Wait, He has rights as an American (read before posting about the arrest of "Suspect #2:)

Yes or NO?? Lets not get too long winded Y - N

Myself IF they are known terrorist ask away, the flip side, he is a Citizen.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...ogation-group/


Anticipating that Tsarnaev may be in a condition to be questioned, expect the activation of the president’s High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG).

The group, set up in 2009, is made up of agents from the FBI, CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency. They have been on standby waiting for the moment the suspect was taken in.
According to the FBI, the HIG’s “mission is to gather and apply the nation’s best resources to collect intelligence from key terror suspects in order to prevent terrorist attacks against the United States and its allies.”


I like some of the "Quotes / Comments" I know the Obama Fan base is up in arms.


If his is a US Citizen this is wrong and somebody has to step down for not respecting the constitution.

Which of you posted this?

According to the link- they are ONLY allowed to ask him about bombs that may still be at large, how to disarm them, and whether they’re active. It’s not a violation of rights, as he can- and will, most likely- invoke his right to an attorney at some point. The Exception is to contain an emergency situation for the safety of the public and law-enforcement. They cannot ask him where he got his supplies, why he did it, or anything else that is not of immediate threat to the public. They can’t even ask him if *HE* was the one who set them, created them, or blew them up. However, those spouting: “he shouldn’t have rights and such”- extremely ignorant and naive. The Supreme Court, the highest court in the land, does not decide whether a Constitutional Law has been broken by whether or not you’re an evil terrorist- they go solely, and only, on the court’s due process. You start setting dangerous precedences of stripping rights away from a citizen, and next thing you know *you’ll* be the one detained without any rights (whether you’re guilty or not). Try to see the larger picture of what you’re spewing- not just the small point at the end of your nose

Yes

I thought they were legal residents and NOT citizens?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sneakerd

I thought they were legal residents and NOT citizens?

---

The media has been reporting that the younger one (suspect 2) was granted citizenship on sept. 11.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bogie

The media has been reporting that the younger one (suspect 2) was granted citizenship on sept. 11.

---

So does the MSM rally around O and support this way of questioning, OR do they remain Silent? Blitzer, madcow, matthhews, all of CNN and PMSNBC , Sirota etc. What will their OP ED's read like?

Citizen? He better hope that he is not a citizen. Non-citizens seen to have more rights than actual natural citizens.

Yes, if you are guilty the courts should just be a formality. If we don't hold this standard the whole Constitution is blown.

Not exactly the answer you're looking for but The MS media is doing nothing but reporting in a way to keep people in a state of absolute confusion.

Fuck him. He's an unlawful enemy combatant. Mirandize away, waterboard him till he begs to talk, read him his "rights" while he's waterboarded, put him before a military tribunal then hang him.

Now...I don't necessarily like the idea of the gov't setting up some sort of work-around to the constitutional rights of US citizens. But as far as I'm concerned he's renounced his citizenship and apparently sworn allegiance to Islam, then declared war on the US. Get whatever information is needed and kill him. I'd be OK with that in this case.

It's not like this guy was just arrested for shoplifting.

Yes

As for the media, it really pisses me off that these outlets have no integrity, reporting on stuff that they have no proof of, etc. and now they want to make sure everyone follows the rules?!?!? Fawk them..