesterday at 6:22 PM
EDMONDS, Wash. – The KING 5 Investigators have learned that an illegal immigrant accused of raping a woman in Edmonds Sunday has been deported nine times. That's much more than previously reported.
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement won't comment on the case of Jose Lopez Madrigal. But KING 5 got the information through confidential sources and documents.
Larry Klein was the man who heard the alleged victim's cries for help. Police say the suspect pulled the woman off the street to a dumpster and raped her.
"I could see the back of his head. I could see his pants were down. I could see her lying on the ground. I could hear her crying, but I couldn't really see her face," said Klein.
Klein called police, who quickly arrested the suspect. But learning his identity took much longer because of some 30 aliases. It was only through fingerprints that they identified him as Madrigal, a Mexican citizen.
Madrigal's arrest and immigration record includes a staggering number of contacts with law enforcement since 1989. That's the year he was convicted of theft using a firearm in California.
He was deported a couple of times after that. Then in 1999, he was arrested for drug sales in both San Diego and San Francisco. Records show that he was deported three times that year between April and August.
He was arrested for drugs again in Stockton, Calif. in 2000. In 2002, he pleaded to third degree sexual assault in Denver. Later that year, he was deported again. And in 2003, records show he was deported three more times.
People who live near the scene of Sunday's alleged rape wonder how it could keep happening.
"Makes you wonder, what are we doing wrong? How is he getting back in here?" said Kirby Aumick.
"It’s troubling. I mean, if this man should not have been in this country, he should have been behind bars then, really, this is a senseless tragedy," said Klein.
According to our sources, Madrigal's last contact before Sunday was around 2003. So, it's not clear how much of that time Madrigal was in this country.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has refused to comment on the case which started making national headlines when it was learned that Madrigal had been deported several times prior to the Edmonds case.
In reviewing records and talking with confidential sources, the KING 5 Investigators learned just how extensive Madrigal’s immigration and arrest record is.
They found he was first deported in California in 1989 and since then he’s returned from his Mexican homeland and been arrested for drug crimes, a sex assault in Colorado and other offenses.
One criminal justice source says Madrigal is a "poster boy" for the federal governments ineffectiveness at keeping the most serious "criminal aliens" – illegals who commit crimes – out of the United States.
iamhunter
05-23-2010, 12:44
If I walked up on something like that happening,
I don't know if I could restrain myself.
Birddog1911
05-23-2010, 13:12
Justified use of lethal force. Too bad that guy didn't use it. This asshole needs to die.
9 times that is pathetic, it all could have been solved with one shot. I would happily go to jail forever for my daughter if anything of this nature ever happened to her. No questions asked murdrer would be on the menu[Twist]
Is this the "Tolerance" that those Liberal Bastards keep preaching? I'm sure it was the girl's fault... right? I'm sure he'll walk and she'll pick up a bogus drug charge or something. that's how these things work out.
blackford76
05-23-2010, 13:40
I will gladly donate a Hydrashock, hell I'll even administer it for them. This kind of thing has to end.
In the lovely state of AZ, rape just happens to be one of the few crimes that you can shoot a person to stop...I'm not sure that I'd test the theory though.
Colorado Luckydog
05-23-2010, 18:05
Obama and Pelozi would like to get him some therapy through our new health care system. Then help him get a house and welfare for 25 years until he gets on his feet. I would just like to shoot the fucker!
We should forward this along with Rep. Toms reply to the Mex. Pres.
Justified use of lethal force. Too bad that guy didn't use it. This asshole needs to die.
I dunno about WA, and here you'd better pick your county wisely :|
18-1-704 Use Of Physical Force In Defense Of A Person
1. Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, a person is justified in using
physical force upon another person in order to defend himself or a third person from what
he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by that
other person, and he may use a degree of force which he reasonably believes to be
necessary for that purpose.
2. Deadly physical force may be used only if a person reasonably believes a lesser degree of
force is inadequate and:
a. The actor has reasonable grounds to believe, and does believe, that he or another
person is in imminent danger of being killed or of receiving great bodily injury; or
b. The other person is using or reasonably appears about to use physical force
against an occupant of a dwelling or business establishment while committing or
attempting to commit burglary as defined in sections 18- 4-202 to 184-204; or
c. The other person is committing or reasonably appears about to commit
kidnapping as defined in section 18-3-301 or 18-3-302, robbery as defined in
section 184-301 or 184-302, sexual assault as set forth in section 18-3-402 or 18-
3-403, or assault as defined in sections 18-3-202 or 18-3-203.
theGinsue
05-24-2010, 07:44
[HEAVY DOSE OF SARCASM]
I don't see what the problem is and why everyone is getting so worked up.
This poor undocumented worker, who came here to make a better life for himself, has been a victim to our anti-immigrant hatred. Hooray for him in maintaining his determination and not getting deterred by our archaic and descriminatory laws which fail to consider the rights of foreign nationals.
Unable to make a go of it within the established system, this poor man chose to engage in acts of entrepreneurship by retailing undocumented pharmaceuticals. Once again, our racist system which is designed to keep a good man down, makes his actions illegal.
Next, he just needed a little affection. Once again, our system has failed to consider his needs. Because of the negative stigma attached to undocumented workers such as himself, he was unable to find a willing companion to share in all that he has to offer. Because of this, he took matters into his own hands and engaged in undocumented love-making (rape is such a nasty word for this).
So, you can clearly see that this man didn't even have a chance within our system. At every turn he was forced to do things that we consider unsavory. Shame on us for not having the foresight to consider his needs and to leave such unfairly restrictive laws in place. WE must stand up and bear the responsibility for his actions since he is nothing more than a victim of our society.
[/HEAVY DOSE OF SARCASM]
Now, it's time for me to [Puke]
[HEAVY DOSE OF SARCASM]
I don't see what the problem is and why everyone is getting so worked up.
This poor undocumented worker, who came here to make a better life for himself, has been a victim to our anti-immigrant hatred. Hooray for him in maintaining his determination and not getting deterred by our archaic and descriminatory laws which fail to consider the rights of foreign nationals.
Unable to make a go of it within the established system, this poor man chose to engage in acts of entrepreneurship by retailing undocumented pharmaceuticals. Once again, our racist system which is designed to keep a good man down, makes his actions illegal.
Next, he just needed a little affection. Once again, our system has failed to consider his needs. Because of the negative stigma attached to undocumented workers such as himself, he was unable to find a willing companion to share in all that he has to offer. Because of this, he took matters into his own hands and engaged in undocumented love-making (rape is such a nasty word for this).
So, you can clearly see that this man didn't even have a chance within our system. At every turn he was forced to do things that we consider unsavory. Shame on us for not having the foresight to consider his needs and to leave such unfairly restrictive laws in place. WE must stand up and bear the responsibility for his actions since he is nothing more than a victim of our society.
[/HEAVY DOSE OF SARCASM]
Now, it's time for me to [Puke]
My Sarcasm:
Do you write for the White House's briefing team?
HAHAHA [Beer]
trlcavscout
05-24-2010, 10:34
In the lovely state of AZ, rape just happens to be one of the few crimes that you can shoot a person to stop...I'm not sure that I'd test the theory though.
I dont think it would be a problem in AZ if the guy was deported 9 times already. You would get fried for it here in this liberal state. They would mourn him and name a day in his honor.
Sounds like there might need to be a law change. After so many times committing crime here, he becomes our responsibility to deal with; which pretty much means throwing him behind bars until we can find the time to execute him.
Sounds like there might need to be a law change. After so many times committing crime here, he becomes our responsibility to deal with; which pretty much means throwing him behind bars until we can find the time to execute him.
If you look at the timeline of some of his deportations that article does give the impression that he served jail time before being deported. I'm pretty sure that's the law here as in most countries. If this guy is convicted of rape I doubt he's going to be deported right away and made to promise he'll never, ever do it again.
It's also interesting to note that although this is undoubtedly President Obama's fault, "[a]ccording to our sources, Madrigal's last contact before Sunday was around 2003."
Posted the link before but this story warrants it as well
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7Q9ZEdOLSE
theGinsue
05-24-2010, 15:15
My Sarcasm:
Do you write for the White House's briefing team?
HAHAHA [Beer]
No, to write these things I think of a sensible and intelligent person, and I take away reason and accountability and logic. What's left is what I know the majority of the liberal community believe.
funkfool
05-24-2010, 15:37
El Paso County CCW Packet (http://shr.elpasoco.com/NR/rdonlyres/B999F2B8-570B-42A8-9B0B-6109DB267BB8/0/ConcealedHandgunPermitInfoApplicationPacket011309. pdf):
18-1-704 Use Of Physical Force In Defense Of A Person
1. Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, a person is justified in using
physical force upon another person in order to defend himself or a third person from what
he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by that
other person, and he may use a degree of force which he reasonably believes to be
necessary for that purpose.
2. Deadly physical force may be used only if a person reasonably believes a lesser degree of
force is inadequate and:
a. The actor has reasonable grounds to believe, and does believe, that he or another
person is in imminent danger of being killed or of receiving great bodily injury; or
b. The other person is using or reasonably appears about to use physical force
against an occupant of a dwelling or business establishment while committing or
attempting to commit burglary as defined in sections 18- 4-202 to 184-204; or
c. The other person is committing or reasonably appears about to commit
kidnapping as defined in section 18-3-301 or 18-3-302, robbery as defined in
section 184-301 or 184-302, sexual assault as set forth in section 18-3-402 or 18-
3-403, or assault as defined in sections 18-3-202 or 18-3-203.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, a person is not justified
in using physical force if:
a. With intent to cause bodily injury or death to another person, he provokes the use
of unlawful physical force by that other person; or
b. He is the initial aggressor, except that his use of physical force upon another
person under the circumstances is justifiable if he withdraws from the encounter
and effectively communicates to the other person his intent to do so, but the latter
nevertheless continues or threatens the use of unlawful physical force; or
c. The physical force involved is the product of a combat by agreement not
specifically authorized by law.
Remember the Alamo [Tooth]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.