Well i guess its time to talk about what on the Ballot

Talk about it.
Amendment 64: Definition of person and child

Amendment 68: Horse racetrack casino gambling

Prop 104: School Board meeting requirements

Prop 105: Labeling of GMO foods

I will start.
Amendment 64: No, even if i cared its not the right way to go about it.

Amendment 68: No, i do not care if people gamble but a promise of money to education never works out. It always goes to the general fund and that is the last thing i want.

Prop 104: Yes, public is public.

Prop 105: Yes, only because it is a thorn in the back of companies that get away with trespassing to test others fields, disregard the constitution under a SCOTUS ruling and litigate against farmers that did nothing wrong but do it the way they always have for generations. I do not hate GMO foods but i hate the way the companies that make it happen are above the law.

Ballot, sorry but can the mods fix the title.

ETA Thank you.

Aw...I wanted to talk about the ballet.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sniper7

Aw...I wanted to talk about the ballet.

---

Same here. I was thinking, wow, ok, Swan Lake, great thread topic [Flower]

Yes, No, Yes, No...nice how that works out.

Ballot?................removes TuTu. awwwwwe.

I'd like more info about this casino. I plan to vote no, because the Constitution probably shouldn't be changed to get it, and certainly not by an out of state entity. Also for the reasons already mentioned.

No on the amendments, not every thing needs to be part of the state constitution.

Prop 104 - yes

Prop 105 - undecided still.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rabid

Talk about it.
Amendment 64: Definition of person and child NO

Amendment 68: Horse racetrack casino gambling NO

Prop 104: School Board meeting requirements YES

Prop 105: Labeling of GMO foods NO This effects the small grower.

I will start.
Amendment 64: No, even if i cared its not the right way to go about it.

Amendment 68: No, i do not care if people gamble but a promise of money to education never works out. It always goes to the general fund and that is the last thing i want.

Prop 104: Yes, public is public.

Prop 105: Yes, only because it is a thorn in the back of companies that get away with trespassing to test others fields, disregard the constitution under a SCOTUS ruling and litigate against farmers that did nothing wrong but do it the way they always have for generations. I do not hate GMO foods but i hate the way the companies that make it happen are above the law.

---

I haven't made up my mind yet on the others, but I'm voting yes on the gmo labeling

No -

Yes - I don't care where the money is promised to go. I have no problem with people gambling, and would rather have people come to Denver instead of Vegas to piss away their cash. Don't care that it's a Rhode island company, as opposed to Nevada or other state companies currently operating in the small towns.

Yes - all local government meeting should be open to the public.

No - most of this is in conflict with current labeling laws.