A bit low energy, it seems:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si1vB6U5z5k
Printable View
A bit low energy, it seems:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si1vB6U5z5k
Just the pneumonia. To be expected. ;)
I do enjoy the strategic placement of those "STRONGER TOGETHER" signs. It would seem to be true for poor Hillary.
My guess is she's heavily medicated just to make brief appearances and seem competent while doing so. It remains obvious that the best thing for her would be to give it up.
We really need her to get all the way to November. No matter how much you like him, Trump would have a harder time against biden or kaine, and in fact would probably lose.
I'm okay with that as long as she has an aneurysm or other random non-violent event prevents her from taking office should Trump lose the election. What I don't get about the NeverTrumpers and Obamabots is that this woman is clearly the most dangerous possible candidate for the health of the Republic, public safety, national security, and the national economy. Why she should get more than 5% (nimrod portion) of the vote is beyond me.Quote:
Originally Posted by KestrelBike
I just can't imagine her with the nuclear consent codes.
From Karl Rove, still not a done deal by any stretch:Quote:
Originally Posted by KestrelBike
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/19/politi...ump/index.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb
One of the last people i'd go to for advice.
I think she is likely staying in just to secure a path for Kaine in.
He's worse than she is, politically, and I don't think he actually has a chance at winning a presidential bid.
Thankfully, even mainstream media is showing Trump as ahead. Unless there is MASS voter fraud, I don't think she's winning.
What do the stats on that betting website say I wonder.
Isn't that just a popular vote count though? Notwithstanding Karl Rove being an ***hole, to his point, Trump could still pull an Al Gore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant H.