Chrome Vs. Phosphate Vs. Fail Zero Bolts

[ThunderSquirrel]

Is the price variance really going to add any sort of reliability?
I'm building a 10.5" that i plan on running alot once its completed, between range time and carbine classes.

I've never had any issues with phosphate bolts, so its hard for me to justify paying nearly double for a BCG.

Does anyone here have any actual experience with a Chrome or Fail Zero bolt? Pros, Cons?

Thanks,

[BPTactical]

It depends on what type of chrome is used. If it is conventional nickle/chrome you have to watch for peeling. I have seen this on some "budget" chrome bolts.
If it is a true hard chrome it won't peel as readily.

IMHO- I feel chrome bolts are a waste of money. If you keep the BCG clean and lubed well you should not have any issues with a Parkerized BCG.
I just completed a build for a customer with a ZeroFail. It is a nice piece to be sure, but is it really that much better than a standard BCG? I guess only time will tell.
What is the advantage to chrome?
Corrosion resistance-in Colorado not too big of a factor if you keep your items clean + oiled.
Wear- the chrome is very hard and wears well. That means your upper will take the brunt of the wear.
Shiny cool factor- big deal.

Chrome lined bores make sense as does the factory chrome on the back of a bolt or the inside of the bolt carrier.

When I built bikes we had a saying: "Chrome don't get you home."
In other words if it didn't make it run/stop/ride better then why waste the cash?

Just my .02
I would rather put the extra into a nice trigger, stock, optics or the like.

[Colorado Osprey]

When I built bikes we had a saying: "Chrome don't get you home."
In other words if it didn't make it run/stop/ride better then why waste the cash?


In the auto classic world we say that chrome adds 50 horse power! ;)