PDA

View Full Version : Gabby Gifford's says "There will be consequences"



Hound
04-18-2013, 14:21
This is being put out to the Anti-Gun crowd. We need to stay up on what they are saying to be prepared. I agree there will be consequences just not the ones she thinks:

There will be consequences

Dear Insert Name


Since last night, well over ten thousand individuals have stepped up and contributed to our organization, Americans for Responsible Solutions, to hold the Senators who opposed background checks accountable for their vote.


I'm not going to stop fighting, and I hope you'll commit to kicking off the accountability portion of our campaign to reduce gun violence by adding your $10 contribution right now.


http://action.americansforresponsiblesolutions.org/consquences


I also wrote a New York Times op-ed that I hope you'll read. It's included below. Please take a look and share it with your friends and family.


Thank you,


Gabby






__________________________________________________


A Senate in the Gun Lobby's Grip
By Gabrielle Giffords


SENATORS say they fear the N.R.A. and the gun lobby. But I think that fear must be nothing compared to the fear the first graders in Sandy Hook Elementary School felt as their lives ended in a hail of bullets. The fear that those children who survived the massacre must feel every time they remember their teachers stacking them into closets and bathrooms, whispering that they loved them, so that love would be the last thing the students heard if the gunman found them.


On Wednesday, a minority of senators gave into fear and blocked common-sense legislation that would have made it harder for criminals and people with dangerous mental illnesses to get hold of deadly firearms -- a bill that could prevent future tragedies like those in Newtown, Conn., Aurora, Colo., Blacksburg, Va., and too many communities to count.


Some of the senators who voted against the background-check amendments have met with grieving parents whose children were murdered at Sandy Hook, in Newtown. Some of the senators who voted no have also looked into my eyes as I talked about my experience being shot in the head at point-blank range in suburban Tucson two years ago, and expressed sympathy for the 18 other people shot besides me, 6 of whom died. These senators have heard from their constituents -- who polls show overwhelmingly favored expanding background checks. And still these senators decided to do nothing. Shame on them.


I watch TV and read the papers like everyone else. We know what we're going to hear: vague platitudes like "tough vote" and "complicated issue." I was elected six times to represent southern Arizona, in the State Legislature and then in Congress. I know what a complicated issue is; I know what it feels like to take a tough vote. This was neither. These senators made their decision based on political fear and on cold calculations about the money of special interests like the National Rifle Association, which in the last election cycle spent around $25 million on contributions, lobbying and outside spending. Speaking is physically difficult for me. But my feelings are clear: I'm furious. I will not rest until we have righted the wrong these senators have done, and until we have changed our laws so we can look parents in the face and say: We are trying to keep your children safe. We cannot allow the status quo -- desperately protected by the gun lobby so that they can make more money by spreading fear and misinformation -- to go on.


I am asking every reasonable American to help me tell the truth about the cowardice these senators demonstrated. I am asking for mothers to stop these lawmakers at the grocery store and tell them: You've lost my vote. I am asking activists to unsubscribe from these senators' e-mail lists and to stop giving them money. I'm asking citizens to go to their offices and say: You've disappointed me, and there will be consequences.


People have told me that I'm courageous, but I have seen greater courage. Gabe Zimmerman, my friend and staff member in whose honor we dedicated a room in the United States Capitol this week, saw me shot in the head and saw the shooter turn his gunfire on others. Gabe ran toward me as I lay bleeding. Toward gunfire. And then the gunman shot him, and then Gabe died. His body lay on the pavement in front of the Safeway for hours.


I have thought a lot about why Gabe ran toward me when he could have run away. Service was part of his life, but it was also his job. The senators who voted against background checks for online and gun-show sales, and those who voted against checks to screen out would-be gun buyers with mental illness, failed to do their job.


They looked at these most benign and practical of solutions, offered by moderates from each party, and then they looked over their shoulder at the powerful, shadowy gun lobby -- and brought shame on themselves and our government itself by choosing to do nothing.


They will try to hide their decision behind grand talk, behind willfully false accounts of what the bill might have done -- trust me, I know how politicians talk when they want to distract you -- but their decision was based on a misplaced sense of self-interest. I say misplaced, because to preserve their dignity and their legacy, they should have heeded the voices of their constituents. They should have honored the legacy of the thousands of victims of gun violence and their families, who have begged for action, not because it would bring their loved ones back, but so that others might be spared their agony.


This defeat is only the latest chapter of what I've always known would be a long, hard haul. Our democracy's history is littered with names we neither remember nor celebrate -- people who stood in the way of progress while protecting the powerful. On Wednesday, a number of senators voted to join that list.


Mark my words: if we cannot make our communities safer with the Congress we have now, we will use every means available to make sure we have a different Congress, one that puts communities' interests ahead of the gun lobby's. To do nothing while others are in danger is not the American way.


Paid for by Americans for Responsible Solutions PAC; not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

asmo
04-18-2013, 14:22
We need a good PAC..

Rucker61
04-18-2013, 14:41
Since when does victim make one an expert?

ChuckNorris
04-18-2013, 14:51
Since when does victim make one an expert?

Just ask Diana DeGette - she's an expert!
She's also the victim of her own stupidity!

SuperiorDG
04-18-2013, 14:54
"SENATORS say they fear the N.R.A. and the gun lobby." Really?

KAPA
04-18-2013, 14:58
"SENATORS say they fear the N.R.A. and the gun lobby." Really?

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny." -Thomas Jefferson

The NRA is made up of millions of Americans.

wctriumph
04-18-2013, 14:58
Does anyone actually believe that she is writing this stuff? I don't believe it for one minute, I think this is being written by the DNC, OFA and the whole anti-gun team. She is a pawn and is being used and most likely has no input at all, they are using her as a victim to push their agenda to enforce their anti-freedom agenda down our throats. These people, these progressives, will stop at nothing to make their lying vision a reality. It makes me so sick to see this and then hear people that should know better parrot this crap across the airwaves on TV and radio.

Fromk
04-18-2013, 15:12
I went to Del Taco for lunch today. The consequences were that I was full and happy. The lady that took my order was held accountable (for doing the job she was there to do I might add) with a polite "thank you" from myself. My $10 contribution was well spent.

See? If you take the scary context away from those words it doesn't sound so bad. The Del Taco story was true by the way.

Ronin13
04-18-2013, 15:34
"SENATORS say they fear the N.R.A. and the gun lobby." Really?
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny." -Thomas Jefferson

The NRA is made up of millions of Americans.
My thoughts exactly! Good, they should be scared, so scared that they don't dare try to shred the Constitution any more!

avandelay
04-18-2013, 16:42
Not to cold here, but does the traumatic brain injury that she suffered give her the capacity to write such an OpEd, or is this someone using her tragedy to tweak up the emotional aspect by penning these under her name?

rocktot
04-18-2013, 16:47
Hmmm, nothing on mental illness and re-uptakeinhibiter drugs like prozac, etc. Hmmmm, nothing in these posts either....hmmmm. NO ONE except some NRA blurbs with talk show morons mentioned all these shooters are on reuptakeinhibiter drugs.

Jeffrey Lebowski
04-18-2013, 16:53
Not to cold here, but does the traumatic brain injury that she suffered give her the capacity to write such an OpEd, or is this someone using her tragedy to tweak up the emotional aspect by penning these under her name?

Wilkow raised an interesting point on her today that she, in all likelihood, suffers from PTSD. OR, if we are going to paint our returning veterans with that brush, and deny their liberties, well, you can figure out the rest.

CO Hugh
04-18-2013, 17:04
Since when does victim make one an expert?

Since Americans have become wussies!! [and elected a tyrannical government on both sides]

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/13/Obama-uses-grieving-Sandy-Hook-mother-push-gun-control


OBAMA EXPLOITS GRIEVING SANDY HOOK MOTHER IN WEEKLY ADDRESS


by BEN SHAPIRO (http://www.breitbart.com/Columnists/Ben-Shapiro) 13 Apr 2013 1100 (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/13/Obama-uses-grieving-Sandy-Hook-mother-push-gun-control#disqus_thread)
On Saturday, President Obama handed over the camera and teleprompter to the mother of a victim of Sandy Hook Elementary shooter Adam Lanza. Explaining his exploitative choice via email to his entire WhiteHouse.gov email list, Obama explained:

Each week, like many presidents before me, I sit down to record a short address to the nation. It's something I take very seriously because it offers a chance to bring focus to an issue that needs to be part of the national dialogue.
But today, I've asked someone to take my place.
Francine Wheeler is a mother. She and her family live in Newtown, Connecticut. Four months ago, her six year-old son Ben was murdered in his elementary school, along with 19 other children and six brave educators.
Joined by her husband David, Francine shares her perspective about the steps we can take to reduce gun violence and prevent the kind of tragedy she understands all too well.
It's a message that every American should hear:
Watch Francine, then join her in speaking out to make our country safer.
This week, because people like Francine and like you got involved, the U.S. Senate took a step forward on commonsense reforms to reduce gun violence.
And that's good. Because this shouldn't be about politics. This is about doing the right thing for families that have been torn apart by gun violence, and for all our families going forward.
But we've got a lot of work to do before Congress finishes the job.
So if you believe that we can take sensible steps to protect more of our kids from gun violence and protect our Second Amendment rights, stand up and join us.
Wheeler’s address (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/13/mother-of-newtown-victim-delivers-emotional-weekly-address-in-obamas-stead/?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonpost) was emotional, as befitting the mother of a murdered child. She talked at length about her son, Ben, and described how he wanted to play piano, and become an architect or paleontologist. Then she turned to politics, praising President Obama and criticizing Senators who, in her view, had been intransigent about her preferred legislative option: gun control. “When I packed for Washington on Monday,” she said, “it looked like the Senate might not act at all. Then, after the president spoke in Hartford, and a dozen of us met with senators to share our stories, more than two-thirds of the Senate voted to move forward. But that’s only the start. They haven’t yet passed any bills that will help keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. And a lot of people are fighting to makes sure they never do.”
It is Wheeler’s choice to appear on camera. But it is President Obama’s choice to exploit her tragedy, perversely hiding behind her grief rather than making actual arguments as to why gun control would lower the rate of incidents like those in Sandy Hook. Nothing Obama is pushing will make any child in America safer; calling on shooting victims’ family members to avoid making a rational case for legislation is the hallmark of a political bully.
To label gun rights advocates opponents of child safety is malicious propagandizing. President Obama, though, is a vicious and manipulative propagandizer. And if he has to use the tears of a grieving mother to ram through bad legislation, he has no problem doing so.
Ben Shapiro is Editor-At-Large of Breitbart News and author of the New York Times bestseller “Bullies: How the Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences America (http://www.amazon.com/Bullies-Culture-Intimidation-Silences-Americans/dp/1476709998/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0)” (Threshold Editions, January 8, 2013).

avandelay
04-18-2013, 17:06
Wilkow raised an interesting point on her today that she, in all likelihood, suffers from PTSD. OR, if we are going to paint our returning veterans with that brush, and deny their liberties, well, you can figure out the rest.

A very valid point. But I still question whether she still has the mental capacity to pen these letters to the editor without a LOT of help. I fear that she is being used as a pawn which is just sad.

sabot_round
04-18-2013, 20:24
Does anyone actually believe that she is writing this stuff? I don't believe it for one minute, I think this is being written by the DNC, OFA and the whole anti-gun team. She is a pawn and is being used and most likely has no input at all, they are using her as a victim to push their agenda to enforce their anti-freedom agenda down our throats. These people, these progressives, will stop at nothing to make their lying vision a reality. It makes me so sick to see this and then hear people that should know better parrot this crap across the airwaves on TV and radio.

The LIBTARDS and the liberal media are drinking the koolaid. Do not underestimate them!!

kidicarus13
04-18-2013, 21:29
Gabby is only an anti-gun figurehead now that she is unable to formulate completed sentences. Unable to construct more than 3 sensible words together the other anti-gunners use her as a true pawn. "Gabby... you smile in the background and we'll speak on your behalf." Show me a video clip to dispute my charges and I'll retract my post.

motorep
04-20-2013, 16:09
Not to cold here, but does the traumatic brain injury that she suffered give her the capacity to write such an OpEd, or is this someone using her tragedy to tweak up the emotional aspect by penning these under her name?

I think that, having suffered obviuos TBI, she should be on the list of those disqualified to buy/own/handle firearms. Hillary, too.

BPTactical
04-20-2013, 16:20
As a gent said so well: "the only thing Gabby Giffords is qualified for after incurring a TBI is being a Democrat"





Cupid Stunt

sniper7
04-20-2013, 21:37
I hate to use the word, but Gabby has gone full retard

Great-Kazoo
04-20-2013, 21:47
A very valid point. But I still question whether she still has the mental capacity to pen these letters to the editor without a LOT of help. I fear that she is being used as a pawn which is just sad.

If you believe anyone other than a bloomberg shill wrote that drivel i'd be surprised


Gabby is only an anti-gun figurehead now that she is unable to formulate completed sentences. Unable to construct more than 3 sensible words together the other anti-gunners use her as a true pawn. "Gabby... you smile in the background and we'll speak on your behalf." Show me a video clip to dispute my charges and I'll retract my post.


They got a lot of mileage AND an AWB from chair bound brady.

They put Shabby out in the limelight and who knows how much traction they get.

The fat lady hasn't sung and being complacent because the UBC lost, is what I believe the left is hoping for.

buffalobo
04-20-2013, 23:16
New meaning to the term useful idiot.

Shiro
04-21-2013, 10:00
Return like for like, pro-gun doesn't get poster children, but we can ensure there are consequences for any legislator who voted against the human rights of all Americans.

roberth
04-21-2013, 16:34
New meaning to the term useful idiot.

LOL!!! [ROFL1]

centrarchidae
04-21-2013, 20:41
New meaning to the term useful idiot.


I was not previously aware that Giffords was useful. When did that happen?

buffalobo
04-22-2013, 07:39
I was not previously aware that Giffords was useful. When did that happen?

She wasn't, until a left wing nut case shot up her and her meeting. Now her drooling presence can be used as this generations Jim Brady.

Sent from my DROID Pro using Tapatalk 2