First it was DHS and now the national weather service. Do they know something we don't? Maybe it's time for more group buys.
http://www.infowars.com/national-wea...ammo-purchase/
Printable View
First it was DHS and now the national weather service. Do they know something we don't? Maybe it's time for more group buys.
http://www.infowars.com/national-wea...ammo-purchase/
1) Infowars.com ...seriously?
2) 46000 rounds is a lot? Since when?
3) WTF doe the NWS need with ammo? Training/equipping security guards and maintenance personnel for remote weather monitoring facilities, maybe?
Lol calm down sweetheartQuote:
Originally Posted by TFOGGER
Boulder Colorado isn't remote. I can't answer as to the other locations listed on the document.
16,000 to Boulder
8000 to Ellsworth, ME
8000 to New Bedford, MA
24000 to St Petersberg, FL
6000 to Wall, NJ
I heard this earlier as well. Does NWS have some sort of Sever Weather Response/Rescue Team or anything like that? After what some of the people were doing in the aftermath of Katrina, I would want to be armed going into an area after a catastrophic event.
The Boulder office folks service remote stations all over the Rocky Mountain west, including some that are 2-3 day hikes from the nearest paved road. I'm willing to be that some members here have more .40 than that on hand...[Beer]Quote:
Originally Posted by WETWRKS
Infowars is great for sensationalizing stuff. Like the mainstream media, but in reverse.
They are probably just gonna shoot the breeze...
Very interesting ammo purchases by various government agencies it makes you pause and think a little....
I keep coming back to the question...what is Obamas stance on this? He is anti gun....so I wonder how he feels about arming all these people that he cannot controll.
Saw on Drudge a clarification was sent to the Washington Post by NOAA, claiming a "clerical error" and the order was for the NOAA Fisheries Office of Law Enforcement.