Gun Rights Protest are acts of low level terrorism per the Pentagon

[battle_sight_zero]

For those of you saying the military would-be on our side please explain why the Pentagon says marches for the support of the 2nd are low level terrorism? Does not sound to supportive to me. Personally I am getting more worried when I see such information. Either way read up http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2013/01/22/pentagon-says-protests-are-acts-of-low-level-terrorism/ . I don't feel like a terrorist, sad that I may be considered one because I support the 2nd. Seems that Government and media are going all out to minimize 2nd supporters as some fringe members of society on the same level of criminal terrorist.

[Aloha_Shooter]

Panetta is hardcore (albeit less offensive) liberal and political flunkie. Pronouncements by him or other political appointees (who are naturally going to carry Obama's water) have very little to do with what the mid- and low-level officer and enlisted force would do given orders that clearly go against their training, education and natural proclivities. Hickenlooper's support for more gun control didn't mean squat to 62 of 64 Colorado Sheriffs or to the local PD or deputies that would be required to carry out some of the more extreme proposals being aired in Denver.

Having said all that, we should be inundating the mass media with questions and pointing out the inconsistencies and extremism in Obama's campaign against traditional American values and the Constitution.

[buffalobo]

Another step on the path...

Sent from my DROID Pro using Tapatalk 2

[ChunkyMonkey]

Keep in mind pogs and pencil pushers in the pentagon are mostly lefty.

[sellersm]

So the Pentagon finally caught up with DHS? They've labeled us a few years ago... Two words: "political appointees".

[Uberjager]

Any other sources on this?

[ChunkyMonkey]

Any other sources on this?

Your google broke? [Coffee]
Right wingers....
http://thebellnews.com/2013/01/21/pentagon-exam-calls-protests-low-level-terrorism-angering-activists/
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,526972,00.html

Left wingers...
http://open.salon.com/blog/dennis_loo/2009/06/14/dod_training_manual_protests_are_low-level_terrorism
http://current.com/community/94028086_pentagon-says-protests-are-acts-of-low-level-terrorism.htm
http://occupywallst.org/forum/the-frog-has-boiled-pentagon-says-protests-are-act/

Left wingers who pretend to be the defender of freedom...
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/dod-aclu-we-surrender

[sellersm]

Here's a link to the DHS-funded study that made up their '2012 watch list' that was sent out to various agencies across the country. http://start.umd.edu/start/publications/research_briefs/LaFree_Bersani_HotSpotsOfUSTerrorism.pdf

[Uberjager]

Your google broke? [Coffee]
Right wingers....
http://thebellnews.com/2013/01/21/pentagon-exam-calls-protests-low-level-terrorism-angering-activists/
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,526972,00.html

Left wingers...
http://open.salon.com/blog/dennis_loo/2009/06/14/dod_training_manual_protests_are_low-level_terrorism
http://current.com/community/94028086_pentagon-says-protests-are-acts-of-low-level-terrorism.htm
http://occupywallst.org/forum/the-frog-has-boiled-pentagon-says-protests-are-act/

Left wingers who pretend to be the defender of freedom...
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/dod-aclu-we-surrender

Yes[Abused]

I tried several different search terms and nothing came up.

[Kraven251]

Awesome...Phase 2 : Label anyone defending their Second Amendment rights with their First Amendment rights as Terrorists.

[DOC]

They are high level terrorists for attacking the second amendment. They can suck it.

[Ronin13]

They are high level terrorists for attacking the second amendment. They can suck it.
My thoughts exactly... going against the Constitution would be treasonous.

[Gman]

The volunteer soldiers are with us. The political wonks and bureaucrats in the Pentagon...that's not surprising.

[SA Friday]

I'll take all the low level enlisted...

You take all the high ranking generals (there are 112 - 4 star generals BTW)

Lets see which comes out on top.

I'll piss off a commander, I won't piss off a Chief. That's just stupid, and I'm not.

[Ronin13]

I'll take all the low level enlisted...

You take all the high ranking generals (there are 112 - 4 star generals BTW)

Lets see which comes out on top.

I'll piss off a commander, I won't piss off a Chief. That's just stupid, and I'm not.
THIS! There is a reason an NCO will correct you when you call him 'sir', the enlisted are the ones who actually do work for a living... [Coffee]