View Full Version : The Rigged Republican Convention and the proof
I think the teleprompter can predict the future. Sure looks like it to me. What a disgrace.
Watch the whole thing so you can see what they are voting on but if you have attention problems then jump to 1:30. Keep in mind this is John Boehner taking the vote.
77W5OKStO5s
Everyone knows it was rigged. This isn't new information.
blacklabel
09-01-2012, 12:20
Ahh, yes the upright and moral political party. They'll certainly be gaining my vote.
stevelkinevil
09-01-2012, 19:43
yeah the crap they pulled to keep Ron Paul and the Tea party out is disgusting, but dont worry Bailey Guns will be in shortly to tell us how Mittens and rest are good for us so just shut up and vote for him or your a libtard Obama lover.
milwaukeeshaker
09-01-2012, 21:09
Notice. The hate Ron Paul, GOP acolites are silent. Whatsamatter, you usual Paul haters are not going to comment on the completely despicable way your GOP Gods cheated and manipulated the election process??? Your "Gods" definetely have feet of clay. What a bunch of maroons.
Ron Paul is worth fifty of these scumbags.
Great-Kazoo
09-01-2012, 21:30
Notice. The hate Ron Paul, GOP acolites are silent. Whatsamatter, you usual Paul haters are not going to comment on the completely despicable way your GOP Gods cheated and manipulated the election process??? Your "Gods" definetely have feet of clay. What a bunch of maroons.
Ron Paul is worth fifty of these scumbags.
Vote for someone other than the GOP presidential nominee, it's your choice & right. However if O wins, you can never complain about Obama, ever. You make a choice and stick with it.
Paul has some valid points, more so than mitts. Until the time both sides of the aisle get their grip on.gov diminished it will never happen. BIG MONEY unfortunately trumps truth, justice and the American way. Sad but true.
So the REPUBLICAN convention was scripted and some of you are actually surprised by this?
Next you will say the main stream media is biased towards Obama.
News flash guys, Ron Paul is NOT going to be the next president.
As much as I would love to see a 3rd party President this is not the election, we have way too much to lose with another 4 years of the current POtuS.
I can't drink enough to support the assholes.
Goodburbon
09-01-2012, 22:57
So the REPUBLICAN convention was scripted and some of you are actually surprised by this?
Next you will say the main stream media is biased towards Obama.
News flash guys, Ron Paul is NOT going to be the next president.
As much as I would love to see a 3rd party President this is not the election, we have way too much to lose with another 4 years of the current POtuS.
Yeah, our guy sucks this time, and last time, and the time before that, but maybe in 4 years right. Amiright? Can I get an AMEN...
[Bang]
Yeah, our guy sucks this time, and last time, and the time before that, but maybe in 4 years right. Amiright? Can I get an AMEN...
[Bang]
You are right, in 4 years the candidates are gonna suck again.
The problem with the current 3rd party is they do not take votes away from the liberals.
So the REPUBLICAN convention was scripted and some of you are actually surprised by this?
Next you will say the main stream media is biased towards Obama.
News flash guys, Ron Paul is NOT going to be the next president.
As much as I would love to see a 3rd party President this is not the election, we have way too much to lose with another 4 years of the current POtuS.
This isn't about Ron Paul and whether he could win. We all know he didn't have enough delegates even if they didn't remove some of them.
They did this to stop any type of dissent from grassroots delegates. in this convention or future ones. And they did it with mafia style corruption.
Just remember that if these rules were in place in 1976 we might not have had a brokered convention with Reagan and Ford. Reagan might not have been put on the political map in 1980.
Read this for a timeline of events on what went down and how the Romney attorneys submitted the rules changes.
http://www.freedomworks.org/blog/dean-clancy/romneys-rnc-power-grab-what-happened
Again, this is NOT about Paul winning or not, Its about silencing dissent.
-neither side of the aisle exactly inspires me to vote this time in spite of having never skipped before. Let's see, do I want bad option A or should I opt for bad option B?!
Teufelhund
09-02-2012, 11:36
Vote for someone other than the GOP presidential nominee, it's your choice & right. However if O wins, you can never complain about Obama, ever.
Damn, that's kinda rough. Used to be if someone doesn't vote at all, he can't complain about what we get. Now if someone doesn't vote for a particular guy he can't complain either?
Have you folks been paying attention to what the GOP nominee for 2008 has been doing (http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/53270/) on the legislative front the last four years? Remember the NDAA that everyone was pissed off about BO signing into law? Well the guy you probably voted for in 2008 sponsored that bill. It makes me nauseous to recall that I voted for him "just to keep BO out of the white house." I honestly don't see how Romney will be any better for the country. As long as perception is one must vote R or D or stay home, we are completely screwed.
we are completely screwed.
yep, pretty much.
HoneyBadger
09-02-2012, 15:31
-neither side of the aisle exactly inspires me to vote this time in spite of having never skipped before. Let's see, do I want bad option A or should I opt for bad option B?!
Instead of abstaining, your vote would be better used to support a 3rd party candidate (if you felt inclined to do so). If everyone who intentionally abstained voted for a 3rd party, the 3rd party would win. If just a few percentage of abstainers voted for a 3rd party, we would see a third party rise and break the mold of the 2-party system.
And don't everybody get their panties in a bunch... I'm talking only about voters who intend to abstain for lack of better candidates in the R and D parties, so it's not "the same as voting for Obama."
So the REPUBLICAN convention was scripted and some of you are actually surprised by this?
Next you will say the main stream media is biased towards Obama.
News flash guys, Ron Paul is NOT going to be the next president.
As much as I would love to see a 3rd party President this is not the election, we have way too much to lose with another 4 years of the current POtuS.
In the words of Huckabee: "[Ron Paul supporters,] You lost, move on."
Tar is very right- This is not the year for dissent, it is the year we must defeat Obama and try to help get America on track- as much as we can, which is possible to make some headway with a Republican in off, but impossible with a Dumbocrat or especially with Obummer.
Not saying Romney is the best candidate, not by a long shot. But he's a helluva lot better than Obama, and once we get Obama out, then we can see about getting a good candidate elected. Let's also not forget, that even if the dissent only affects the numbers by 2%, that could be enough to ensure a victory for Beeho, and there is an 80% chance of two more Supreme Court Justices retiring prior to 2016, and do we really want Obama appointees? Think about the children!
HoneyBadger
09-05-2012, 21:08
Think about the children!
Call me cynical, stereotyping, whatever, but I've met very few liberal voters who ever think about anyone but themselves... Handouts, sustained government dependency, and welfare for life if you vote for the right (wrong) guy.
In the words of Huckabee: "[Ron Paul supporters,] You lost, move on."
Tar is very right- This is not the year for dissent, it is the year we must defeat Obama and try to help get America on track- as much as we can, which is possible to make some headway with a Republican in off, but impossible with a Dumbocrat or especially with Obummer.
Not saying Romney is the best candidate, not by a long shot. But he's a helluva lot better than Obama, and once we get Obama out, then we can see about getting a good candidate elected. Let's also not forget, that even if the dissent only affects the numbers by 2%, that could be enough to ensure a victory for Beeho, and there is an 80% chance of two more Supreme Court Justices retiring prior to 2016, and do we really want Obama appointees? Think about the children!
I'm going to repeat it again. This isn't about Ron Paul winning or losing.
Its about silencing dissent in this convention and future ones, and doing it with rigged votes and mafia style corruption.
But if that floats your boat then so be it....
Great-Kazoo
09-05-2012, 21:30
Doing it with rigged votes and mafia style corruption.
I'm offended by your remark young man. Everyone knows most GOP'ers are WASP.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.