That did not take long. You know the 2nd was created for hunters. Hunters don't need high cap mags. Sarcasm of course
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...security-bill/
Printable View
That did not take long. You know the 2nd was created for hunters. Hunters don't need high cap mags. Sarcasm of course
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...security-bill/
Yep, writing my senators now.
Also, S.3414 creates a new DHS linked government bureaucracy to regulate the internet ... at the expense of our privacy and liberty of course.
So maybe this amendment will get two birds knocked out with one stone.
Underhanded, sneaky, traitorous...
Obligatory mails sent to elected officials.
This is not something to be quietly hidden in the pages of an unrelated bill and surreptitiously adopted in the dark of night. Despite the widely held belief of many of our elected representatives, the Federal Government exists for The People. Subsequently I appeal to your sense of honesty and fair play to do the right thing and either force this insidious deceit to brave the light of public scrutiny or better decried by the just sons of Liberty for it's chicanery.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Kind regards,
W. ********
When does this come up for a vote?
Letters sent to both. Mine were not nearly so eloquent as Whistler's.
It has come to my attention that legislation which would place restrictions on the sale, manufacture, and possession of "high-capacity" magazines has been proposed as an amendment to a pending cyber-security bill.
I oppose legislation which would place restrictions on magazines of any capacity, and will not support legislators who would back such legislation.
Sincerely,
Jason ********
Do we have an amendment number for this. I'm seeing two different ones.
Does it really matter if the Senate does manage to pass this? The house will never approve it.
MF's! God, I want the pimp hand for them Dems right now!