View Full Version : LoDo Attacks AGAIN!
IF you have been reading Drudge, then you know that black teen-agers have been going wild almost every day in some city, mainly against whites. Its all over the news, and of course, we had the LoDo attacks last year that went unreported because of the racial aspect. Well here you go again Virginia:
Of course, its 'not racially motivated'. No, not at all.
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_18340820?obref=obnetwork
Nice. I work at 17th & Curtis, and frequently have to be down there after midnight. Always have my lil' buddy Roscoe with me, of course.
IF you have been reading Drudge, then you know that black teen-agers have been going wild almost every day in some city, mainly against whites. Its all over the news, and of course, we had the LoDo attacks last year that went unreported because of the racial aspect. Well here you go again Virginia:
Of course, its 'not racially motivated'. No, not at all.
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_18340820?obref=obnetwork
If they went unreported how did you hear about them?
They were pretty heavily reported by the way.
hammer03
06-27-2011, 19:53
In only one instance did an attacker utter a racial epithet, Jackson said.
OOooooh, ok, only in one of these cases that are very similar and seem to follow a pattern, did someone report that they used a slur. That definitely means that they aren't racially motivated. However, if the attack was against some "more than equal" class, without any comment made, it would obviously be racially motivated?
IF you have been reading Drudge, then you know that black teen-agers have been going wild almost every day in some city, mainly against whites. Its all over the news, and of course, we had the LoDo attacks last year that went unreported because of the racial aspect. Well here you go again Virginia:
Of course, its 'not racially motivated'. No, not at all.
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_18340820?obref=obnetwork
Trying to figure out your point here. Why would there be an agenda for the police to withhold information on racially motivated attacks. I remember the racially motivated Lodo attaacks, I also remember the racially motivated attacks that have occurred up and around Boulder. This latest story is about inebriated transients being victimized. Not sure I like which direction your going with this
Trying to figure out your point here. Why would there be an agenda for the police to withhold information on racially motivated attacks. I remember the racially motivated Lodo attaacks, I also remember the racially motivated attacks that have occurred up and around Boulder. This latest story is about inebriated transients being victimized. Not sure I like which direction your going with this
If a flurry of attacks is publicized, it's liable to make people think twice about going to the bars and restaurants in that area, thus hurting the businesses, who will raise a stink with the mayor's office, etc. Nobody's going to want to visit an area that may have roving thugs lurking in the shadows looking for victims. So, if it's kept quiet, none's the wiser.
Almost sounds like a perfect opportunity act out Death Wish :).
UberTong
06-28-2011, 09:02
While in every instance the victims were white men and the attacker or attackers black men, police do not believe the crimes to be racially motivated.
This statement baffles me. WTF would happen if the tables were turned, hoooly shit it would be hate crime this, white supremacy that.
Zundfolge
06-28-2011, 09:30
If a flurry of attacks is publicized, it's liable to make people think twice about going to the bars and restaurants in that area, thus hurting the businesses, who will raise a stink with the mayor's office, etc. Nobody's going to want to visit an area that may have roving thugs lurking in the shadows looking for victims. So, if it's kept quiet, none's the wiser.
I think that may be half of it. The other half is simply PC nonsense.
Liberal politicians don't want to admit that racist action is even possible from a minority group against whites. Both because it dulls their claims to be 100% pure victims, and I suspect many liberal politicians believe that most white folk are borderline animals that will put together lynch mobs and start murdering black boys at random if we get riled up [Roll1]
Most liberal positions are built on strawmen ... one of the big ones is that all whites (especially them Republican ones) are virulent racists ... remember the reason they believe most of us here own guns is so we can kill us some brown people.
Get some good ole boys to start taking evening strolls around LoDo and the news could get pretty interesting. [Muaha]
...
Get some good ole boys to start taking evening strolls around LoDo and the news could get pretty interesting. [Muaha]
Except they won't mess with anyone that appears to be capable of defending themselves. They are cowards that prey on the weak. Sooner or later, though, they're going to pick on a homeless vet that will go full on batshit and f**king kill them. And they will deserve it. [Rant1]
I think that may be half of it. The other half is simply PC nonsense.
Liberal politicians don't want to admit that racist action is even possible from a minority group against whites. Both because it dulls their claims to be 100% pure victims, and I suspect many liberal politicians believe that most white folk are borderline animals that will put together lynch mobs and start murdering black boys at random if we get riled up [Roll1]
Most liberal positions are built on strawmen ... one of the big ones is that all whites (especially them Republican ones) are virulent racists ... remember the reason they believe most of us here own guns is so we can kill us some brown people.
Get some good ole boys to start taking evening strolls around LoDo and the news could get pretty interesting. [Muaha]
I'm not white and sure as hell not a victim. The statement your make sounds paranoid. You seem to doing the same thing you are accusing liberal politicians of doing....grouping a large mass of people together and making assumptions about them. IMO a crime is a crime. I'm not a big advocate of hate crime legislation because it over criminalizes what is allready on the books. If you hurt or prey on someone black, white, purple whatever you should be held accountable. Bad people are bad people whether they act in groups or alone and they come in all flavors. I like this site because I'm a strong 2nd amendment advocate and enjoy hunting and shooting. When you take an us against them mentality ( unless it's a good versus bad thing ) it can divide even those of us that share a lot in common. Rant over. Good day
DeusExMachina
06-28-2011, 10:00
This is why I carry an extra magazine.
from a minority group against whites.
And now that Colorado is officially going to be the next state to have whites as a minority how do you think the tables will turn? They won't. According to a news report I was reading last week, Colorado is the next of four more states (seven already there) where whites will be less than 50% of the population - yet I'm guessing that even when it's far lower than that we won't get any special treatment - we will still be the oppressor.
And now that Colorado is officially going to be the next state to have whites as a minority how do you think the tables will turn? They won't. According to a news report I was reading last week, Colorado is the next of four more states (seven already there) where whites will be less than 50% of the population - yet I'm guessing that even when it's far lower than that we won't get any special treatment - we will still be the oppressor.
Who is calling you an oppressor Ranger......paranoid a little. You should till be able to sleep ok, there a long way to go. From the US Census Bureau:
Colorado
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI105210.htm) White persons, percent, 2010 (a) 81.3%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI205210.htm) Black persons, percent, 2010 (a) 4.0%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI305210.htm) American Indian and Alaska Native persons, percent, 2010 (a) 1.1%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI405210.htm) Asian persons, percent, 2010 (a) 2.8%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI505210.htm) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2010 (a) 0.1%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI605210.htm) Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2010 3.4%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI705210.htm) Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2010 (b) 20.7%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI805210.htm) White persons not Hispanic, persons, 2010 70.0%
Nationally
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI105210.htm) White persons, percent, 2010 (a) 72.4%
Black persons, percent, 2010 (a) 12.6%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI305210.htm) American Indian and Alaska Native persons, percent, 2010 (a) 0.9%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI405210.htm) Asian persons, percent, 2010 (a) 4.8%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI505210.htm) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2010 (a) 0.2%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI605210.htm) Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2010 2.9%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI705210.htm) Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2010 (b) 16.3%
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/img/infoicon.gif (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/meta/long_RHI805210.htm) White persons not Hispanic, persons, 2010 63.7%
Where are you getting your statistics? Maybe if you write your congressman they establish a law that prohibits anyone who is not white from procreating once a certain percentage is struck
I think the term "Hate Crime" is stupid. Isn't just about any crime somewhat loosely based on hate? You certainly won't assault someone you love, or at least I hope one wouldn't.
I would love for these guys to approach me one night in LoDo, come up on me and start trying to beat me up and rob me, I'd draw down, defend myself with extreme prejudice and then sue the NAACP for breeding this kind of behavior. Advancement my ass, how about prosecuting blacks for attacking whites the same way you would if the situation was reversed. Racially motivated usually transfers over to "class motivated." Black men robbing white men because of the social stigma that white people have more money than blacks. Try to steal my car from me... I'll show you what happens. Once you see the flash it's already too late.
Denying that these attacks "racially motivated" is ignorance at it's finest. It even says it, all of the victims are white, all of the perpetrators are black. Don't let that double standard hit you in the ass.
Who is calling you an oppressor Ranger......paranoid a little.
Really? Whites aren't blamed for pretty much everything bad in American History since slavery? Live under a rock much RMAC?
I should have been more specific and wasn't - white BIRTH rates are down, meaning white is moving towards becoming a minority. I also should have cited sources:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/23/census-shows-whites-are-in-minority-among-new-births-in-us/
Zundfolge
06-28-2011, 13:19
When you take an us against them mentality ( unless it's a good versus bad thing ) it can divide even those of us that share a lot in common. Rant over. Good day
So are you saying you're a liberal politician? Because I said nothing about race (other than to point out the apparent beliefs of liberal politicians vis-à-vis race).
I'm with you, I think the entire concept of "hate crimes" laws are asinine ... hell I think the entire concept of "race" is both arbitrary and asinine since we're all members of the same species.
We’ve got; Kingdom (Animalia), Phylum (Chordata), Class (Mammalia), Order (Primates), Family (Hominidae), Tribe (Hominini), Genus (Homo), Species (H. sapiens).
I don’t see “Race” listed there.
But the simple FACT is that the left (or progressives or liberals or whatever they're calling themselves this week) uses race as a way to divide us. Pointing that out is not a continuation of that division.
Relax ... you're among friends here ... rant unnecessary.
funkymonkey1111
06-29-2011, 12:51
Trying to figure out your point here. Why would there be an agenda for the police to withhold information on racially motivated attacks. I remember the racially motivated Lodo attaacks, I also remember the racially motivated attacks that have occurred up and around Boulder. This latest story is about inebriated transients being victimized. Not sure I like which direction your going with this
why indeed, yet that is exactly what happened with the Lodo attacks last year.
Self-defense in this situation with a gun would ruin you. You would be put away for life, there is no-one being 'killed'. And in front of a Denver jury.
Fox news actually covered it, and showed a bunch of black mobs going ape all over the place. Its on youtube but the link I have is....well really not enthusiastic about multi-culturalism so you'll have to google.
Ok, it hasn't been that bad in Denver, or California for that matter, it seems to be the South and East coast with this problem, this year.
Apparently the knocking out the white guy is called 'polar bear hunting', and that seems to be universal thing going on, even in England, apparently blacks were 'slapping' white people and filming it. Like old white ladies and stuff.
http://urbangrounds.com/2010/09/the-new-urban-sport-polar-bear-hunting/
Just a heads up for all you urban polar bears... [Tooth]
My cousins got jumped by that mob.
trlcavscout
06-29-2011, 20:33
Epic beard man is all I have to say!
Its ok to be proud of your race, unless you're white. Then its racist!
CMP_5.56
06-29-2011, 22:35
Its ok to be proud of your race, unless you're white. Then its racist!
This is unfortunately the truth. If you said you were proud of being white you would automatically be a racist. I have been called a racist for being proud of my ancestors heritage. I say im proud to be of Irish, Scottish and German decent in the wrong bar and all of a sudden I'm a bigot.
I look at it this way, crime is crime, and if you are commiting a crime you are a criminal. There has long been a double standard in this country. And yes to deny that whites have been called the start to all problems would be ignoring it. White people have been the excuse for all other races to claim they can't make it further than a certain level. Well all that was disproved in November of 2008. Everyone has the potential to go as far as they want to. And it is every persons responsibility to better themselves. Race has nothing to do with it.
I personally don't like anyone who would knowingly perpetuate the negative stereotypes of their people. That includes all races and creeds.
Lex_Luthor
06-30-2011, 08:16
+1 I would love for some of those guys to realize that some people won't be their victims, and will defend themselves in a situation like that.
Racism is simply the lowest form of collectivism. Taking 'pride' in something like race over which you have no influence or control is ridiculous. Pride is properly reserved for legitimate accomplishments; if you have none, I would suggest your time and mental energy would be better spent on something other than your racial identity. In short, get a life...
Byte Stryke
07-24-2011, 10:40
Racism is simply the lowest form of collectivism. Taking 'pride' in something like race over which you have no influence or control is ridiculous. Pride is properly reserved for legitimate accomplishments; if you have none, I would suggest your time and mental energy would be better spent on something other than your racial identity. In short, get a life...
first post and he uses it to resurrect a zombie thread instead of the Introduction section.
Fail.
You cry 'fail' without addressing the issue; your turn...
Fentonite
07-24-2011, 13:50
Seriously, Byte is right. Post something in the intro section, let us know a little about you. You also need to post an acknowledgement of the terms for posting items for sale, or your ads will disappear. This is a pretty welcoming group, but at least show some respect for the rules here before you start trolling for arguments. Oh yeah... Welcome to the forum.
You cry 'fail' without addressing the issue; your turn...
I disagree. I've never introduced myself on any website I've ever been to, and people know who I am just fine.
Byte Stryke
07-24-2011, 14:55
I disagree. I've never introduced myself on any website I've ever been to, and people know who I am just fine.
Well, I could have been a complete dick and reported him for non-compliance of the location requirement.
Had he gone through all of the steps instead of simply clicking "Next" he would know these things.
I'm not arguing with the For Sale forum requirement. Introduction subforum is mostly worthless though. Guy says "Hi," 150 forum members say "Hi, welcome." New member, in most cases, never visits that thread again.
"Well, I could have been a complete dick and reported him for non-compliance of the location requirement.
Had he gone through all of the steps instead of simply clicking "Next" he would know these things."
I just took care of the 'for sale' post requirement - sorry about the oversight.
------
"...before you start trolling for arguments."
How is opposing racism and other forms of collectivism 'trolling'?
I am not trying to offend anyone, but the truth is more important than concerns over disturbing anyone's sensibilities. If anyone wishes to discuss matters of substance in a civilized manner, I am always open to considering opposing points of view. I have long been of the opinion that what is said is far more relevant that who says it.
Should someone take pride in being the only race that can be discriminated against legally? I never said I take pride in my race although I should. I said " I'm never going to be ashamed of myself for being white."
Byte Stryke
07-24-2011, 16:17
"Well, I could have been a complete dick and reported him for non-compliance of the location requirement.
Had he gone through all of the steps instead of simply clicking "Next" he would know these things."
I just took care of the 'for sale' post requirement - sorry about the oversight.
Actually, the location requirement is a board-wide requirement, not just for trade.
This is added in your personal profile. and is visible here._____________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _____^
Diverse and well articulated viewpoints are always welcome. Basis for those viewpoints and personal background are equally welcome.
I'm pretty sure my first post here was to sell something, and I never made an intro thread either, seems as though the newer folks here think it's a requirement to say "hi".
Only because everyone tells them to go introduce themselves.
"Should someone take pride in being the only race that can be discriminated against legally? I never said I take pride in my race although I should. I said " I'm never going to be ashamed of myself for being white.":
Race, being beyond one's control, is not properly a matter of either pride or shame.
It is certainly true that political correctness and anti-white racism have created many problems - flawed 'reasoning' usually does.
As far as official (government) discrimination being 'legal', it most certainly is not - the Constitution was amended to guarantee equal (not special) protection for all citizens, any statute, ordinance or regulation to the contrary is, in fact, not law, but mere usurpation and attempts to enforce said edicts should result in severe penalties for those oath-breakers who attempt said enforcement as well as the oath-breakers who promulgated them in the first place. In fact, I feel that 'Justice' Sotomayor is NOT qualified to sit on the Supreme Court precisely because of her racism. She served on the board of directors of a racist organization, whose very name translates as, "The Race."
SideShow Bob
07-24-2011, 17:31
Hi, my name is SideShow Bob, and I am an.....Ooops, sorry wrong group.
Try being a mixed race individual, not white enough to to accepted by the white boys and not ethnic enough to be accepted by the race that is not white in your genetic makeup.
So you end up at odds with everyone.
Byte Stryke
07-24-2011, 20:28
I'm pretty sure my first post here was to sell something, and I never made an intro thread either, seems as though the newer folks here think it's a requirement to say "hi".
Back when you joined it also was not a requirement to post your location in your profile. Seasons change and so do we.
The intro thing is just a courtesy.
Back when you joined it also was not a requirement to post your location in your profile. Seasons change and so do we.
The intro thing is just a courtesy.
Just goes to show how a few newbs can f**k it up for us all.
"Should someone take pride in being the only race that can be discriminated against legally? I never said I take pride in my race although I should. I said " I'm never going to be ashamed of myself for being white.":
Race, being beyond one's control, is not properly a matter of either pride or shame.
It is certainly true that political correctness and anti-white racism have created many problems - flawed 'reasoning' usually does.
As far as official (government) discrimination being 'legal', it most certainly is not - the Constitution was amended to guarantee equal (not special) protection for all citizens, any statute, ordinance or regulation to the contrary is, in fact, not law, but mere usurpation and attempts to enforce said edicts should result in severe penalties for those oath-breakers who attempt said enforcement as well as the oath-breakers who promulgated them in the first place. In fact, I feel that 'Justice' Sotomayor is NOT qualified to sit on the Supreme Court precisely because of her racism. She served on the board of directors of a racist organization, whose very name translates as, "The Race."
What about affirmative action laws? Those are meant to discriminate against no one unless you're white. La Raza is another good one. I was at a Latino funeral and one of the people speaking turned it into a La Raza rally. I was the one of the only white guys there and was so bored and couldn't tell him to shut up.
I disagree. I've never introduced myself on any website I've ever been to, and people know who I am just fine.
Do we really know who you are...? [LOL] I think after about a few weeks people usually get a good idea who you are and what you're about... I think.
DOC,
Affirmative action 'laws' are clearly in violation of the equal protection clause as well as the founding spirit of our country. La Raza (and all other race-based organizations) are repugnant to every true American. I mentioned Sotomayor earlier; even if the 'wise latina woman' were to prove Constitutionally perfect in all other areas, her racism is enough to disqualify her from ANY public office, let alone the Supreme Court.
SideShow Bob,
Among my associates and friends, your race is irrelevant; the 'white boys' as well as the brown and yellow people among us don't give a rat's ass about your paint job. What's between your ears and in your heart is all that counts with us...
That's all I was saying. I don't want them to feel bad about "their paint job" anymore then I want to feel bad about mine. I especially don't want them to think they can make me feel bad about mine. They are going to be in for some severe disappointment.
The Westword had a good story about this area about six months ago. If had "REAL" information from creditable sources. Too many people in one area at once. Drunks, gangbangers, trouble seekers...
funkymonkey1111
08-01-2011, 15:24
what does LoDo mean??
lower downtown
what does LoDo mean??
LOwer DOwntown...basically the part of Denver where you never went after dark when I was a kid...
LOwer DOwntown...basically the part of Denver where you never went after dark when I was a kid...
oh hahaha i thought it was some racist term.....man coming from jersey i havnt seen a side of denver ive been nervous about being in
oh hahaha i thought it was some racist term.....man coming from jersey i havnt seen a side of denver ive been nervous about being in
Basically, is was a shithole warehouse district when I was growing up, gentrified in the late 80s/early90s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoDo,_Denver
oh hahaha i thought it was some racist term.....man coming from jersey i havnt seen a side of denver ive been nervous about being in
Being from Denver public schools everything is racist if you don't understand it. Its a crutch for some people. A good talking to clears things up usually.
Basically, is was a shithole warehouse district when I was growing up, gentrified in the late 80s/early90s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LoDo,_Denver
I used to hang down there during that time: Rock Island, Wazee Supper Club, Calvins, Skyline Cafe, City Lights. I think it actually started getting gentrified in more of the mid 90's. I don't think the 15th St. Viaduct came down until '91.
Quite honestly I think it was safer back then than it is now, even as dark and desolate as it was. Now it's the party place for the whole Metro area, so no wonder it attracts less than desirables.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.