PDA

View Full Version : An atrocity of such Magnitude it warrants its own thread



Byte Stryke
09-07-2011, 23:15
http://www.footloosemovie.com/en_us/


what in the fuck...




Over?

Guylee
09-07-2011, 23:20
Another entry into Hollywood's campaign to destroy all that was awesome about the 80's.

I'll still probably see it at some point...

DFBrews
09-07-2011, 23:21
http://www.footloosemovie.com/en_us/


what in the fuck...




Over?

got nothing...





still nothing

Elhuero
09-08-2011, 01:33
dennis quaid is the new john lithgow

Circuits
09-08-2011, 01:58
This *is* one of the seven signs.

Bailey Guns
09-08-2011, 07:21
Ummm...I'll stay home and watch Open Range again.

tmleadr03
09-08-2011, 07:23
I saw the preacher from Deadwood in it.

I think the trailer is enough for me, dont need to see anything else.

spleify
09-08-2011, 07:24
The first one sucked enough, this one will likely suck twice as much

Ranger
09-08-2011, 07:27
Another 80's iconic coming of age movie that gets butchered by Hollywood who has no original ideas. Of all the fantastic books out there they can only re-hash old hits rather than create new ones - quite depressing really.

flan7211
09-08-2011, 07:39
Wow that looks absolutely horrid. I was really waiting for the footloose song to pop into the trailer at some point. If your going to copy a movie might as well go all out.

BPTactical
09-08-2011, 08:00
I think Ranger hit the nail on the head. There are no writers left with any original ideas.
Didn't watch the first Footloose, sure wouldn't waste time on the second.

alxone
09-08-2011, 08:02
I think Ranger hit the nail on the head. There are no writers left with any original ideas.
Didn't watch the first Footloose, sure wouldn't waste time on the second.
+1

MattR
09-08-2011, 09:41
1. Its an MTV "Film" and they haven't had an original idea since they put music video's on tv.
2. Why would a writer think of an original idea when this turd will make a few hundred million dollars?
3. The target audience isn't the people who saw the first one, the formula for a successful movie is "Cute actors in little clothing, silly music and dancing". All things that 16-20 year olds like, because they are all professional dancers at that age.
4. If you were to go back and watch the orignal now, it probably wasn't that good anyways, Hollywood is a bunch of whores.

Zundfolge
09-08-2011, 09:52
I addressed this in a thread while you were "on hiatus".

Its not just the debasement of cherished memories that these remakes often become that bothers me, its the lack of new ideas.

Like I said in the other thread, every year there are hundreds (if not thousands) of new stories written, either as novels or screenplays. And all Hollywood can do is go back and redo something that's already been done?

TS12000
09-08-2011, 10:36
It's comic book adaptations and remakes for the foreseeable future it seems [Help]

Ranger
09-08-2011, 10:52
I'm so sick of the comic book stuff. I saw Green Lantern and while it was an OK movie, it was nothing but two hours of action - I left with nothing more than that. There are so many outstanding books I have read that would make great movies, but that would mean taking a risk and Hollywierd isn't about taking risks. Just take a look at any "blockbuster" these days, they are hedging their bets by having not just one big name actor, but three or more (as in The Expendables).

I was watching Unforgiven a few weeks ago, what a great movie and if you look at how the westerns have done recently (Open Range, Unforgiven, True Grit - even though it was a remake, etc) I just don't understand why they have to re-hash old material.

If it doesn't have big stars and lots of gratuitous nudity, they are less interested.

Ronin13
09-08-2011, 11:19
I'm so sick of the comic book stuff. I saw Green Lantern and while it was an OK movie, it was nothing but two hours of action - I left with nothing more than that. There are so many outstanding books I have read that would make great movies, but that would mean taking a risk and Hollywierd isn't about taking risks. Just take a look at any "blockbuster" these days, they are hedging their bets by having not just one big name actor, but three or more (as in The Expendables).

I was watching Unforgiven a few weeks ago, what a great movie and if you look at how the westerns have done recently (Open Range, Unforgiven, True Grit - even though it was a remake, etc) I just don't understand why they have to re-hash old material.

If it doesn't have big stars and lots of gratuitous nudity, they are less interested.

Agreed, I don't read Marvel or DC comics so I have no clue what's going on in those movies- especially Thor and Captain America... I was so confused I almost walked out.
Originality? Hell no, they're Hollywood.

Irving
09-09-2011, 00:59
Brad Pitt is currently making World War Z in case anyone didn't know. It's cool that he picked it up to make into a movie, but they made him the "star" and each character in the book only has 2 chapters each. Hope he doesn't blow it. I like Brad Pitt.