New CT gun laws target mags

[Dave]

http://news.yahoo.com/conn-reaches-deal-tough-gun-laws-newtown-221504941.html

[theGinsue]

Upset over not getting an outright ban on magazines that carry 10 or more rounds, Ron Pinciaro, executive director of Connecticut Against Gun Violence said:


"We have to be satisfied. There are still other things that we want, we'll be back for in later sessions," he said. "But for now, it's a good thing."

Does anyone still have any doubt that their ultimate goal is total and absolute banning of all firearms?

[streetglideok]

I haven't had any doubts here, nor have I for a long time. Some, even on this site are still running around like sheep, in denial outside the slaughter house. Obviously they failed history.

[GilpinGuy]

Does anyone still have any doubt that their ultimate goal is total and absolute banning of all firearms?

Sadly, the issue is just like abortion....folks are on one side or the other and there is little you can say/do that will convince one side or the other.

So no, I have absolutely no doubt that this is the long term goal.

[Circuits]

The Gene Pool. Chlorine is urgently required.

[ben4372]

It is getting closer.

[sabot_round]

Upset over not getting an outright ban on magazines that carry 10 or more rounds, Ron Pinciaro, executive director of Connecticut Against Gun Violence said:



Does anyone still have any doubt that their ultimate goal is total and absolute banning of all firearms?

I have no doubts about it. I just want to know where are the LIBTARD gun owners that voted for these BOZOS, and what their response is in regards to this mess they have help created?!?! What is their stand now??

[sniper7]

Can't fix stupid

[Dingo]

It is getting closer.

Yes, "IT" is. And there are more of us ready for it than they think.

[Caithford]

I grew up in CT, and just got the opportunity to visit my family last week. This is the same knee jerk reaction we're seeing here in CO. All eyes are on CT & CO because they feel if they can pass this garbage in the two states where tragedy has struck, they can get their retarded feet in the door. Hold on to your butts, this is going to be a bumpy ride.

[JoeT]

I just wrote my new representatives (we moved here last month)

My email explained that I've been a legal gun owner for 23 years and have carried almost every day for 19. I've lived in 7 states in those years, payed more than my fair share in taxes, and have voted in EVERY election. With this signing of law they have turned me into a felon. I will not comply with their registration and feel good gun laws that will do nothing to prevent additional tragedies or crime

I expect a no-knock soon

[Great-Kazoo]

Your title should have read: CT starts the first step like CO towards outlawing Gun ownership. How ANYONE can say they represent the people and vote, let alone introduce, ANY GUN LAW is beyond amazing.

[mikedubs]

Your title should have read: CT starts the first step like CO towards outlawing Gun ownership. How ANYONE can say they represent the people and vote, let alone introduce, ANY GUN LAW is beyond amazing.

Because they don't represent the people, they represent themselves, and we all have to listen to them, as they know what's best for 320 million people...

[Inconel710]

Ah, CT - the state where even if you did get a concealed carry permit, allowing that weapon to even print under your clothing results in a brandishing charge.

People don't get it. We keep getting told to be reasonable while they ignore the fact that we've been reasonable for over 90 years of slowly tightening gun laws and are sick of it.

[Ronin13]

Sadly, the issue is just like abortion....folks are on one side or the other and there is little you can say/do that will convince one side or the other.

So no, I have absolutely no doubt that this is the long term goal.
Except that this side of the issue (our side) is the one that is supposedly protected by the 2nd Amendment, and not open to "interpretation." I mean, seriously, I don't see any other way to view "Shall not be infringed." And I count any legislation, past or present, that does exactly that, "infringe" upon the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, to be unconstitutional and wrong... But of course there's really nothing I as one man can do about it. [Mad]