Where can I get Ron Paul stickers today?

[Brass]

I'm headed back to work and I'd like to put Ron Paul 2012 bumper stickers on our fleet of trucks. Is there a place in the Denver area where I can pick up a small stack of Paul stickers?

[Rust_shackleford]

Don't Waste your vote, vote Ron Paul 2012

http://www.ronpaul.com/ron-paul-store/ron-paul-bumper-stickers/

[Brass]

Thank you for the link, but I was looking for a local place to stop by this afternoon.

[Hoosier]

Might try asking the people on this group:

http://www.meetup.com/The-Denver-Campaign-for-Liberty-Meetup/

H.

[Irving]

Hope you own the company.

[Elhuero]

If I had the dough I'd make a batch of Reagan/Thatcher 2012 stickers.

[sniper7]

Not sure what type of business you are in but if it were my company I wouldn't put anything political on there. just fire anyone that drives their personal vehicle with an obama sticker.

[Bailey Guns]

My question would be, "Why would you want to do that?"

[Ridge]

Not sure what type of business you are in but if it were my company I wouldn't put anything political on there. just fire anyone that drives their personal vehicle with an obama sticker.

Yeah, that...

[Brass]

Got the stickers, thanks to all who replied!

[Zundfolge]

If I had the dough I'd make a batch of Reagan/Thatcher 2012 stickers.

Awesome ... i'd buy one of those.

We named or dog Thatcher (he's an English Shepherd (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Shepherd)).

[rocktot]

It looks like Ron Paul is pro Illegal Alien, open borders this time around.[Rant2]

[sneakerd]

Imho- he is not electable. Talk about wasting your vote. No offense intended.

[Marlin]

It looks like Ron Paul is pro Illegal Alien, open borders this time around.[Rant2]

This,




Imho- he is not electable. Talk about wasting your vote. No offense intended.

And, this.

[rocktot]

Illegal immigration isn't an issue anyone will bring up anyway. Romney is afraid to be called a 'racist' and most of the retardicans will not even address the issue, maybe Trump would have, but he has a democrat for a campaign manager, so its high ho, the way we go, third world America with no liberty and no gun ownership allowed in 20 years. I blame the 'moderate' retardicans[Stooge], but hey don't want to be too political here.[NoEvil]

[gcrookston]

Imho- he is not electable. Talk about wasting your vote. No offense intended.


That's exactly what they said about Ross Perot, and look at how WRONG they wh..., um, oh wait.


Never mind.


I've been a registered Libertarian for over 20 years and Ron Paul is too flaky, even for my party's majority.

[Hoosier]

It looks like Ron Paul is pro Illegal Alien, open borders this time around.[Rant2]

http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/border-security/

Did he flip-flop since '08?

H.

[Hoosier]

That's exactly what they said about Ross Perot, and look at how WRONG they wh..., um, oh wait.


Never mind.


I've been a registered Libertarian for over 20 years and Ron Paul is too flaky, even for my party's majority.

Yeah, but if the 2012 election was Obama v. Paul, who would the L's vote for?

H.

[sneakerd]

A lock-step libertarian, no matter how much I agree with many of those principles, will not be elected.

[CMP_5.56]

I've always wondered if all the people that say they would vote third party, but feel it is a wasted vote. If all those people actually voted for those people, would it really be a wasted vote.co vote for the candidate I agree with the most. You can say It's wasted, but I can sleep with a clear conscious knowing I stood by my beliefs.

[sneakerd]

Standing by your beliefs is one thing, putting your vote towards an un-electable candidate is another. He's not even going for a 3rd-party vote, he's trying to be the Republican nominee. You know just as well as I do that he will not be the GOP nominee. As I said, I respect many Libertarian ideas, but I'm also realistic. He will not move far enough towards the center to be elected. All candidates must move towards the center during the election cycle, whether from the right or the left, to get elected. He's a fringe candidate.

[Rust_shackleford]

So let us continue down this road and elect some turd burglar from either party. Gee where did my freedom go?
No other candidate even addresses liberty.

[sneakerd]

Unfortunately, in every election cycle we are presented with 2 "mainstream" candidates. 1 from the left, 1 from the right. Like it or not, this is a 2 party system, and that's just the way it is. We have to choose the candidate who most closely adheres to our individual values. 1 candidate represents 65% of what we truly believe, the other fulfills (in electioneering talk) 25% or less, of what we believe. Which one do you choose? Sitting it out "on principle" only helps the guy whose belief system least mirrors our own. I'll choose the guy who most closely resembles my beliefs, and will NEVER sit out an election on principle- just because I'm not in lock-step with the guy who is closer to my beliefs. The lesser of 2 evils is exactly that. Sitting it out on principle only helps the other side.

[gcrookston]

Yeah, but if the 2012 election was Obama v. Paul, who would the L's vote for?

H.


I can't speak for the L's. But if it came down to those two, the U.S. is more fare gone than I was hoping.

[ghettodub]

Yeah, but if the 2012 election was Obama v. Paul, who would the L's vote for?

H.

I have a hard time with Ron Paul, just because I like a lot of what he stands for, but I don't like the fact that he has some conservative social beliefs and has voted so several times. I'm a pretty staunch libertarian, so anything like that bugs me, but I know that the chance of a pure L being elected is pretty much nil right now. So I guess my decision will just have to wait and see who the end candidates are, but if it was Obama vs Paul, I would go Paul

[sneakerd]

Absolutely, Obama vs Paul, I'll vote for Paul. Not because I am a staunch Libertarian (I'm not), but because if those are the choices, he is the lesser of 2 evils.

[CMP_5.56]

I'm so sick of the lesser of two evil stance. No offense to you personally sneakerd, but it just seems like a cop out. And one of the reasons why a third party candidate will never be elected. Because everyone is too busy voting for the lesser of two evils instead of voting their hearts. And if you aren't voting in the caucuses then the right candidate will never get into the final race.

[sneakerd]

These are hot subjects- I understand the 2 guys who are standing opposite each other arguing heatedly- when they actually believe much the same thing. I never take a conversation like this personally, unless another makes it personal. I too am terribly frustrated by our gov't. I think it will be (will be because it is going to happen) insane to raise the debt ceilling. Can we as citizens do that- NO. Force me to purchase health care insurance from the gov't? NO. Further intrude into my personal life? NO. Tell me I cannot smoke in my own home? (not a smoker) NO. Tell me what kind of vehicle I can drive partially by raising the cost of gas? NO. I can go on forever. [Beer]

[bryjcom]

Wow!! I am truly disappointed in my fellow members here!!

Keep saying he's unelectable yet we keep electing all these ass hat republicans that don't do anything different. Do you guys think that way because Bill O'reilly told you so? Do you guys think this because Shaun Hannity told you so? What about Fox News? Did they tell you, or how about the national media? Did they say that you will be wasting your vote???

[B]Let me ask you guys a few questions-

Do you think Newt Gingrich, with his third wife that he had an affair with on his second wife is going to win against Obama with his Billion $$$ campaign fund??

Do you think Mitt Romney, with his Obama style health care and his liberal policies are going to win against Obama with his Billion $$$ campaign fund???

Do you think that any of the other "same old" Grand Old Party candidates are going to win against Obama with his Billion $$$ campaign fund?



The only person thats going win against Obama and his Billion $$$ campaign fund is a person that is not like the rest of the "Good Ole' Boys"

That person is Ron Paul.

You guys keep thinking this way and we will see another 4 years of Obongo, and by any chance that a republican does get in the white house, it will be no different than Obama. We have had democrat and republican presidents for a long, long time and we have been traveling on the progressive steam engine for a long, long time.


Its time to wake up!

[sneakerd]

I am actually quite awake thank you. Putting your response/argument in bold red and/or black changes nothing. I'll put my 3rd gen Colt 44-40 SAA in a (sorry) left handed Bachman (Old West Repro) fully-tooled holster as on the cover of "Packing Iron" up against any equal collateral. I'll put right here in print the SN and any other info you want- one for one. Neither Ron or Rand Paul will be the GOP candidate for President in 2012. You hard-line absolutist Libertarians put your money where your mouth is- right here, right now. I challenge any of you.

[Hoosier]

I am actually quite awake thank you. Putting your response/argument in bold red and/or black changes nothing. I'll put my 3rd gen Colt 44-40 SAA in a (sorry) left handed Bachman (Old West Repro) fully-tooled holster as on the cover of "Packing Iron" up against any equal collateral. I'll put right here in print the SN and any other info you want- one for one. Neither Ron or Rand Paul will be the GOP candidate for President in 2012. You hard-line absolutist Libertarians put your money where your mouth is- right here, right now. I challenge any of you.

I wouldn't take that bet. But unless or until the GOP fields a better candidate, I'm going to support Paul for the nomination. I don't agree with his stance in several areas either, but most of what he says IS "change I can believe in." Someone who understands the 10th amendment, at least.

He's not running as a third party candidate, he's running for the GOP. I'm hoping he gets the nod. However I bet we'll be left with some crappy candidate who simply panders to the far right wing base to win the nomination, then stands no chance against Obama.

H.

[gcrookston]

...You hard-line absolutist Libertarians put your money where your mouth is- right here, right now. I challenge any of you.

absolutist and Libertarian are diametrically apposed. But we have a lot of arm chair absolutists on this forum, and not many true Libertarians. Bethatasitmay, we won't see the Paul boys get too far if they have to answer for their records or have to account for their integrity. Mitt's a fiscal conservative, but he's got some interesting socialist ideas that won't fly. I quite like Huckabee, but he can't get any money behind him (too honest a guy), and he recognizes that and won't run. Trump is a self aggrandizing lampoon of a success and a serial bankrupt (of course, if the country needs a guy that knows how to dodge creditors, he might just qualify).

Guess this leaves Sara Palin's daughter. I mean, since she had her cosmetic surgery she's looking pretty hot. How many kids you know her age that have been able to sock away a few million? Speaking of age, we'll just get the birthers to come up with a birth certificate showing she's a hot 45 something. It's about time they contribute concrete something to the little circus they run.... [Stooge]

[Bitter Clinger]

Anyone here know of rick Scott of Florida? I don't know much about him yet but I've heard his name ( in GOOD context) quite a few times.

[bryjcom]

I am actually quite awake thank you. Putting your response/argument in bold red and/or black changes nothing. I'll put my 3rd gen Colt 44-40 SAA in a (sorry) left handed Bachman (Old West Repro) fully-tooled holster as on the cover of "Packing Iron" up against any equal collateral. I'll put right here in print the SN and any other info you want- one for one. Neither Ron or Rand Paul will be the GOP candidate for President in 2012. You hard-line absolutist Libertarians put your money where your mouth is- right here, right now. I challenge any of you.

I wasn't trying to direct my post to you in particular. I just get frustrated with the "He doesn't stand a chance" argument. Question is WHY doesn't he stand a chance? Because the mainstream media says so? The mainstream media doesn't vote in the primaries, we do. So if you want to just right him off then go right ahead. I'm well aware of the chances of his GOP nod. I'm sure he is also. In my opinion he is doing it more to promote the ideals of liberty and change the course of the debate.


The fact is we can't afford another standard/progressive republican president any more then we can afford another democratic socialist.

So, what is a conservative to do? Just go with the same old shit or should we actually get some change for once?

When I voted for Paul in the '08 primaries we had a couple stand up and declare their support for Mitt Romney because, " he is the most conservative candidate that stands a chance of winning" They just basically wrote off Ron Paul because his views are not "ordained" by the establishment media. Just a bunch of "sleeping" people that let other people decide who is "qualified" to run their corporate welfare government............

Lets just hope that this time people actually vote for the most conservative candidate this time , because this country will be no more in another 4 years......Hell, it may already be to late.......

[sneakerd]

Just an FYI that'll probably get me all beat up- In the current GOP line-up, I'll take Newt Gingrich. With all of his thaws and issues, he's the smartest guy up there and I'll take that guy, who is one hell of a historian, not likely to ignore or repeat historical mistakes of the past. Also keep in mind, that I consider all of this a good-natured argument between friends. [Coffee]

[sneakerd]

Also, I don't think the lamestream media will cover Paul enough for anyone unfamiliar with his viewpoint to have any real idea where he stands.

[Rust_shackleford]

Yes Global Warming Newt[Flower] [Plow]

Just an FYI that'll probably get me all beat up- In the current GOP line-up, I'll take Newt Gingrich. With all of his thaws and issues, he's the smartest guy up there and I'll take that guy, who is one hell of a historian, not likely to ignore or repeat historical mistakes of the past. Also keep in mind, that I consider all of this a good-natured argument between friends. [Coffee]

[sneakerd]

Yup-ok, I just learned something about Newt I don't agree with. Found the Utube vid of him "debating" with John "3 bullshit Purple Hearts" Kerry.
He still speaks pretty logically if you listen to the whole thing. Kerry is stuck standing there just listening as the smarter guy speaks.

[ghettodub]

I still need more info on Newt, as he has skated around some social issues in the past, so I don't know where he stands on a few items. He's decent on a few issues, but I dunno enough yet

[rocktot]

The Neo-cons are neuter or liberal on social issues. Homolovin, abortion, illegal immigration, immigration in general, etc...

A true conservative cannot get in and certainly will not become president, because of the Military Industrial Complex sucking money out to destroy and then 'rebuild' third world muslim countries, my god, they might try for all of North Africa now, to stay there forever, flooding America with the third world, the biggest problem, so that Nationalism will be impossible, banking system elects presidents, as well as wall street, all the power structure is involved, no way around it, and with the third world society looming in 20 years, the third world ass-kissing will get even worse. Its all planned, take down America, then install a one-world banking system. Not sure if Russia, China and India can get around it, work with it, or whatever, but America as we knew it is gone, and going fast. -Argentina anyone?

Kennedy DID what Ron Paul wants, he tried to close the Federal Reserve. Look what happened to him. (The 'red' seal on currency is from Kennedy, google it if you want to see it)

The best to hope for is a halfway decent RHINO, who may put in a couple conservative justices to save the Supreme Court for the next decade or 2, so they don't totally destroy the Social Structure with Multi-cultism. Anyone but Obama![Weight]

[sneakerd]

Oh my.

[Mazin]

So I guess no one is gonna vote for me or Morgan Freeman?

[gcrookston]

[quote=rocktot;355600]

...Kennedy DID what Ron Paul wants, he tried to close the Federal Reserve. Look what happened to him. (The 'red' seal on currency is from Kennedy, google it if you want to see it).../quote]

Are you talking about the red seal that was first used on the five dollar bill in 1923, or the crack-pot conspiracy theory brewed up by that whack job Marrs over executive order 11110 which Reagan cleaned up and amended in EO 12608?

I read in the Paper this morning the world is going to end Friday at 6 pm (its on the first page, if anyone missed it, along with a photo of some nut pestering a panhandler), so I guess if I was going to vote for Newt, it won't matter much come Saturday morning.

[sneakerd]

One thing I'm not- is a conspiracy theorist of any kind. Red Seal, the watching eye, the pyramid.. blah, blah, blah. Could not care less.[BooHoo]

[bryjcom]

I don't care and I don't want to hear about it.

Is there a smilie with him plugging his ears????

[gcrookston]

So I guess no one is gonna vote for me or Morgan Freeman?


I'll vote for you, but only if you tap Morgan as VP....

[sneakerd]

Carmen Electra for VP.

[rocktot]

[quote=rocktot;355600]

...Kennedy DID what Ron Paul wants, he tried to close the Federal Reserve. Look what happened to him. (The 'red' seal on currency is from Kennedy, google it if you want to see it).../quote]

Are you talking about the red seal that was first used on the five dollar bill in 1923, or the crack-pot conspiracy theory brewed up by that whack job Marrs over executive order 11110 which Reagan cleaned up and amended in EO 12608?

I read in the Paper this morning the world is going to end Friday at 6 pm (its on the first page, if anyone missed it, along with a photo of some nut pestering a panhandler), so I guess if I was going to vote for Newt, it won't matter much come Saturday morning.

-WTF???-[Flower] You don't know about Kennedy, who tried to END the Federal Reserve System, actually, I think he did....for a few months....then...well, now you know the 'rest of the story'. Dig it? Notice the name of the blog: Last American Dollar... Im always amazed Ron Paul supporters don't even know about this...

http://www.gold-speculator.com/bill-downey/17136-last-real-american-dollar.html
http://ts4.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=870944680923&id=3fec2a05b87ee40b9cf15376c953699b&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.gold-speculator.com%2fattachments%2fbill-downey%2f5953d1260562748-last-real-american-dollar-5dollars.png

[Marlin]

[quote=rocktot;355600] I read in the Paper this morning the world is going to end Friday at 6 pm (its on the first page, if anyone missed it, along with a photo of some nut pestering a panhandler), so I guess if I was going to vote for Newt, it won't matter much come Saturday morning.

No, just the beginning of the end. The "Real" end is Oct.21st.

Oh and getting "facts" about the Fed. Reserve from a place that wants you to buy gold, might be a tad bit biased.



[Tooth]

[sneakerd]

Give him a break. He's from Boulder of all places.

[gcrookston]

[quote=gcrookston;355636]

No, just the beginning of the end. The "Real" end is Oct.21st.


[Tooth]

Well great! I love summer in the rockies. I was afraid it might get canceled. [Flower]

[gcrookston]

WTF???-[Flower] You don't know about Kennedy, who tried to END the Federal Reserve System, actually, I think he did....for a few months....then...well, now you know the 'rest of the story'. Dig it? Notice the name of the blog: Last American Dollar... Im always amazed Ron Paul supporters don't even know about this...


Ah, I see. The whack job Marrs explicative. Throw away his book and quit paying attention to that regurgitated tripe. Remember: You can't always believe everything you read on the internet --- That's how WWI started!

P.S. It was Nixon that closed the Gold Window, ending backed currency.

[sneakerd]

Cheryl Tiegs for VP! Come 'on guys- who could forget the fishnet swimsuit pic in SI??

[rocktot]

Im still not getting this, are you in 'law enforcement? No law enforcement guys allowed in political commentary. Don't you guys have the internet? This is just basic history, no wonder you guys expect miracles from neo-cons, and think they work for you![Coffee]

...What many people don't know about JFK is that he was the last American President to print money that was NOT backed by the Federal Reserve. Let me repeat the last portion of the sentence. ..........MONEY THAT WAS NOT BACKED OR PRINTED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!!

What you are looking at is a "UNITED STATES NOTE" - So ordered by John F Kennedy, president of the United States. Look at the very top of the front of the bill, at the very top middle. See how it says "UNITED STATES NOTE" instead of "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE”?

Constitutionally, JFK had this money printed.(IE: Ron Paul wetdream) Only Government has the legal authority to coin legal tender money.

The ramifications are too much for me to contemplate, but the bottom line is that JFK was issuing money (REMEMBER THE 2 DOLLAR SILVER CERTIFICATE BILL) that was either backed up by silver or in this case above, was not "BORROWED" from the Federal Reserve. Now if the Feds had gold to back up all that they would print it would be a different story. But they do not.-conjecture..

It is often said that if you want to get on the trail of the truth in history, follow the money. While we will never know the entire details of the JFK assassination, I find it interesting that these bills were QUICKLY CANCELLED after his assassination and not issued? Why?

[Stooge]

[clublights]

[QUOTE=gcrookston;355636]

No, just the beginning of the end. The "Real" end is Oct.21st.



Well that is really gunna screw with my Halloween plans....

[colocowboy01]

Unfortunately, in every election cycle we are presented with 2 "mainstream" candidates. 1 from the left, 1 from the right. Like it or not, this is a 2 party system, and that's just the way it is. We have to choose the candidate who most closely adheres to our individual values. 1 candidate represents 65% of what we truly believe, the other fulfills (in electioneering talk) 25% or less, of what we believe. Which one do you choose? Sitting it out "on principle" only helps the guy whose belief system least mirrors our own. I'll choose the guy who most closely resembles my beliefs, and will NEVER sit out an election on principle- just because I'm not in lock-step with the guy who is closer to my beliefs. The lesser of 2 evils is exactly that. Sitting it out on principle only helps the other side.

So why should we settle for choosing between two candidates that are presented for the mainstream that only differ on just enough issues so that one looks right-wing and the other looks left-wing? Both candidates share the same views on: continuing the integration of America with the rest of the world through globalization, ridding the American citizen of their guns through a process of sensible "gun control", and increasing socialism throughout America by offering and increasing government welfare. It seems that the democrats enact the policies that are destroying America during their control of the government, and then the republicans get their shot at the government but the policies that the democrats enacted are not changed or scuttled. The only thing that happens is that the republican masses go back to sleep because there is an R in the White House or in control of part of Congress. The globalism and socialism is not ended by the republicans in office they just cool the ire of the people so that the democrats can enact more socialism during their next round in control. I will not vote for socialism, not even just a little socialism just so we keep a larger amount of socialism at bay. I will not take three steps toward socialism just to avoid taking one step toward it. I will vote non-socialist knowing that America will still end up socialist because that is what the masses have been taught to want by the media for one, but I did not help put America into socialism willingly through small steps. And remember that, any non-socialist, non-globalist would be unelectable.

[gcrookston]

Im still not getting this, are you in 'law enforcement?

[Stooge]


Nope. Not law enforcement. I'm a money guy, Card carrying member of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Registered Libertarian, NRA Life member, highly sensitive BS meter (especially when it comes to economics and monetary theory), and if we can get Cheryl Teigs and Carmen Electra on the presidential ticket I'm voting for them .... twice!

But apparently I can't make any plans for halloween

[rocktot]

Ok, I agree with Cheryl Tiegs, when she was 30, omg,.....

But I still don't get why your knocking Kennedy and his trying to shut down the Fed Reserve. Are you saying its a myth, or are you lumping him with the dumocrat-commies we have now?

Its Johnston that was the total ass-hole! Kennedy, with just the FedReserve issue, was the greatest president ever, he went up against the banks, and paid for it big time. From then on, you have to kiss bankers ass to be elected. Hell, Obama is a corporate ass-kissing goon, most libs don't know how bad he is, that would be waccist...bla bla bla..
[Flower]
http://ts3.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=763034404466&id=a686ed5483c6b170a228f1499c9d6934&url=http%3a%2f%2fimg.poptower.com%2fpic-4973%2fcheryl-tiegs.jpg%3fd%3d1024

Hi Cheryle, I loves you.....

[gcrookston]

But I still don't get why your knocking Kennedy and his trying to shut down the Fed Reserve. Are you saying its a myth, or are you lumping him with the dumocrat-commies we have now?


Now, did I say anything about Kennedy, at all? Noooo. Not one word. I never mentioned his escalation of Vietnam, his about face in Cuba that cost thousands of innocent lives, his Mobster father, nor his philandering. I didn't even mention the well documented roll he played in the murder of Marylin Monroe.

Maybe I should have mentioned the part about Monroe because that's the one part of his legacy that is just as true and valid as this dingleberry Jim Marrs' crackpot theory (Yes, I did bash Marrs. The guy is a nut job of first order. He's the Charlie Manson of Conspiracy Theory). --- What's scarey is this guy is believed and followed by so many ill informed and poorly educated lemmings who believe every word as gospel that spews from his meandering imagination.

Myth is too kind of a word. I give the story an F for: Fantasy. Farce. Fable. Falsehood. Fraudulent. Flatulent. Fictional. E.O.11110, upon which this bedtime story is based, didn't have enough teeth in it to stand against revision, let alone get anyone killed. It's obvious you've read Marrs, or read someone that's read Marrs, but you haven't read the E.O.

[Bailey Guns]

Cheryl Tiegs for VP! Come 'on guys- who could forget the fishnet swimsuit pic in SI??

CT pushing 64. Not too shabby:

http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt337/baileyguns/edbb8cb2.jpg

You may now continue your regularly scheduled topic.

[sneakerd]

That is one hot milf. Somebody please find and post that SI pic.

[Hoosier]

About that coming rapture, I just got invited on Facebook to an event the day after. It's the "Post Rapture Looting", Location: Everywhere, please RSVP.

H.

[Bailey Guns]

That is one hot milf. Somebody please find and post that SI pic.

It's not suitable for posting here.

[sneakerd]

I am IN pal. We'll start by looting 5280, then head for Sportsman's Warehouse, then the nearest Safeway or King Soopers. Maybe a road trip to Cabelas in NE. Oh and the nearest Hummer dealership or the nearest place where we can find some military Hummers.

[sneakerd]

Hey man- if that pic could be posted in the SI in- when was it- 1976? It should not be an issue in today's world where "it depends on what the meaning of the word is- is", and where a bj is not sex.

[Bailey Guns]

Well then it should be really easy for you to find and post.

[sneakerd]

Not trying to get someone else to do my dirty work. I am unable to post pics for some reason- they end up too big, and I have to send them to a friend to post them. Just having some fun here. Also not wanting to get anyone in trouble if that pic is too risque.

[gcrookston]

That is one hot milf. Somebody please find and post that SI pic.

Wouldn't she be a GMILF?

[sneakerd]

If she's a grandma, I'm still all in- and so are you if you had the chance and could get away clean!