Bush done GOOD???

Does anyone know of, or can see, any down side to this?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea.../20070817.html

I know it has nothing to do with the 2nd.

Yeah, DOI (department of interior) will take at least 5 years to even think about implimenting it. Having a little inside understanding of at least a few affected agencies within DOI, it isn't that they don't approve of hunting, it's that they have very limited staffing and that directive doesn't associate additional funding to make it happen. Thus it is a low priority and like I said to start.. several years in coming.

I would prefer the feds stayed out of it and left it up to game and fish. I have little to no faith in the feds and all their bureaucracy.

Federal interference in the state F&G laws screwed up the season and limits in Alaska. It really sucked for people living there that relied on hunting to provide food for year. Not to mention the new fishing regs.

Once again Bush shows his big gov't mentality.