Irving
11-18-2010, 21:04
Personally, I don't have much of an opinion about what happened. I mean I laughed, but I don't feel any serious way about it one way or the other.
http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/g/ahmed_khalfan_ghailani/index.html
Basically, this guy was caught in 2004 and thought to be involved in some bombings in 1998 that killed 224 people. He was the very first Guantanamo Bay prisoner to get a trial. Obama wanted him to be tried in Civilian Federal Court, instead of a military tribunal. A lot of people flipped out about the decision, then New York was a mess with all kinds of added security or something. Obama said, "Don't worry, this will work, this guy will get what's coming to him." When people asked Eric Holder (Attorney General) "What if he gets acquitted in Federal court?" Eric said, "We'll just have to make sure we do it right" or something along those lines. Essentially he was really saying, 'Don't worry about it, because it's never going to happen.'
Well, this guy was charged with 280 different things, over 200 counts of murder. He was acquitted of 279 charges, and only charged with "Conspiracy to damage government property."
So far, I've heard people say that the NSA is saying that there was a very good chance that this would have happened in a military tribunal as well, especially since there is a good chance that any information obtained from the use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" couldn't be used in court, etc. I've also heard people defending this saying, "Well, this guy is still going to spend the rest of his life in prison, his life is changed, blah blah blah."
So like I was saying, I find this interesting, but aside from what all I just typed about, I don't really know anything else. Not enough to know if I should be upset or not.
http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/g/ahmed_khalfan_ghailani/index.html
Basically, this guy was caught in 2004 and thought to be involved in some bombings in 1998 that killed 224 people. He was the very first Guantanamo Bay prisoner to get a trial. Obama wanted him to be tried in Civilian Federal Court, instead of a military tribunal. A lot of people flipped out about the decision, then New York was a mess with all kinds of added security or something. Obama said, "Don't worry, this will work, this guy will get what's coming to him." When people asked Eric Holder (Attorney General) "What if he gets acquitted in Federal court?" Eric said, "We'll just have to make sure we do it right" or something along those lines. Essentially he was really saying, 'Don't worry about it, because it's never going to happen.'
Well, this guy was charged with 280 different things, over 200 counts of murder. He was acquitted of 279 charges, and only charged with "Conspiracy to damage government property."
So far, I've heard people say that the NSA is saying that there was a very good chance that this would have happened in a military tribunal as well, especially since there is a good chance that any information obtained from the use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" couldn't be used in court, etc. I've also heard people defending this saying, "Well, this guy is still going to spend the rest of his life in prison, his life is changed, blah blah blah."
So like I was saying, I find this interesting, but aside from what all I just typed about, I don't really know anything else. Not enough to know if I should be upset or not.