Obama to use kids to push agenda

[jslo]

Just reported Obama will use young children (as props) tomorrow during his speech on gun control.
DISGUSTING!

[mahabali]

Completely disgusting! This really is unbelievable what a scumbag.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2518621#.UPWhd2e5wt0

[cofi]

saw that just now and thought.....man this is gonna be bad

[Kraven251]

This is actually going to be perfect. He wants outrage, I am fairly certain he is going to get it. I just don't think it is going to come in the way he is hoping.

[Zundfolge]

This is actually going to be perfect. He wants outrage, I am fairly certain he is going to get it. I just don't think it is going to come in the way he is hoping.
Agreed. The more they over-reach ... the more the mask slips ... the sooner people actually wake the f*** up (even though it's probably too late).

[CrufflerSteve]

Cynical politics at the best. I'm sure children make great stage props. Save the Children!​ is always a good move. It's emotional so it avoids actually having to debate the facts.

[BuffCyclist]

The irony is that the children surrounding Obama will be exposed and in closer proximity to more guns/ammo, than they would experience on any day of their regular at-home lives.

[Fmedges]

c'mon impeachment. What a classless piece of shit.

[jslo]

Just makes me think he's gonna push hard on strict controls. Will feel a need to with all the young faces, next to him, listening to his words.

[Rooskibar03]

http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm251/cmuthard03/40c11139b1b916465241d13d38c48d55.jpg

[BPTactical]

Typical hypocracy from the left.
They will claim to "Save innocent lives" but yet the administration is fully "Pro Choice".

[Ronin13]

c'mon impeachment. What a classless piece of shit.
Exactly what I was thinking... the guy is so lacking in class I'm surprised he even can hack it at the WH black tie deals.

[Aloha_Shooter]

... and this is news how?

Obama has used kids as props consistently throughout his career as a politician and community organizer. Hell, the only value anyone has to him is his/her utility as a prop.

[Ashton]

I'm not quite sure why this surprises anyone...

[Ronin13]

I'm not quite sure why this surprises anyone...
Oh it comes as no surprise... I think there would be an even bigger cry if he actually did something out of character...

[jslo]

Not surprised.....but still disgusting. But then that's just my opinion.

[waxthis]

He will be a Hero tomorrow, way to many sheep out there, and not enough of us to change anything. All we can do is keep trying.

[hollohas]

... the sooner people actually wake the f*** up...

I'm not holding my breath. We have been shown time and time again that they will not wake up.

[The Nuge]

So . . . Let me get this straight. It's ok for us to abort them, but not to shoot them????

[Monky]

Wonder if any of the kids will be the victims of Sandy Hook?

[blacklabel]

Wonder if any of the kids will be the victims of Sandy Hook?

That's actually where they got all of the kids from.

[Rooskibar03]

So . . . Let me get this straight. It's ok for them to abort them, but not to shoot them????

FIFY.

[whitbaby]

I still think the best way is to impose an AUTOMATIC sentence on any aggressor who brandishes a weapon in a menacing manor.

Like:

First offense of brandishing a weapon: 5 years, no appeals.
2nd offense, 20 years, no appeals.

Actually using the weapon, whether resulting in death/s or not... execution.

Similar to the so-called 'third-strike' law in CA (if they even do that anymore) only this would be 'one-strike'.

I'm sure the lawyer lobbyists would scream, but it's about the only way to give a potential perp something to consider, as he knows the laws we already have, and rarely enforced, are a joke and little to worry about.

We don't need more 'feel-good' laws to solicit more votes, we need something that will get their attention.

[blacklabel]

I still think the best way is to impose an AUTOMATIC sentence on any aggressor who brandishes a weapon in a menacing manor.

Like:

First offense of brandishing a weapon: 5 years, no appeals.
2nd offense, 20 years, no appeals.

Actually using the weapon, whether resulting in death/s or not... execution.

Similar to the so-called 'third-strike' law in CA (if they even do that anymore) only this would be 'one-strike'.

I'm sure the lawyer lobbyists would scream, but it's about the only way to give a potential perp something to consider, as he knows the laws we already have, and rarely enforced, are a joke and little to worry about.

We don't need more 'feel-good' laws to solicit more votes, we need something that will get their attention.

I'm sure that Lanza would have taken that into consideration before committing 26 counts of first degree murder.

[Guylee]

Color me shocked.

[Zundfolge]

I still think the best way is to impose an AUTOMATIC sentence on any aggressor who brandishes a weapon in a menacing manor.

Like:

First offense of brandishing a weapon: 5 years, no appeals.
2nd offense, 20 years, no appeals.

Actually using the weapon, whether resulting in death/s or not... execution.

Similar to the so-called 'third-strike' law in CA (if they even do that anymore) only this would be 'one-strike'.

I'm sure the lawyer lobbyists would scream, but it's about the only way to give a potential perp something to consider, as he knows the laws we already have, and rarely enforced, are a joke and little to worry about.

We don't need more 'feel-good' laws to solicit more votes, we need something that will get their attention.

Yeah, that won't get abused ... perp tries to rob you, you draw weapon, he runs away and calls the police "a mean man pointed a gun at me" ... your word against his, for whatever reason the jury believes him over you and BAM you go away for 5 years and lose your 2A rights forever.


The dirty little secret is we don't need any new laws and the laws we have are frankly enforced just fine. Violent crime is both in decline and at historic lows. There is no problem to be fixed.

[Aloha_Shooter]

It's not an execution, it's just a really Really Late term abortion ...

[Kraven251]

It's not an execution, it's just a really Really Late term abortion ...

seems to be a need for more of those lately, must be the moral decline of society

[robertcolorado2009]

Laws are not meant to enacted because of the latest outrage. Intelligent people understand this. But when you get a person in a high enough office who has an agenda and an event takes place that can further this persons agenda, you get bills that are not intelligently thought out or written. Just as we have today. The laws we have are good enough, they just have to be enforced with the same sense of urgency as the person who wants his/her agenda furthered has put for their bills. Think about it, they keep writing new laws for everything all the time. It justifies their existence/job. When is it that there are enough laws? Just because an event happens that out rages people doesn't mean we need a new law. Just enforce the ones we have. Then those "law" makers cannot stay in office for life making the wages they do. Why don't we ever hear of them taking a pay cut? That's another story. WE DO NOT NEED NEW LAWS!!!! ENFORCE THE ONES WE HAVE!!!

[polski]

No surprise there, they normally use women and children as shields.

[n8tive97]

So . . . Let me get this straight. It's ok for us to abort them, but not to shoot them????

Quote of the day!