PDA

View Full Version : Colorado Legislature "Most Wanted" Deck of Cards



DeusExMachina
03-12-2013, 10:24
I'm thinking of putting together a handy visual guide to get these jokers out of office. Each card would have the individual's name, picture, district and date of when they are up next for election.

Now the question is, who's who?

Ace of Spades - Hickenlooper
Ace of Clubs - Morse
Ace of Hearts - Fields
Ace of Diamonds - Hodge
Queen of Spades - Hudak
Joker - McLachlan (for being a traitorous Marine, who can't be trusted)

Who else?

Boadie30
03-12-2013, 10:43
I'm thinking of putting together a handy visual guide to get these jokers out of office. Each card would have the individual's name, picture, district and date of when they are up next for election.

Now the question is, who's who?

Ace of Spades - Hickenlooper
Ace of Clubs - Morse
Ace of Hearts - Fields
Ace of Diamonds - Hodge
Joker - Lachlan (for being a traitorous Marine, who can't be trusted)

Who else?

Good thinking and when completed.... Make it a Sticky!

BPTactical
03-12-2013, 10:51
Queen of Spades- Hudak

Rucker61
03-12-2013, 11:03
Why limit yourself to the normal suits? Create four new ones that are more appropriate.

Teufelhund
03-12-2013, 11:22
Why limit yourself to the normal suits? Create four new ones that are more appropriate.

Turds?
Redcoats?
Traitors?

Teufelhund
03-12-2013, 11:24
I'm thinking of putting together a handy visual guide to get these jokers out of office. Each card would have the individual's name, picture, district and date of when they are up next for election.

Now the question is, who's who?

Ace of Spades - Hickenlooper
Ace of Clubs - Morse
Ace of Hearts - Fields
Ace of Diamonds - Hodge
Queen of Spades - Hudak
Joker - Lachlan (for being a traitorous Marine, who can't be trusted)

Who else?

Did you mean McLachlan? Or is this someone different?

two shoes
03-12-2013, 11:24
Turds?
Redcoats?
Traitors?
Douchebags?

Fify

DeusExMachina
03-12-2013, 11:50
Did you mean McLachlan? Or is this someone different?

McLachlan, sorry.

mdflem51
03-12-2013, 17:10
Queen of Spades- Hudak Hudak? You mean Rhonda (Yeah they be my checks Foo! ) Fields don`t you?

bigshane
03-12-2013, 17:17
Hudak? You mean Rhonda (Yeah they be my checks Foo! ) Fields don`t you?
Slow down there, Trigger. I'm pretty sure he intentionally chose NOT to make that connection.

mtnrider
03-12-2013, 17:28
I can just see them having a cow over this if they ever saw one. They would probably twist it to the media that you had "hits" out on each of them.

.

jslo
03-12-2013, 17:29
Kind of biased, but I'd like mine added. The only time Linda Newell payed an attention yesterday was when King was debating, she couldn't take her eyes off of him. Damn near stalking like. She also won by a pretty small margin.

Cofaler
03-12-2013, 18:12
We should take it a step further. Compile a list of all of their holdings and financial interests and boycott. Why should we spend our money in places that benefit those that are bent on taking our rights away?

liberty19
03-12-2013, 18:59
Did you mean McLachlan? Or is this someone different?

Queen of Clubs - Jeanne (sit down and shut up) Nicholson
Queen of Hearts - Angela Giron

Jutt
03-19-2013, 14:09
I'm thinking of putting together a handy visual guide to get these jokers out of office. Each card would have the individual's name, picture, district and date of when they are up next for election. Now the question is, who's who? Ace of Spades - Hickenlooper Ace of Clubs - Morse Ace of Hearts - Fields Ace of Diamonds - Hodge Queen of Spades - Hudak Joker - McLachlan (for being a traitorous Marine, who can't be trusted) Who else?
Great idea, I like it.

SideShow Bob
03-19-2013, 14:21
I can just see them having a cow over this if they ever saw one. They would probably twist it to the media that you had "hits" out on each of them.

.

This is a "hit list", a visual reminder list to hit them hard at the polls when they come up for reelection.......

Cthulhu
03-19-2013, 14:25
Slow down there, Trigger. I'm pretty sure he intentionally chose NOT to make that connection.

THIS! Plus she's a bleeding heart. Don't mess with the suits too much but if the hearts were bleeding that would be awesome.

Jeffrey Lebowski
03-19-2013, 14:53
Queen of Clubs - Jeanne (sit down and shut up) Nicholson


2nd this one.

Hound
03-19-2013, 15:05
We should take it a step further. Compile a list of all of their holdings and financial interests and boycott. Why should we spend our money in places that benefit those that are bent on taking our rights away?

Or just post them on a web site. That is what they were doing with our information in some news papers.

Hound
03-19-2013, 15:08
This is a "hit list", a visual reminder list to hit them hard at the polls when they come up for reelection.......

Be careful with statements like that. I know how you feel but we don't need to lose good people to dumb crap like what happened with Sain over Fields. Just saying!

def90
03-19-2013, 21:46
You are missing Levy, Carroll, Aguilar, Salazar, Heath and the whiny bitch Ulibarri..

RMGOdirector
03-23-2013, 10:33
RMGO's PAC is going to be publishing a list of the vulnerable legislators along with their opponents (when we have fully vetted and chosen one to support) in the next election.

Notably, we'll include a link to the pro-gun and RMGO PAC endorsed candidate's website (for gun owners to link in and donate to NOW).


Our first pick is an easy one: Frmr GOP St Sen Tim Neville. http://nevilleforcolorado.com/


Tim served in the State Senate for a short time before being drawn out of his district. He had a 100% voting record on guns, and even sponsored RMGO legislation.


He's already announced against Sen Nicholson. Nicholson voted for ALL of the anti-gun legislation.


We will strongly suggest focusing efforts on winnable seats, and not to get spread too thin.


Case in point: As objectionable and despicable as St Rep Rhonda Fields is, only a card-carrying Marxist Dem is going to win that seat. Best spend that money in a different House seat.

roberth
03-23-2013, 10:52
RMGO's PAC is going to be publishing a list of the vulnerable legislators along with their opponents (when we have fully vetted and chosen one to support) in the next election.

Notably, we'll include a link to the pro-gun and RMGO PAC endorsed candidate's website (for gun owners to link in and donate to NOW).


Our first pick is an easy one: Frmr GOP St Sen Tim Neville. http://nevilleforcolorado.com/


Tim served in the State Senate for a short time before being drawn out of his district. He had a 100% voting record on guns, and even sponsored RMGO legislation.


He's already announced against Sen Nicholson. Nicholson voted for ALL of the anti-gun legislation.


We will strongly suggest focusing efforts on winnable seats, and not to get spread too thin.


Case in point: As objectionable and despicable as St Rep Rhonda Fields is, only a card-carrying Marxist Dem is going to win that seat. Best spend that money in a different House seat.

I was wondering about that, her name was mentioned at a Hudak recall meeting I attended and there wasn't alot of support for recalling Fields, kinda like trying to recall Degette.

RMGOdirector
03-24-2013, 08:47
After my big mouth in Sen Judic hearing RMGO PAC will have to write a check against Ulibarri, but that's wasted: no one decent will win in that district. The same is true for Heath, Fields, etc.

longbow
03-24-2013, 14:53
I am in Nicholson's area and will contact Neville to volunteer any way that I can. Nicholson has to go!

blacklabel
03-24-2013, 15:00
After my big mouth in Sen Judic hearing RMGO PAC will have to write a check against Ulibarri, but that's wasted: no one decent will win in that district. The same is true for Heath, Fields, etc.

it sent a message regardless of how effective it will be in that district.

RMGOdirector
03-25-2013, 09:59
Given Ulibarri's attitude, there was NO WAY for me to avoid firing back.

Singlestack
03-25-2013, 11:31
Dudley,

What is your opinion vis a vis vulnerability of Matt Jones (Boulder Cty)? I am assuming that would be an unlikely seat to win, but would appreciate your take.

Thanks!

RMGOdirector
03-29-2013, 18:20
Registration numbers are bad. 37 D 27 R

don't have performance numbers on hand here but I know we looked at generic ballot test trends in all 100 state legislative districts and this one didn't even make the "if we had a great candidate we might make a run at it" list for RMGO PAC.