Chuck Norris on Obama Smuggling guns and Registering yours

[Mtn.man]

http://townhall.com/columnists/chucknorris/2011/08/23/obama_smuggling_guns_and_registering_yours

Chuck Norris is a columnist and impossible to kill.

[Mazin]

And all the founding fathers just screamed "Hell Yea!".

Only Chuck....Only Chuck.

[Robby30-06]

Good on ya Chuck! So the cartels have access to machine guns, grenades and rocket launchers but are getting weaponry from US gun stores? Nice try Obama Admin. [Bang]

[alxone]

A+ chuck !!!

[Bailey Guns]

...but are getting weaponry from US gun stores? Nice try Obama Admin. [Bang]

Yeah...it's a little shop called Uncle Barack's Gun Store.

[alxone]

Yeah...it's a little shop called Uncle Barack's Gun Store.
ooo i hear they have a great deal on class 3 weapons
[LOL]

[Zundfolge]

Doesn't Obama know that restricting the right to bear arms primarily ties the hands of good guys... Yes Chuck, he knows ... that's kind of the point.


I'm tired of critics of Obama acting like they're all confused by his actions ... they can't seem to get their heads around the idea (or they're afraid to say it publicly) that Obama HATES the constitution, capitalism, freedom and America and is doing his best to destroy them all.



One interesting point made in the comments though:

Supplying Guns to Anti-Government Cartels to fight against the Mexican Military & other govenment agencise is an act of war, yet one more war not voted on by Congress, in addition to Lybia.

[Lex_Luthor]

Yeah...it's a little shop called Uncle Barack's Gun Store.

LOL [Beer]

[Ronin13]

If you put Chuck Norris and Wayne LaPierre back to back, armed to the teeth... they could re-organize the entire governments of Mexico and the US in less than a week.

[Zundfolge]

I gotta wonder how many keyboards Chuck Norris destroyed while typing that long article with his massively strong fingers.

[ghettodub]

While I appreciate what ol Chuck has to say, I'm gonna wait on my verdict until I hear what Van Damme has to say...

[UberTong]

Another reason to love Chuck Norris, hes a patriot. And a WMD.

[sniper7]

Chuck Norris: The original weapon of Mass Destruction


Bush didn't lie, he was misinformed about WMD's in Iraq because Chuck Norris was there kicking some jihadist ass that day!

[Ronin13]

Bush didn't lie

I don't want to stir up a debate, but I have intimate knowledge that there were WMDs in Iraq... can't provide proof until 2028 (due to classification), but just ask the Kurds.

[Lex_Luthor]

2028, awesome. Just enough time for them to use them!

[Ronin13]

2028, awesome. Just enough time for them to use them!

No, Alex, what I was saying is I can't go into detail about Iraq's WMD program until then because it's classified SECRET and I signed a DA Non-Disclosure Agreement which states I could face 20-50 years in prison for "illegal dissemination of classified material."
My #1 argument though is: Let's say you're a big shot drug dealer and you have multiple kilos of cocaine in your house. The police and DEA show up and only surround 2 sides of your house. You, without them seeing, take your stash to your neighbors house then the cops break down your door... you aren't exactly caught with the drugs because you had ample warning and time to get them out before the cops rushed in. Saddam wasn't stupid, and I can tell you who we should be asking about WMDs, namely chemical agents... Syria.

[Mtn.man]

We did teach Saddam all he knew.

[Lex_Luthor]

No, Alex, what I was saying is I can't go into detail about Iraq's WMD program until then because it's classified SECRET and I signed a DA Non-Disclosure Agreement which states I could face 20-50 years in prison for "illegal dissemination of classified material."


Absolutely. I know the seriousness of the contract you signed.

My thoughts were more along the lines of the US not doing anything about it either until then. Just let it blow on by, and play cover-up.

[n8tive97]

Best part...[Beer]

Doesn't Obama know that restricting the right to bear arms primarily ties the hands of good guys while the bad guys purchase them from a host of illegal sources? And what part of "shall not be infringed" in the Second Amendment do the feds not understand?

[sniper7]

I don't want to stir up a debate, but I have intimate knowledge that there were WMDs in Iraq... can't provide proof until 2028 (due to classification), but just ask the Kurds.

I have heard/read the rumors/conspiracies/truth that there were WMDs. I believe there were, I am sure of it. With todays technology they can actually watch a bear shitting in the woods from outer space. With that bit of info, I have no doubt they can watch the movement of WMDs and know what is going on in other countries.

[n8tive97]

I have heard/read the rumors/conspiracies/truth that there were WMDs. I believe there were, I am sure of it. With todays technology they can actually watch a bear shitting in the woods from outer space. With that bit of info, I have no doubt they can watch the movement of WMDs and know what is going on in other countries.

Totally agree with you.... and BTW, that wasn't a bear... my bad.

[Ronin13]

Totally agree with you.... and BTW, that wasn't a bear... my bad.

Guess we need to reiterate to your wife: Clean up after your pets please! [ROFL1]

As far as how good our technology is, the average cost to operate an NSA Keyhole imaging satellite is in the millions per week, and re-tasking, without regard for time, can cost up to $5Million in a pinch situation. There is a lot of sand to watch for, hence why we had SAS and Ranger teams scouring the desert for SCUDs during the 1st Gulf War, a look-down satellite can only see so much for so long.

[Jer]

I have heard/read the rumors/conspiracies/truth that there were WMDs. I believe there were, I am sure of it. With todays technology they can actually watch a bear shitting in the woods from outer space. With that bit of info, I have no doubt they can watch the movement of WMDs and know what is going on in other countries.

I'm just not sure why such info would be classified after the shit storm that 'not having any WMDs' caused. Maybe details don't need to be given but this is some pretty big information that should have been at least glossed over years ago since it was our reason for going to war. I've said since day 1 I knew there was and have even been quick to point out that even if there wasn't Saddam was violating terms of the treaty that kept him in power after Desert Shield/Storm and the biggest of these was the disallowing of inspectors. This went on for quite a few years and if he wasn't doing anything wrong, why wouldn't he allow inspection as he agreed he would? We had been warning him for nearly a decade and after 9/11 it was brought to our attention that these sorts of things could result in the loss of American lives. It brought all of our 'threats' into focus and Saddam was a big one of those. Whether he harbored Al Qaeda or not. My point was that if this was the primary reason for going to war then how can we as a nation get away with saying there weren't any, effectively destroying our credibility on the world stage, and then continue to deny this for years afterward during a time when our nation needs to save as much face as possible. Why this information, if it exists, has been made top secret is beyond me.

[Ronin13]

I'm just not sure why such info would be classified after the shit storm that 'not having any WMDs' caused. Maybe details don't need to be given but this is some pretty big information that should have been at least glossed over years ago since it was our reason for going to war. I've said since day 1 I knew there was and have even been quick to point out that even if there wasn't Saddam was violating terms of the treaty that kept him in power after Desert Shield/Storm and the biggest of these was the disallowing of inspectors. This went on for quite a few years and if he wasn't doing anything wrong, why wouldn't he allow inspection as he agreed he would? We had been warning him for nearly a decade and after 9/11 it was brought to our attention that these sorts of things could result in the loss of American lives. It brought all of our 'threats' into focus and Saddam was a big one of those. Whether he harbored Al Qaeda or not. My point was that if this was the primary reason for going to war then how can we as a nation get away with saying there weren't any, effectively destroying our credibility on the world stage, and then continue to deny this for years afterward during a time when our nation needs to save as much face as possible. Why this information, if it exists, has been made top secret is beyond me.

The keyword you're looking for is evidence. Empty chemical casks don't constitute enough evidence to the American public these days with our CSI and NCIS and what not. People need concrete evidence, and the DIA, CIA, and various .mil organizations couldn't provide actual samples of what they discovered in Iraq, thus they could not prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Saddam actually had them. On the other side, one of the bigger reasons why Bush made the Saddam-Al Qaeda connection was that if he had the ability to refine and weaponize anything from small pox to a full blown nuke, he supported AQ's mission against the west (and spoke openly about this after 9/11), and we didn't want to run the risk that they would be his best customers, because we all know Saddam didn't have the means to carry out a direct attack on US soil, but AQ did as we all saw. The burden of proof falls, unfortunately, on our teams that searched for months after the initial invasion, and thanks to the cheesedicks in Hollywood we had to come up with something a little more concrete than what we did find. I just don't know for the life of me why people didn't see what that maniac was doing to his own people (the mass murder of 1,000's of Kurds using chemical agents, the torture and murder of his own people, ruling the country with an iron fist, Uday and Qussay torturing people, and the mentality that if you speak out against the leader you would be severely punished) and see that alone as justification to oust the bastard.