PDA

View Full Version : Aurora cop charged with sexual exploitation of 15-year-old runaway



ghettodub
03-28-2011, 15:28
An Aurora police officer has been charged with sexual exploitation of a child related to his arrest of a a 15-year-old female runaway.

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_17718448?

Yikes

patrick0685
03-28-2011, 15:31
man thats scary...glad i dont have kids right now

hurley842002
03-28-2011, 15:35
Here we go

Monky
03-28-2011, 15:35
I just read the article..

COP BASHING! COP BASHING! jk.

It honestly doesn't matter that this guy is a cop, he's a friggin pedo. I understand putting his job in there, his issued cell-phone.. the fact that he was working. But it's kind of pointing out that he's a cop first.. not a pedo.

Seriously though... they come from every walk of life, stupid and intelligent all the same. Just watch 'To Catch A Predator'. These people should be drawn and quartered. Or at least allowed into gen pop in prison.. being a cop and a pedo he won't be in w/ the rest of the criminals. Get some real justice done to him then.

(nothing against cops, just don't like pedos)

glocklp
03-28-2011, 15:45
Piece of s%&t

Lex_Luthor
03-28-2011, 15:50
That just makes me sick. Anyone who would abuse a child's trust like that, position of authority or not, should be put to death.

trlcavscout
03-28-2011, 15:53
yep doesnt matter if hes a cop, teacher, parent/relative etc. He is a POS! Hope he gets his.

Zundfolge
03-28-2011, 15:53
Wow, that gives new meaning to the meme Pedobear!

ghettodub
03-28-2011, 16:03
yep doesnt matter if hes a cop, teacher, parent/relative etc. He is a POS! Hope he gets his.

^this

TFOGGER
03-28-2011, 16:03
Hmmm.... mixed thoughts here.

1) If the guy is found guilty in a court of law, put him under the jail, preferably in an oxygen free sealed container.

2) He hasn't been convicted yet. His relatively low bond would seem to indicate there is some weakness in the case against him. Given the propensity for the "news" media to sensationalize stuff, it's entirely possible that when all of the facts come out, that he's guilty of nothing more than being stupid. Trial by public opinion flat pisses me off, as all someone has to do is blab to one of these so called journalists, and someone's life can be destroyed, long before a jury decides guilt or innocence.

Some of you may remember the United Bank robbery/killings years ago in Denver. The man accused of those murders was the father of one of my good friends. He was acquitted after a 6 month trial, lost his job, nearly lost his house, and had to declare bankruptcy. The newspapers crucified him, and branded him a killer, when the most compelling evidence against him (a retired police officer) was the outline of a novel he was writing. To this day, he has to deal with repercussions of this fiasco, even after he was cleared of all charges.

/soapbox

Monky
03-28-2011, 16:24
Crimes that are not violent in nature usually do not have a high bond set. They probably also added in that he was a cop, with ties to the community.. blah blah blah.. not much of a flight risk.. turned himself in, all that stuff.

The fact that they issued a press release makes me think that they have plenty of evidence to convict, and asking for others to come forward to find a pattern of behavior for harsher charges. It could also imply that it was leaked and they wanted to head it off at the pass should anyone say they tried to cover it up.

Just my opinion.. I could be horribly wrong. [Beer]

OneGuy67
03-28-2011, 17:38
The press release was to get ahead of the media, so they can't say that Aurora was hiding anything. Looks like they did their own investigation and didn't ask for an outside agency.

He was charged with one count of felony exploitation of a child, one count felony contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and a misdemeanor charge of official misconduct.

No counts of sexual assault, which he would have committed if he had sex with a 15 year old, given he is over 10 years his senior. From the limited information and the charges, I'm guessing she stayed at his place, he provided her with illegal substances, such as liquor, took inappropriate pictures of her on his department cell phone and did something with those photos. Just guessing. No ties to this case or do I have knowledge other than what is in the news.

Elhuero
03-28-2011, 19:47
[Peep]

DoubleTap
03-28-2011, 20:17
Hmmm.... mixed thoughts here.

1) If the guy is found guilty in a court of law, put him under the jail, preferably in an oxygen free sealed container.

2) He hasn't been convicted yet. His relatively low bond would seem to indicate there is some weakness in the case against him. Given the propensity for the "news" media to sensationalize stuff, it's entirely possible that when all of the facts come out, that he's guilty of nothing more than being stupid. Trial by public opinion flat pisses me off, as all someone has to do is blab to one of these so called journalists, and someone's life can be destroyed, long before a jury decides guilt or innocence.

Some of you may remember the United Bank robbery/killings years ago in Denver. The man accused of those murders was the father of one of my good friends. He was acquitted after a 6 month trial, lost his job, nearly lost his house, and had to declare bankruptcy. The newspapers crucified him, and branded him a killer, when the most compelling evidence against him (a retired police officer) was the outline of a novel he was writing. To this day, he has to deal with repercussions of this fiasco, even after he was cleared of all charges.

/soapbox

No need for all this. He will be an excop and pedo in jail. Think about it, the two things real criminals hate the most according to their bizzare creed. I also agree to reserve judgment until all the facts are in.

Clint45
03-28-2011, 20:28
No need for all this. He will be an excop and pedo in jail. Think about it, the two things real criminals hate the most according to their bizzare creed. I also agree to reserve judgment until all the facts are in.

Well, IAD said they seized his smartphone and found sexually explicit photos of the 15 yo complainant as well as a few candid underskirt shots it appears he took of young girls during his D.A.R.E. class.

Ex-cops never go into general population. He will be in the protective custody wing.

sniper7
03-28-2011, 22:57
doesn't matter his profession, although being a cop did allow him the opportunity. sick people are employed every where. doctors, teachers, cops, pilots, metal workers, unemployed and even politicians...yes those who represent us all.

hopefully justice is served either way. doesn't sound good that they found photos of the girl and other women in his phone.

I can see where a runaway girl is vulnerable, a cop seems safe and tells her it will be okay and uses that to his advantage. I can also see where the girl might do anything she can to receive the attention she didn't receive at home and ran from. could go either way.

Irving
03-28-2011, 23:38
Stories like this really make me wonder. Denver PD told me that I didn't pass the psych portion of their test. In retrospect, I think that they made the right decision not to hire me, as I don't think I would make a good officer. However, it boggles my mind that guys like this get hired on and I didn't. I'm making this statement ONLY on the (supposed) fact that they found these pictures on his phone.

Buzzkill69
03-29-2011, 01:58
If he truly is guilty than he deserves more than what he'll get. He probably won't do much time if any. LT only got 6 years probation for rape (he somehow got felony rape down to a sexual misconduct charge?) and as mentioned, there is no "sexual assault" charge in this case. If convicted he will have to register as a sex offender. Life as he know's it now is over as it should be but it's not enough IMO.

SA Friday
03-29-2011, 07:36
Stories like this really make me wonder. Denver PD told me that I didn't pass the psych portion of their test. In retrospect, I think that they made the right decision not to hire me, as I don't think I would make a good officer. However, it boggles my mind that guys like this get hired on and I didn't. I'm making this statement ONLY on the (supposed) fact that they found these pictures on his phone.

Well having been invol,ved in more than my share of recruiting for LE, I can tell you there are two profiles not desired. One is obviously the mentally broken side of the spectrum. The outher is the squeaky clean side of the spectrum. The clean psych profiles are either covering for something or juist can't think like a criminal. The difference between a good cop and a criminal is a consiounce (sp). I've worked with the clean profiles before. They can't place themselves within a criminal mind set.

alxone
03-29-2011, 07:39
if he is guilty i hope they put him in gen pop and tell the other cons that he is a pedophile cop , then justice will be served out , for sure .

ghettodub
03-29-2011, 08:19
Hmmm.... mixed thoughts here.

1) If the guy is found guilty in a court of law, put him under the jail, preferably in an oxygen free sealed container.

2) He hasn't been convicted yet. His relatively low bond would seem to indicate there is some weakness in the case against him. Given the propensity for the "news" media to sensationalize stuff, it's entirely possible that when all of the facts come out, that he's guilty of nothing more than being stupid. Trial by public opinion flat pisses me off, as all someone has to do is blab to one of these so called journalists, and someone's life can be destroyed, long before a jury decides guilt or innocence.

Some of you may remember the United Bank robbery/killings years ago in Denver. The man accused of those murders was the father of one of my good friends. He was acquitted after a 6 month trial, lost his job, nearly lost his house, and had to declare bankruptcy. The newspapers crucified him, and branded him a killer, when the most compelling evidence against him (a retired police officer) was the outline of a novel he was writing. To this day, he has to deal with repercussions of this fiasco, even after he was cleared of all charges.

/soapbox

I think, or at least I hope, that everyone is thinking in that same direction; if he is found guilty... then, he is a sicko and will get what is coming in prison.

68Charger
03-29-2011, 08:51
That just makes me sick. Anyone who would abuse a child's trust like that, position of authority or not, should be put to death.


yep doesnt matter if hes a cop, teacher, parent/relative etc. He is a POS! Hope he gets his.


doesn't matter his profession, although being a cop did allow him the opportunity. sick people are employed every where. doctors, teachers, cops, pilots, metal workers, unemployed and even politicians...yes those who represent us all.

The fact that he's an authority figure means they can charge him with greater crimes... I'm surprised they haven't charged him with "sexual assault on a minor by one in a position of trust"... unless he didn't touch her, just took pictures? (the wording of this statute requires touching, but not "sex" as an act)


Hmmm.... mixed thoughts here.

1) If the guy is found guilty in a court of law, put him under the jail, preferably in an oxygen free sealed container.

2) He hasn't been convicted yet. His relatively low bond would seem to indicate there is some weakness in the case against him. Given the propensity for the "news" media to sensationalize stuff, it's entirely possible that when all of the facts come out, that he's guilty of nothing more than being stupid. Trial by public opinion flat pisses me off, as all someone has to do is blab to one of these so called journalists, and someone's life can be destroyed, long before a jury decides guilt or innocence.

Some of you may remember the United Bank robbery/killings years ago in Denver. The man accused of those murders was the father of one of my good friends. He was acquitted after a 6 month trial, lost his job, nearly lost his house, and had to declare bankruptcy. The newspapers crucified him, and branded him a killer, when the most compelling evidence against him (a retired police officer) was the outline of a novel he was writing. To this day, he has to deal with repercussions of this fiasco, even after he was cleared of all charges.

/soapbox


Well put, but if the story of pictures on his phone is accurate, that's a crime in itself... but he is innocent until proven guilty, the severity of his accused crime doesn't automatically mean he's guilty...

AMD-65
03-29-2011, 10:49
Being in law enforcement myself if this guy is guilty "which so far the evidence does not look good for him" then nail this guy. We are not perfect just like anyone else but there is a difference between doing something stupid verses being a CHOMO "child molester". Nail this guy to the wall. Child molesters are already in deep trouble going to DOC. Well a cop going to DOC as a child molester is even worse. I have friends who have had run ins with this guy and he seemed like a jerk to begin with. Makes the people who do our jobs right and try to live good lives look like this piece of garbage.

Clint45
03-29-2011, 12:25
I've worked with the clean profiles before. They can't place themselves within a criminal mind set.

Some of them seem so friendly and naive they are easily duped or taken advantage of, but then you get the other ones who want to act like a hallroom monitor and cite people for every minor infraction they can think of. Neither type should be involved with law enforcement.

Now, the sneaky sociopathic types with above average intelligence usually know all the "right" answers, smile, laugh, and interview very well. They are even harder to weed out if they come from a police family as they will blend in easier and present as an ideal candidate. Then, years later, you find out they've been acting like a thug or a criminal and getting away with it for a long time.

Clint45
03-29-2011, 12:29
I have friends who have had run ins with this guy and he seemed like a jerk to begin with.

Why is it that departments always seem to pick the creepy guy who the other cops don't get along with to be the D.A.R.E. officer?

rockhound
03-29-2011, 12:41
sickos they are everywhere,

Irving
03-29-2011, 18:56
I've worked with the clean profiles before. They can't place themselves within a criminal mind set.

So when you take your lie detector test and psych test, you're supposed to ignore all that "answer honestly" stuff and try and test like a criminal?