View Full Version : Yet again, someone who destroys Piers Morgan!
Okay, this one is pretty good- and the guy, albeit from Kommiefornia, does have a few missteps on gun rights, just ANNIHILATES Piers, calls him a bully, and basically comes out and says it: Piers stands on the graves of the Sandy Hook victims! BOOYAH! Brietbart editor Ben Shapiro vs Limey Prick Piers Morgan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJdhAm_oUUs
Aloha_Shooter
01-10-2013, 23:57
Lancelot Link could destroy Piers Morgan.
ezgoinrob
01-11-2013, 00:08
I dont really want him destroyed... now dead would be good!! I dont even think he is worthy of becoming pig feed!!
Ez
Rucker61
01-11-2013, 00:10
This is the most I've ever watched Piers. What a frickin' douche.
Rucker61
01-11-2013, 00:11
I dont really want him destroyed... now dead would be good!! I dont even think he is worthy of becoming pig feed!!
Ez
Never trust a man who raises pigs...
Waywardson174
01-11-2013, 00:15
Simply owned Piers. The end.
This is the most I've ever watched Piers. What a frickin' douche.
I was just thinking that half-way through watching this... I never watch Piers, hell, I never watch CNN, but ever since mid-December I've probably watched about 45min worth of Piers' show, just to see him get owned.
stevelkinevil
01-11-2013, 00:22
If you listen closely you will realize that overall this man (shapiro) is an apologist. He is in many ways is more dangerous than the douche interviewing him.
KestrelBike
01-11-2013, 00:56
Breitbart has been going hard against piers lately, and I wish they'd just stop giving him the coverage. piers is trolling extremely effectively, and it doesn't matter if intelligent people see through him right away. It's the other side that voted for obama, that automatically assume without any critical thinking that what they've just been told is accurate and gospel.
All that said, piers is a fucking c*** who should go back to his own hosed country and go to jail. I'd probably drink a beer or two in celebration if he got hit by a bus.
ETA: BTW where the hell is the official, undisputed report that whoever shot all the kindergartners solely used an assault rifle, and not two pistols as originally reported? MSM keeps touting "Ohhhh assault rifles at newton!" when it still isn't even clear what the hell weapons were used? WTF.
jhood001
01-11-2013, 01:15
If you listen closely you will realize that overall this man (shapiro) is an apologist. He is in many ways is more dangerous than the douche interviewing him.
I actually saw your comment before I even watched the video so I 'listened closely' as you put it. I missed the apologist stuff. Anyone care to point out the parts that went over my head?
That is how you own a conversation people. Call the horse a fucking horse and ride that shit!
BPTactical
01-11-2013, 06:53
Ben Shapiro is articulate, factual and proffesional. He stayed on topic when Purse tried to deflect and distract.
He held Purse to task and towards the end had him rattled.
The man did more for the cause than 1000 Alex Jones could ever do.
Bailey Guns
01-11-2013, 07:01
I actually saw your comment before I even watched the video so I 'listened closely' as you put it. I missed the apologist stuff. Anyone care to point out the parts that went over my head?
I don't know about "apologist", but he did say he was in favor of background checks on ALL sales and he was in favor of requiring all guns be locked up. Maybe a few other minor points.
stevelkinevil
01-11-2013, 08:07
I don't know about "apologist", but he did say he was in favor of background checks on ALL sales and he was in favor of requiring all guns be locked up. Maybe a few other minor points.
This is more fair than what I posted. And an example of why sometimes whiskey makes me lippy.
UncleDave
01-11-2013, 08:15
I loved the line about his relatives in Europe that had no problem with registration that are now ashes. That puts it all in perspective! Nice touch of personalizing the issue too.
[handbags]
DavieD55
01-11-2013, 08:24
I dont look for that limey douche nozzle to have a show here in the near future. His show is on par with Rosie O'donnell.. He will end up getting cancelled.
BPTactical
01-11-2013, 09:00
I dont look for that limey douche nozzle to have a show here in the near future. His show is on par with Rosie O'donnell.. He will end up getting cancelled.True, but you can always find an ass to fill a seat.And there are plentiful asses on their side..........
I was just thinking that half-way through watching this... I never watch Piers, hell, I never watch CNN, but ever since mid-December I've probably watched about 45min worth of Piers' show, just to see him get owned.
^^^ This
I don't know about "apologist", but he did say he was in favor of background checks on ALL sales and he was in favor of requiring all guns be locked up. Maybe a few other minor points.
Caveat! He did make a point that the mother of the CT shooter (I will not give him more publicity, he will not be named) was very irresponsible in having her weapons unsecured. It's fine to take your mentally ill child shooting under SAFE, CONTROLLED situations, but due to his inability to function normally in society (we haven't seen much on the family's background, did the kid have outbursts, anger issues, etc? Oh sorry, that doesn't fit the anti's agenda) she should have had those guns locked up. I know if I had a child under the age of 15 (personal beliefs) in my household, be it my own or other, I would keep all my guns locked up in a safe (minus my EDC which wouldn't leave my sight)... it's just good safety practices.
Aloha_Shooter
01-11-2013, 09:34
I dont look for that limey douche nozzle to have a show here in the near future. His show is on par with Rosie O'donnell.. He will end up getting cancelled.
I'd equate him more with a bidet than a douche ...
DavieD55
01-11-2013, 09:38
I'd equate him more with a bidet than a douche ...
Yeah, You're right.
Never trust a man who raises pigs...
haha
Cut through bone like butter.
Zundfolge
01-11-2013, 09:56
Ben Shapiro is articulate, factual and proffesional. He stayed on topic when Purse tried to deflect and distract.
He held Purse to task and towards the end had him rattled.
The man did more for the cause than 1000 Alex Jones could ever do.
He did well. Shapiro is usually pretty good at holding his own against the leftards.
Watching him in action made me really miss Andrew Breitbart though ... can you imagine the ass whopping Andrew would have given that limey schmuck?
Byte Stryke
01-11-2013, 09:57
Someone needs to point morgan at the battle of Athens.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Athens_(1946)
How come no one brings up the fact that the AR-15 5.56/.223 is the second cheapest target / sporting rifle to shoot next to a .22? Not to mention they are infinitely configurable to suit anyone, from young to old. Not that it will matter to the left, but it may help people see it has other another purpose other than protecting us from potential government tyranny.
I think that there are so many things that he could have done better throughout that interview that would have better displayed his argument. Piers is a giant douche bag, and there were obvious holes in his arguments that could have been used to make him look absolutely retarded. I doubt that I will watch anything else that comes from him because I do not want to give him any support. Let the idiots that watch him regularly marvel in their own stupidity. This whole petition thing and follow up interviews have been the best thing for his career since it started.
I think that there are so many things that he could have done better throughout that interview that would have better displayed his argument. Piers is a giant douche bag, and there were obvious holes in his arguments that could have been used to make him look absolutely retarded. I doubt that I will watch anything else that comes from him because I do not want to give him any support. Let the idiots that watch him regularly marvel in their own stupidity. This whole petition thing and follow up interviews have been the best thing for his career since it started.
The asshat uses the same immaterial arguments over and over... "What gun was used in X, and what was used in x?" Does it really matter the choice of weapon? His logic is flawed and narrow sighted. No one brings up the Bath School Bombing, where 38 children, 6 adults were killed, and 58 wounded... No guns there.
Cylinder Head
01-11-2013, 10:36
Ben gave that smarmy redcoat a sound dick-kicking. 10/10 would watch again.
DavieD55
01-11-2013, 10:38
How come no one brings up the fact that the AR-15 5.56/.223 is the second cheapest target / sporting rifle to shoot next to a .22? Not to mention they are infinitely configurable to suit anyone, from young to old. Not that it will matter to the left, but it may help people see it has other another purpose other than protecting us from potential government tyranny.
Because that is not politically correct.
On the subject of a mentally ill child/teen have shooting as a hobby. Sorry but I completely disagree, just my opinion. I don't wanna piss on the mother's grave, but she was MORE than irresponsible, she was downright practically GUILTY of what happened. Read some more about the history of that mental defect (that shall not be named) and you get a good picture of why he should never have even been allowed ANYWHERE NEAR ANY firearm.
Now here is another mother who took shit seriously, as painful as it was. But sometimes in these extreme cases of mental defect, YOU NEED TO BE BRAVE and do the right thing. Read this, if you haven't already:
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/perspectives/i-am-adam-lanzas-mother-my-son-threatens-to-kill-me-ive-tried-everything-everything-is-not-enough-667485/
brokenscout
01-11-2013, 11:21
It used to be cheap to shoot[Coffee]
How come no one brings up the fact that the AR-15 5.56/.223 is the second cheapest target / sporting rifle to shoot next to a .22? Not to mention they are infinitely configurable to suit anyone, from young to old. Not that it will matter to the left, but it may help people see it has other another purpose other than protecting us from potential government tyranny.
This is the most I've ever watched Piers. What a frickin' douche.
+1
Never thought I would say that I agree with the representative from California.
I don't know about "apologist", but he did say he was in favor of background checks on ALL sales and he was in favor of requiring all guns be locked up. Maybe a few other minor points.
I think this is where the give and take part would come in. I am for background checks on all purchases... Fine, it's fifteen minutes to an extra hour out of my time. However, if you are required to do this, I think they should give up the coat carry tax. You want to make me keep proving that I am legal to purchase a firearm every damn time, you know I'm legal to carry it and shouldn't have to pay an extra fee to do so concealed. I guess that I don't really care that much because I don't have to pay a ridiculous ammount of money to get a transfer done either..... Like I said though, if they don't want to give anything up, I don't want to give anything up.
i have a hard time watching anything with piers morgan in it. the debate is a very good one with piers being given whats for yes, but there is something about the man that I find absolutely and utterly revolting.
For people who keep talking about private party sales.... you live in or near a largely populated area.. don't you? I do as well and while this area isn't huge it's populated enough to have more than a few choices for FFL transfers and as such there is a spread on both price and customer service so there's something for everyone. I have to think of my buddy who, much like a LOT of gun owners across this country, live in a more remote area. He basically has to drive an hour to get to the only FFL within about 6 hrs of his location and that FFL fella charges and absurd rate for transfers and takes FOREVER to do anything. It's bad enough that my buddy who is a HUGE lover of guns with the means to purchase said guns rarely does so anymore. Just too much crap to jump through for something as simple as a transfer. He deals only with private individuals in his state (would rather drive 8hrs across the state to buy from a private individual than mess with dealers) and as such is stuck with whatever is available at whatever price. Not a very fun situation to be in. But take that from him and the others like him and things are a little more dire than they would be for someone like you or me where a FFL transfer is simply an issue of a little more time and a little more money. We've got it pretty good compared to those who don't have it like us.
In spirit of full disclosure, I don't feel like background checks do very much to protect us from the bad guys of the world. But that's another thread entirely.
blacklabel
01-11-2013, 12:02
Requiring background checks for private sales isn't going to stop or prevent a felon from getting their hands on guns. It's ignorant to think that it will solve the problem, much like thinking that an out right ban on weapons will stop gun violence.
Zundfolge
01-11-2013, 12:08
How come no one brings up the fact that the AR-15 5.56/.223 is the second cheapest target / sporting rifle to shoot next to a .22? Not to mention they are infinitely configurable to suit anyone, from young to old.
The libtard response: "Oh so you will willingly sacrifice the lives of children just so you can have your toys?"
Requiring background checks for private sales isn't going to stop or prevent a felon from getting their hands on guns. It's ignorant to think that it will solve the problem, much like thinking that an out right ban on weapons will stop gun violence.
Again, goes back to laws don't control criminals... Murder, crack, all illegal, criminals don't care.
DavieD55
01-11-2013, 12:20
Requiring background checks for private sales isn't going to stop or prevent a felon from getting their hands on guns. It's ignorant to think that it will solve the problem, much like thinking that an out right ban on weapons will stop gun violence.
They know that. It is just an excuse to make it more difficult for good people. Politicians dont like for good people to have guns.
liberty19
01-11-2013, 12:57
Consider the source. Piers isn't even an American.
Cylinder Head
01-11-2013, 13:39
Consider the source. Piers isn't even an American.
It goes beyond that, the guy is a Redcoat.
hollohas
01-11-2013, 14:08
Requiring background checks for private sales isn't going to stop or prevent a felon from getting their hands on guns.
^Exactly. Criminals by definition don't obey the law. This would just be another un-enforceable law for bad guys to break and good guys to follow. But how do we make sure the good guys don't sell without a BGC? Glad you asked. Every law abiding gun owner must submit to a monthly inventory to make sure they didn't sell one without a background check. And how would they know the good guy didn't sell any of his guns? Yup, a registry.
But bad guys can steal guns too. Well, guess we better make it harder for them to do that by making a law that requires law abiding gun owners to lock up their guns at all times. If one gets stolen and used in a crime, we'll send the good guy to jail for not locking them up. Yup, that should prevent bad guys from stealing guns, making more good guys liable.
Peirs got owned. But I still had a very hard time watching it. He is such a smug, arrogant SOB, I can't hardly look at the screen when he is talking.
The libtard response: "Oh so you will willingly sacrifice the lives of children just so you can have your toys?"
The same can be said on a much larger scale for automobiles so they don't have to walk or peddle their lazy asses anywhere.
It goes beyond that, the guy is a Redcoat.
THE BRITISH ARE COMING!!!! Oh wait they're already here. [hahhah-no]
hollohas
01-11-2013, 14:19
Consider the source. Piers isn't even an American.
Pretty clear when he said "Do you REALLY believe that your government will become tyrannical?" Um, well, actually no...because we have the 2nd Amendment to prevent that. But take it away and there is NOTHING to prevent our government from becoming tyrannical like the English Government we fought for Independence against.
Do they not teach the American Revolution in England? That should hit close to home for Peirs...you'd think a Redcoat would know a bit more about tyrannical government.
That said, I think the 2nd Amendment is first and foremost important to prevent and deter tyranny. He kept saying it was important to fight tyrannical government, but that's it's secondary purpose.
Well there is some great rebuttal here and some that I have to read two or three times. For one I feel stupid not knowing that BG checks weren't done else where at gun shows! That's scary , I have always enjoyed my fire arms but never paid attention to the individual states and lack of or stricker rights!! I am very informed now. But I will be damned if the government is going to mandate me to register my toys, or make me pay to keep them. Hell the anti gun pos wouldn't like it if we mandated them to release their porn collection, or expose there hard drives for a right to know sweep ! Thats a private thing the gooberment has no right knowing what I have at home or what I watch at home period, each step they take they are attempting to infringe on every liberty we have. slow death of this country is in site and the sheep just let it happen!
Well there is some great rebuttal here and some that I have to read two or three times. For one I feel stupid not knowing that BG checks weren't done else where at gun shows! That's scary , I have always enjoyed my fire arms but never paid attention to the individual states and lack of or stricker rights!! I am very informed now. But I will be damned if the government is going to mandate me to register my toys, or make me pay to keep them. Hell the anti gun pos wouldn't like it if we mandated them to release their porn collection, or expose there hard drives for a right to know sweep ! Thats a private thing the gooberment has no right knowing what I have at home or what I watch at home period, each step they take they are attempting to infringe on every liberty we have. slow death of this country is in site and that sheep just let it happen!
Background checks weren't required a gun shows here until recently.
So you say that you support BG checks and you despise firearm registration, that sound about right? So how much trust do you put in our government to 'lose' or 'destroy' all the information they 'voluntarily' receive from gun buyers for every single firearm transaction other than private party sales? In other words, the info with your personal info, background/history and the list of firearms plus serial numbers you're buying on that particular transaction. If you trust the government as much as I do probably very little. This means you are basically 'registering' your firearms every time you're required to do a background to buy a firearm so if you do indeed despise the idea of registering firearms so much then why are you alright with background checks? I for one fail to see a significant difference between the two. With one they have all the information and with the other you're aware of the idea that they have all that information.
DavieD55
01-11-2013, 15:34
Maybe he will invite James Yeager onto his show.
No you are reading between the lines, I have to do cbi checks every 6 months because of my job , if I carry its with a registered firearm! But the face to face purchases I, lets say I have possibly done, its no ones business but mine or the seller. Are you condoning the fact that a pos or gang banger can walk into a show and purchase anything he wants? Or a convicted felon? Just stating that up until 3 years ago I felt if it didn't effect me why should I care, after seeing all the bs getting pushed thru I have made it a point to be more informed about all policies and where things are going. I have bought from tanner and gladly waited for the BG check, and I don't disagree with you just don't read into what I am saying, If I was in front of my pc my word track would be a little more clear! The iPhone and the fact I don't have my glasses today might of helped!
soldier-of-the-apocalypse
01-11-2013, 16:37
I really hate this guy
Maybe he will invite James Yeager onto his show.
I'd pay PPV for that.
I'd pay PPV for that.
As would I... hey, lets get Joe Rogan on the horn, I'll bet Yeager vs Morgan, UFC 155, or whatever, would be lucrative as hell!
blacklabel
01-11-2013, 16:57
As would I... hey, lets get Joe Rogan on the horn, I'll bet Yeager vs Morgan, UFC 155, or whatever, would be lucrative as hell!
Piers bloody as hell in a corner would make my day.
hollohas
01-11-2013, 17:08
You'd be paying $49.95 for like 17 seconds of fight and the subsequent footage of the crying prat.
You'd be paying $49.95 for like 17 seconds of fight and the subsequent footage of the crying prat.
And it would be a bargain at twice the price!
You'd be paying $49.95 for like 17 seconds of fight and the subsequent footage of the crying prat.
Probably less. I'd imagine he would ask a question and he would mozambique his ass. Two in the chest one in the head followed by WELCOME TO AMERICA!
and I'd pay more.
Probably less. I'd imagine he would ask a question and he would mozambique his ass. Two in the chest one in the head followed by WELCOME TO AMERICA!
and I'd pay more.
That would be too quick and only entertaining to watch the replay over and over... I'd rather see Yeager take his time, with his index fingers only... [Coffee]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.