Log in

View Full Version : .5 Billions of Tax Payers' fund later, Fisker Fired 75% of its Workers!!!!!



ChunkyMonkey
04-07-2013, 23:05
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/06/report-obama-backed-fisker-lays-offs-workers-faces-suit-by-solyndra-related/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/05/fisker-layoffs-75-percent_n_3023101.html


Fisker Fires 75 Percent Of Its U.S. Workforce During Massive LayoffsReuters | Posted: 04/05/2013 3:34 pm EDT





* 160 layoffs latest symptom of cash crunch

* Fisker: move necessary to "maximize value of core assets"

* Raised $1.2 bln from investors, but cash has dwindled to $30 mln

* Fisker has not made a car since last July

By Deepa Seetharaman

DETROIT, April 5 (Reuters) - Fisker Automotive, the struggling, government-backed hybrid sports car maker, said on Friday that it terminated most of its rank-and-file employees, in what sources said was a last-ditch effort to conserve cash and stave off a potential bankruptcy filing.

Fisker, which raised $1.2 billion from investors and tapped nearly $200 million in government loans, has "at least" $30 million in cash, according to a source familiar with the company's finances. This does not include $15 million Fisker will receive after settling a claim this week with its bankrupt battery maker, the source said.

About 160 employees were fired at a Friday morning meeting at Fisker's Anaheim, California, headquarters, according to a source who attended the meeting. They were told that the company could not afford to give them severance payments.

Fisker confirmed in a statement that it let go about 75 percent of its workforce but did not specify the number of workers affected. It called the move "a necessary strategic step in our efforts to maximize the value of Fisker's core assets."

"Unfortunately we have reached a point where a significant reduction in our workforce has become necessary," the company said, adding that it was still searching for a strategic partner.

The layoffs are the latest symptom of Fisker's cash crunch. In late March, Fisker put its entire U.S. workforce on furlough. It also hired law firm Kirkland & Ellis to advise on a possible bankruptcy filing.

The layoffs hit several key departments, including engineering, public relations and marketing, according to the source who attended Friday's meeting in Anaheim.

Fisker asked 53 senior managers and executives to stay on board, primarily to pursue buyers for the company's assets, the source said. The remaining Fisker executives also are continuing negotiations with the U.S. Department of Energy.

A Fisker representative could not immediately answer questions on the company's financial position. In the past, the automaker has declined to comment on the possibility of a bankruptcy restructuring.


APRIL 22 PAYMENT LOOMS

Fisker, which was founded in 2007, hopes to renegotiate a DOE loan payment due on April 22, which the source familiar with Fisker's finances said was around $10 million.

In 2009, the DOE awarded Fisker a $529 million loan as part of a U.S. program to finance advanced vehicle development. Fisker pledged its assets, including equipment and property, as collateral on the DOE loan, according to the loan agreement dated Sept. 18, 2009.

The company's flagship vehicle, the $100,000-plus Karma plug-in hybrid, quickly won accolades for its styling and cachet with celebrities, including pop star Justin Bieber and actor Leonardo DiCaprio, who is also an investor in the company.

Fisker used $193 million of the DOE loan and earmarked the rest for a second plug-in hybrid, the Atlantic, but the DOE froze the credit line after delays in launching the Karma. The last payment from the DOE came in May 2011, government records show.

"The Department of Energy stopped payment on the federal loan in 2011 after Fisker stopped meeting their milestones, and is committed to the best outcome for taxpayers," DOE spokeswoman Aoife McCarthy said in a statement.

"Despite Fisker's difficulties, our overall loan portfolio of more than 30 projects continues to perform very well, and more than 90 percent of the $10 billion loan loss reserve that Congress set aside for these programs remains intact," she said.

The Energy Department's loan program has been under scrutiny ever since solar panel maker Solyndra went bankrupt in mid-2011. Since then, other U.S.-backed companies have failed, notably Fisker's battery supplier formerly known as A123 Systems and now called B456 Systems Inc.


STALLED NEGOTIATIONS IN CHINA

Fisker has faced many challenges over the past month, including the abrupt resignation in March of its founder, Henrik Fisker, over "several major disagreements" with top management.

The company has not produced a car since July and has been seeking a financial backer to help finish the development of the Atlantic and produce it at a Delaware plant.

Fisker had been in talks with Chinese automakers Dongfeng Motor Group Co Ltd and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group to gauge interest in acquiring a majority stake.

But those efforts stalled after both companies balked at the terms of Fisker's loan agreement with the DOE. Fisker's chief executive, Tony Posawatz, visited China to try to rekindle those deals, sources said.





Fisker now is open to selling off pieces of the company, including intellectual property rights for its plug-in electric hybrid technology, sources have previously said.

F#(*&$ PIECE OF $ht... libtards always get away with super expensive fantasy ideas.

KestrelBike
04-07-2013, 23:19
What investor in their right mind would look at that rap sheet and want to piss away their money reinvesting in them?

Gman
04-08-2013, 07:05
Karma is a bitch.

Cylinder Head
04-08-2013, 08:04
Karma is a bitch.

I see what you did there.

sniper7
04-08-2013, 10:15
The cars look cool but what a damn waste.

nynco
04-08-2013, 10:21
I feel the same way about giving tax subsidies to big oil. Of which Exon is the most profitable company is human history, but they still need tax subsidies?

ChunkyMonkey
04-08-2013, 10:38
I feel the same way about giving tax subsidies to big oil. Of which Exon is the most profitable company is human history, but they still need tax subsidies?

I thought you were better than the typical libtard..but I am wrong. Tax subsidies/credit/incentives are NOT free loans to some unrealistic company with fantasy goal on unproven technologies which guarantee lost at the end. For those who wonders why would anyone invests 1.5 billions into this, they were using the DOE letter of guarantee. In short, it's a speculation created solely by the big GOV, not by the market.

I am against TAX and against free money or unnecessary govt's intrusion in free market.

Aloha_Shooter
04-08-2013, 11:16
Tax credit != subsidy just as reducing growth != cutting expenditures and reducing tax rates != spending $$$. This is the biggest liberal fallacy that continues to permeate the press (even Fox News on occasion). It irritates me to no end when some liberal schmuck talks about how tax rate reductions "have to be paid for" as if they were the same thing as spending money on new government programs or buying things we don't need.

nynco
04-08-2013, 11:52
No what they are is an unfair advantage. You guys boggle my mind. Many of you are business owners who do not get tax breaks but you think its OK that the big corporations get taxcuts that you don't. We fought a revolution in this nation when the British East Indy company started to get taxcuts while small businesses did not. Makes no difference whether the gov gives the money to a company or just picks and chooses who will pay taxes and who will not. In the end, it is not a free market then.

Byte Stryke
04-08-2013, 12:10
No what they are is an unfair advantage. You guys boggle my mind. Many of you are business owners who do not get tax breaks but you think its OK that the big corporations get taxcuts that you don't. We fought a revolution in this nation when the British East Indy company started to get taxcuts while small businesses did not. Makes no difference whether the gov gives the money to a company or just picks and chooses who will pay taxes and who will not. In the end, it is not a free market then.


OK Damnit, Why is nynco making sense and why do I agree with him?

You have to get out of the mindset that its the Governments money.
It is not a tax credit, its not a tax subsidy... it was your money to begin with and they chose to let you keep it for reason (x)
Flat tax is the only way to get around a biased system.

Irving
04-08-2013, 14:35
Well Byte, because you are smart enough to not automatically discount what someone says, just because of who is saying it.

tmleadr03
04-08-2013, 14:41
Well Byte, because you are smart enough to not automatically discount what someone says, just because of who is saying it.

Meh, most of what he posts is drivel. Even a blind squirrel gets a nut every once and a while.

Broken clock and all that.

spqrzilla
04-08-2013, 14:45
I feel the same way about giving tax subsidies to big oil. Of which Exon is the most profitable company is human history, but they still need tax subsidies?
Nonsense. There are no "subsidies" to oil companies. In fact, oil companies pay a larger rate of taxes on their revenues than the majority of companies.

I get very upset with people who repeat talking points about taxation but have no clue how taxation law actually works.

In 2012, Exxon paid $31 $31.05 billion in taxes on Earnings before taxes of $78.73 billion from total revenue of $428.38 billion.

Irving
04-08-2013, 14:49
My roommate is a geophysist for Exxon, he could probably clear this up of I asked him.

sniper7
04-08-2013, 15:12
Big oil posts big profit because they are everywhere. The profit margins are very small...typically under 5%.

speedysst
04-08-2013, 17:06
"Indeed, oil companies have a much smaller profit margin than a computer or pharmaceutical company. But they do so much volume that the real dollars are enormous." From a CBS article in 2011.

Irving
04-08-2013, 17:09
Big oil posts big profit because they are everywhere. The profit margins are very small...typically under 5%.

As with nearly every large company in the world.

Gman
04-08-2013, 17:48
Evil big oil. Shame on them for producing a commodity product that vastly improves our lives to make $.07 on a gallon of gas while the govt. that produces absolutely nothing makes over $.40 per gallon.