http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/02/fa...-man.html?_r=1 [facepalm]
To this. Tit, meet TAT
https://www.facebook.com/TheRealMike...71145119562297 [Beer]
Printable View
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/02/fa...-man.html?_r=1 [facepalm]
To this. Tit, meet TAT
https://www.facebook.com/TheRealMike...71145119562297 [Beer]
Mike Rowe ftw!
NY Times apparently thinks the "Modern Man" is a wo-man.
The man's man uses a stick to clean out the modern man from between his boot tread. Anyone that looks for cues on how to be a man, especially from a newspaper, probably takes up most of the closet. In more way than one.
WomanQuote:
Originally Posted by Gman
Wo Man
Whoa, Man!
And I thought we were done with "metrosexuals."
Now I just want to amble off to have a good cry to some Wu-Tang
Nothing to add after Mike Rowe.
However, just the use of the word "modern" ruins the entire article before it even started.
WTF ... the NYT doesn't even know what a man is, modern or not.
NewQuote:
Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter
York
Transexual
I say chap you are a bit of a fop aren't you.
Bill Whittle made a few counter-points to the NYT's 'modern man' in a piece on gun control. Thanks,Bill:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwLjFm6GMBM
I was gonna share this with the wife. But she REALLY likes Mike Rowe. I don't need to be compared to MR for the next week to 10 days. Don't get me wrong...I admire MR. But I think I'd be better off if he never made it big. F**ker.
ETA: I think this whole comparison could be summed up in just a few words:
What is a "man's man"? When your wife looks at you and smiles and says, "Mike Rowe? Compared to you, baby, he's a pussy."