View Full Version : Could 2012 be America's last election
In the past three years, the Obama administration has been very carefully crafting the nation for a political take over by his Marxist regime and this isn’t just my opinion.
http://tmkeel.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/ ... el-savage/ (http://tmkeel.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/could-2012-be-america-s-last-presidential-election-by-michael-savage/)
palepainter
05-16-2012, 08:02
Did someone confiscate your keyboard in the middle of your sentence?
Did someone confiscate your keyboard in the middle of your sentence?
nice [ROFL1]
BPTactical
05-16-2012, 08:16
Yes
Hmm showed up fine the first time, who be messin with the board???
In the past three years, the Obama administration has been very carefully crafting the nation for a political take over by his Marxist regime and this isn’t just my opinion.
http://tmkeel.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/ ... el-savage/ (http://tmkeel.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/could-2012-be-america-s-last-presidential-election-by-michael-savage/)
stevelkinevil
05-16-2012, 08:28
Guess the DHS got there faster than he ever thought possible.
Sarah Nelson (@sarahsside) (http://twitter.com/sarahsside) says:
April 6, 2012 at 3:34 pm (http://tmkeel.wordpress.com/2012/03/08/could-2012-be-america-s-last-presidential-election-by-michael-savage/#comment-76)
This is America – Obama will either be voted out 2012 or he has to retire 2016. Americans are not afraid to get into a second civil war to kick him out if he tried to ‘dictate’ his way into a third term or dissolve congress. As much as Americans are ‘numb’ to their freedoms, when they rally around a cause – even Russia can’t stop them. We The People will defend our liberty by any means necessary…..BELIEVE!
This comment on the article really annoys me. Really people arent afraid of a second civil war? half the population poops their pants if they see an evil gun. those people would happily go along with whatever the government says as long as their iphones get good service in the camps.
Zundfolge
05-16-2012, 08:38
I've been predicting for some time now that if Obama wins in November that America is over. Done. Fin. Period.
No in that case I would not at all be surprised to see 2012 the last legitimate presidential election (I suspect they'll still keep up some dog-and-pony show for the next few election cycles afterward).
Yes
Absolutely correct.
Just take good hard look at what is going on.
The DOE is disabling our ability to mine and drill to meet our needs. Meanwhile Obama gives Brazil a couple of billion to develop their own oil resources.
Obamacare will control who gets what and when, no more free market healthcare. When the government decides you are no longer a viable life form they'll send you home to die with some pills for the pain.
Wall Street and the government walk hand-in-hand. Wall Street is borrowing money from the USG at zero percent and buying US treasuries at 2%.
DHS/TSA commit open harassment of citizens while allowing illegals of all stripes to flourish.
DOJ allows Black Panthers to threaten voters at a polling place, no action taken. DOJ won't prosecute the guilty parties involved with Fast and Furious even though the program MURDERED FEDERAL OFFICERS.
A Supreme Court justice who helped write Obamacare won't recuse herself, which way do you think this piece of shit will vote when it comes up in June.
You know almost nothing about Obama but somehow the press manages to find some 50 year old dirt on Romney.
I could go on and on.
My only advice is to buy ammo, you should already have the guns from the scare in 2008/2009.
Mtn man.. i just tried posting on this too and it f'ed my post up 3 times too. its not just you
Somebody is watching us.
Gotta run I think I hear a chopper,,,
I've been predicting for some time now that if Obama wins in November that America is over. Done. Fin. Period.
No in that case I would not at all be surprised to see 2012 the last legitimate presidential election (I suspect they'll still keep up some dog-and-pony show for the next few election cycles afterward).
Just like every other tin pot dictatorship that holds elections.
You'll vote for the Marxist or we'll kill your family, no wonder these dictators win in a landslide.
One difference b/t us and them, they have no second amendment rights to use in their defense and we still hold millions of rifles.
Mtn man.. i just tried posting on this too and it f'ed my post up 3 times too. its not just you
I'm having no trouble posting, maybe the net is closing. LOL
Zundfolge
05-16-2012, 08:44
Gotta run I think I hear a chopper,,,
If you can hear it its not them.
You'll vote for the Marxist or we'll kill your family, no wonder these dictators win in a landslide.
Naw, it'll be "Vote for Marxist A or Marxist B and then celebrate the joys of our Democracy comrade!"
Somebody is watching us.
Gotta run I think I hear a chopper,,,
http://www.fugly.com/media/IMAGES/Random/get-to-the-choppa.jpg
Naw, it'll be "Vote for Marxist A or Marxist B and then celebrate the joys of our Democracy comrade!"
Comrade, we have a choice this election, how delightful!! LMAO
We could almost apply that to this upcoming election.
I've been predicting for some time now that if Obama wins in November that America is over. Done. Fin. Period.
No in that case I would not at all be surprised to see 2012 the last legitimate presidential election (I suspect they'll still keep up some dog-and-pony show for the next few election cycles afterward).
by legitimate presidential election do you mean one where thousands of dead people vote democrat, illegals vote democrat, and some people get to vote several times for a democrat?
Interesting to think about... to the vast majority of voters, en election is more of a popularity contest than a civil obligation. It is often a choice of the lesser of two evils, or who happens to have the most money to throw around.
Delfuego
05-16-2012, 09:21
Do we have a "tin foil hat" smiley yet???
I'm having no trouble posting, maybe the net is closing. LOL
I know the problem they're having, and I hope the mods are aware of it (take your time on fixing it guys, no rush, you work too hard as it is), if not here it is:
Quoting, I've noticed, has a little glitch or something, I try posting and it doesn't post the whole thing, so you have to click back, copy what you posted, click forward to your broken post, then click edit, and paste over what you originally typed. [Beer]
Back to our discussion... I've been saying it for months, ANYONE but Obama... seriously, I think a mentally handicapped llama would do a better job, and is more predictable. Whoever posted that vid of Dinesh D'Souza the other day, that was very insightful and he is so right, we've never had a president that we knew so little about! WTF? How come none of his friends from college have come forward to say "yeah, I knew Barack in college, nice guy," or whatever (somehow I doubt they would say he's a nice guy, he seems like a pompous ass hole).
If Obama wins... we lose. Mark my words, mark them well.
KevDen2005
05-16-2012, 10:19
http://www.fugly.com/media/IMAGES/Random/get-to-the-choppa.jpg
or it's already too late...good luck...
Zundfolge
05-16-2012, 10:45
...ANYONE but Obama... seriously, I think a mentally handicapped llama would do a better job...
Dunno why but that instantly made me think of this:
FbwkkXGmFrI
stevelkinevil
05-16-2012, 11:20
Comrade, we have a choice this election, how delightful!! LMAO
We could almost apply that to this upcoming election.
Common folks get real, this is already what we have. Romney is just a socialist with an R next to his name. 6 of one 1/2 dozen of the other when you get down to it. But if you insist on wearing blinders, sure Mittens is ever so slightly better than Obeyme, ever so slightly.
The liberals have been working from at least the mid '90s to have people in place to control the results of the votes. I'll quote Uncle Joe again-
"You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this - who will count the votes, and how."
The libs control most of the vote counters or the people that rule on the votes.
I don't expect to see another election if obama 'wins' the coming election.
Less than 20% of the popiulation participated in the first American Revolution. I don't think that many people will be enough this time.
Common folks get real, this is already what we have. Romney is just a socialist with an R next to his name. 6 of one 1/2 dozen of the other when you get down to it. But if you insist on wearing blinders, sure Mittens is ever so slightly better than Obeyme, ever so slightly.
Exactly. I have a hard time taking anyone serious who says Obama is the anti-christ while simultaneously supporting Mittens. Same person, different name.
BPTactical
05-17-2012, 05:53
Exactly. I have a hard time taking anyone serious who says Obama is the anti-christ while simultaneously supporting Mittens. Same person, different name.
But-and it is a big but, I really feel that although Romney may be Obama lite he still has the best interest of America at heart.
It is very evident by the actions shown the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania does not.
That's a start.
I also do not feel we would get the level of dishonesty that we do now. At least we know something about Mittens, his background and his leadership experience.
Helluva lot more than we can say for "Americas First Gay President"........
Exactly. I have a hard time taking anyone serious who says Obama is the anti-christ while simultaneously supporting Mittens. Same person, different name.
But-and it is a big but, I really feel that although Romney may be Obama lite he still has the best interest of America at heart.
It is very evident by the actions shown the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania does not.
That's a start.
I also do not feel we would get the level of dishonesty that we do now. At least we know something about Mittens, his background and his leadership experience.
Helluva lot more than we can say for "Americas First Gay President"........
In addition.
Do you think Mitt would do or allow the things I listed to happen under his administration? I do not.
Somebody is watching us.
Gotta run I think I hear a chopper,,,
saw 3 of the damn things right over my house yesterday. one guy in the blackhawk even pointed at me while hitting the guy next to him in the arm. I dove in the bushes![Tooth]
But-and it is a big but, I really feel that although Romney may be Obama lite he still has the best interest of America at heart.
It is very evident by the actions shown the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania does not.
That's a start.
I also do not feel we would get the level of dishonesty that we do now. At least we know something about Mittens, his background and his leadership experience.
Helluva lot more than we can say for "Americas First Gay President"........
In addition.
Do you think Mitt would do or allow the things I listed to happen under his administration? I do not.
This is where I get frustrated. When people talk about Ron Paul potentially being president all you hear is that he won't be able to get anything done because the president has no real power. Then, when people talk about Obama he has the power to turn the country into a socialistic nation and undo everything that's been done since the country was created. He has that power mind you even though he's working against a Republican house. Then, when people consider Mittens Romney he suddenly can do no wrong even though he has the backing of a Republican house. Okay. This all makes sense.
Face it, the ONLY option to not further destroy this country with political business as usual just announced he is no longer actively campaigning in states that haven't yet voted. We continue to elect politicians that are in the pockets of big business and have ZERO concern for the people (other than re-election) and we keep getting what we deserve. Bush fucked us. Obama fucked us. Romney will just be more of the same. You people need to realize it's no longer D v R but Us v Them because they sure have and so far they're WAY ahead in the score building an insurmountable lead heading toward the end of the game. As long as we're focused on fighting over what the batting order is they're hitting homerun after homerun. They invented the game they're playing and nobody on our side even cares to learn the rules of the game.
BPTactical
05-17-2012, 09:35
But until we can get an "us" candidate elected we have to make the best choice of what is available.
As somebody stated pre crash, this upcoming erection is like choosing which STD you want.
Obumbler is AIDs, a death sentence.
Romney, the clap, maybe herpes. Annoying as hell but not deadly if kept in check.
Rucker61
05-17-2012, 09:51
The liberals have been working from at least the mid '90s to have people in place to control the results of the votes. I'll quote Uncle Joe again-
"You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this - who will count the votes, and how."
The libs control most of the vote counters or the people that rule on the votes.
I guess that's a change since 2000, then? I was under the impression that a significant amount of the vote counting machines were manufactured by a company owned by a staunch Republican, and that the tinfoil hat liberals were complaining that those machines could count the votes according to the software, which didn't have to have a one-to-one match with the actual vote input.
But until we can get an "us" candidate elected we have to make the best choice of what is available.
As somebody stated pre crash, this upcoming erection is like choosing which STD you want.
Obumbler is AIDs, a death sentence.
Romney, the clap, maybe herpes. Annoying as hell but not deadly if kept in check.
See, you're doing it again.
Obama is death and Mittens is a slight burning when you pee but treatable. I disagree because you're not factoring house control into your decision. To me, Mittens is more dangerous with Republican control than Obama is w/Republican control. Pro-Republican people don't want to talk about that though. They want to act like Bush was a godsend compared to Obama and I don't see it that way. He did as much if not more bad in his term than Obama has. In fact, Obama is using a lot of what Bush started to do what he's doing but so many people don't want to talk about that. Just vote Republican and all that ales you will be solved. /sarcasm
Rucker61
05-17-2012, 09:56
This is where I get frustrated. When people talk about Ron Paul potentially being president all you hear is that he won't be able to get anything done because the president has no real power. Then, when people talk about Obama he has the power to turn the country into a socialistic nation and undo everything that's been done since the country was created. He has that power mind you even though he's working against a Republican house. Then, when people consider Mittens Romney he suddenly can do no wrong even though he has the backing of a Republican house. Okay. This all makes sense.
Face it, the ONLY option to not further destroy this country with political business as usual just announced he is no longer actively campaigning in states that haven't yet voted. We continue to elect politicians that are in the pockets of big business and have ZERO concern for the people (other than re-election) and we keep getting what we deserve. Bush fucked us. Obama fucked us. Romney will just be more of the same. You people need to realize it's no longer D v R but Us v Them because they sure have and so far they're WAY ahead in the score building an insurmountable lead heading toward the end of the game. As long as we're focused on fighting over what the batting order is they're hitting homerun after homerun. They invented the game they're playing and nobody on our side even cares to learn the rules of the game.
I'm with you on this. Big Business/Old Money isn't going to let any changes that wil threaten them.
stevelkinevil
05-17-2012, 21:18
This is where I get frustrated. When people talk about Ron Paul potentially being president all you hear is that he won't be able to get anything done because the president has no real power. Then, when people talk about Obama he has the power to turn the country into a socialistic nation and undo everything that's been done since the country was created. He has that power mind you even though he's working against a Republican house. Then, when people consider Mittens Romney he suddenly can do no wrong even though he has the backing of a Republican house. Okay. This all makes sense.
Face it, the ONLY option to not further destroy this country with political business as usual just announced he is no longer actively campaigning in states that haven't yet voted. We continue to elect politicians that are in the pockets of big business and have ZERO concern for the people (other than re-election) and we keep getting what we deserve. Bush fucked us. Obama fucked us. Romney will just be more of the same. You people need to realize it's no longer D v R but Us v Them because they sure have and so far they're WAY ahead in the score building an insurmountable lead heading toward the end of the game. As long as we're focused on fighting over what the batting order is they're hitting homerun after homerun. They invented the game they're playing and nobody on our side even cares to learn the rules of the game.
well said Jer. We should have a beer sometime. Feeling forced (and in some ways quite legitimately due to the system set up that gets people nominated) to vote the lesser of two evils is why we are in this mess, and kid yourself not this is a very deep mess, going back to at least the civil war, being Americans and naturally distrustful of governments it has taken much longer and many of our forefathers have fought the good fight, but too many others did what they were told they could hoping to make a difference knowing that whether they choose coke or pepsi it will still rot your teeth, just in different ways. I agree with the earlier poster that mentioned that only 20% supported the revolutionary's (and much less actually took up arms) then, and I fear that wont be nearly enough this time.
As I've stated before the third parties have done an absolutely abysmal job of promoting themselves and their views. Of course it doesn't help when the mass media paints them as clowns and then ignores them. Third parties have to work through that and they just don't.
I'd prefer to vote for a third party but I know that at least 30% of the voting citizens will vote (R) and my goal is to see Obama out of office so I'm voting (R) to help realize my goal. If I voted for a third party my vote would be a selfish exercise in futility because no third party is going to beat Obama in 2012.
Mitt is a horrible candidate but he is better than Obama so I'll compromise just to see Obama, Obama's czars, Eric Holder, and all of Obama's other appointments and pending appointments end their evil work on January 20, 2013.
Third parties need to start working on 2016 yesterday.
I'm voting (R) to help realize my goal.
Mitt is a horrible candidate...
Our founding fathers would be SO proud of you. After they risked death to form this free nation you're not willing to risk loss to choose the right candidate to run it. And people openly admit this and criticize those who don't follow this asinine logic.
If I voted for a third party my vote would be a selfish exercise in futility because no third party is going to beat Obama in 2012.
Not as long as everyone who has a crystal ball doesn't even bother voting on them. If everyone just voted for who they felt was the right person (not the lesser of two evils) we might all be surprised.
Zundfolge
05-18-2012, 10:11
Our founding fathers would be SO proud of you. After they risked death to form this free nation you're not willing to risk loss to choose the right candidate to run it. And people openly admit this and criticize those who don't follow this asinine logic.
Ok, Now you're just being a dick.
There's nothing unpatriotic or wrong with voting tactically.
I'm not thrilled with "Mittens" either, but its asinine to claim that he's only "Obama Lite" ... Obama is actively engaged in the destruction of our country and free market capitalism. No Mitt isn't as rock-ribbed conservative as I'd like, but he's at least pro-American and pro-capitalist.
I get the old "the lesser of two evils is still evil" cliche, but that's simpleton bumper-sticker thinking ... so in order to avoid the lesser of two evils you'll help the greater of two evils?
Ok, Now you're just being a dick.
There's nothing unpatriotic or wrong with voting tactically.
I'm not thrilled with "Mittens" either, but its asinine to claim that he's only "Obama Lite" ... Obama is actively engaged in the destruction of our country and free market capitalism. No Mitt isn't as rock-ribbed conservative as I'd like, but he's at least pro-American and pro-capitalist.
I get the old "the lesser of two evils is still evil" cliche, but that's simpleton bumper-sticker thinking ... so in order to avoid the lesser of two evils you'll help the greater of two evils?
I'm being a dick for pointing out the obvious?
I'll vote for the right man for the job regardless of party affiliation. Voting the lesser of two evils has worked real well for us so why buck the system, right?
HBARleatherneck
05-18-2012, 10:25
i love talk of patriotism, from guys who never served their country. its all about me me me me me. but dont ask me to do anything.
i will bet the founding fathers would be proud.
Zundfolge
05-18-2012, 10:48
I'm being a dick for pointing out the obvious?
No you're being a dick for questioning the intelligence and patriotism of people that just happen to disagree with you.
It doesn't help that you're also wrong [insert missing smilie here]
Our founding fathers would be SO proud of you. After they risked death to form this free nation you're not willing to risk loss to choose the right candidate to run it. And people openly admit this and criticize those who don't follow this asinine logic.
Not as long as everyone who has a crystal ball doesn't even bother voting on them. If everyone just voted for who they felt was the right person (not the lesser of two evils) we might all be surprised.
Are there any other judgements you want make about me, after all you know me so well.
You missed my entire point about third parties and their futile campaigns.
You pointed out another issue I have with third parties, they are exclusive not inclusive. Meaning that you tow their line and if you don't you're unpatriotic, they are just like liberals that way.
Unless you're one of those fuckstains that thinks a civil disturbance, or better yet, a civil war would be cool. Then you'll be able to force your views on other folks at gunpoint.
pickenup
05-18-2012, 12:05
It is no longer a discussion, when you revert to calling each other names.
(insert sad face here)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.