Reading the exact verbiage of the law it would appear that Saiga 10 and 12 round drums are not at issue? Thoughts?
Printable View
Reading the exact verbiage of the law it would appear that Saiga 10 and 12 round drums are not at issue? Thoughts?
(2) (a) "LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINE MEANS:
...
(II) A FIXED, TUBULAR SHOTGUN MAGAZINE THAT HOLDS MORE THAN
TWENTY-EIGHT INCHES OF SHOTGUN SHELLS, INCLUDING ANY EXTENSION DEVICE
THATISATTACHEDTOTHEMAGAZINEANDHOLDSADDITIONAL SHOTGUNSHELLS;OR
(III) A NONTUBULAR, DETACHABLE MAGAZINE, BOX, DRUM, FEED STRIP, OR
SIMILAR DEVICE THAT IS CAPABLE OF ACCEPTING MORE THAN EIGHT SHOTGUN
SHELLS WHEN COMBINED WITH A FIXED MAGAZINE.
...
Hm - am interested in your opinion... seems it's limited to 8 shells as I read it.
I think they probably shot themselves in foot. It says in the 8 round limitation "When combined with a Fixed Magazine". Which seems to indicate, no fixed magazine, back to 15 round limit.
Brian: NICE attention to detail in the statute !!!! You've raised some pretty good points lately. Kudos !!!!
I'll need some help from the experts on this forum with the following:
Can a "chamber" also be considered a "specialized" fixed magazine with a capacity of ONE?
A magazine is a place to store munitions or ammo, right ? Chambers can do that in addition to presenting the round for firing.
EX:
A Glock 19 with a 15 round mag can actually store/hold 16 rounds: 15 + 1.
When loaded this way, its capacity is 16 rounds.
Can one then say the capacity of the detachable+ fixed magazines is 16 rounds ?
Or better, could a good lawyer convince a jury that the above is true ?
If so, then the "...when combined with a fixed magazine" does not support the "10 and 12 round mags/drums are legal because they are not combined with a fixed magazine" position.
Note: I'm not arguing either way...just testing the bounds and hoping someone can sway the balance one way or the other.
Can anyone help us out ?