PDA

View Full Version : Pakistan Attacks



CapLock
05-17-2011, 07:15
Crapistan tried shooting down two US helicopters this morning. I say we give them more money.[Bang]

Bailey Guns
05-17-2011, 07:23
Yeah, me too. In the form of JDAMs. Course, we wouldn't wanna violate their national sovereignty or borders or anything like that. [/sarcasm]

SuperiorDG
05-17-2011, 07:38
We wouldn't want to upset them by cutting off OUR money, you know they have nukes. Sounds a little like blackmail to me.

KevDen2005
05-17-2011, 08:05
We have nukes too...

Where are you parked...oh, I'm in the Pakistan lot

Elhuero
05-17-2011, 21:37
We wouldn't want to upset them by cutting off OUR money, you know they have nukes. Sounds a little like blackmail to me.


donald trump has money. The guy with the sign on the higway onramp has money.

the U.S. has nukes. pakistan has nukes.

see what I'm getting at?

mutually assured destruction is what kept the U.S. and Soviet Union from WWIII.

M.A.D. does not exsist between pakis and us. they can not threaten us with nukes.

also, I think the U.S. has a closer watch kept on their fissionable material then they do.

also, pakis have no means to deliver it to us. All the more reason to secure the border.

I think behind the scenes that pakistan knows what would happen to them if they allow their glow rocks used on us.

palepainter
05-18-2011, 07:57
Fuggem....

Rust_shackleford
05-18-2011, 11:20
So we are allowed to attack their military and they can not fight back?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8518101/Nato-helicopter-attacks-Pakistan-army-post.html

We need to bring our troops home and secure OUR BORDERS

Byte Stryke
05-18-2011, 12:11
So we are allowed to attack their military and they can not fight back?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8518101/Nato-helicopter-attacks-Pakistan-army-post.html

We need to bring our troops home and secure OUR BOARDERS

Absolutely, because or Boarders are in danger from... high room rates or long rope ladders?

[ROFL1]




board·er 1 (bôrhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gifdhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/schwa.gifr, bhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/omacr.gifrhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gif-)n. One who boards, especially:a. One who pays a stipulated sum in return for regular meals or for meals and lodging.
b. One who goes on board a vessel as part of an assault or military action: repel all boarders.

Elhuero
05-18-2011, 16:35
Absolutely, because or Boarders are in danger from... high room rates or long rope ladders?

[ROFL1]




board·er 1 (bôrhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gifdhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/schwa.gifr, bhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/omacr.gifrhttp://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gif-)n. One who boards, especially:a. One who pays a stipulated sum in return for regular meals or for meals and lodging.
b. One who goes on board a vessel as part of an assault or military action: repel all boarders.


cunt hair split

DOC
05-18-2011, 21:04
They were harboring terorists for 10 + years. Lets round up their leaders and give the land to Trashganifstan. That's what they get for fugging around with the US.

bobbyfairbanks
05-18-2011, 21:36
Option #1

Lets not do anything but pack up all of our toys and go home. Once home deploy the Army to defend our sovereign soil for the Mexican hordes. Once we leave the Stans they will resume fighting each other.

Option #2

Hand out nice new blankets. [Flower]I bet we could get all of the liberals to go along with that one. Clean up a lot of our problems at one time.[ROFL1]

CapLock
05-19-2011, 00:52
Pakistan has nukes but only catapults to launch them.[ROFL1] Probably couldn't get them far enough into India to keep them from technically bombing themselves.