Banning Sharia Law

[ghettodub]

Interesting...hm...


Two bills to ban Sharia law in Georgia courts
http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2011/02/08/a-bill-to-ban-sharia-law-in-georgia-courts/

[Irving]

It seems to me, that any type of law that is not our own, should automatically be banned in this country. Is that not already the case?

[BigBear]

It seems to me, that any type of law that is not our own, should automatically be banned in this country. Is that not already the case?


Logic... not allowed in the United States of Idiocracy!!!

[cstone]

It is more of a social code by those who choose to live by it's tenets. Until a government entity begins enforcing religious laws, I am not getting too worked up over this issue.

Besides, there is always the Law of the Jungle! It enforces itself.

[Irving]

How can you ban a social code? That would be similar to banning the word "like" from the vocabulary of teenagers.

[BigBear]

Don't worry Stu. You can't ban a social code. It'll go to the SCOTUS and then be declared an assault on religion. Then the fun stuff will start happening here instead of the Middle East, hehe.

[cstone]

M. Khurram Baig, a litigator with Kumar, Prabhu, Patel & Banerjee in Atlanta and a member of the Georgia Association of Muslim Lawyers, said the answer is no: “I don’t know of any instance where foreign law has prevailed in a Georgia court ever. So why is this necessary?

This has to be one of the funniest things I've read all day. If a muslim lives in Georgia long enough, do they pray with a southern drawl?

[patrick0685]

How can you ban a social code? That would be similar to banning the word "like" from the vocabulary of teenagers.

Like, that would be crazy stupid

[earplug]

I have studied the Sharia banking and currency laws and they have much to offer.
Our constitution prior to the federal reserve act and our abandonment of silver and gold based currency was closer to Sharia law then what we have now.
My point is banning a system of laws would theoretically limit certain good actions.

[BPTactical]

My point is banning a system of laws would theoretically limit certain good actions.

Like beating and or stoning for:
Premarital sex,
Drinking alcohol,
Sex by divorced persons
Theft
Adultery
Dressing in "Non-Traditional" dress
Being out in public with a non family male
"Honor" killings

And that is just a few.......................


PHAQ!


We already have the "Law of the Land" in place.
We have no place in western society for "Sharia Law".

[yosemite]

set your watches back 1000 years!

[streetglideok]

Things like this probably inspired the anti-sharia campaign
http://nation.foxnews.com/justice/2010/08/06/sharia-law-comes-new-jersey

It was later overturned.

[Danimal]

I have done quite a bit of reading about Sharia law over the past couple years and it is much more than just some social code. It is a blueprint for ethnic cleansing. The idea is to kill everyone not Muslim. There are many books put out by the Muslim Brotherhood that detail the implementation of Sharia and we are playing right into their hand. The idea of "Stealth Jihad" as they call it is used and it describes the destroying of foreign powers from within through colonizing then at very specific population concentrations they will start to enact their law until we are powerless to stop them from taking over and killing everyone who resists. Getting it accepted in court of law is just one of the first steps. Look at France for example. They are on the verge of becoming a Muslim country believe it or not. It all will culminate with mass rioting and an overthrow of the government. Take Egypt, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Gaza, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Malaysia for example.

I think that what they are attempting is the right thing to do and we should be doing the same thing everywhere. Yes it is implied that our laws are in no way superseded by any foreign law, but our justice and political system is known for getting around that and interpreting things in any way that benefits their current agenda. I just read an article today about a Tennessee Sheriff’s department arguing “the right to liberty does not mean physical liberty” and it was upheld after they wrongfully imprisoned a man.

[cstone]

Unless a law is enacted by a legislature or interpreted from the bench, it is not enforceable. If a significant voting population of any jurisdiction lobby for specific laws to be enacted, they are likely to become laws.

Thou shalt not kill is a religious commandment.

Murder in the First Degree is a violation of Colorado Revised Statutes 18-3-102.

Many if not all laws have their foundation in a religious or certainly a moral code. If you were a muslim living in Saudi Arabia, wouldn't you want to be governed by Sharia law? Fortunately for me, because I am not a muslim and I do not live in a predominately muslim community, there is not much chance that I will be living under Sharia law in the near future.

What France and much of western Europe is dealing with is a war of demographics. Muslims significantly out produce non-muslims. Minorities will always be less powerful and influential in a properly working democracy.

If you truly want to maintain a western, Judeo/Christian culture in the United States, find a wife and literally get busy! Encourage those of like mind to do likewise.