PDA

View Full Version : Firebombing in CA...



ANADRILL
10-22-2012, 12:35
http://video.foxnews.com/v/1916900975001/

wctriumph
10-22-2012, 12:42
We should probably ban glass containers and require valid ID scans before purchasing any kind of flammable liquid, especially gasoline. It would be best, I guess, to require gasoline permits after a background check at the DMV. Or eventually have instant check available at the federally licensed and operated fuel distribution centers.

Sawin
10-22-2012, 12:45
Was that a person, engulfed in flames, running across the top of the screen at the very end, or was the victim the one the other people pulled away from the fire?

DangerLee_Industries
10-22-2012, 12:48
Wtf is wrong with people I don't get. Where I grew up if you had an issue with someone you talked to them face to face.
If that didn't work you stepped outside in the dirt and handled it. Then you walk back inside and drink beer with him the rest of the night. You don't light them on fire and watch....

Aloha_Shooter
10-22-2012, 14:23
We should probably ban glass containers and require valid ID scans before purchasing any kind of flammable liquid, especially gasoline. It would be best, I guess, to require gasoline permits after a background check at the DMV. Or eventually have instant check available at the federally licensed and operated fuel distribution centers.

I'm surprised these aren't Brady Bunch talking points:

- Microregistration of all liquid containers
- Permits and ID required to purchase any flammable liquids
- Microtracers for all flammable liquids
- Expansion of the BATFE to the BATFEFL
- Limits on what flammable liquids anyone can purchase or own.

hatidua
10-22-2012, 15:01
We should probably ban glass containers and require valid ID scans before purchasing any kind of flammable liquid, especially gasoline. It would be best, I guess, to require gasoline permits after a background check at the DMV. Or eventually have instant check available at the federally licensed and operated fuel distribution centers.

You jest, -just give 'em time...

ray1970
10-22-2012, 15:42
Disclaimer: the following is purely a hypothetical situation put forth solely for the purpose of entertainment and amusement. I would never intentionally harm another human being.

If I ever did snap and do something crazy, my weapon of choice would be a nine iron. Can you imagine how it would ruin everyone's game when they ban them?

Aloha_Shooter
10-22-2012, 15:50
Disclaimer: the following is purely a hypothetical situation put forth solely for the purpose of entertainment and amusement. I would never intentionally harm another human being.

If I ever did snap and do something crazy, my weapon of choice would be a nine iron. Can you imagine how it would ruin everyone's game when they ban them?

Nah, you can do without a nine iron easily as long as you have both an eight iron and a good putting wedge. Now, use a Big Bertha-style driver or a self-centering putter and you'll really mess up some games ... :(

Monky
10-22-2012, 16:02
With as many politicians and lawyers as there are that play golf.. good luck getting that law passed! [Coffee]

mofuknfamily
10-22-2012, 21:19
WTF!!!!! really??